Moderator: Andrew
Monker wrote:Since you are Mr. Statistics...find a chart or graph that shows WHY people are no longer seeking employment. How many left the workforce and took retirement, or early retirement? How many are women who married and no longer seeking a career? How many decided to join the military rather then be unemployed? Not really trying to prove a point, just curious...since I *KNOW* more people are retiring then there are people entering the workforce.
And, all these numbers below will start falling in line next year - regardless of who is President. People were making these EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS at the end of Reagan's first term.slucero wrote:Memorex wrote:Monker wrote:
Regardless of who is President next year, the economy is recovered. Obama did a fine job of ensuring that.
This is such an ignorant comment. growth is slowing. True unemployment is 11% I don't think any sane person considers anything recovered.
no where near recovered if one looks at the facts...
The US economy grew at a 1.65% pace in the first half of the year and, according to Bloomberg Brief's chief economist Jo Brusuelas, is now tracking at a 1.5% pace of growth. The IMF's dour outlook for the world's economy has been shoulder-shrugged by many but in this compendium of everything you need to know about the US economic outlook but were afraid to ask, Brusuelas provides the facts and nothing but the facts. From slack in the labor markets, to a slowdown in investment and soft household spending, even the Fed's unprecedented QEternity is unlikely to grab us back from the edge of a malaise-like sub-2% consensus forecast for Q4.
Labor Market Slack... (divergent)
Policy Uncertainty... high!
Slower Manufacturing Growth... (accelerating lower...)
and Capex Plunges...
Without positive movement in these areas... there is no recovery.. period.
Memorex wrote:Yea. We have a great economy with great jobs available and people are just choosing to retire. ok.
Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:Yea. We have a great economy with great jobs available and people are just choosing to retire. ok.
What are you talking about? The baby boom generation is retiring. That means more people are retiring then entering the workforce. It has been that way since 2007 or so. THAT is a fact.
I can also see a person being in his 60's, being laid off, and retiring early rather then looking for a job. That's opinion, but not unreasonable at all.
It seems to me that both situations are going to add to this statistic of people leaving the workforce...and artificially inflate it.
So, where is the chart that shows WHY people are leaving. I absolutely do NOT believe that they are ALL "working age" people who just gave up looking for a job.
Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:Yea. We have a great economy with great jobs available and people are just choosing to retire. ok.
What are you talking about? The baby boom generation is retiring. That means more people are retiring then entering the workforce. It has been that way since 2007 or so. THAT is a fact.
I can also see a person being in his 60's, being laid off, and retiring early rather then looking for a job. That's opinion, but not unreasonable at all.
It seems to me that both situations are going to add to this statistic of people leaving the workforce...and artificially inflate it.
So, where is the chart that shows WHY people are leaving. I absolutely do NOT believe that they are ALL "working age" people who just gave up looking for a job.
AR wrote:Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:Yea. We have a great economy with great jobs available and people are just choosing to retire. ok.
What are you talking about? The baby boom generation is retiring. That means more people are retiring then entering the workforce. It has been that way since 2007 or so. THAT is a fact.
I can also see a person being in his 60's, being laid off, and retiring early rather then looking for a job. That's opinion, but not unreasonable at all.
It seems to me that both situations are going to add to this statistic of people leaving the workforce...and artificially inflate it.
So, where is the chart that shows WHY people are leaving. I absolutely do NOT believe that they are ALL "working age" people who just gave up looking for a job.
I'm certainly no Obama supporter but Monker makes a valid point here.
Behshad wrote:Funniest joke of the night at the Al Smith dinner :
Obama: " as you noticed , I was more energetic during the second debate. It's cause I was fully rested after the nap I took.... During the first debate ".
RocknRoll wrote:AR wrote:Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:Yea. We have a great economy with great jobs available and people are just choosing to retire. ok.
What are you talking about? The baby boom generation is retiring. That means more people are retiring then entering the workforce. It has been that way since 2007 or so. THAT is a fact.
I can also see a person being in his 60's, being laid off, and retiring early rather then looking for a job. That's opinion, but not unreasonable at all.
It seems to me that both situations are going to add to this statistic of people leaving the workforce...and artificially inflate it.
So, where is the chart that shows WHY people are leaving. I absolutely do NOT believe that they are ALL "working age" people who just gave up looking for a job.
I'm certainly no Obama supporter but Monker makes a valid point here.
I think a lot of the Baby Boomers are retiring not because they want to, they just don't have a choice. There retirement dreams are gone, and they're just having to face up the world today. I hope these retirees don't end up on food stamps in their last years
Monker wrote:Since you are Mr. Statistics...find a chart or graph that shows WHY people are no longer seeking employment. How many left the workforce and took retirement, or early retirement? How many are women who married and no longer seeking a career? How many decided to join the military rather then be unemployed? Not really trying to prove a point, just curious...since I *KNOW* more people are retiring then there are people entering the workforce.
And, all these numbers below will start falling in line next year - regardless of who is President. People were making these EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS at the end of Reagan's first term.
....actual and hypothetical change in the employment status of the adult population. The employment-population ratio fell by 4.6 percentage points, of which 4.4 percentage points remain after controlling for demographics. Similarly, 1.6 percentage points (3.7 million people) of the 1.9 percentage point (4.6 million people) decrease in labor force participation remains after controlling for demographic factors. Approximately one-fifth of the drop in labor force participation is due to demographic—not strictly economic—factors. A recent Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago study came to a similar conclusion, finding that demographic factors accounted for one-quarter of the drop in labor force participation between 2008 and 2011 ( http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_asset ... 12_296.pdf )
Behshad wrote:Someone please tell this guy that he is wrong and Romney has already won the whole thing.
Memorex wrote:Monker wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Rick wrote:Fact Finder wrote:MATT DRUDGE@DRUDGE
The great Candy Crowley did not 'fact check' during debate how O has Investments In Cayman Trust... ... and has bigger pension than Romney!
Romney has could buy and sell the company that will pay Obama's pension and ship the jobs overseas. If he hasn't already.
Well, he's about to ship one job to the unemployment line.
I guess that's why Gallup is saying unemployment is now down to 7.3%
Regardless of who is President next year, the economy is recovered. Obama did a fine job of ensuring that.
This is such an ignorant comment. growth is slowing. True unemployment is 11% I don't think any sane person considers anything recovered.
AR wrote:Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:Yea. We have a great economy with great jobs available and people are just choosing to retire. ok.
What are you talking about? The baby boom generation is retiring. That means more people are retiring then entering the workforce. It has been that way since 2007 or so. THAT is a fact.
I can also see a person being in his 60's, being laid off, and retiring early rather then looking for a job. That's opinion, but not unreasonable at all.
It seems to me that both situations are going to add to this statistic of people leaving the workforce...and artificially inflate it.
So, where is the chart that shows WHY people are leaving. I absolutely do NOT believe that they are ALL "working age" people who just gave up looking for a job.
I'm certainly no Obama supporter but Monker makes a valid point here.
Fact Finder wrote:New Developments on Federal Unemployment Extensions
(Updated October 16, 2012)
Updated: Number of individuals who have run out of benefits is now over 891,300.
http://www.edd.ca.gov/Unemployment/Fede ... nsions.htm
Fact Finder wrote:Donald J. Trump✔ @realDonaldTrump
I'll be making a major announcement on President Obama next week--stay tuned!
19 Oct 12 Reply Retweet Favorite
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Donald J. Trump✔ @realDonaldTrump
I'll be making a major announcement on President Obama next week--stay tuned!
19 Oct 12 Reply Retweet Favorite
Trump is a white, straight male who was also a very successful businessman in his day. What possibly could he say that would cause a dem to change their vote?
Monker wrote:The Sushi Hunter wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Donald J. Trump✔ @realDonaldTrump
I'll be making a major announcement on President Obama next week--stay tuned!
19 Oct 12 Reply Retweet Favorite
Trump is a white, straight male who was also a very successful businessman in his day. What possibly could he say that would cause a dem to change their vote?
He found a copy of his Muslim birth certificate in Kenya...and it just can't be fake, like the one from Hawaii.
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Donald J. Trump✔ @realDonaldTrump
I'll be making a major announcement on President Obama next week--stay tuned!
19 Oct 12 Reply Retweet Favorite
Trump is a white, straight male who was also a very successful businessman in his day. What possibly could he say that would cause a dem to change their vote?
Fact Finder wrote:According to the latest Gallup survey, Mitt Romney is polling 52% of likely voters. At this point in the race he is ahead of:
Where Jimmy Carter was in 1976 (47%)
Where Ronald Reagan was in 1980 (39% -- Carter was six points up)
Where George H.W. Bush was in 1988 (50%)
Where Bill Clinton was in 1992 (40%)
Where George W. Bush was in 2000 (48%)
Where Barack Obama was in 2008 (49%)
conversationpc wrote:AR wrote:Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:Yea. We have a great economy with great jobs available and people are just choosing to retire. ok.
What are you talking about? The baby boom generation is retiring. That means more people are retiring then entering the workforce. It has been that way since 2007 or so. THAT is a fact.
I can also see a person being in his 60's, being laid off, and retiring early rather then looking for a job. That's opinion, but not unreasonable at all.
It seems to me that both situations are going to add to this statistic of people leaving the workforce...and artificially inflate it.
So, where is the chart that shows WHY people are leaving. I absolutely do NOT believe that they are ALL "working age" people who just gave up looking for a job.
I'm certainly no Obama supporter but Monker makes a valid point here.
Only if you look at the U3 unemployment rate, perhaps. In other words, no, he doesn't have a point. If I remember correctly, the U6 or "real unemployment" rate doesn't count retirees amongst those who've left the workforce but those who are "marginally attached" are, i.e. those who've lost a job and have given up looking for but would like to find a job.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests