The 2008 US Presidential Election Thread

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:12 pm

Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:

What's wrong with being independent? Gotta be better than the two party system we're dealing with now. As to freaky church stuff when the muslims take over you'll be begging. I wonder if those burgas come in emerald green like my eyes.


independent as is want to see secede from the united states.

are you crazy? paranoid? wow, that is some comment.


Lula...that whole story about her and her husband was debunked within 2 days of it being spun out there in media land.

Hell now even YOU are going negative.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:13 pm

Saint John wrote:
Lula wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Lula wrote:do we know that every sunday service was racial crap? Yes.


bologna!

and i knew how to spell that by singing the song...... my bologna has a first name, it's o-s-c-a-r :lol:
I bet you didn't need summer school to learn that song. :lol: :twisted: :P


the summer program is for teachers, not school kids. i went through a program. got a whopping $1000 for 8 weeks of teacher boot camp.

i was a horrible student come high school.... could never seem to find my way to class :oops: :lol:
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby scarygirl » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:15 pm

Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:

What's wrong with being independent? Gotta be better than the two party system we're dealing with now. As to freaky church stuff when the muslims take over you'll be begging. I wonder if those burgas come in emerald green like my eyes.


independent as is want to see secede from the united states.

are you crazy? paranoid? wow, that is some comment.


Not paranoid. Sharia law is taking over Great Britain. Granted their courts have been in existence for over 25 years, but their is talk of it superceding British law. If Britain falls how much longer do you think we'll have before we're ruled by islamic law too?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... itain.html

As to Alaska wanting to secede. Let them. They'll probably be better off. Heck, the US would be better off if we hadn't been messing in other people's business in the first place.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2957428/Sharia-law-courts-operating-in-Britain.html
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:15 pm

Let me ask the liberals here: Do any Democrats bear ANY responsibility for the meltdown?

All I have read is how, :::GASP:::, it's all Bush's fault...do you REALLY believe that?
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:17 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:

What's wrong with being independent? Gotta be better than the two party system we're dealing with now. As to freaky church stuff when the muslims take over you'll be begging. I wonder if those burgas come in emerald green like my eyes.


independent as is want to see secede from the united states.

are you crazy? paranoid? wow, that is some comment.


Lula...that whole story about her and her husband was debunked within 2 days of it being spun out there in media land.

Hell now even YOU are going negative.


never heard it was debunked. todd was a registered member for 7 years and she did a videotaped speech for their convention this year. and stu i only brought it up to counter judgment calls. i don't care about her husbands party affiliations.
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:17 pm

Barb wrote:Here's some more from Charly James.....

http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/10/04 ... o-clothes/


Dude, if you think this kind of bullshit appeals to normal Americans, you are out of your mind. This guy is so full of hatred, he can barely type! :roll:


Sounds like the very accusations leveled at John Kerry throughout the 2004 campaign.
Only Democratic war veterans fair game to you?
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:18 pm

scarygirl wrote:
Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:

What's wrong with being independent? Gotta be better than the two party system we're dealing with now. As to freaky church stuff when the muslims take over you'll be begging. I wonder if those burgas come in emerald green like my eyes.


independent as is want to see secede from the united states.

are you crazy? paranoid? wow, that is some comment.


Not paranoid. Sharia law is taking over Great Britain. Granted their courts have been in existence for over 25 years, but their is talk of it superceding British law. If Britain falls how much longer do you think we'll have before we're ruled by islamic law too?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... itain.html

As to Alaska wanting to secede. Let them. They'll probably be better off. Heck, the US would be better off if we hadn't been messing in other people's business in the first place.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2957428/Sharia-law-courts-operating-in-Britain.html


and an obama admin will allow islamic rule how?
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby Saint John » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:20 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:Let me ask the liberals here: Do any Democrats bear ANY responsibility for the meltdown?

All I have read is how, :::GASP:::, it's all Bush's fault...do you REALLY believe that?


The meltdown, as I understand it, is primarily the fault of CEO's and execs that became greedy and lowered the old benchmark standard of a 20% down payment. Additionally, they lowered their standards for credit scores and gave out ARM's like lenders were fucking trick or treaters. This has very little/nothing to do with Bush. Which is exactly why these companies should be allowed to fail and die for good.
Last edited by Saint John on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby scarygirl » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:20 pm

Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:
Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:

What's wrong with being independent? Gotta be better than the two party system we're dealing with now. As to freaky church stuff when the muslims take over you'll be begging. I wonder if those burgas come in emerald green like my eyes.


independent as is want to see secede from the united states.

are you crazy? paranoid? wow, that is some comment.


Not paranoid. Sharia law is taking over Great Britain. Granted their courts have been in existence for over 25 years, but their is talk of it superceding British law. If Britain falls how much longer do you think we'll have before we're ruled by islamic law too?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... itain.html

As to Alaska wanting to secede. Let them. They'll probably be better off. Heck, the US would be better off if we hadn't been messing in other people's business in the first place.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2957428/Sharia-law-courts-operating-in-Britain.html


and an obama admin will allow islamic rule how?


By wanting to pacify terrorist nations. By disarming us. By changing our capitalist society to a socialist one.
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby Uno_up » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:20 pm

I'm all for teachers...hell, my parents are both retired public school elementary school teachers. Yet, I found it ludicrous in the last four years my mother was teaching kindergarten, she was given a PAID teachers aide to help out wih the 25 kids she had (As were all 16 classroom teachers at this school). When I asked her what she needed the extra person for, she'd respond that it was unnecessary, yet welcomed by the teachers.
Yeah, at the taxpayers expense! (I love my mom though)
Instead we need to be proactive! I say there should be some type of branding system that recognizes adults that shouldn't be having kids. I'd be in favor of the government paying to have their tubes tied/vasectomy in return for a nice little check that they can blow on things they like...jeans that ride low, crack, and beer. Watch the quality of students improve then. (PS...I'm pro-life)
Uno_up
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:44 pm
Location: north of you

Postby Barb » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:21 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Barb wrote:Here's some more from Charly James.....

http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/10/04 ... o-clothes/


Dude, if you think this kind of bullshit appeals to normal Americans, you are out of your mind. This guy is so full of hatred, he can barely type! :roll:


Sounds like the very accusations leveled at John Kerry throughout the 2004 campaign.
Only Democratic war veterans fair game to you?


I'm pretty sure you didn't know me or what I thought during the 2004 election. Nice deflection. There is absolutely nothing you won't defend if it's on the liberal side of the political fence, is there?
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:22 pm

treetopovskaya wrote:obama will enact socialist programs.


Wow.
The same charge thrown at every Democratic president since FDR.
How very original.
Wasn't Teddy Roosevelt, McCain's idol and a a fierce supporter of a living wage, also brandished a socialist?
Call it whatever you will. People aren't voting for the status quo.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Saint John » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:23 pm

Uno_up wrote: I'd be in favor of the government paying to have their tubes tied/vasectomy in return for a nice little check that they can blow on things they like...jeans that ride low, crack, and beer.
This might be my favorite post, ever. Man, that's some funny shit. I'm 100% in agreement.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:23 pm

Saint John wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:Let me ask the liberals here: Do any Democrats bear ANY responsibility for the meltdown?

All I have read is how, :::GASP:::, it's all Bush's fault...do you REALLY believe that?


The meltdown, as I understand it, is primarily the fault of greedy CEO's and execs that became greedy and lowered the old benchmark standard of a 20% down payment. Additionally, they lowered their standards for credit scores and gave out ARM's like lenders were fucking trick or treaters. This has very little/nothing to do with Bush. Which is exactly why these companies should be allowed to fail and die for good.


OK Barney Frank's lover was in charge of the loosening of standards at Fannie Mae.

Chris Dodd got preferential loan terms from Countrywide and he is the Chair of the Senate Banking Committee while the meltdown was starting.

Obama has taken the 3rd most money IN HISTORY from Fannie Mae...and he is only been a Senator for TWO YEARS.

Don't they bear SOME responsibility?
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby donnaplease » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:24 pm

Does anyone else find it somewhat odd that those recent bombings haven't affected this election one iota?
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby Jana » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:24 pm

ROSSVALORYROCKS, everybody had a part in the meltdown, absolutely, some more than others. I don't even pretend to understand the dyanamics of it all. But Democrats aren't getting a free pass.
Last edited by Jana on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Rhiannon » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:24 pm

Saint John wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:Let me ask the liberals here: Do any Democrats bear ANY responsibility for the meltdown?

All I have read is how, :::GASP:::, it's all Bush's fault...do you REALLY believe that?


The meltdown, as I understand it, is primarily the fault of CEO's and execs that became greedy and lowered the old benchmark standard of a 20% down payment. Additionally, they lowered their standards for credit scores and gave out ARM's like lenders were fucking trick or treaters. This has very little/nothing to do with Bush. Which is exactly why these companies should be allowed to fail and die for good.


Agree one thousand percent. What they just passed might as well be called welfare for corporate america.
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:26 pm

Jana wrote:Saint John, everybody had a part in the meltdown, absolutely, some more than others. I don't even pretend to understand the dyanamics of it all. But Democrats aren't getting a free pass.


They do with the liberals here...usually...7 did call Barney Frank a douchebag a page or two ago...
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:26 pm

scarygirl wrote:


By wanting to pacify terrorist nations. By disarming us. By changing our capitalist society to a socialist one.


well scarygirl, i'm completely unaware of these plans. it would seem we have a socialist society already tho, and it isn't under president obama.
Last edited by Lula on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby scarygirl » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:26 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
treetopovskaya wrote:obama will enact socialist programs.


Wow.
The same charge thrown at every Democratic president since FDR.
How very original.
Wasn't Teddy Roosevelt, McCain's idol and a a fierce supporter of a living wage, also brandished a socialist?
Call it whatever you will. People aren't voting for the status quo.


I'd rather have the status quo. I don't make a hell of a lot of money, but I'd like to keep it with me and not have it pay for every Tom, Dick and Harry's Viagra prescription.

If I had to, I'd go back to the trailer park where I grew up with zero money, but lots of freedom.
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:26 pm

Barb wrote:I'm pretty sure you didn't know me or what I thought during the 2004 election. Nice deflection. There is absolutely nothing you won't defend if it's on the liberal side of the political fence, is there?


I'm not a deflecting OR defending.
I'm just pointing out more Republican mock outrage.
Rush Limbaugh talked about Swift Boaters Against McCain as well - before he clinched the nomination.
They've been out there for some time, and its too Obama's immense credit that he hasn't stooped as low as the GOP to wield it as a blunt instrument .
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:28 pm

Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:
and an obama admin will allow islamic rule how?


By wanting to pacify terrorist nations. By disarming us. By changing our capitalist society to a socialist one.


well scarygirl, i'm completely unaware of these plans. it would seem we have a socialist society already tho, and it isn't under president obama.[/quote]

1 TRILLION in new spending...and increased taxes on the VERY people who provide the investment capital that starts new companies, provides new jobs and such...yeah...the economy is going into the tank within 6 months of Obama's economic plan starting.

It will be WORSE than the Great Depression, because we have almost 3 times the population today.

But hey Lula, you and Dean get your wish and Obama will be President.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:29 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:Let me ask the liberals here: Do any Democrats bear ANY responsibility for the meltdown?

All I have read is how, :::GASP:::, it's all Bush's fault...do you REALLY believe that?


absolutely!! i don't hold bush responsible, not for the whole thing just for the socialist aspect ;).
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby donnaplease » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:29 pm

Saint John wrote:
Uno_up wrote: I'd be in favor of the government paying to have their tubes tied/vasectomy in return for a nice little check that they can blow on things they like...jeans that ride low, crack, and beer.
This might be my favorite post, ever. Man, that's some funny shit. I'm 100% in agreement.


Let's make Casey Anthony the poster child for that committee... What I wouldn't do to that skank!!! :evil:
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby scarygirl » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:30 pm

Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:


By wanting to pacify terrorist nations. By disarming us. By changing our capitalist society to a socialist one.


well scarygirl, i'm completely unaware of these plans. it would seem we have a socialist society already tho, and it isn't under president obama.


If we have a socialist society already it is because of everyone thinking they deserve everything. And yes, this entitlement mentality has been pushed forward primarily by the democratic party and will be set in stone by Barock Obama. We're in the early throes of socialism. It hasn't gelled completely yet.
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:31 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:
and an obama admin will allow islamic rule how?


By wanting to pacify terrorist nations. By disarming us. By changing our capitalist society to a socialist one.


well scarygirl, i'm completely unaware of these plans. it would seem we have a socialist society already tho, and it isn't under president obama.


1 TRILLION in new spending...and increased taxes on the VERY people who provide the investment capital that starts new companies, provides new jobs and such...yeah...the economy is going into the tank within 6 months of Obama's economic plan starting.

It will be WORSE than the Great Depression, because we have almost 3 times the population today.

But hey Lula, you and Dean get your wish and Obama will be President.[/quote]

so how does this create islamic rule? and aren't obama's tax policies in line with clinton's? seems things were pretty good with bill in charge. nothing higher than reagan's taxes?
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby treetopovskaya » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:32 pm

did you say mayer? };C))

Image

Rhiannon wrote:
Lula wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Lula wrote:do we know that every sunday service was racial crap? Yes.


bologna!

and i knew how to spell that by singing the song...... my bologna has a first name, it's o-s-c-a-r :lol:


My bologna has a second name, it's m-a-y-e-r! I love to eat it everyday and if you ask me why I'll sayyyy...

Cause Oscar Mayer has a way with b-o-l-o-g-n-a. 8)
User avatar
treetopovskaya
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3071
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:58 pm

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:33 pm

scarygirl wrote:
Lula wrote:
scarygirl wrote:


By wanting to pacify terrorist nations. By disarming us. By changing our capitalist society to a socialist one.


well scarygirl, i'm completely unaware of these plans. it would seem we have a socialist society already tho, and it isn't under president obama.


If we have a socialist society already it is because of everyone thinking they deserve everything. And yes, this entitlement mentality has been pushed forward primarily by the democratic party and will be set in stone by Barock Obama. We're in the early throes of socialism. It hasn't gelled completely yet.


how the hell was this pushed forward by the dems? the gop has had the power for quite sometime, the dems only regained some power 2 yrs ago.
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby 7 Wishes » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:36 pm

Saint John wrote:The meltdown, as I understand it, is primarily the fault of CEO's and execs that became greedy and lowered the old benchmark standard of a 20% down payment. Additionally, they lowered their standards for credit scores and gave out ARM's like lenders were fucking trick or treaters. This has very little/nothing to do with Bush. Which is exactly why these companies should be allowed to fail and die for good.


Yep. I agree. BOTH parties passed legislation that, in retrospect, was very damaging. Bush did have a hand in it, though...no more and no less than the Dems or Republicans when both were in a majority in the House and Senate.

But the MAIN culprit is greed.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:37 pm

conversationpc wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
conversationpc wrote:That has nothing to do with what I said. I'm merely pointing out what other Dems have said about Fox News' coverage of the campaign this year.


Ok. And I'm merely pointing out that those aforementioned Dems (all Clinton surrogates) are full of shit.
The very network that accuses her and Bill of muder is more fair then CNN and MSNBC?
Riiiight. :roll:


Take that up with Rendel and McAuliffe.


As if nobody around here piggybacks onto other existing posts?
I took issue with what you quoted and felt the need to comment on it.
If you’re not interested, maybe someone else is, and if not, I don’t really give a tinker's fuck.
Last edited by The_Noble_Cause on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests

cron