The 2008 US Presidential Election Thread

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Enigma869 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:03 am

strangegrey wrote:
That's not a maverick. That's a spineless sack of shit.



I'm just pleased to see that a card-carrying Republican has finally figured out how to spell MAVERICK. Every time I see the sign held up at the political rallies, it is always spelled MAVRICK! I realize that not everyone is a great speller (myself included, at times). That said, if you're going to go to a political rally and make these big ass signs, at least take the time to look up the word, to ensure you don't look like a complete jackass, in front of a gazillion people!


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Rhiannon » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:05 am

Enigma869 wrote:in front of a gazillion people!


Typical lib, always exaggerating numbers. :P
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby Skylorde » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:08 am

strangegrey wrote:Exactly how? I am, by all definitions a true conservative...but I think 95% of the current Republican leadership is completely and utterly shirking their duties. They've allowed this country, it's economy and it's military efforts to be completely destroyed and subverted by under handed agendas.

While I'm not ready to trust Obama either...I feel that a vote for McCain is a mistake. He's a lying sack of shit that has changed his position to suit the political wind more times than I can imagine. That's not a maverick. That's a spineless sack of shit.


Dude you better vote for Obama then or THIS MIGHT HAPPEN! (Pay close attention) LOL
Image
Skylorde
45 RPM
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:03 am

Postby Tito » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:12 am

Skylorde wrote:
strangegrey wrote:Exactly how? I am, by all definitions a true conservative...but I think 95% of the current Republican leadership is completely and utterly shirking their duties. They've allowed this country, it's economy and it's military efforts to be completely destroyed and subverted by under handed agendas.

While I'm not ready to trust Obama either...I feel that a vote for McCain is a mistake. He's a lying sack of shit that has changed his position to suit the political wind more times than I can imagine. That's not a maverick. That's a spineless sack of shit.


Dude you better vote for Obama then or THIS MIGHT HAPPEN! (Pay close attention) LOL


That is great. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Skylorde » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:19 am

Hmmm. Someone just sent this to me. I thought it was bogus at first. Here's the jist of it, then the PDF link below.

MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PHILIP J. BERG.Brief in support thereof and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit)(BERG, PHILIP)

Philip J Berg, Esquire
-VS-
Barack Hussein Obama, ET AL

United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE came before the United States District Court Judge, Honorable R.
Barclay Surrick on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the
Motion and any response thereto and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P.
56(c) is GRANTED. This Court Declares Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein
Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry
Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen and is ineligible to
run for and/or serve as President of the United States
. The Democratic National
Committee is hereby enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the
Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot and both the Democratic National
Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning
on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency. It is an ORDER
of this Court that Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all
ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.
BERG v. OBAMA et al Doc. 27
Dockets


http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/di ... 3/27/0.pdf
Last edited by Skylorde on Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Skylorde
45 RPM
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:03 am

Postby Alex Landenburg » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:24 am

guess im switching to mccain

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMPNWT6NxMY
User avatar
Alex Landenburg
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:03 pm

Postby Rick » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:27 am

Alex Landenburg wrote:guess im switching to mccain

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMPNWT6NxMY


:lol: That was great.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Lula » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:33 am

conversationpc wrote:
Tito wrote:
Lula wrote:very cool, regardless of the candidate receiving the votes. i teach u.s. history and have been teaching and holding discussions about the current election and the historical aspect. my students are eating it up, very exciting- they're even getting the opportunity to vote along with other schools in a mock election offered through our sec of state.


Great! :roll: I'm sure that's a balanced lecture.


Come on, dude! You don't know how she teaches. I'd expect Lula is non-partisan as far as how she teaches her history class.


thank you dave. i keep my political beliefs out of my teaching. i have presented both candidates and their platforms from lessons that have been sent out to teachers. it is non-partisan in its finest!

and tito if i thought you were worthy, i'd say- bite my ass!
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby Lula » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 am

not too difficult to file court papers like a request for summary judgement.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/bi ... ficate.asp
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby Skylorde » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:53 am

Lula wrote:not too difficult to file court papers like a request for summary judgement.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/bi ... ficate.asp


Filing a summary judgment request is easy, getting a summary judgement isn't (I don't think)

Be interesting to see where this goes
Image
Skylorde
45 RPM
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:03 am

Postby Wildfire » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:04 am

User avatar
Wildfire
45 RPM
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:02 pm

Postby nolippin » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:12 am

Yep, looks like she's going to be the one facing charges now.



http://kdka.com/local/attack.McCain.Blo ... 47628.html

Police: Campaign Worker Admits Making Up Story

A Pittsburgh police commander told KDKA Investigator Marty Griffin that Ashley Todd confessed to making up the story & is facing charges
PITTSBURGH (KDKA) ― Police sources tell KDKA that a campaign worker has now confessed to making up a story that a mugger attacked her and cut the letter "B" in her face after seeing her McCain bumper sticker.

Ashley Todd, 20, of Texas, initially told police that she was robbed at an ATM in Bloomfield and that the suspect became enraged and started beating her after seeing her GOP sticker on her car.

Police investigating the alleged attack, however, began to notice some inconsistencies in her story and administered a polygraph test.

Authorities, however, declined to release the results of that test.

Investigators did say that they received photos from the ATM machine and "the photographs were verified as not being the victim making the transaction."

This afternoon, a Pittsburgh police commander told KDKA Investigator Marty Griffin that Todd confessed to making up the story.

The commander added that Todd will face charges; but police have not commented on what those charges will be.

According to police, investigators working on the interview process detected several inconsistencies in Todd's story that differed from statements made in the original police report.

Pittsburgh Police Public Information Officer Diane Richard released a statement earlier today, saying: "Because of the inconsistencies in her statements, Ms. Todd was asked to submit to a polygraph examination which she agreed to do."

No photos of Todd are being released by Pittsburgh Police at this time.

The investigation is continuing as officials determine what charges will be filed.







Tito wrote:
nolippin wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D940VEM01&show_article=1


Police: McCain volunteer changes ATM attack story

Oct 24 12:23 PM US/Eastern
7 Comments

PITTSBURGH (AP) - Pittsburgh police say a McCain campaign volunteer who said she was held down by a black man who cut the letter "B" in her face has changed her story.
Police spokeswoman Diane Richard says investigators gave the 20-year-old woman a lie-detector test and are "looking at some inconsistencies" in her story.

The student, Ashley Todd, of College Station, Texas, initially said a black man robbed her at knifepoint Wednesday night and then cut her cheek after seeing a McCain sticker on her car.

Police say bank surveillance footage doesn't show her at an ATM where she says she was attacked.

Todd, who is white, now says she was knocked unconscious and doesn't remember being cut. She now says she only discovered the wound later.

No arrests have been made.


When I saw the pictures on Drudge, I agreed with everyone else here it sounded like bullsh-t.
nolippin
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:12 am

Postby Wildfire » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:14 am

She is a stupid fool.

nolippin wrote:Yep, looks like she's going to be the one facing charges now.



http://kdka.com/local/attack.McCain.Blo ... 47628.html

Police: Campaign Worker Admits Making Up Story

A Pittsburgh police commander told KDKA Investigator Marty Griffin that Ashley Todd confessed to making up the story & is facing charges
PITTSBURGH (KDKA) ― Police sources tell KDKA that a campaign worker has now confessed to making up a story that a mugger attacked her and cut the letter "B" in her face after seeing her McCain bumper sticker.

Ashley Todd, 20, of Texas, initially told police that she was robbed at an ATM in Bloomfield and that the suspect became enraged and started beating her after seeing her GOP sticker on her car.

Police investigating the alleged attack, however, began to notice some inconsistencies in her story and administered a polygraph test.

Authorities, however, declined to release the results of that test.

Investigators did say that they received photos from the ATM machine and "the photographs were verified as not being the victim making the transaction."

This afternoon, a Pittsburgh police commander told KDKA Investigator Marty Griffin that Todd confessed to making up the story.

The commander added that Todd will face charges; but police have not commented on what those charges will be.

According to police, investigators working on the interview process detected several inconsistencies in Todd's story that differed from statements made in the original police report.

Pittsburgh Police Public Information Officer Diane Richard released a statement earlier today, saying: "Because of the inconsistencies in her statements, Ms. Todd was asked to submit to a polygraph examination which she agreed to do."

No photos of Todd are being released by Pittsburgh Police at this time.

The investigation is continuing as officials determine what charges will be filed.







Tito wrote:
nolippin wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D940VEM01&show_article=1


Police: McCain volunteer changes ATM attack story

Oct 24 12:23 PM US/Eastern
7 Comments

PITTSBURGH (AP) - Pittsburgh police say a McCain campaign volunteer who said she was held down by a black man who cut the letter "B" in her face has changed her story.
Police spokeswoman Diane Richard says investigators gave the 20-year-old woman a lie-detector test and are "looking at some inconsistencies" in her story.

The student, Ashley Todd, of College Station, Texas, initially said a black man robbed her at knifepoint Wednesday night and then cut her cheek after seeing a McCain sticker on her car.

Police say bank surveillance footage doesn't show her at an ATM where she says she was attacked.

Todd, who is white, now says she was knocked unconscious and doesn't remember being cut. She now says she only discovered the wound later.

No arrests have been made.


When I saw the pictures on Drudge, I agreed with everyone else here it sounded like bullsh-t.
User avatar
Wildfire
45 RPM
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:02 pm

Postby Tito » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:39 am

Lula wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Tito wrote:
Lula wrote:very cool, regardless of the candidate receiving the votes. i teach u.s. history and have been teaching and holding discussions about the current election and the historical aspect. my students are eating it up, very exciting- they're even getting the opportunity to vote along with other schools in a mock election offered through our sec of state.


Great! :roll: I'm sure that's a balanced lecture.


Come on, dude! You don't know how she teaches. I'd expect Lula is non-partisan as far as how she teaches her history class.


thank you dave. i keep my political beliefs out of my teaching. i have presented both candidates and their platforms from lessons that have been sent out to teachers. it is non-partisan in its finest!

and tito if i thought you were worthy, i'd say- bite my ass!


How are you posting at 10:30 am (your time) if you're at school? :P
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Saint John » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:39 am

nolippin wrote:Yep, looks like she's going to be the one facing charges now.
Let me be the first to say that I believe her to be an Obama supporter that is taking one for the team and this is indeed all planned out. Getting "busted" for the fake story being the whole point. Just a guess on my part, though.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Tito » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:43 am

Fact Finder wrote:Now there is an idiot blogger who "allegedly" has posted NUDE pictures of Obama's mother. I won't post the link here unless some of you sick fucks really want to see them. (soft core) Or I can PM the link. And No I didn't uncover it and don't even know if it really is his mother, but none the less it's out there.

People are freaky about politics. :roll:


http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/z ... 24.article
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Lula » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:52 am

it's my conference period tito. i knew you cared about the inner city school children! i actually have a student teacher in my room today and i am at my desk for the next hour 8) .

so let's talk about my gal palin and how unamerican i am :lol:
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby Tito » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:59 am

Lula wrote:it's my conference period tito. i knew you cared about the inner city school children! i actually have a student teacher in my room today and i am at my desk for the next hour 8) .

so let's talk about my gal palin and how unamerican i am :lol:


Ok. Sorry, I believe you. I thought you were the "other guy." :lol:

xoxo,

Tito
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Saint John » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:59 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Saint John wrote:
nolippin wrote:Yep, looks like she's going to be the one facing charges now.
Let me be the first to say that I believe her to be an Obama supporter that is taking one for the team and this is indeed all planned out. Getting "busted" for the fake story being the whole point. Just a guess on my part, though.


Her myspace said she's a Ron Paul person but who the hell knows. She needs to be made an example of either way. This is the kind of shit that can set this Country on fire.
They should carve a real "B" into her face. It could stand for buffoon, bitch, butt ugly, or c-unt. :lol:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Jana » Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:14 am

They're saying she has a history of mental illness. Obviously. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that if someone did that to themselves they have serious problems.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Tito » Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 am

User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby strangegrey » Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:20 am

Enigma869 wrote:
strangegrey wrote:
That's not a maverick. That's a spineless sack of shit.



I'm just pleased to see that a card-carrying Republican has finally figured out how to spell MAVERICK. Every time I see the sign held up at the political rallies, it is always spelled MAVRICK! I realize that not everyone is a great speller (myself included, at times). That said, if you're going to go to a political rally and make these big ass signs, at least take the time to look up the word, to ensure you don't look like a complete jackass, in front of a gazillion people!


John from Boston


Yeah, I was cringing, while I was watching the Republican National Convention. The signs displaying "Mavrick" were really embarassing. I mean, holy crap...if you're going to display a sign on TV...fucking spell it right.

Ironically, most of the signs you see at a Palin and McCain rally these days are actually given to people entering the hall, arena or area. They dont let you bring in your own signs....they actually have people on staff making these fucking things and handing them to people. If that isn't a wasted pile of resources, I can't tell you what is.

Anyway, to that end, when you see a Hayseed yokel holding up a sign spelling "Mavrick," there's a damn good chance he snuck it into the place...
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:20 am

Skylorde wrote:You discredit Conservative sources when the point of view is contrary to yours yet you credit them when it works in your favor. You can't have it both ways, pick one.


Last I checked, there's nothing Conservative about a Rasmussen poll.
World Net Daily, like other media outlets, just happened to be citing it.
If it was a World Net Daily conducted poll, you'd have a good point.

Skylorde wrote:And the talking head's on the left never lie? Olbermann never lies?


To the same extent of the Hannitys and the Limbaughs of the world? - I say no, but the Doctrine never applied to cable, so I fail to see the pont.
If you want some sort of equal-time rule for cable go ahead and propose it.

Skylorde wrote:How Constitutional of you. I guess that statement alone about sums you up 'eh? Giving you the benefit of the doubt in assuming you made that statement in sarcasm (which I don't think you did), I'm fairly certain you wouldn't be leading the charge to protect Beck's freedom of speech if it came down to him getting "thrown off the air"


Correct.

Skylorde wrote:I can't stand Olbermann and frankly pounding nails through my cock with a framing hammer would be more entertaining than suffering through his hour of diarrhea. That being said, I would never advocate "throwing him off the air". I guess I'm one of the minority who still cling to the principles of that "pain in the Liberals ass" document called the Constitution.


Olbermann isn't on the public airwaves.
Besides, most of the right wing ire is pointed at his closing editorials, which is distinct and separate from making up facts out of whole cloth.

Skylorde wrote:Why don't you stop pretending and just admit you'd be gleefully happy abandoning the Constitution in favor of a Chavez or Jong-il style government?


The Doctrine was perfectly constitutional from 1949 until 1987.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:24 am

Skylorde wrote:Then again TNC gave them a nod so maybe they aren't a bunch of lying right wing SOB's afterall?


Depends on the source. WND is basically a clearinghouse of syndicated rightwing writers, some more valid than others.
Besides, unlike other media, internet is as close as we've got to an equal playing field.

Skylorde wrote:Dude, everyone knows Ayres "never really meant all those things" and his statements have been "blown completely out of context" by the right wing attack dogs.

Really, he's an upstanding citizen everyone should aspire to be like.


Again, this article is talking about stuff from 1969.
Doesn't alleviate his crimes, but people change, move on etc.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Skylorde » Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:46 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:To the same extent of the Hannitys and the Limbaughs of the world? - I say no, but the Doctrine never applied to cable, so I fail to see the pont. If you want some sort of equal-time rule for cable go ahead and propose it.

I'm not defending Hannity & Limbaugh and you side stepped the point with semantics so let me rephrase; do you really think Randi Rhodes, for example, doesn't lie?

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Besides, most of the right wing ire is pointed at his closing editorials

Stupidity & absurdity invites mockery. Olbermann should follow Mark Twain's advice.


The_Noble_Cause wrote:The Doctrine was perfectly constitutional from 1949 until 1987.

Hmmm. In checking the Constitution, I must have missed the "talk radio" exclusion for freedom of speech. Just because something is law does not make it Constitutional. Just ask the queens in your party how they feel about any laws banning gay marriage. Slavery was Constitutional at one time too, why don't you make the same argument?

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Again, this article is talking about stuff from 1969. Doesn't alleviate his crimes, but people change, move on etc.


I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough. -- Bill Ayres, NY Times article headlined "No Regrets for a Love of Explosives.", 9-11-2001
Guilty as sin, free as a bird, it's a great country. -- Bill Ayres, NY Times, 9-11-2001
I can't imagine entirely dismissing the possibility -- Bill Ayres (in reference to ever using bombs again in the book "Fugitive Days")

Sounds like a changed man, a man who's moved on!
Image
Skylorde
45 RPM
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:03 am

Postby Enigma869 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:14 am

Former Pennsylvania governor and homeland security secretary Tom Ridge said today that the race would be different if McCain had chosen him as his running mate, instead of Sarah Palin.



http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 ... rah-palin/


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Don » Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:17 am

Former Bush White House press secretary Scott McClellan and Republican Minnesota Governor Arne Carlson are endorsing Obama, if anyone cares.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:23 am

Skylorde wrote:I'm not defending Hannity & Limbaugh and you side stepped the point with semantics so let me rephrase; do you really think Randi Rhodes, for example, doesn't lie?


Since the Doctrine is applicable to all, I fail to see what you're driving at.
Does she lie to the same mendacious lengths of Limbaugh, whose stock in trade is 99% fact-free bullshit?
From what I've heard, I'd say no, but lies are bound to happen in any live medium.

Skylorde wrote:Stupidity & absurdity invites mockery. Olbermann should follow Mark Twain's advice.


Like satellite being out of the censorship reach of the FCC, cable wouldn't be covered by the Doctrine.
It's a public airwaves thing.
So what does Olbermann have to do with anything?

Skylorde wrote:Hmmm. In checking the Constitution, I must have missed the "talk radio" exclusion for freedom of speech. Just because something is law does not make it Constitutional. Just ask the queens in your party how they feel about any laws banning gay marriage. Slavery was Constitutional at one time too, why don't you make the same argument?


Yeh, i'm sure that's exactly what Reagan had in mind when he repealed it. :roll:
Why, he was concerned about ensuring the future health of this country's civic dialogue, of course! :roll:
There is less "free speech" as a result of the Doctrine being overturned, not more.
Like the FCC's current efforts to allow newspapers and broadcasters to merge, the decision was all about profit$.

Skylorde wrote:I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough. -- Bill Ayres, NY Times article headlined "No Regrets for a Love of Explosives.", 9-11-2001
Guilty as sin, free as a bird, it's a great country. -- Bill Ayres, NY Times, 9-11-2001
I can't imagine entirely dismissing the possibility -- Bill Ayres (in reference to ever using bombs again in the book "Fugitive Days")

Sounds like a changed man, a man who's moved on!


Some of these are out of context, some aren't.
I'm not gonna go through it again, I just think we should interview his students before casting judgement.
Last edited by The_Noble_Cause on Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby RedWingFan » Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:23 am

Enigma869 wrote:Former Pennsylvania governor and homeland security secretary Tom Ridge said today that the race would be different if McCain had chosen him as his running mate, instead of Sarah Palin.



http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 ... rah-palin/


John from Boston

Yeah, it would have been different. I wouldn't be voting for McCain. :D
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby Enigma869 » Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:09 am

RedWingFan wrote:Yeah, it would have been different. I wouldn't be voting for McCain. :D


I'm sure that your vote will catapult the old fuck to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue! I'm just happy to not have to look at Puppet Palin two weeks from now!


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron