They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[S2M]

CHRIST! Don't tell me he had kids!!!!!!

Numbnuts, read Andrew's post at the top of the page.

Exactly. No wonder this forum is a ghost town.

[The_Noble_Cause]

CHRIST! Don't tell me he had kids!!!!!!

Numbnuts, read Andrew's post at the top of the page.

Hey, Monker was the king of dishing it out. If he can't take it and needs to run to mommy, maybe he should stop posting. All he did in this thread is disrespect people with alternative views.

[The_Noble_Cause]

So you're cool if your ISP hikes your monthly fees and adds additional charges so you can "enjoy" regular speeds, and takes liberties to block certain websites if they feel like it? Not me.

These rules won't go into effect immediately, anyway. We can still do something about this.

Hate to break it to you, but the internet existed before the net neutrality rules. Sounds like they have you whipped up into a frenzy also.

[verslibre]

So you're cool if your ISP hikes your monthly fees and adds additional charges so you can "enjoy" regular speeds, and takes liberties to block certain websites if they feel like it? Not me.

These rules won't go into effect immediately, anyway. We can still do something about this.

Hate to break it to you, but the internet existed before the net neutrality rules. Sounds like they have you whipped up into a frenzy also.

I'm well aware of it, being a 40something myself, but it's important to check what the bigwigs intend to do now, not then.

[verslibre]

CHRIST! Don't tell me he had kids!!!!!!

Numbnuts, read Andrew's post at the top of the page.

Hey, Monker was the king of dishing it out. If he can't take it and needs to run to mommy, maybe he should stop posting. All he did in this thread is disrespect people with alternative views.

Yes, I know you two were having a back-and-forth, but Andrew finally put his mod hat on. The stew can only boil over for so long before the chef catches a whiff.

[verslibre]

If it really was a joke, and you're not doing a backpedal, [EDIT] then relax.

[Boomchild]

So you're cool if your ISP hikes your monthly fees and adds additional charges so you can "enjoy" regular speeds, and takes liberties to block certain websites if they feel like it? Not me.

These rules won't go into effect immediately, anyway. We can still do something about this.

I find it interesting that there is all this concern now but when the previous administration turned over control of internet domain name assignment over to the U.N. they weren't. Perhaps it was not clear to them that by doing so, the process is no longer protected under Constitutional laws. A former commissioner who was in charge of the agency that handle it said "He who controls domain name assignment, controls the internet".

[Memorex]

Everyone needs to back the hell up and chill out. Trump will get us all killed eventually anyway, so why argue.

BTW - if you think Drump is honest and doesn't lie/bullshit, then please delete your account and get off my site.

Enough of the nastiness or I'll kill this board.

People are adults Andrew and can take care of themselves. You are talking about people that dish it out as least as bad as they get it. Monker and others are not defenseless little snowflakes that can't handle it. It's clear you'd rather have had the massively corrupt family that is the Clintons than some guy that pops off with whatever he thinks. This post pisses me off because this thread plus the Obama thread include pages and pages and pages of everyone participating in the vile equally. Basically what I am trying to say is your are full of shit. Like it or not these are more our boards now than yours. You barely participate at all. So don't call out people for doing the exact same thing as you and everyone else.

[steveo777]

Political threads are always "enter at your own risk". Everyone here, save for perhaps one butt hurt snitch, is a willing participant. There is no need to moderate this, as we are all adults and can handle it. It's a danger to freedom when someone who hates our president wishes to stifle our discussion and tells those who support him to get off the page. BTW, all politicians are liars, so no I do not believe Trump is without lies either. At least we dodged the corrupt Clinton bullet.

[Andrew]

Looks like Monker went crying to Andrew.

Move on dude.... it's never been ok to post family pictures of other users here. Never.

[Andrew]

Everyone needs to back the hell up and chill out. Trump will get us all killed eventually anyway, so why argue.

BTW - if you think Drump is honest and doesn't lie/bullshit, then please delete your account and get off my site.

Enough of the nastiness or I'll kill this board.

People are adults Andrew and can take care of themselves. You are talking about people that dish it out as least as bad as they get it. Monker and others are not defenseless little snowflakes that can't handle it. It's clear you'd rather have had the massively corrupt family that is the Clintons than some guy that pops off with whatever he thinks. This post pisses me off because this thread plus the Obama thread include pages and pages and pages of everyone participating in the vile equally. Basically what I am trying to say is your are full of shit. Like it or not these are more our boards now than yours. You barely participate at all. So don't call out people for doing the exact same thing as you and everyone else.

Argue about whatever the fuck you have time in your lives to devote to. But DON'T post pictures without authorization. That's just common sense.

[Memorex]

Everyone needs to back the hell up and chill out. Trump will get us all killed eventually anyway, so why argue.

BTW - if you think Drump is honest and doesn't lie/bullshit, then please delete your account and get off my site.

Enough of the nastiness or I'll kill this board.

People are adults Andrew and can take care of themselves. You are talking about people that dish it out as least as bad as they get it. Monker and others are not defenseless little snowflakes that can't handle it. It's clear you'd rather have had the massively corrupt family that is the Clintons than some guy that pops off with whatever he thinks. This post pisses me off because this thread plus the Obama thread include pages and pages and pages of everyone participating in the vile equally. Basically what I am trying to say is your are full of shit. Like it or not these are more our boards now than yours. You barely participate at all. So don't call out people for doing the exact same thing as you and everyone else.

Argue about whatever the fuck you have time in your lives to devote to. But DON'T post pictures without authorization. That's just common sense.

I never saw a picture and I do agree with that.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Move on dude.... it's never been ok to post family pictures of other users here. Never.

Pic was in the PUBLIC DOMAIN. That's on Monker - Not me. Monker said he wanted to play games. Ok, so let's play games.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Argue about whatever the fuck you have time in your lives to devote to. But DON'T post pictures without authorization. That's just common sense.

What authorization does one require when it is PUBLICLY AVAILABLE?

[The_Noble_Cause]

Monker most likely lied to Andrew and said it was a private picture stolen from FB or something. Bottom line is, Monker is on here saying he wants to play games with people. He has no interest in conversation whatsoever. He has become a total troll. So fuck him. The pic is still public btw. Anybody who wants it, should give me a PM.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Once again this is the heart of the situation. Long before the ABC report in question, Monker made it known that he truly believed that there was collusion between Trump and Russia. That in time with the "revealing" of the "classified information" from Mueller it would prove he was correct all the long. Then ABC's press releases comes out seeming to give Monker some "ammo" to support his position BUT we are supposed to believe that his post about it was supposed to be some kind of prank. Yeah sure..........

Of course. Monker was caught in such an obvious lie. Instead of admitting it, he obfuscates and insults. And btw, anybody who posts pics of their kids online in an attempt to get pussy deserves to be shamed.

[Boomchild]

Monker most likely lied to Andrew and said it was a private picture stolen from FB or something. Bottom line is, Monker is on here saying he wants to play games with people. He has no interest in conversation whatsoever. He has become a total troll. So fuck him. The pic is still public btw. Anybody who wants it, should give me a PM.

TNC, I can see your point. It was Monker that kept on stating that he was playing a game and trolling you for his own amusement. He started the situation and if indeed he talked to Andrew, it appears he doesn't like when it's directed back towards him. As far as the picture goes, if it is indeed his picture, he posted it in a public domain. I highly doubt that he is naive and did not know that anyone could view it.

[Boomchild]

[verslibre]

Has anyone heard anything about Roy Moore's accusers in the past three days? Didn't think so.

Got your conspiracy theorist hat on, K.C.?

[Boomchild]

Has anyone heard anything about Roy Moore's accusers in the past three days? Didn't think so.

The fact that he has filed lawsuits against them has a lot to do with it. I'm sure their legal advisors have told them to zip it up.

[Boomchild]

Things that shoud make you go hmmmmm.

https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/fran ... rying-hide

So the question is, did any State Dept. personnel review the items they were allowed to remove to ensure that now of it was government property? If they were allowed to remove documents without them being checked that a serious problem.

[Boomchild]

Thomas Paine
·
7h
The FBI Texts are Child's Play. We bring the house DOWN on this whole shit show in <72 hours.

Who or what is this? Is this part of anonymous?

[Boomchild]

I do hope Monker sticks around to discuss the upcoming carnage...

There is something rotten at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I mean all of this is just absurd. We have two FBI agents texting one another, one of which is having an extramarital affair with the other, cryptically talking about “insurance” against a Trump presidency. That text between these two agents was delivered on August 15, 2016. You also have Andrew Weissmann, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s top lieutenant, voicing praise for then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates for refusing to enact President Trump’s executive order on immigration, which got her fired. Then, there’s another DOJ official, Bruce Ohr, who was demoted for meeting the authors of the infamous and unverified Trump dossier, Fusion GPS; Ohr’s wife, Nellie, worked for that firm during the 2016 election. If there is nothing rotten at the FBI, then it’s credibility is definitely in question, something that The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board mentioned in their op-ed about this mess. The two FBI agents at the center of the firestorm right now, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are obviously no longer working with Mueller; Strzok was removed in August, while Page’s assignment with the investigation has already ended and she has been transferred elsewhere. Still, from this past summer to now—and we’re just learning about these 10,000 text messages between the two. The Journal makes it clear that there appears to be mounting evidence of election meddling emanating from the bureau:

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Mr. Strzok wrote Ms. Page in an Aug. 15, 2016 text. He added: “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

What “policy” would that be? The “Andy” in question is Andrew McCabe, the deputy FBI director. FBI officials are allowed to have political opinions, but what kind of action were they discussing that would amount to anti-Trump “insurance”?

In another exchange that month, Ms. Page forwarded a Trump-related article and wrote: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace.” He thanked her and assured: “Of course I’ll try and approach it that way.” Mr. Strzok, recall, is the man who changed the words “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in James Comey’s July 2016 public exoneration of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The McCabe meeting came on the heels of the FBI’s launch of its counterintelligence probe into Trump-Russia ties. July is also when former British spook Christopher Steele briefed the FBI on his Clinton-financed dossier of salacious allegations against Mr. Trump. The texts explain why Mr. Mueller would remove Mr. Strzok, though a straight shooter wouldn’t typically resist turning those messages over to Congress for as long as Mr. Mueller did.

Meanwhile, we’re learning more about the political motives of Mr. Mueller’s lieutenant, Andrew Weissmann. Judicial Watch last week released an email in which Mr. Weissmann expressed his “awe” and praise for Sally Yates, after the then acting AG and Obama holdover refused to implement Mr. Trump’s travel ban.

This should trouble anyone who cares about the integrity of the Justice Department.

[…]

Public confidence isn’t helped by the continuing Justice and FBI refusal to cooperate with Congress. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who supervises Mr. Mueller, toed the Mueller-FBI line on Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee. He repeated FBI Director Christopher Wray’s preposterous excuse that he can’t answer questions because of an Inspector General probe. And he wouldn’t elaborate on the news that Nellie Ohr, the wife of senior Justice official Bruce Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS, which hired Mr. Steele to gin up his dossier.

The man who should be most disturbed by all this is Mr. Mueller, who wants his evidence and conclusions to be credible with the public. Evidence is building instead that some officials at the FBI—who have worked for him—may have interfered in an American presidential election.

So, again, what’s the insurance policy? Is it the dossier that contains salacious and unverified information about Trump, something that Katie pointed out in her post? Or, as it seems, is it the FBI investigation into Russian interference in July. Did they hope to find actual evidence of collusion to nail Trump if he were to become president? Strzok was an agent with the counter-intelligence wing of the bureau. Whatever the case, it seems that meddling, or at least conversation of such activities, is coming from inside the house, or to be more accurate—inside the J. Edgar Hoover Building and not the Kremlin. Judicial Watch just filed a FOIA lawsuit to obtain all of Peter Strzok’s files relating to his reassignment from the Russia investigation conducted by Robert Mueller.

In my opinion there is no doubt the credibility of the FBI is now in question. Long before the most recent revelations you had reports of agents witnessing Comey writing his decision on the Clinton email investigation LONG BEFORE all the evidence was reviewed. That in it self should have set off alarm bells. Now I don't believe answers are going to come from the current director of the FBI nor the assistant AG. The real question is where the hell is Sessions? If a major hammer is about to drop on this subject don't be surprised if people go "missing" or suddenly decide to commit suicide. Tick-Tock Tick-Tock, time will tell. I don't know about others but I ain't holding my breath.

[Boomchild]

[Andrew]

Has anyone heard anything about Roy Moore's accusers in the past three days? Didn't think so.

See this pisses me off...what kind of knuckle dragging troglodyte would even consider raising such an issue? The guy was a 100% kiddy fiddler by his own fucking words.

He is EVERYTHING that is wrong with religion and the American south.

[Andrew]

Move on dude.... it's never been ok to post family pictures of other users here. Never.

Pic was in the PUBLIC DOMAIN. That's on Monker - Not me. Monker said he wanted to play games. Ok, so let's play games.

MOVE ON!

I don't want family pictures posted here unless it's the users family being posted themselves. NO other scenario is ok.

[The_Noble_Cause]

MOVE ON!

I don't want family pictures posted here unless it's the users family being posted themselves. NO other scenario is ok.

Love you Wombat. Just saying it was a public picture. There was no breach in privacy committed by me.

[Boomchild]

Lionel talks about the use of the word conspiracy theory. He makes some very thought provoking points. He talks about how the use and meaning of these words changed with the Warren Commission. I think he does a good job of making the case as to why people react they way they do to things that are labeled a "conspiracy theory".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6pYXmggYOo

[Boomchild]

Ya,Funny how it mattered before the election but not now. If Moore had won, he would have been ousted and replaced by another from his same party. If you've read my posts, you'd see I've said he was guilty as hell,but this was about gaining a democratic seat in the Senate.

K.C. as I said in a prior post I have not been following the Moore accusations closely. For the sake of discussion, lets say that the accusations are true. With all the corruption within our government please don't tell me you were banking on it would "play out" the way you have suggested.

[Boomchild]