Moderator: Andrew
ProgRocker53 wrote:I shook John McCain's hand at a rally tonight.
That was one epic experience. I feel inspired.
And to think just two months ago I was under the spell of Obamamania.
So glad I woke up..
ProgRocker53 wrote:I shook John McCain's hand at a rally tonight.
That was one epic experience. I feel inspired.
And to think just two months ago I was under the spell of Obamamania.
So glad I woke up..
The_Noble_Cause wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:I shook John McCain's hand at a rally tonight.
That was one epic experience. I feel inspired.
And to think just two months ago I was under the spell of Obamamania.
So glad I woke up..
Maybe you're just under a different spell?
I never caught the Obama bug - even his alleged landmark 2004 speech left me nonplussed.
Prog, what drew you to him in the first place, if I may ask?
StocktontoMalone wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:I shook John McCain's hand at a rally tonight.
That was one epic experience. I feel inspired.
And to think just two months ago I was under the spell of Obamamania.
So glad I woke up..
Post here when you REALLY wake up.....on Nov. 5th - when Obama is the new president.
Skylorde wrote:strangegrey wrote:While some people might be all frigging pissed off and offended at the 'Fuck McCain' graffitti...I personally think there isn't enough of it.
Until someone tags your garage
Seriously, I'm with you on "Fuck McCain" however the message itself "Fuck McCain" and appearing as graffiti on random garage doors isn't likely to sway those voters who are leaning towards him
Fact Finder wrote:I fail to see your point. Your last 4 posts have been TOTALLY incoherent to me, you are the second most ignorant poster on this board, what can be said except you are delusional and uninspiring and frankly a bore.
Go write "Fuck McCain" on someones house with Frank(he's 3rd) , we know you want to.
7 Wishes wrote:I won't even bother posting the articles that prove the Bush Administration pushed this more than Clinton, and in fact spearheaded efforts to make more people have access to loans than ever before.
ProgRocker53 wrote:I shook John McCain's hand at a rally tonight.
That was one epic experience. I feel inspired.
And to think just two months ago I was under the spell of Obamamania.
So glad I woke up..
Voyager wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:I shook John McCain's hand at a rally tonight.
That was one epic experience. I feel inspired.
And to think just two months ago I was under the spell of Obamamania.
So glad I woke up..
Good luck with that. Hope you don't get addicted to that good feeling too much... because it's only going to last for another week and a half. I hope you wake up and see the light before then. Lattes are on me.
ProgRocker53 wrote:Hahaha, you all shouldn't worry about my little ol' McCain vote. After all, Obama's already measured the drapes, written his acceptance speech, and put up a poster of Marx in the Oval office.
At least, that's what America told me.
strangegrey wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:Hahaha, you all shouldn't worry about my little ol' McCain vote. After all, Obama's already measured the drapes, written his acceptance speech, and put up a poster of Marx in the Oval office.
At least, that's what America told me.
America told you that? It sounds awfully similar to the idiocy that DisDain's been spewing at campaign stops.
You already sound dreadfully confused, logically. America does NOT equal McCain....ever.
ProgRocker53 wrote:Voyager wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:I shook John McCain's hand at a rally tonight.
That was one epic experience. I feel inspired.
And to think just two months ago I was under the spell of Obamamania.
So glad I woke up..
Good luck with that. Hope you don't get addicted to that good feeling too much... because it's only going to last for another week and a half. I hope you wake up and see the light before then. Lattes are on me.
Hahaha, you all shouldn't worry about my little ol' McCain vote. After all, Obama's already measured the drapes, written his acceptance speech, and put up a poster of Marx in the Oval office.
At least, that's what America told me.
strangegrey wrote:You still think the financial ruin that has gripped this country was Barney Frank's fault? I know the guy's a fat fucktard that can't put a coherent sentence together without choking on a meatball hero....but let's get real here. This failure of this economy is a failure of POLICY. Policy is ONLY created by majority.
Skylorde wrote:strangegrey wrote:You still think the financial ruin that has gripped this country was Barney Frank's fault? I know the guy's a fat fucktard that can't put a coherent sentence together without choking on a meatball hero....but let's get real here. This failure of this economy is a failure of POLICY. Policy is ONLY created by majority.
You just hit warp 10 and jettisoned your reactor core on the other side of the galaxy. You are correct, this is a policy failure and this policy was in place before Bush got in office. Whether or not he furthered that along remains to be seen, Voyager seems to have a take on that I want to check out. Regardless, this train was at full speed in 1999. Refer to the NY times article in 1999 that trumpets Fannie & Freddies ZERO DOWN loans and loans up to, I think, 125% of value.
Regardless of how much incriminating evidence you can come up with on the Republicans & the financial mess (nothing will suprise me), it will never, ever absolve the Democrats and the mountain of irrefutable evidence that proves their culpability.
strangegrey wrote:Skylorde wrote:strangegrey wrote:You still think the financial ruin that has gripped this country was Barney Frank's fault? I know the guy's a fat fucktard that can't put a coherent sentence together without choking on a meatball hero....but let's get real here. This failure of this economy is a failure of POLICY. Policy is ONLY created by majority.
You just hit warp 10 and jettisoned your reactor core on the other side of the galaxy. You are correct, this is a policy failure and this policy was in place before Bush got in office. Whether or not he furthered that along remains to be seen, Voyager seems to have a take on that I want to check out. Regardless, this train was at full speed in 1999. Refer to the NY times article in 1999 that trumpets Fannie & Freddies ZERO DOWN loans and loans up to, I think, 125% of value.
Regardless of how much incriminating evidence you can come up with on the Republicans & the financial mess (nothing will suprise me), it will never, ever absolve the Democrats and the mountain of irrefutable evidence that proves their culpability.
absolutely ...and I agree with you. There are VERY guilty parties on BOTH sides of the aisle.
However, congressional democracy is constructed in such a fashion so that if anyone in the minority wanted to do damage, he/she would have to subvert a person in the majority to comply with the minority person's wishes.
It is to that end that I hold the republican majority responsible for it's actions, without question. It doesn't matter who's responsible. The group in the majority had not only the power to stop it, but in a way, a fiduciary responsibility to the american people. They failed....they must burn.
McCain deserves an equal share of that blame.
strangegrey wrote:Second...if McCain tried to stop this corruption, he clearly failed. Failure at leadership is *not* a good reason to elect someone to the executive.
strangegrey wrote:Personally, the first is more an important statement than the second. It takes a true, reprehensible liar to march into a room and claim you tried to stop impropriety while having your pockets lined from those you're claiming to stop.
Skylorde wrote:I know many of you are borderline psychotic in your support for Obama & nothing will sway you from that. Just think about it though. This power pendulum swings back & forth and back & forth and in 4-8 years max, you'll be exactly where the Republicans are today and nothing will have changed but the designation of the party in power.
strangegrey wrote:Let me also add, for anyone that tries to swoop in and claim McCain 'tried' to stop this....you're as much a fucking liar as that fuck-stain mccain.
First.... Fannie May and Freddie Macwas lining McCain's pockets right along side Obamas.
Second...if McCain tried to stop this corruption, he clearly failed. Failure at leadership is *not* a good reason to elect someone to the executive.
Personally, the first is more an important statement than the second. It takes a true, reprehensible liar to march into a room and claim you tried to stop impropriety while having your pockets lined from those you're claiming to stop.
Skylorde wrote:strangegrey wrote:Second...if McCain tried to stop this corruption, he clearly failed. Failure at leadership is *not* a good reason to elect someone to the executive.
He did, it's called the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005
Rick wrote:I'd like to know what politician isn't getting their pockets lined by someone. Fuckers are all corrupt, right down to the city mayor.
ProgRocker53 wrote:I would LOVE to vote for a third-party candidate, BUT, in this day and age it won't make a single dent.
ProgRocker53 wrote:I would LOVE to vote for a third-party candidate, BUT, in this day and age it won't make a single dent.
Rick wrote:It would declare your dissatisfaction with the candidates that are going to win, but ultimately, a waste of gas.
strangegrey wrote:Tell me mike, how's that working out....eh?
ProgRocker53 wrote:It's disgusting how little coverage by the news channels, magazines, and papers give to the third-party candidates.
The lack of exposure to "other" parties is doing a disservice to the voters and ultimately to the nation.
I'd venture to say 70% of American voters don't even know Nader or Barr are on the ballot, let alone who they are...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests