Moderator: Andrew
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Watched Hannity tonight and expected more on the liberal witch hunt lie of Trump and Russia to be exposed and wasn't let down. Then he had Sara Carter and Peter Campbell's attorney on. I didn't know the Congress had been looking into Uranium One and exposed alot. In both cases, charges are about to be filed. I was glad to hear that. Uranium One is breaking, this is all I can find so far. Grade school personal attacks against me will not change reality. Boomer, it's gonna happen and soon.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... officials/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... oundation/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... ommittees/
Hillary and Russia are all over this. Treason against Clinton and the Foundation is not out of the question.
Andrew wrote:You know Wiki is also funded by Russian money.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:George W Bush came out of his retirement clearing brush to say that Russia meddled in our election. This means it's as definite as Saddam being behind 9/11.
tj wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:George W Bush came out of his retirement clearing brush to say that Russia meddled in our election. This means it's as definite as Saddam being behind 9/11.
He needs to be quiet about anything political.
Fact Finder wrote:Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02 ... teele.html
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Boom !
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... y-exposed/
Boom 2
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... nst-trump/
And another rat bailing.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... quits-fbi/
The_Noble_Cause wrote:George W Bush came out of his retirement clearing brush to say that Russia meddled in our election. This means it's as definite as Saddam being behind 9/11.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Watched Hannity tonight and expected more on the liberal witch hunt lie of Trump and Russia to be exposed and wasn't let down. Then he had Sara Carter and Peter Campbell's attorney on. I didn't know the Congress had been looking into Uranium One and exposed alot. In both cases, charges are about to be filed. I was glad to hear that. Uranium One is breaking, this is all I can find so far. Grade school personal attacks against me will not change reality. Boomer, it's gonna happen and soon.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... officials/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... oundation/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... ommittees/
Hillary and Russia are all over this. Treason against Clinton and the Foundation is not out of the question.
Monker wrote:Actually, I'd love to see a W. quote where he says 9/11 was the fault of Saddam.
Monker wrote:You came on here and for weeks talked about this big document dump was going to be the end of the Democratic party. The day came and went without even the smallest incident.
Monker wrote:Then you were all about the Nunes memo. Weeks before it even came out I said it was a memo written by a biased Nunes and a biased committee...both of which had already lost all credibility due to his midnight run to the Whitehouse, months prior. So, it comes out and is a huge dud because of the above reasons and the fact that it was lacking any facts at all because ALL of the underlying facts were still classified. it was a BIG NOTHING that you propped up. Even the beloved Trey Gowdy was on Face the Nation and said that there would still be a Russian probe without the dossier.
Monker wrote:You have no real credibility on this "Chicken Little" fascination. You still jump on "more memos" from Nunes, even though he has repeatedly been disgraced. You rely on an OPINION writer like Sean Hannity to gather your facts for you...even though that opinion writer has essentially become a spokesman for the Whitehouse, meeting with Trump often.
Monker wrote:You are like a street corner preacher screaming about the end of the world to whoever will listen. "In just a few days..." Those "few days" have turned into months of repeated bullshit. Now you are back to Uranium One...please.
Monker wrote:I wonder what you are going to write when Trump, the subject of this thread, is served a subpoena to testify before Mueller. Will you scrutinize him as he tries to squirm his way out of it? If he takes the 5th, will you be critical of that? When Kushner, Jr. and maybe even Ivanka are idicted, will you admit that this is the most corrumpt administration in history?
Boomchild wrote:So here we are a year and couple months since the last election. President Trump has been in office for one year. What is the Democrats message and platform? No one knows because they are still fixated on their last loss at the polls. They're still droning on with the resist Trump and hate Trump narratives. Somehow I don't think that is going to help them in the midterms. Speaking of President Trump, the other day I took my dad to the dentist and while checking out I got into the conversation about taxes with the receptionist. Without asking her she told me that with the reform she is already seeing more money in her paycheck. She commented that it was significant. This is the kind of thing that effects how people vote. Remember not a single Democrat voted for the reform.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Everything I claimed is going down.
Here's something from the Main Stream Media. It's about a month behind, but it's something. Monker can say "it ain't so", but it's so. Mueller is going to have to step down as Monkers "nothing to see here" Uranium Ones explodes. Take a look at whats going on and what Monker claims. As usual, Monker is the liar.
https://www.investors.com/politics/edit ... irty-work/
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:You came on here and for weeks talked about this big document dump was going to be the end of the Democratic party. The day came and went without even the smallest incident.
Sounds like you raving incomprehensibly about Russian bots under your bed. Hey, at least KC didn't claim he was "Buzzinga-ing" everybody when the memo came out. He is more of a man than you.Monker wrote:Then you were all about the Nunes memo. Weeks before it even came out I said it was a memo written by a biased Nunes and a biased committee...both of which had already lost all credibility due to his midnight run to the Whitehouse, months prior. So, it comes out and is a huge dud because of the above reasons and the fact that it was lacking any facts at all because ALL of the underlying facts were still classified. it was a BIG NOTHING that you propped up. Even the beloved Trey Gowdy was on Face the Nation and said that there would still be a Russian probe without the dossier.
The only people claiming it was a "huge dud" are the same tools that didn't want the memo released citing BOGUS national security concerns. The most interesting thing about the memo (to me), is it reveals how info was fed to the media and then the media were used/cited to further an agenda. Steele's info was given to Yahoo etc. Then the Yahoo article was used to assist with acquiring the FISA warrant. This is similar to how Cheney gave Iraq WMD info to Judith Miller of the NYTimes and then used her NYT reporting to further the case for war. It's a government feedback loop and how the game is played.Monker wrote:You have no real credibility on this "Chicken Little" fascination. You still jump on "more memos" from Nunes, even though he has repeatedly been disgraced. You rely on an OPINION writer like Sean Hannity to gather your facts for you...even though that opinion writer has essentially become a spokesman for the Whitehouse, meeting with Trump often.
And you rely on X-Files and imaginary quotes with NO ATTRIBUTION AT ALL ("hillary had permission..."). So shut your dick hole, you dateless loser.
Monker wrote:You are like a street corner preacher screaming about the end of the world to whoever will listen. "In just a few days..." Those "few days" have turned into months of repeated bullshit. Now you are back to Uranium One...please.
The Uranium One FBI informant just testified this week. So yea, it is back in the news in a pretty big way.Monker wrote:I wonder what you are going to write when Trump, the subject of this thread, is served a subpoena to testify before Mueller. Will you scrutinize him as he tries to squirm his way out of it? If he takes the 5th, will you be critical of that? When Kushner, Jr. and maybe even Ivanka are idicted, will you admit that this is the most corrumpt administration in history?
I wonder, when Trump gets re-elected will you set yourself on fire like a Buddhist monk while shouting 'RESIST!' on the White House lawn?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:Actually, I'd love to see a W. quote where he says 9/11 was the fault of Saddam.
1) You are in no position to be expecting quotes/corroboration from anyone. Where is your proof that Sebastian Gorka is wanted by "multiple governments"? You make claims with reckless abandon.
2) By 2003, over 70% of all American believed there was a Saddam- 9/11 link. Why is that? The entire administration conflated the two again and again and again. Below are just quotes made ON RECORD. Tons of more shit said in meetings and in declassified memos etc etc.
Bush: "Before 11 September 2001, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents and lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons, and other plans - this time armed by Saddam Hussein."
Bush: "The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda: because there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda,"
Bush: "the battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11th, 2001."
Bush: "you can't distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the War on Terror."
Cheney: “..pretty well confirmed, that 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.”
Cheney: "The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we’ve never been able to develop anymore of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it."
Cheney: "supposedly, Mohamed Atta, who was the leader hijacker, had met with one of the senior officials of the Iraq intelligence service in Prague five months before 9/11. That was information provided to us by our intelligence."
Powell: "We've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases. And we know that after 11 September, Saddam Hussein's regime gleefully celebrated the terrorist attacks on America."
Boomchild wrote:
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Three people resigned from the FBI this week. One suicide, and this. rright monker, lie some more. I love watching you look stupid. What a pitty it isn't just looks.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... ied-intel/
Boomchild wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Three people resigned from the FBI this week. One suicide, and this. rright monker, lie some more. I love watching you look stupid. What a pitty it isn't just looks.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... ied-intel/
Come on K.C. you know these are all just pure a coincidence. Oh and don't forget the one or more "retirements" in the DOJ.
Boomchild wrote:
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:
You've been going over a year about Trump and Russia and have your faith in this.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... otel-room/
Monker wrote:Get back to me when you can stop acting like a child.
Monker wrote:So what? I asked where W said 9/11 was the fault of Saddam.....not what people believed.
Monker wrote:This has nothing to do with blaming Saddam for 9/11. He's just giving the fear mongering line of "what if Saddam gave the 9/11 terrorists WMD?" NOT THE SAME THING AT ALL.
Monker wrote:More fear mongering of Saddam giving terrorists WMD...NOT THE SAME THING.
Monker wrote:Not blaming Saddam for 9/11...just equating Saddam with terrorism so he could equate it with 9/11.
Monker wrote:Not blaming Saddam for 9/11.
Monker wrote:NONE of these quotes are saying Saddam had ANYTHING to do with 9/11. They are all just fear mongering statements to justify the Iraq war. That is a COMPLETELY different issue than blaming 9/11 on Saddam. As far as I know, he never did that...but, if he did - I would like to know about it.
Monker wrote:Didn't even read these. Dick Cheney and Colin Powel are not W. Neither is Donald Rumsfield, BTW. These statements are irrelevant because W did not say them.
Monker wrote:My argument has always been that they (the W administration) knew that the public was blaming Iraq/Saddam for 9/11...and knew it wasn't true. W never said anything to support that idea, as far as I know....but he also never said anything against it...he allowed the public to believe a lie.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests