Page 1 of 1

Michael Jackson Erased McCartney...Can DeYoung Be Far Behind

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:44 am
by Blue Falcon
It can be done, JY. Just erase DDY's vocals from all those "cringe-inducing" albums and replace him with Gowan, and you'll have it made! :roll:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=504734&in_page_id=1773

Michael Jackson has delivered the ultimate snub to his former friend Sir Paul McCartney - by erasing his vocals from their 1982 hit duet The Girl Is Mine.

The reclusive King of Pop has remixed his classic album Thriller to mark the 25th anniversary of the disc, which is set for release in February.

On the track, which was the first single release from Thriller, McCartney and Jackson argue over a girl.

The song hit number two in the U.S. Billboard charts and number eight in the UK charts.

A year later, the pair teamed up again for the duet Say Say Say, which appeared on McCartney's Pipes of Peace album.

However on the latest version, the former Beatle's singing has been removed from The Girl Is Mine 2008.

Instead, Jackson and The Black Eyed Peas rapper Will.I.Am share McCartney's lines, according to US reports.

Jackson and McCartney famously fell out in 1985 when the Billie Jean pop star bought the Associated Television Corporation (ATV)'s back catalogue, which included the publishing rights to The Beatles' songs.

Jackson paid a reported $47.5million for between 160 and 260 Beatles classics, including Yesterday and Let It Be.

Other stars who have contributed to the remixed Thriller 25 album include Kanye West, Akon and Will.I.Am's bandmate Fergie.

Jackson is reportedly in talks to make his comeback after the album's release with a series of gigs at the O2 Arena in London in the spring.

Promoters want him to recreate his classic Thriller album on stage to mark the record's 25th anniversary.

Tickets are expected to cost hundreds of pounds, as Jackson is said to be in debt to the tune of more than £165million

Re: Michael Jackson Erased McCartney...Can DeYoung Be Far Be

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:46 am
by Higgy
Children
Chimpanzees
Paul McCartney

Does Michael Jackson have to shit all over everything in this world that is good?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:31 am
by Jodes
Keep grasping at straws..

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:52 am
by brywool
Works for Me! I always hated Paul's contribution to The Girl is Mine. Not because it was bad, but because the song itself was terrible. The work that they both did on Paul's "Say Say Say" was great though. "The Girl is Mine" has always sucked.

Jackson was the A-hole in that relationship hands down. Came to Paul for investment advice, Paul told him to by music rights, so he bought The Beatles publishing rights. Whatta jerk!


The most surprising thing about Michael Jackson's not guilty verdict?
That 12 adults got him off!!

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:20 am
by LordofDaRing
He did Paul a favor, that song was never any good. Paul should return the favor on Say Say Say. Replace Jackson's vocal with Diana Ross. Oh, but nobody would know the difference would they? It always cracked me up that Jackson's sister, Janet, played his love interest in the music video that they did for that song. A sick sign of things to come perhaps.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:13 am
by brywool
LordofDaRing wrote:He did Paul a favor, that song was never any good. Paul should return the favor on Say Say Say. Replace Jackson's vocal with Diana Ross. Oh, but nobody would know the difference would they? It always cracked me up that Jackson's sister, Janet, played his love interest in the music video that they did for that song. A sick sign of things to come perhaps.


That was Latoya. Snake Girl to her friends...

I always thought Latoya and Michael were the same person. They must've filmed their parts separately.

Have you seen the new Janet pics? Holy cow! Too bad we saw what was under the facade at the superbowl. God, looked like a National Geographic pictorial.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:27 am
by Higgy
brywool wrote: God, looked like a National Geographic pictorial.


I guess they all look alike to you.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:39 pm
by brywool
Higgy wrote:
brywool wrote: God, looked like a National Geographic pictorial.


I guess they all look alike to you.


Um, no, but check it out... saggy, baggy elephant.

Image

In what way, shape or form does that look good???

Also, Higgy, do you have a problem with me or something? I've noticed a couple of your posts come off pretty harsh towards me. What's the problem?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:08 pm
by Higgy
brywool wrote:
Also, Higgy, do you have a problem with me or something? I've noticed a couple of your posts come off pretty harsh towards me. What's the problem?


No, I'm an asshole to everyone. Don't be sensitive. :wink: