Moderator: Andrew
perryswoman wrote:Seems like Neal can’t get along with anyone
perryfan61 wrote:I'm shocked!! I can't believe Smitty and Ross would try to pull a stunt like this! If this is true, then that's it for the band, IMHO. I guess Neal could ask Deen to come back, and replace Ross with someone else, but I don't know if Arnel is up for another tour anyway. Maybe it's time to retire.....except Neal has lots of alimony still to pay, and a wife who is draining the bank account, so who knows what will happen.![]()
![]()
Eric wrote:I can’t help but be excited about this. This band needed a shakeup. It’s sounds troubling how it’s gone down... I get that. But this band has been without a heartbeat since Smith came back. Now it sounds like he and Valory just don’t want to work anymore. If Schon and Cain are back on track then just bring Deen-O back and they can be an active band again. Valory? Eh, whatever.
Arkansas wrote:Btw, this is interesting. I guess this explains how Perry has been on the payroll without being in the band. As long as NS or JC are active as Journey, SP is one-third owner of the trademark.![]()
If so, there's probably another supporting agreement that defines compensation.
In 1985, pursuant to a Trademark License Agreement, Nightmare Productions, Inc., one of the band’s corporate entities, provided an exclusive, irrevocable license of the Journey Mark to Schon, Cain and Perry. Under the Trademark License Agreement, the license continues "until the date upon which none of Stephen Perry, Neal Joseph Schon, or Jonathan Cain is actively engaged in a professional music career utilizing the name "‘JOURNEY.’"
Sounds like RV & SS wanted a piece of that pie too.
later~
onmyjrny wrote:Something smells fishy to me in all this. I just don't see Smith or Valory trying to pull a stunt as dumb as this. No way they could have ever pulled it off even if it wasn't stopped. Gotta be something else to it. Maybe a publicity stunt? Trying to drum up more ticket sales or get out of the contract they have currently.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:onmyjrny wrote:Something smells fishy to me in all this. I just don't see Smith or Valory trying to pull a stunt as dumb as this. No way they could have ever pulled it off even if it wasn't stopped. Gotta be something else to it. Maybe a publicity stunt? Trying to drum up more ticket sales or get out of the contract they have currently.
The actual legal documents are pretty convincing - includes specific details including dates of meetings etc.
indigo wrote:https://mms.businesswire.com/media/20200303006138/en/777460/1/Complaint+-+Journey+%281%29.pdf?download=1
Jump to pg.23 to read up on the Elmo Agreement. Some interesting things that regulated what the band could do and not do after Perry left.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests