strangegrey wrote:Check CNN's poll. 70%/30% dude.....50% is a pipe dream
I fail to see how a poll on Lou Dobbs is representative of the American people at large.
While nowhere near a complete hack like Hannity, he does skew Conservative.
Moderator: Andrew
strangegrey wrote:Check CNN's poll. 70%/30% dude.....50% is a pipe dream
Tito wrote:Obama is an act. Don't be fooled. Vote for Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin instead.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:strangegrey wrote:Check CNN's poll. 70%/30% dude.....50% is a pipe dream
I fail to see how a poll on Lou Dobbs is representative of the American people at large.
While nowhere near a complete hack like Hannity, he does skew Conservative.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Where's the "freedom of speech" in media monopolies buying up wholesale swaths of stations?
Where's the competitive market forces in Limbaugh being concurrently aired on every dial across the AM spectrum?
It's the public airwaves, the Doctrine merely gave the people a right of reply -that includes groups as diverse as the ACLU to the NRA.
If Limbaugh's blathering stood up to so much as the slightest bit of scrutiny he wouldn't fear an injection of sharp elbowed opposition, he would embrace it.
Reagan repealed the doctrine, because, as was the case with most of his Presidency, he put corporate profits ahead of public interest.
As his own FCC chairman said, TV is simply "a toaster with pictures."
Skylorde wrote:TNC, you usually make good arguments but you are stretched thin on this one. What part of free market do you not understand? Liberals have tried and failed time and time again to get traction in radio. The people have repeatedly rendered judgement: You guys SUCK in radio and people don't listen in large enough numbers to attract the advertising dollars needed to sustain the program.
After years and years of individual failures in the market, what did the left do? They pulled a classic liberal manuever; they threw MORE money at the perceived problem with Airhead America Radio thinking "If we can just spend enough money, we'll finally beat Limbaugh!"
Do we need to talk about the colossal failure AAR is? Is it any wonder all the "supposed" hot shot talent bailed?
You know as well as I do if a hot shot liberal radio guy/gal came along who appealed to a wide audience they'd be signed in a fucking heartbeat. The left doesn't have that card to play and they've really run out of ideas on how to win so they'll just use the power of the federal government to ram the left's drivel down the throat of an unwilling public.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I fail to see how a poll on Lou Dobbs is representative of the American people at large.
While nowhere near a complete hack like Hannity, he does skew Conservative.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:If Rush (or anyone) wants to masquerade as "America's newsman" and spew shit on substantive issues, there should be some form of recourse.
strangegrey wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:I fail to see how a poll on Lou Dobbs is representative of the American people at large.
While nowhere near a complete hack like Hannity, he does skew Conservative.
Who the hell cares what he or anyone else thinks?
I'm bringing a factual scientific poll result to the argument, you're bringing a flawed concept that if people dont want to listen (and advertise) that you're going to ram it down their throats.
Whether Lou Dobbs, Keith Olberman or Rush Limbaugh presented the poll shouldn't matter one iotta, so long as the poll itself was conducted with scientifically sound sampling.
strangegrey wrote:Fine, the way to go about doing this is to have a left-wing radio personality bid for time on the same or a competing network. He/she will go through the same application process Rush did 20 years ago...and he/she will present a case to the network and the network will determine if the personality is a viable business decission based on whether or not the show will attract advertising revenue.
To force the network to put up an oposing viewpoint with no viable revenue doesn't make much sense...from a business standpoint or another other.
If the left's message was resonating with radio listeners, it wouldn't be an issue as advertising revenue would be there.
Just because Air America was a colossal failure, it doesn't mean that the apropriate course of action is to have the government force air america on the airwaves.
How completely idiotic and stupid....
Fact Finder wrote:You talk as if the radio landscape is an open and level playing field.
It absoutley is, ratings and revenue wins. The way it should be.
Fact Finder wrote:It sells...how can we get that through your thick head? What you're selling isn't being bought (Air America). It's that simple.
Skylorde wrote:Let's try to put this in terms your feeble mind can understand 7 brain cells.
Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton sure do. Otherwise they'd be unemployed.treetopovskaya wrote:nobody wants to listen to whiny liberals complain all the time.
WXPI.com wrote:Copyright 2008 by WPXI.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Skylorde wrote:Ding ding ding ding. Strangegrey wins the prize behind door #3.
When liberals talk about Women's rights, equality, etc, what they REALLY mean is women who CONFORM to their leftist ideas and leftist beliefs. All bets are off for the ones who dont walk the walk and talk the talk.
This is no different than Liberals screaming about "freedom of speech" then clammering to bring back the fairness doctrine LOL. The liberal definition of freedom of speech is its "free speech" as long as what you have to say is acceptable to them. If not then you are racist, fascist, fear monger, vast right wing conspiracy (did I leave anything out?)
THAT being said, the right would be all over this if the roles were reversed AND you can bet your next paycheck the left would use the sexism defense.
scarygirl wrote:Did anyone see this? I hope they hang this idiot.
http://www.wpxi.com/news/17789715/detail.html
I think you answered the question yourself. Edwards was a moron because the money came out of his own pocket...to get a fucking trim "Joe the barber" could have done. Palin had her shit paid for. What's the difference if they used it for ads or for her attire? The woman is drop dead gorgeous and needs clothes to match. McCain is one of the ugliest people alive and looks like he should have fucking formaldehyde in his veins rather than blood, Obama is hideous as well and looks some Gumby doll gone bad, and Biden looks like "Alfred" the butler from the old Batman series. That money was well spent on Sarah.7 Wishes wrote:I can't believe the lengths to which you guys will go to defend behavior in Palin you would find reprehensible, condemnable, and elitist in Obama.
There is simply no WAY to justify this kind of expenditure. To think people were all over Edwards for $400 haircuts he paid for out of his own pocket.
treetopovskaya wrote:nobody wants to listen to whiny liberals complain all the time.
}:CP
scarygirl wrote:Did anyone see this? I hope they hang this idiot.
http://www.wpxi.com/news/17789715/detail.html
Mugger Carves ‘B’ In McCain Supporter’s Face
Thursday, October 23, 2008 – updated: 6:23 pm EDT October 23, 2008
PITTSBURGH -- Police said a mugger carved a “B” into a 20-year-old woman’s face, saying he would teach her a lesson, after noticing a McCain/Palin bumper stick on her car.
Sgt. Bickerstaff, of Pittsburgh Robbery, said that the woman told police she was at a Citizens Bank ATM on Pearl and Liberty in Bloomfield on Wednesday night when a man put a knife to her throat and demanded money.
He said the mugger noticed a McCain bumper sticker on the woman’s car, became angry and began punching the woman in the back of the head.
After the woman fell to the ground, the mugger told her he was going to teach her a lesson and carved a “B” into the right side of her face, Bickerstaff said.
Bickerstaff said the woman claims the mugger was a black male, about 6 feet 4 inches tall, and wore dark-colored jeans and a black undershirt.
Peter Feldman, communications director for the McCain/Palin campaign, confirmed that the woman was a volunteer for the campaign and was mugged at knifepoint on Wednesday night.
After the mugging, he said the mugger noticed the McCain/Palin bumper sticker on her car and told her, “I’m going to teach you a lesson.”
Feldman said he then carved a “B” in her face.
He said the woman was take to an area hospital, treated and released.
Both John McCain and Sarah Palin spoke with the victim and her family on Thursday, Feldman said.
The Obama/Biden campaign issued a statement regarding the incident that said, "Our thoughts and prayers are with the young woman for her to make a speedy recovery, and we hope that the person who perpetrated this crime is swiftly apprehended and brought to justice."
Copyright 2008 by WPXI.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Email ››Print ››diggnewsvinedel.icio.usfacebookreddit
scarygirl wrote:Did anyone see this? I hope they hang this idiot.
http://www.wpxi.com/news/17789715/detail.html
Mugger Carves ‘B’ In McCain Supporter’s Face
Thursday, October 23, 2008 – updated: 6:23 pm EDT October 23, 2008
PITTSBURGH -- Police said a mugger carved a “B” into a 20-year-old woman’s face, saying he would teach her a lesson, after noticing a McCain/Palin bumper stick on her car.
Sgt. Bickerstaff, of Pittsburgh Robbery, said that the woman told police she was at a Citizens Bank ATM on Pearl and Liberty in Bloomfield on Wednesday night when a man put a knife to her throat and demanded money.
He said the mugger noticed a McCain bumper sticker on the woman’s car, became angry and began punching the woman in the back of the head.
After the woman fell to the ground, the mugger told her he was going to teach her a lesson and carved a “B” into the right side of her face, Bickerstaff said.
Bickerstaff said the woman claims the mugger was a black male, about 6 feet 4 inches tall, and wore dark-colored jeans and a black undershirt.
Peter Feldman, communications director for the McCain/Palin campaign, confirmed that the woman was a volunteer for the campaign and was mugged at knifepoint on Wednesday night.
After the mugging, he said the mugger noticed the McCain/Palin bumper sticker on her car and told her, “I’m going to teach you a lesson.”
Feldman said he then carved a “B” in her face.
He said the woman was take to an area hospital, treated and released.
Both John McCain and Sarah Palin spoke with the victim and her family on Thursday, Feldman said.
The Obama/Biden campaign issued a statement regarding the incident that said, "Our thoughts and prayers are with the young woman for her to make a speedy recovery, and we hope that the person who perpetrated this crime is swiftly apprehended and brought to justice."
Copyright 2008 by WPXI.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Email ››Print ››diggnewsvinedel.icio.usfacebookreddit
I do as well. O'Reilly also said at first glance that it looks like complete bullshit. The "B" being carved backwards could give it some validity as most Obama supporters are seemingly illiterate.The_Noble_Cause wrote:The B is carved in her face backwards like it was done in a mirror, it looks too perfect (no signs of struggle?) and she refused medical treatment.
I smell a rat.
Saint John wrote: I think you answered the question yourself. Edwards was a moron because the money came out of his own pocket...to get a fucking trim "Joe the barber" could have done. Palin had her shit paid for. What's the difference if they used it for ads or for her attire? The woman is drop dead gorgeous and needs clothes to match. McCain is one of the ugliest people alive and looks like he should have fucking formaldehyde in his veins rather than blood, Obama is hideous as well and looks some Gumby doll gone bad, and Biden looks like "Alfred" the butler from the old Batman series. That money was well spent on Sarah.
Enigma869 wrote:Saint John wrote: I think you answered the question yourself. Edwards was a moron because the money came out of his own pocket...to get a fucking trim "Joe the barber" could have done. Palin had her shit paid for. What's the difference if they used it for ads or for her attire? The woman is drop dead gorgeous and needs clothes to match. McCain is one of the ugliest people alive and looks like he should have fucking formaldehyde in his veins rather than blood, Obama is hideous as well and looks some Gumby doll gone bad, and Biden looks like "Alfred" the butler from the old Batman series. That money was well spent on Sarah.
While I don't agree that Puppet Palin is "drop dead gorgeous", I do agree with the rest of your post. McCain looks like he died 10 years ago, and someone forgot to tell him, and what the fuck is with Obama's ears. Those fucking ears don't even look human![]()
![]()
![]()
John from Boston
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests