K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Watch Roy Moores Accusers never be heard from again on the news.
They will take their money and go away. They aren't needed any more.
Moderator: Andrew
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Watch Roy Moores Accusers never be heard from again on the news.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Your "I Meant to Do That" excuse is even lamer and less believable than Hillary having permission to use a private server. Try harder.
Monker wrote:The Flynn version you posted was virtually identical to what Joy Behar read and what other news sources reported. Where's the exaggeration? Nobody's buying it, dude.
Monker wrote:There is no other explanation for using "BUZZINGA!", other than to manipulate you into replying to my post.
We already know you are a sad loser who watches too much TV and never gets pussy. What of it? You regularly spam the board with Star Trek dissertations.
Even OhSherrie calls you "a liberal lemming" now. Everybody sees through you and your precious little ego can't take it! This forum is clearly all you have in life. It sure is fun watching you squirm!
I'm a real liberal. Supported Nader, Bernie, etc. Not neoliberal globalist Clintonite warmongering trash. Proud of it too.
Lol. Weren't you arguing the difference between primary "rigging" and "cheating"? Talk about meaningless word games. You're a hypocrite and a DNC shill. Everybody knows it and now you are self-destructing. Its glorious.
Monker wrote:You're a joker, and I don't care how you got your scars.
Now we've gone from quoting Big Bang Theory to Batman? You are such a pathetic little fag.
Monker wrote:Nope. You were lured in with my bait of a post and ONE WORD. It was BAIT. YOU ate the whole fucking thing....and I AM LOVING IT!
Monker wrote:Oh, there were other versions of that news which do not go as far as that version.
Monker wrote:You only see what you WANT to see...and when I post something you want to see, you eat it up like a fucking piranha. A complete tool.
Monker wrote: The reason I posted "BUZZINGA!" was to ENSURE that I could call ALL your bullshit "bullshit" because there is only ONE reason for me to post that word - to reference Sheldon's BBT "I got you!"
Monker wrote:There is absolutely NO OTHER REASON to use that word, especially that spelling of the word, which was also intentional.
Monker wrote:You were baited, and used like the tool you are.
Monker wrote:I don't care. I've dealt with her since before this forum existed.
Monker wrote:Holy shit, give that guy a medal. Hell, I'm feeling generous, give him two!
Monker wrote:LOL...you finally picked up on ONE of my quotes...you are a pathetic TOOL! Geez, I had to practically shove it in your face for you to see it and reply to it. But, you still did....tool.
tj wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Watch Roy Moores Accusers never be heard from again on the news.
They will take their money and go away. They aren't needed any more.
Boomchild wrote:Not that I really have been paying attention to this one but, I believe Moore released a statement that he is taking his accusers to court.
Monker wrote:
Nope. You were lured in with my bait of a post and ONE WORD. It was BAIT. YOU ate the whole fucking thing....and I AM LOVING IT!
Right on cue....here you are again, spinning harder than Michelle Kwan and failing desperately at not looking like a gullible dumbfuck. Successful pranks don't need to be explained again and again. They are simply funny.
Monker wrote:
Oh, there were other versions of that news which do not go as far as that version.
Another lie.
If "Buzzinga!" was such a knee-slappingly funny prank, why are you here having to explain it?
You must so feel naked and vulnerable to be exposed as the microphallused card-carrying DNC Hillaryite that you are.
People say "I got you!" after they pulled off a successful prank. Not in the middle of it.
Buzzinga is also used to mean "Zing" or to exclaim victory - which is obviously what you were going for. But like I said, if this stunt was soo successful, you wouldn't be here having to explain it.
Monker wrote:
I don't care. I've dealt with her since before this forum existed.
Sherrie has been around a long time. So have I. That why when she says you have become a "liberal lemming" (a nicer way of saying you are complete DNC suck-off), you can take it to the bank.
Monker wrote:
Holy shit, give that guy a medal. Hell, I'm feeling generous, give him two!
Hey, if you wanna call me out as a liberal
Monker wrote:
LOL...you finally picked up on ONE of my quotes...you are a pathetic TOOL! Geez, I had to practically shove it in your face for you to see it and reply to it. But, you still did....tool.
It really seems like this thread is starting to get to you.
I bet you'll even respond to this post too.
Monker wrote:Oh, it depends on who it is, what their agenda(s) is/are and what I expect from them. I totally expect you to go into denial mode and I totally planned on explaining it over and over again. Hence, "BUZZINGA!", and the spelling of it...you can't get away from it! I EXPECT, and WANT you to try to get away from it over and over and over again...and I EXPECT to have to explain it over and over and again...until I get bored with it and decide to play with my new tool in a different way.
Monker wrote:Nope...I picked it up off of Yahoo's news an hour or so after it broke.
Monker wrote:There were several others that did not go into the "make contacts with Russians."
Monker wrote:It wasn't meant to be "funny" but entertainment for ME, not the thread. See above about having to explain it...I EXPECTED it and PLANNED on it, I WANTED you to do EXACTLY what you did and continue to do! Tool!
Monker wrote:Not really...you see, you tilted your hand and gave yourself away. Not only did you say you don't attack liberals but you also said, "The Clintons are NOT liberals. This thread should be re-titled." You are just playing games. YOU are exposed.
Monker wrote:I foreshadowed it with "BUZZINGA!" and then explained it and exposed it on your first reply.
Monker wrote:It worked just as I wanted it to. And, it continues to because you keep replying! Too fun!
Monker wrote:LOL. Too funny! "Buzzinga" isn't a real word. It ONLY exists in the CC of the DVD's of BBT. THAT is why I chose that spelling! I expected and planned to have to explain this, too! You are a tool!
Monker wrote:Don't care. See above regarding your posts in the Clinton thread. It's just a game you are playing. You all can think whatever you want to about me.
Monker wrote:So, Sherrie can relate, it's like in the olden days if I decided to go and post in a Perry thread. I would *KNOW* and *EXPECT* people to think of me in certain ways and to say certain things. It's no different here, I *KNOW* and *EXPECT* you to think of me in certain ways and say certain things - and I DO NOT CARE. If I cared, I wouldn't be here.
Monker wrote:Nope, it's fun playing with a new tool.
Monker wrote:As I said a while back, the thread itself is a bit irrelevent to me now. But, baiting you into doing things like the above is still fun!
Monker wrote:Well, of course you could bet that since I have explicitly said that I WANT you to reply, ie: I WANT this conversation....I baited you into it, of course I am going to reply to it - tool! I'll do it until I'm bored with it, then I'll play you in a different way.
Monker wrote:It's been a while since I have manipulated somebody this easily...I forgot how fun it truly is!
Fact Finder wrote:ChuckGrassleyVerified account @ChuckGrassley
51m51 minutes ago
FBI owes answers about "insurance policy" against Trump victory…& if nothing to hide, why would senior FBI leaders use secret phones that "cant be traced" to talk Hillary? DOJ needs to give JudicComm full transparency/cooperation 2 restore public trust. FBI CANT BE POLITICAL.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:What your doing is keeping this bullshit going so you can ignore the corruption of your Party you claim you don't belong too, yet defend with reckless abandon. Mueller is falling apart. Your Trump/Russia /Impeachment crap is falling apart.
Monker wrote:Wow! That is amazing! Look at what you just did. Without the help of Trump's butt buddy Sean Hannity, Steve Bannon, or some random alt-right link, you came up with your own wacky conspiracy theory. Did you do that all on your own? You must be so proud of yourself. Good job, I'm happy for you! You DO have a brain somewhere in that head of yours!
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Look at how much time and creative energy you have been forced to spend defending your obvious lies. What a complete and total pathetic loser you are.
Monker wrote:Nope...I picked it up off of Yahoo's news an hour or so after it broke.
You obviously don't know what a single source story is. Sure, OTHER websites carried the ABC report. But they were all piggy-backing off the ONE ABC report. If you posted the Yahoo version (which you won't), it would contain a link to the ABC report.
Monker wrote:It wasn't meant to be "funny" but entertainment for ME, not the thread. See above about having to explain it...I EXPECTED it and PLANNED on it, I WANTED you to do EXACTLY what you did and continue to do! Tool!
Nobody believes that. And that's what really bothers you.
Monker wrote:I foreshadowed it with "BUZZINGA!" and then explained it and exposed it on your first reply.
Ah, is that how a prank works? If you put a bucket of water on a door frame, do you also shout "gotcha" before anyone grabs the doorknob? When you put a whoopee cushion on a chair, do you shout "Ha ha!" before the person sits? Nothing you are saying makes any sense.
Monker wrote:LOL. Too funny! "Buzzinga" isn't a real word. It ONLY exists in the CC of the DVD's of BBT. THAT is why I chose that spelling! I expected and planned to have to explain this, too! You are a tool!
CC? So you are admitting to being deaf, in addition to being a mongoloid retard?
Monker wrote:Don't care. See above regarding your posts in the Clinton thread. It's just a game you are playing. You all can think whatever you want to about me.
Happy to defend my posts about the Clintons. And I can show you countless MR posts where I said the same thing FOR YEARS. The Clintons are the worst thing to happen to the Democratic Party.
Monker wrote:So, Sherrie can relate, it's like in the olden days if I decided to go and post in a Perry thread. I would *KNOW* and *EXPECT* people to think of me in certain ways and to say certain things. It's no different here, I *KNOW* and *EXPECT* you to think of me in certain ways and say certain things - and I DO NOT CARE. If I cared, I wouldn't be here.
Thanks for the history lesson. But I have been around since the very early days of BackTalk and don't need it.
I know who you are and I am in total agreement with Sherrie. You have become a little DNC cocksucking prissy.Monker wrote:Nope, it's fun playing with a new tool.
So you are gay, deaf, and mongoloid. Got it.
Monker wrote:As I said a while back, the thread itself is a bit irrelevent to me now. But, baiting you into doing things like the above is still fun!
I don't need any goading to kick your intellectual ass. Been doing it for far too long.
Monker wrote:Well, of course you could bet that since I have explicitly said that I WANT you to reply, ie: I WANT this conversation....I baited you into it, of course I am going to reply to it - tool! I'll do it until I'm bored with it, then I'll play you in a different way.
I’m typing this by speaking into my phone while taking a shit.
Meanwhile you are rambling about the eytomological origins of the word, Buzzinga. Who is being played again?
Monker wrote:It's been a while since I have manipulated somebody this easily...I forgot how fun it truly is!
Your posts are like watching the countdown clock in the finale of a Bond movie. You are completely melting down. Very satisfying. Couldn’t happen to a bigger and dumber piece of shit.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:Wow! That is amazing! Look at what you just did. Without the help of Trump's butt buddy Sean Hannity, Steve Bannon, or some random alt-right link, you came up with your own wacky conspiracy theory. Did you do that all on your own? You must be so proud of yourself. Good job, I'm happy for you! You DO have a brain somewhere in that head of yours!
You post like a little eunuch bitch. So many exclamations (OMG!! Mueller is, like, totes hot!). KC is right. You can't debate the facts so you talk shit like a two-bit punk. You're leaving this thread because the Russia narrative has collapsed. It was obvious BS from the start.
S2M wrote:Fact Finder wrote:ChuckGrassleyVerified account @ChuckGrassley
51m51 minutes ago
FBI owes answers about "insurance policy" against Trump victory…& if nothing to hide, why would senior FBI leaders use secret phones that "cant be traced" to talk Hillary? DOJ needs to give JudicComm full transparency/cooperation 2 restore public trust. FBI CANT BE POLITICAL.
And the CIA shouldn't allow drugs to enter the country...but guess what.....
Monker wrote:At least I'm me. You are just my tool.
Monker wrote:Blah, blah, blah. I posted it because I wanted you to reply to it, so we can have this very conversation. I don't care who sourced it. YOU are the source of MY fun.
Monker wrote:I don't care what people believe. I only care that you keep replying to my post! Just as I want you to, because you are my tool!
Monker wrote:What I did was put a whoopee cushion on a chair (the quote) and then put a big sign up that said "WHOOPIE!" (BUZZINGA!) and had an arrow pointing to the chair...signed by Monker (my post). And, you came by and like a trigger happy moron saw the "signed by Monker" and sat your giant fat ass in the chair with monstrous fart sound.
Monker wrote:And, I pointed to the sign that said "WHOOPIE" (BUZZINGA!) and called you a trigger happy dumb fuck for sitting in that chair.
Monker wrote:No, I'm admitting I know more about BBT than you do.
Monker wrote:Not attacking your opinions about Clinton's or liberals. Just pointing out that I know you are playing games. I'm not playing your game. I'm playing MY game.
Monker wrote:Oh, shut up. I'm an Ent. I've been around since before BT. I was around before the forum that existed before BT. I was around the internet before Internet Explorer even existed.
Monker wrote:You know me so well! Do you need a kiss?
Monker wrote:LOL.
That is all this thread means to you, isn't it? I've seen it in your posts to me, I've seen it in your posts to others. You don't care about discussing politics of any sort...all you care about is being one up on other people.
Monker wrote:
That is disgusting. Why would you steal someone's shit? Who's is it, KC's? You should study the shit you took from him...he found the brains to write his own conspiracy theory!
Monker wrote:Dude. YOU were trying to break down a fictitious word to prove that it means something. LOL...you are TOO FUNNY!
Monker wrote:NO IDEA what you are talking about. But, at least you left a piece of the shit and didn't take it all. Next time, maybe you should give a shit...you know, to kinda even out your shit taking and giving.
Monker wrote:OMG! You are like, totally biased against exclamation points! Inconceivable! What is wrong with you? Do you not see they are just upside down i's? The are so cute an innocent! You are a total biased bastard!
S2M wrote:Fact Finder wrote:ChuckGrassleyVerified account @ChuckGrassley
51m51 minutes ago
FBI owes answers about "insurance policy" against Trump victory…& if nothing to hide, why would senior FBI leaders use secret phones that "cant be traced" to talk Hillary? DOJ needs to give JudicComm full transparency/cooperation 2 restore public trust. FBI CANT BE POLITICAL.
And the CIA shouldn't allow drugs to enter the country...but guess what.....
Monker wrote:Oh, I'll guess!
You know drugs get in because Trump goes on sniffing fits like he just snorted a pound of cocaine!
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
You post like a little eunuch bitch. So many exclamations (OMG!! Mueller is, like, totes hot!). KC is right. You can't debate the facts so you talk shit like a two-bit punk. You're leaving this thread because the Russia narrative has collapsed. It was obvious BS from the start.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Fake timeline. You discussed the fake Flynn news in this thread with 7 Wishes and took it seriously BEFORE it was debunked.
verslibre wrote:Boomchild wrote:Not that I really have been paying attention to this one but, I believe Moore released a statement that he is taking his accusers to court.
So they can prove he did all that stuff? Cool.
‘Child refugee’ who raped and murdered the daughter of an EU official is 33 YEARS OLD his father tells German court
Hussein Khavari raped and drowned Maria Ladenburger, 19, last year
Bogus refugee, on trial in Freiburg, Germany, originally claimed to be just 17
A dental analysis estimated his age to between 22 and 29 years
But his father has claimed Khavari is in fact 33 years old
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z51CSeIkHS

K.C.Journey Fan wrote:More for Monker and the other libs to ignore.
https://www.investors.com/politics/edit ... tigations/
Fact Finder wrote:Love your spunk TNC but that wasn't nice.
verslibre wrote:You guys can't possibly be for this.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:verslibre wrote:You guys can't possibly be for this.
I don't really care either way. I remember Bill Moyers programs about how net neutrality regulations were desperately needed and that was like 20 years ago. I think everybody is acting hysterical.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:CHRIST! Don't tell me he had kids!!!!!!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests