Onestepper wrote:or they just don't give a damn.
Mostly this.
Moderator: Andrew
Onestepper wrote:or they just don't give a damn.
Onestepper wrote:Please, oh please share with us exactly what they would gain by making this all up and creating a publicity stunt. I'm anxiously waiting.
You honestly think airing the band's dirty laundry and financial arrangements, while also announcing that their longtime bassist and drummer have been fired for trying to steal the band's name somehow increases ticket sales? Do you even read what is taking place on Facebook regarding this mess?
Here's one quote that I picked random.
"Sad to see one of my favorite bands end like this".
No one, and I mean no one with half a brain thinks this is a net positive. The die hard fans, like us, know all about the drama around Journey. Most people do not. So they don't look at it like a new beginning with new members. They look at like a death nail, or they just don't give a damn.
SoonerThunder wrote:What if SP put Ss and RV up to this to get the name back, or at least stop Neal and Jon from using it?
Per the Rolling Stone interview, he’s none too happy with either of them
brywool wrote:If you read that legal document all the way through, it looks like Herbie and Perry voted with Smitty and Valory to make Smith President and Valory Secretary. Cain didn't vote. Neal didn't show up. TO ME this indicates that the organization is unhappy with the Schon/Cain circus that's been going on over the past few years. Maybe I'm reading too much into that, but if I was in a BUSINESS VENTURE with these guys at the top, acting as they have been, I'd definitely be concerned and definitely try to put somebody else in charge of things, at least short term. Now Cain and Schon are suing them. However, there's a majority vote by the board members that puts Smith as pres and Valory as Secretary. It's already been voted on, so I'm not sure how Jon and Neal can fight that. It seems that Perry, Smith, Valory, and Herbie are in charge of Nightmare.
Edit: Ah, but it's Elmo that owns the 'Journey' name, ok. Still, not sure why C&S didn't also sue Perry & Herbie here.
And SP got 50% of the first post Journey tour and album net? wow.
onmyjrny wrote:brywool wrote:If you read that legal document all the way through, it looks like Herbie and Perry voted with Smitty and Valory to make Smith President and Valory Secretary. Cain didn't vote. Neal didn't show up. TO ME this indicates that the organization is unhappy with the Schon/Cain circus that's been going on over the past few years. Maybe I'm reading too much into that, but if I was in a BUSINESS VENTURE with these guys at the top, acting as they have been, I'd definitely be concerned and definitely try to put somebody else in charge of things, at least short term. Now Cain and Schon are suing them. However, there's a majority vote by the board members that puts Smith as pres and Valory as Secretary. It's already been voted on, so I'm not sure how Jon and Neal can fight that. It seems that Perry, Smith, Valory, and Herbie are in charge of Nightmare.
Edit: Ah, but it's Elmo that owns the 'Journey' name, ok. Still, not sure why C&S didn't also sue Perry & Herbie here.
And SP got 50% of the first post Journey tour and album net? wow.
I kind of skimmed the document; haven't had a lot of time to sit down and read. But what you are saying makes a lot of sense. I used to think JC was the smart one with the common sense but not so sure about this now. Herbie was really clear in his interview many years ago what he thought of JC. It is so weird how alliances come and go and change in this band.
But the writing in the complaint is like no other legal document I have ever read.
perryfan61 wrote:I hope there is a counter suit by Ross and Smitty. If there is, I wonder if it will be all over FB, TMZ, and the Rolling Stone?
I think Neal just wanted those two expensive employees out of this coming tour. More money for him and Cain, as replacements will earn a lot less. He's using the board room shuffle as an excuse to fire them......and majorly disrespect them at the same time.
The documents shown do not support the idea that Ross and Smitty wanted to take over the brand. All that happened was a change in board member titles, which was supported by SP and Herbie. Neal wasn't even present. Wonder why he didn't bother to even phone it in? Sounds suspicious to me.
It's true that the language used in the opening documents doesn't sound like it was written by a lawyer, more like a whine from Neal. " More talented musicians " indeed!!
brywool wrote:If you read that legal document all the way through, it looks like Herbie and Perry voted with Smitty and Valory to make Smith President and Valory Secretary of Nightmare. Cain didn't vote. Neal didn't show up. TO ME this indicates that the organization is unhappy with the Schon/Cain circus that's been going on over the past few years. If I was in a BUSINESS VENTURE with these guys at the top, acting as they have been, I'd definitely be concerned and definitely try to put somebody else in charge of things, at least short term. They're probably worried about Cain and Schon driving the band into the ground as seemed to be happening last year. Now Cain and Schon are suing them. However, there's a majority vote by the board members that puts Smith as pres and Valory as Secretary. It's already been voted on, so I'm not sure how Jon and Neal can fight that. It seems that Perry, Smith, Valory, and Herbie are in charge of Nightmare.
Edit: Ah, but it's Elmo that owns the 'Journey' name, ok. Still, not sure why C&S didn't also sue Perry & Herbie here. And it sounds like those 4 are now in control of Nightmare, which is a pretty big deal as it's such a huge part of the Journey machine.
.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
As I've mentioned before on here, when Journey was first trying to rebuild and touring the corn dog county fair festival, Smitty had little interest in rejoining. Now that the band has been succesfully rebuilt, people are coming for their undeserved share of the pie.
Marabelle wrote:What if: Mr P brought SS and the other guy (whatever his name is) into a side project. Journey as it has been known has been quartered and maimed. I'd listen.
perryfan61 wrote:I hope there is a counter suit by Ross and Smitty. If there is, I wonder if it will be all over FB, TMZ, and the Rolling Stone?
perryfan61 wrote: I think Neal just wanted those two expensive employees out of this coming tour. More money for him and Cain, as replacements will earn a lot less. He's using the board room shuffle as an excuse to fire them......and majorly disrespect them at the same time.
perryfan61 wrote: The documents shown do not support the idea that Ross and Smitty wanted to take over the brand. All that happened was a change in board member titles, which was supported by SP and Herbie. Neal wasn't even present. Wonder why he didn't bother to even phone it in? Sounds suspicious to me.
perryfan61 wrote: It's true that the language used in the opening documents doesn't sound like it was written by a lawyer, more like a whine from Neal. " More talented musicians " indeed!!
onmyjrny wrote:Was there any indication before the complaint that Valory and Smith wanted to retire? I assume they were going to be the ones out on the tour this time around?
Eric wrote:Marabelle wrote:What if: Mr P brought SS and the other guy (whatever his name is) into a side project. Journey as it has been known has been quartered and maimed. I'd listen.
What if 3 guys who don't want to record and heavily tour as Journey got together and worked?
Memorex wrote:The way I see it, and I could be wrong, is that Nightmare owns the name and Perry is a stakeholder. And that cost Perry money along the way. That money came from Journey proceeds, I imagine. At least I'm guessing that any stakeholder in Nightmare had to put up money, or some equivalent. So let's assume for a moment that Perry is a stakeholder in a company that he help fund and it's number one asset is the name "Journey". That's akin to a co-owner of a software company that has a product as an asset. He helped pay for and then work the brand to make that product have x value.
Now comes a time where they ask Perry to leave. Well wait, he owns this stake and has this asset that has a large value. No way he just walks away from it, nor should he. But Nightmare says well, we understand it has future value but since we don't keep money in the bank, per se, we have to pay you your share of the asset over time, based on future sales. If you are Perry, at the time, it makes good business sense to get that up front. In fact, it was not good business sense in hindsight. Perry had no way of knowing if Journey would survive very long without him. So he front loads the payment across the first two tours. I bet he wishes he would have made that on the 5th and 6th tours. But either way, he is being compensated for the brand he built and helped fund. It's not getting money for nothing. It's that passive income we all want. But you don't get passive income without first having funded something.
brywool wrote:I would say Perry voting with Smith and Valory pretty much puts an end to ANY speculation of him and Neal ever working together again. Maybe now people will stop asking that question. Hey, if there's anything positive out of all this...
Eric wrote:brywool wrote:If you read that legal document all the way through, it looks like Herbie and Perry voted with Smitty and Valory to make Smith President and Valory Secretary of Nightmare. Cain didn't vote. Neal didn't show up. TO ME this indicates that the organization is unhappy with the Schon/Cain circus that's been going on over the past few years. If I was in a BUSINESS VENTURE with these guys at the top, acting as they have been, I'd definitely be concerned and definitely try to put somebody else in charge of things, at least short term. They're probably worried about Cain and Schon driving the band into the ground as seemed to be happening last year. Now Cain and Schon are suing them. However, there's a majority vote by the board members that puts Smith as pres and Valory as Secretary. It's already been voted on, so I'm not sure how Jon and Neal can fight that. It seems that Perry, Smith, Valory, and Herbie are in charge of Nightmare.
Edit: Ah, but it's Elmo that owns the 'Journey' name, ok. Still, not sure why C&S didn't also sue Perry & Herbie here. And it sounds like those 4 are now in control of Nightmare, which is a pretty big deal as it's such a huge part of the Journey machine.
.
I've been trying to read through and decipher. I'm not a lawyer so who cares what I think it means, but here goes my summary. Anyone... please correct me where I'm wrong:
- Nightmare owns the Journey Mark BUT Elmo controls it.
- Elmo is Schon, Cain and Perry
- I don't understand why Elmo was established in 1985 with Perry/Schon/Cain but in 1998 Perry agreed on Schon and Cain carrying on Journey for conce$$ion$
- I think Nightmare owns the old and Elmo owns the new through NOMOTA?
- As long as Schon and Cain want to tour as Journey they can
- Once they stop, Nightmare regains control
- Valory and Smith got control of Nightmare thinking they can take back control of the Mark.
- Now, the question is does Nightmare have any legal right to pull control? Also, was what Valory and Smith did legal?
- if yes to both of the above, then what would the endgame be? They think it would give them rights to touring proceeds but if successful in pulling the Mark would Schon and Cain continue touring if they had to pay Perry PLUS those two? Not sure they would and then nobody gets anything.
- I understand the firing but not sure I understand the 10mil suit?
As I've said... I'm excited because this could be renewed energy in a near dormant band. But aside from that fact I'm also on Schon and Cain's side because once again they want to work and others don't. I'm not in favor of paying people who don't want to work. I can't imagine they haven't been paid handsomely the last 40+ years?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:perryfan61 wrote:I hope there is a counter suit by Ross and Smitty. If there is, I wonder if it will be all over FB, TMZ, and the Rolling Stone?
I think Neal just wanted those two expensive employees out of this coming tour. More money for him and Cain, as replacements will earn a lot less. He's using the board room shuffle as an excuse to fire them......and majorly disrespect them at the same time.
The documents shown do not support the idea that Ross and Smitty wanted to take over the brand. All that happened was a change in board member titles, which was supported by SP and Herbie. Neal wasn't even present. Wonder why he didn't bother to even phone it in? Sounds suspicious to me.
It's true that the language used in the opening documents doesn't sound like it was written by a lawyer, more like a whine from Neal. " More talented musicians " indeed!!
If Schon only wants bargain rate hired hands, why would he have convinced Smitty to come back in the first place? That makes very little sense to me. Fans can project all sorts of sinister motives onto Neal and Jon. I think the legal documents speak for themselves.
As I've mentioned before on here, when Journey was first trying to rebuild and touring the corn dog county fair festival, Smitty had little interest in rejoining. Now that the band has been succesfully rebuilt, people are coming for their undeserved share of the pie.
FamilyMan wrote:Memorex wrote:The way I see it, and I could be wrong, is that Nightmare owns the name and Perry is a stakeholder. And that cost Perry money along the way. That money came from Journey proceeds, I imagine. At least I'm guessing that any stakeholder in Nightmare had to put up money, or some equivalent. So let's assume for a moment that Perry is a stakeholder in a company that he help fund and it's number one asset is the name "Journey". That's akin to a co-owner of a software company that has a product as an asset. He helped pay for and then work the brand to make that product have x value.
Now comes a time where they ask Perry to leave. Well wait, he owns this stake and has this asset that has a large value. No way he just walks away from it, nor should he. But Nightmare says well, we understand it has future value but since we don't keep money in the bank, per se, we have to pay you your share of the asset over time, based on future sales. If you are Perry, at the time, it makes good business sense to get that up front. In fact, it was not good business sense in hindsight. Perry had no way of knowing if Journey would survive very long without him. So he front loads the payment across the first two tours. I bet he wishes he would have made that on the 5th and 6th tours. But either way, he is being compensated for the brand he built and helped fund. It's not getting money for nothing. It's that passive income we all want. But you don't get passive income without first having funded something.
I could be wrong about this, but I don't think Nightmare, Inc was exclusive to Journey. Nightmare also included a production company called Nocturne at one point - which was a lighting and video company that Herbie founded for big stadium and arena rock acts. (It's featured in the NFL Films doc on ROR). This was the preeminent touring company of the 80's and 90's. If Perry was getting a piece of that too, Journey could never have done another gig and he would still have made a fortune off Nocturne alone.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Journey/Survivor wrote:I smell another pathetic publicity stunt. Journey has been pulling all kinds of publicity stunt shit like crazy in recent years, and it's disgusting.
There's no way that this is a true event.
Seriously Journey members.... Grow the hell up. You're turning into an absolute joke!!!
What publicity stunts has Journey pulled in recent years?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests