Moderator: Andrew
Enigma869 wrote:Okay...this would be funny, if it weren't true! Palin considers herself an "intellectual" and then says in the same article that she wants to name her next kid "Zamboni"![]()
![]()
![]()
Sarah Palin has her next baby's name picked out
by Roger Sinasohn Oct 24th 2008 10:00AM
Remember the Sarah Palin baby name generator? I suspect Governor Palin has been using it as well. Recently, the potential second-in-command of these United States told People Magazine her plans for her next baby's name, should she have one. Given her background, her pride at being a "hockey mom," and the unusualness of her other kids' names, it may not be that big a surprise, however.
"I always wanted a son named Zamboni," said the vice-presidential hopeful. She also told the magazine that she considers herself an intellectual.
Now, I'm as big a fan of unusual names as anyone, but naming a kid after a large machine -- what does that say? I can see it down the road when he's in a pub looking to meet the girl of his dreams: "Hi! I'm Zamboni." "Oh, you drive a Zamboni?" "No, my name is Zamboni." "Goodbye." Palin also says she's not planning on having any more kids. Plus, if she's elected, I doubt she'll have time for another kid; perhaps this is a good reason to vote for her? What do you all think?
John from Boston
Skylorde wrote:strangegrey wrote:Tell me mike, how's that working out....eh?
Dude, I'm right there with you in the disdain for Mexicain but your zeal to hang him high is clouding your judgment.
Chris Dodd was the ranking chair at the time and he prevented the bill from leaving the committee.
The facts speak for themselves.
Could McCain have done more? Should he have done more? Absolutely.
ProgRocker53 wrote:
I'd venture to say 70% of American voters don't even know Nader is on the ballot
Fact Finder wrote:Thank you Joe the Plumber for unmasking this socialist/marxist twit for what he really is.
Wake up America, if Prog can see it why can't you?
strangegrey wrote:However, I guarantee that if McPain actually eeks out a win by some out of this world reason...Nader will get hanged drawn and quartered by the left...
The_Noble_Cause wrote:The lack of exposure to lesser candidates within the two parties was also a disgrace.
Even when Ron Paul or Mike Gravel kicked ass at the debates, the mainstream media would only replay what Hillary and Obama did, or what Romney and Rudy did.
Fact Finder wrote:For those who doubted me when I told you the market meltdown was an Obama Panic, here's the proof. The big boys are taking their money and going home, they do not want their wealth redistributed.
strangegrey wrote:Fact Finder wrote:For those who doubted me when I told you the market meltdown was an Obama Panic, here's the proof. The big boys are taking their money and going home, they do not want their wealth redistributed.
You clearly have zero understanding of financial markets to come in here with a straight face and say the current state of the markets is due to fear of an obama presidency...![]()
That's like claiming massive traffic congestion in florida in advance of a category 5 hurriane making landfall in Miami is really about DIsney World raising admission prices....
Fact Finder wrote:2001 OBAMA: TRAGEDY THAT 'REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH' NOT PURSUED BY SUPREME COURT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Gotta love how a woman who can't name a single supreme court case has become a a rising Conservative folk hero, while a Constiutional law professor is branded an enemy of the state.
Fact Finder wrote:I am speaking of the selloff in the stock markets, not the Fannie/Freddie bailout shit. 2 different animals. People are selling now so as to pay the Bush 15% Cap Gains rate. They do not like the idea of Obama doubling that tax if elected. Don't believe me, I don't care. I've seen it everyday for the last 3 months. People are selling off due to the fear of Barack the Wealth Spreader, that's a fact. Deny it all you want.
conversationpc wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:The lack of exposure to lesser candidates within the two parties was also a disgrace.
Even when Ron Paul or Mike Gravel kicked ass at the debates, the mainstream media would only replay what Hillary and Obama did, or what Romney and Rudy did.
I can't speak of Gravel but Ron Paul definitely cleaned clock at those debates and NO ONE knew about it.
Barb wrote:Senior Lecturer, NOT a professor.
Fact Finder wrote:For those who doubted me when I told you the market meltdown was an Obama Panic, here's the proof. The big boys are taking their money and going home, they do not want their wealth redistributed.Dolphins owner H. Wayne Huizenga said Sunday no date has been set for selling up to 45 percent more of the team to Stephen Ross, but the presidential election is among the issues weighing on his decision.
That's because a Barack Obama administration is expected to mean higher capital-gains taxes.
"He wants to double the capital gains tax, or almost double it," Huizenga said. "I'd rather give it to charity than to him."
Ross purchased 50 percent of the team and Dolphin Stadium for $550 million earlier this year with the intention he would eventually become majority owner.
"If you do it this year or you do it next year, the difference is humongous because of the taxes," Huizenga said.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/foot ... 2404.story
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Barb wrote:Senior Lecturer, NOT a professor.
From the Chicago Law School itself...
"From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track."
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html
Not only that, but it is absolutely assinine to consider the statements from someone like Huizenga....now there's a picture of fiscal health!Skylorde wrote:The quote above is simply fear mongering.
Skylorde wrote:More disgusting hypocricy from the left.
Halloween Palin Prop Sparks Controversy In West Hollywood
WEST HOLLYWOOD (CBS News) ― Sarah Palin is not considered to be a friend of the gay community, but the Republican vice presidential candidate seems to be looming over the West Hollywood Halloween Carnival.
First, a rumor got started that city officials were going to ban Sarah Palin drag queens at its upcoming costumed street party, which draws some 500,000 people annually.
The rumor turned out to be false, but tonight comes word that a mannequin has been outfitted to look like Palin -- with glasses, a beehive wig and a red business suit -- and is hanging from a noose outside a WeHo residence.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Skylorde wrote:More disgusting hypocricy from the left.
Halloween Palin Prop Sparks Controversy In West Hollywood
WEST HOLLYWOOD (CBS News) ― Sarah Palin is not considered to be a friend of the gay community, but the Republican vice presidential candidate seems to be looming over the West Hollywood Halloween Carnival.
First, a rumor got started that city officials were going to ban Sarah Palin drag queens at its upcoming costumed street party, which draws some 500,000 people annually.
The rumor turned out to be false, but tonight comes word that a mannequin has been outfitted to look like Palin -- with glasses, a beehive wig and a red business suit -- and is hanging from a noose outside a WeHo residence.
C'mon, no sane member on either side of the fence supports that shit.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:C'mon, no sane member on either side of the fence supports that shit.
StocktontoMalone wrote:Then maybe when you get upwards in age....you won't have to decide if you are eating tonight....or taking your meds.
Fact Finder wrote:The quote above is simply fear mongering.
Fear mongering my ass. Assuming he does raise cap gains to only 20% (he's proposed as high as 28%) that my friend is a 33% increase in taxes. Let me say again 33% INCREASE.
You want to sell your million dollars in stocks and pay $150,000 now, or wait and pay $200,000 under Obama? The big boys have said 15% now, they are not going to give up another $50,000 to the Gov.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests