The Sushi Hunter wrote:Ever wonder why when whites stand up for one another they call it racist?
who is "they"?
Moderator: Andrew
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Ever wonder why when whites stand up for one another they call it racist?
slucero wrote:The Sushi Hunter wrote:Ever wonder why when whites stand up for one another they call it racist?
who is "they"?
By Michael Isikoff
National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News
Attorney General Eric Holder signed off on a controversial search warrant that identified Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “possible co-conspirator” in violations of the Espionage Act and authorized seizure of his private emails, a law enforcement official told NBC News on Thursday.
slucero wrote:I wonder if Holder is about to get fired..
http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/20 ... -says?lite
By Michael Isikoff
National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News
Attorney General Eric Holder signed off on a controversial search warrant that identified Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “possible co-conspirator” in violations of the Espionage Act and authorized seizure of his private emails, a law enforcement official told NBC News on Thursday.
The Sushi Hunter wrote:This clown posse administration became so overconfident in their corruption that they got sloppy, really sloppy. The stuff in the news about all the shit these fuckers did and are doing to try and shore it up is amazing. Speaking of sloppy, it's utterly amazing that sloppy Joe Biden hasn't even been quoted as saying shit in the news. They don't even have pix of that fucker doing anything right now. Got to wonder if some of the shit that's hit the fan has to do with his dumb fucking ass. And that bitch at the IRS, her tits are so far in the fucking wringer. Doesn't look like she'll be pulling them out anytime soon. Such a nice Friday!
slucero wrote:Doesn't surprise me at all...
Once anything is in electronic form, it can never be hidden..
steveo777 wrote:The top is going to blow off everything next week and many, many people are gonna have to eat their words, including my pack of liberals in my own family.
steveo777 wrote:The top is going to blow off everything next week and many, many people are gonna have to eat their words, including my pack of liberals in my own family.
Seven Wishes wrote:Any Democrat who still has Obama's back after this AP fiasco is at best a hypocrite.
Bengazi is just a glorified witch hunt - there's nothing there. For God's sake, Bush told a deliberate lie to validate declaring an illegal war, and I don't recall anyone calling for Reagan's head after 3 attacks left almost 300 Americans dead in Libya.
If the IRS scandal goes all the way to the top, Obama should be impeached, pure and simple.
Just my two cents. There's a lot more to this, obviously...haven't posted in a year or so.
slucero wrote:There's more to Benghaz, apparently some Congressperson has it on record that Obama directly ordered the stand down.. if true.. it'll probably be used in concert with the IRS thing...
Seven Wishes wrote:slucero wrote:There's more to Benghaz, apparently some Congressperson has it on record that Obama directly ordered the stand down.. if true.. it'll probably be used in concert with the IRS thing...
This is a partisan-based piece of speculation with zero evidence. No way to cover up something like this in this day and age.
Doesn't matter anyway. This is not the issue that will bring this Administration down.
steveo777 wrote:It doesn't matter whether one is a Democrat or Republican, in fact people need to throw away the allegience to party on these issues and see that America has once again been bamboozled into electing yet another bad president. His behavior is ok to change now because he no longer risks his reelection. Time for the true colors to show, which they are.
slucero wrote:steveo777 wrote:It doesn't matter whether one is a Democrat or Republican, in fact people need to throw away the allegience to party on these issues and see that America has once again been bamboozled into electing yet another bad president. His behavior is ok to change now because he no longer risks his reelection. Time for the true colors to show, which they are.
All politicians in Washington are "Corporatists"... have been for decades.. parties are just an illusion..
Seven Wishes wrote:Bengazi is just a glorified witch hunt - there's nothing there. For God's sake, Bush told a deliberate lie to validate declaring an illegal war, and I don't recall anyone calling for Reagan's head after 3 attacks left almost 300 Americans dead in Libya.I
slucero wrote:steveo777 wrote:It doesn't matter whether one is a Democrat or Republican, in fact people need to throw away the allegience to party on these issues and see that America has once again been bamboozled into electing yet another bad president. His behavior is ok to change now because he no longer risks his reelection. Time for the true colors to show, which they are.
All politicians in Washington are "Corporatists"... have been for decades.. parties are just an illusion..
Seven Wishes wrote:Any Democrat who still has Obama's back after this AP fiasco is at best a hypocrite.
Bengazi is just a glorified witch hunt - there's nothing there. For God's sake, Bush told a deliberate lie to validate declaring an illegal war, and I don't recall anyone calling for Reagan's head after 3 attacks left almost 300 Americans dead in Libya.
If the IRS scandal goes all the way to the top, Obama should be impeached, pure and simple.
Just my two cents. There's a lot more to this, obviously...haven't posted in a year or so.
steveo777 wrote:slucero wrote:steveo777 wrote:It doesn't matter whether one is a Democrat or Republican, in fact people need to throw away the allegience to party on these issues and see that America has once again been bamboozled into electing yet another bad president. His behavior is ok to change now because he no longer risks his reelection. Time for the true colors to show, which they are.
All politicians in Washington are "Corporatists"... have been for decades.. parties are just an illusion..
I suddenly like lefties and righties better, sans all the extremism. Centered is better. That will get people working in unison. The way we're doing it now causes too much in fighting and nothing seems to get accomplished, at least not for common good. There are scandals, crookedness and even just fucking nutty behavior from both sides. There is no team, nothing moving us toward anything of progress, only digging deeper holes and creating greater divides. Obstructionism accomplishes nothing, but nobody can seem to agree on what is important anymore. We can focus on foreign policy, welfare, immigration, jobs, economy, etc. Meanwhile, our infrastructure is becoming dated and deteriorating. We owe way too much money to foreign countries. We have sold out and shipped out far too many jobs abroad. America used to be the great country that built and manufactured everything and our products were world class. How did we let ourselves get this way? Anyone who lives in America needs to be on America's team. Back to "We The People". I'm a firm believer in buying American made products. We need to get back to that. It is not our responsibility to creat jobs outside our great country. It is not our responsibility to fight other country's wars. While I don't advocate becoming an isolated society, I do believe in taking care of our own first! I also believe that the people, no matter where they come from, should savor the privilege of living here and contribute to, to the best of their ability, the values that once made this country so great.
slucero wrote:The only way to change this stranglehold/quagmire that is Washington is to remove the law that give business the same rights as the individual, that's called "corporate personhood".. the elimination of which, would effectively put corporations where they belong, BEHIND the citizen, and render corporate lobby illegal. Yes.. corporations legally enjoy the same rights as individual citizens.. even though the Constitution only spoke to individual rights....
Boomchild wrote:slucero wrote:The only way to change this stranglehold/quagmire that is Washington is to remove the law that give business the same rights as the individual, that's called "corporate personhood".. the elimination of which, would effectively put corporations where they belong, BEHIND the citizen, and render corporate lobby illegal. Yes.. corporations legally enjoy the same rights as individual citizens.. even though the Constitution only spoke to individual rights....
I agree that corporations should not be able to lobby like they can. But as you said that will never happen. Also, I think there needs to be term limits set for Congressmen and Senators just like there are term limits for the Presidency.
Memorex wrote:Boomchild wrote:slucero wrote:The only way to change this stranglehold/quagmire that is Washington is to remove the law that give business the same rights as the individual, that's called "corporate personhood".. the elimination of which, would effectively put corporations where they belong, BEHIND the citizen, and render corporate lobby illegal. Yes.. corporations legally enjoy the same rights as individual citizens.. even though the Constitution only spoke to individual rights....
I agree that corporations should not be able to lobby like they can. But as you said that will never happen. Also, I think there needs to be term limits set for Congressmen and Senators just like there are term limits for the Presidency.
I do think things need to be fixed, but most of congress' laws affect business anyway. So if the voice of business is taken away or minimized, what protections do they have?
Unfortunately, America is business. We work more than most. We consume more than most. And we really tout that American Dream of building your own business. There are so many laws and regulations already that strangle business. I can't imagine what it would be if they were not allowed to participate. Could you imagine if the FCC or EPA or any of these government organizations could do all the things they want to business? Remember, most people in government wrongly believe that business is inherently evil. And if you have an entity like that making the laws that control business, well, someone has to be able to fight back.
Besides that, if anyone goes to the voting booth and votes based only on what businesses told them to vote on, then they shouldn't be voting anyway.
tater1977 wrote:So now connect the dots from the Feds raiding Gibson guitar 2 years ago, specifically their CEO...to the IRS ....
Could get interesting....![]()
Does that Gibson Guitar raid make more sense now? (Think IRS)
Hot Air ^ | May 26 | Jazz Shaw
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3024023/posts
Posted on Sunday, May 26, 2013 9:09:13 AM by Hojczyk
An editorial at Investors Business Daily may wind up being filed under how did I miss this one? Following the recent revelations of cases where the administration appears to have used the muscle of the federal government to go after its political enemies, IBD takes a walk down memory lane to the strange case of Gibson Guitars and the federal raids on their facilities for alleged illegal importing of exotic woods used in their products. They reach one provocative conclusion.
The inexplicable raid nearly two years ago on a guitar maker for using allegedly illegal wood that its competitors also used was another targeting by this administration of its political enemies…
Interestingly, one of Gibson’s leading competitors is C.F. Martin & Co. According to C.F. Martin’s catalog, several of their guitars contain “East Indian Rosewood,” which is the exact same wood in at least 10 of Gibson’s guitars. So why were they not also raided and their inventory of foreign wood seized? Well, let’s see… maybe C.F. Martin was getting their supplies from a properly regulated source? No. Did they fill out some forms that Gibson forgot to submit? No… so what could it be?
Grossly underreported at the time was the fact that Gibson’s chief executive, Henry Juszkiewicz, contributed to Republican politicians. Recent donations have included $2,000 to Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and $1,500 to Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.
By contrast, Chris Martin IV, the Martin & Co. CEO, is a long-time Democratic supporter, with $35,400 in contributions to Democratic candidates and the Democratic National Committee over the past couple of election cycles.
“We feel that Gibson was inappropriately targeted,” Juszkiewicz said at the time, adding the matter “could have been addressed with a simple contact (from) a caring human being representing the government. Instead, the government used violent and hostile means.” The end of that story was a travesty, with Gibson being forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in a settlement where there was no finding of criminal action just so they could get back to business. At the time of the judgement, our own Mary Katharine Ham covered the story and found a lot wrong with it, but even she didn’t seem to suspect this situation. And in retrospect, it doesn’t seem all that surprising.
While all this was going on, there was plenty of reason to suspect that there was politics of some sort involved. With Democrats in control of the White House and the Senate, it didn’t seem much of a stretch to think that the eco-warriors were in full throated, chest thumping mode and they would be pushing the limits to show how much they were doing to save the planet. The Gibson story, with its hook of endangered forests and evil manufacturing giants stripping the land, was a perfect fit. But I don’t think many of us imagined that even the Obama administration would be so blatant as to simply launch a police state style attack on a company which supported their enemies while leaving friendly, Democrat donating competitors alone. Or at least I didn’t.
Is this paranoid, tinfoil hat territory? I assure you that Obama supporters reading this will declare it to be exactly that. But given what we’ve been finding in the news recently, is it really that far fetched? Not any more.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest