slucero wrote:I don't recall Einstein ever running for office..
So? Neither did Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or the voices in FF’s head. Should their political views be off limits, too? If that’s so, this thread will be hurting for content. You blab about free markets while your sig contains a quote from one of the most famous socialists of all time. It’s cognitive dissonance on a massive level. If I told you that Mao’s little red book had a killer recipe for stir fried baby bok choy, would you add it to your recipe binder? I guess Republicans are used to holding multiple conflicting beliefs. Water boarding isn’t torture. Nooo. Why, in fact, it’s a form of enhanced freestyle swimming! Weakening emission standards isn’t pollution. Nooo. Instead, it’s the Bob Ross Fluffy Happy Skies Act! And so and so on..
slucero wrote:I recognize and appreciate Einsteins intellectual prowess separate from his political leanings (unlike you)
Yea sure. Uh huh. Much like how you admire Jimmy Carter’s humanitarian peanut farming skills separate from his political leanings, rite? Or Jane Fonda's acting skills separate from her politics? More likely, you had NO FUCKING CLUE about Einstein’s radical politics. And before you get any quick ideas about changing your sig to a Stephen Hawking quote…fair warning – he’s also a LIBERAL! Let me know if you find any GOP theoretical physicists. Trust me, Perry rejoining Journey and causing a tear in the fabric of space time will happen before you can locate one.
slucero wrote:And really, I wasn't posting to you, I was simply answering Monkers question...
Oh yea? And how often do you interject into threads like uninvited in-laws at a groom’s bachelor party? Hypocrite. Here’s a clue – this is a public message board, where anybody can write to anyone. Y’know, kind of like those “for a good time call..” messages you scrawl on gas station bathroom walls. If you want to trade snapchat ass photos with Monker, that’s fine. But do it on your own time.
slucero wrote:…in fact.. there is only one word to describe what you are:
a c-u-n-t.
And so the Republican war against vaginas continues. I’m glad you are man enough to identify your sworn enemy. Me, personally, well, I love the chimi-choco-taco. So I’ll take that as a compliment. Unlike yourself, I wasn’t born in vitro in a grimy hot tub in the back of an abandoned gay bar. Combine this with your unfortunate freak electric pencil sharpening accident and it’s little wonder you harbor such gender animosity. Luckily you have found your way back to the official party of thin-skinned, small pricked losers.
slucero wrote:You have no ability to engage in debate to change minds..
Why would I want to change the mind of a brainless zombie? Better to just laugh at these slow witted creatures as they try to replicate human behavior. There are even reports of them shambling into polling places and casting levers marked “R.” When Bush Sr. called supply-side economics “voodoo”, who knew he was being so literal? Shiiiiit.
slucero wrote:..and are emblematic of what ails Washington.. the unwillingness to even discuss and/or compromise. At least with Monker I can have a dialogue, and he has given me some good reading material on global warming... no such possibility with you. All you are about is hate.
Blah blah blah And what hath compromise wrought? NAFTA? The Patriot Act? Glass Steagall? The Iraq War? Obamacare? Tell ya what, you can splay out the table cloth on the White House lawn and hold hands and sing kumbaya all you want. To paraphrase a quote, “there's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow stripes and dead armadillos.” True fucking dat.