They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Boomchild]

Not a mistake, on purpose. Immigration is a very big part of what got Donald elected. More than you know are cheering him on, on this issue and the issue at the border with the caravan.

I disagree. Of course we all know that immigration issues were a central point of his campaign. Of course those that are totally aligned with this position are going to cheer him on. That's not the point. It the ones being tried to reach that are on the fence that you have to consider. Which in my opinion it's not a good idea to throw another log on the fire. The public was well aware of T r u m p' s positions on the immigration issues before this announcement. So this announcement wasn't "critical to the cause" at this point.

[Boomchild]

Forced by the caravan, otherwise wouldn’t have come up now. He can’t lose with this IMHO.

The birthright argument was not forced by this migrant caravan. They are not on U.S. soil having babies. Even if T r u m p was to sign an EO against it, we know immediately a suit in federal court would be filed. We also know from past experience that a injunction keeping the order going into effect would happen. Until the case can be fully heard in court. This issue was going nowhere fast and it was unnecessary to bring it up now before the mid-terms. You just give the opposition more talking points. My comments have nothing to do with whether T r u m p is in the right or the wrong.

Speaking of the migrant caravan, since Mexico is just letting them pass through, has T r u m p cut the aid funding that he threatened to do??

[steveo777]

Forced by the caravan, otherwise wouldn’t have come up now. He can’t lose with this IMHO.

The birthright argument was not forced by this migrant caravan. They are not on U.S. soil having babies. Even if T r u m p was to sign an EO against it, we know immediately a suit in federal court would be filed. We also know from past experience that a injunction keeping the order going into effect would happen. Until the case can be fully heard in court. This issue was going nowhere fast and it was unnecessary to bring it up now before the mid-terms. You just give the opposition more talking points. My comments have nothing to do with whether T r u m p is in the right or the wrong.

Speaking of the migrant caravan, since Mexico is just letting them pass through, has T r u m p cut the aid funding that he threatened to do??

They will be...they will breed like rabbits, once they are here. It's what they do and very ingrained in women that that is how they increase their government benefits. Not much difference between them and the ones who cross while they are already pregnant. Once kids are involved, the benefits doors open, the more the merrier for them. I personally know some people who do just that and feel entitled to do so. One works part time at McDonalds, has 4 kids and gets section 8 housing, medical, food stamps and a nice Earned Income Tax credit every year, which is far more than she paid in. I love immigrants, but I despise illegals when they come in and expect the tax payers to pull their load.

[slucero]

...T r u m p should simply use Mexico's immigration law (FAR harsher than the US law) for illegal immigrants to the USA, and France's birthright laws for anchor babies...

[Boomchild]

They will be...they will breed like rabbits, once they are here. It's what they do and very ingrained in women that that is how they increase their government benefits. Not much difference between them and the ones who cross while they are already pregnant. Once kids are involved, the benefits doors open, the more the merrier for them. I personally know some people who do just that and feel entitled to do so. One works part time at McDonalds, has 4 kids and gets section 8 housing, medical, food stamps and a nice Earned Income Tax credit every year, which is far more than she paid in. I love immigrants, but I despise illegals when they come in and expect the tax payers to pull their load.

Whether they do or don't doesn't matter. This is also predicated that they are going to be let in. Regardless, everyone knows damn well that if T r u m p signs an EO regarding birthright, it would be immediately challenged and would have a injunction not allowing it to go into effect until the court rules on it. Which means at least a several month delay or longer. Look how long it took to sort out the travel ban E.O.. Again I am not debating the birthright argument itself. There would be no ill effects on T r u m p waiting till after the mid-terms to bring it up. As I said before doing so before the elections only gives the opposition more to talk about.

As has been mentioned here, the timing of this migrant caravan is not by mistake. It was done to create more tension\confusion among voters as well as to try and get T r u m p to stir the pot even more. If the concern is the migrant caravan, the focus should be on closing and securing the border. Also letting Mexico know we are not letting any of them in. That they will have to apply for asylum before attempting to enter the country. That will force Mexico to either keep them around or deport them back.

[ohsherrie]

For what it’s worth... I do not understand how living in a country with its democracy established over 200 years ago, and now, for the first time in history, suddenly we have one of our former presidents set up a group called "Organizing for Action" (OFA).
OFA is 30,000+ strong and working to disrupt everything that our current president’s administration is trying to do. This organization goes against our Democracy, and it is an operation that will destroy our way of governing. It goes against our Constitution, our laws, and the processes established over 200 years ago. If it is allowed to proceed then we will be living in chaos very much like third world countries are run. What good is it to have an established government if it is not going to be respected and allowed to follow our laws?

If you had an army some 30,000 strong and a court system stacked over the decades with judges who would allow you to break the laws, how much damage could you do to a country? We are about to find out in America!

Our ex-president said he was going to stay involved through community organizing and speak out on the issues and that appears to be one post-administration promise he intends to keep. He has moved many of his administration's top dogs over to Organizing for Action.

OFA is behind the strategic and tactical implementation of the resistance to the Trump Administration that we are seeing across America, and politically active courts are providing the leverage for this revolution.

OFA is dedicated to organizing communities for "progressive" change. Its issues are gun control, socialist healthcare, abortion, sexual equality, climate change, and of course, immigration reform.

OFA members were propped up by the ex-president's message from the shadows: "Organizing is the building block of everything great we have accomplished Organizers around the country are fighting for change in their communities and OFA is one of the groups on the front lines. Commit to this work in 2017 and beyond."

OFA's website says it obtained its "digital" assets from the ex-president's re-election effort and that he inspired the movement. In short, it is the shadow government organization aimed at resisting and tearing down the Constitutional Republic we know as AMERICA.

Paul Sperry, writing for the New York Post, says, “The OFA will fight President Donald Trump at every turn of his presidency and the ex-president will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House."

Sperry writes that, “The ex-president is setting up a shadow government to sabotage the Trump administration through a network of non-profits led by OFA, which is growing its war chest (more than $40 million) and has some 250 offices nationwide. The OFA IRS filings, according to Sperry, indicate that the OFA has 32,525 (and growing) volunteers nationwide. The ex-president and his wife will oversee the operation from their home/ office in Washington DC.

Think about how this works.. For example: Trump issues an immigration executive order; the OFA signals for protests and statements from pro-immigrant groups; the ACLU lawyers file lawsuits in jurisdictions where activist judges obstruct the laws; volunteers are called to protest at airports and Congressional town hall meetings; the leftist media springs to action in support of these activities; the twitter sphere lights up with social media; and violence follows. All of this happens from the ex-president's signal that he is heartened by the protests.

If Barack Obama did not do enough to destroy this country in the 8 years he was in office, it appears his future plans are to destroy the foundation on which this country has operated on for the last 241 years.

If this does not scare you, then we are in worse trouble than you know.

So, do your part. You have read it, so at least pass this on so others will know what we are up against. We are losing our country and we are so compliant. We are becoming a "PERFECT TARGET" for our enemy!

[Boomchild]

For what it’s worth... I do not understand how living in a country with its democracy established over 200 years ago, and now, for the first time in history, suddenly we have one of our former presidents set up a group called "Organizing for Action" (OFA).

Because there is a movement to destroy what was established two hundred years ago. This wasn't something that suddenly happened. It's been a careful plan, executed over decades so as to conceal it's goal from public. Which is a globalist government. The globalists don't want countries to have their own sovereignty. Hence the push for open boarders and pushing the narrative that uncontrolled immigration is not a bad thing. For decades, they have been successful in their plan. So much so they no longer have to hide their actions from the public. We all need to remember that a Republic was established two hundred years ago, not a democracy. When the founding fathers set up citizen's rights and freedoms in the Constitution they knew these rights and freedoms could leave it open for attack. Hence the reason for the second amendment.

[Boomchild]

Meanwhile over the pond.......

[Boomchild]

[Boomchild]

Undeniable Hate: Reporter Lists 573 Attacks by Leftists Against Conservatives Since 2016

While the liberal media continues to claim the threat of political violence in the country comes mainly from the right, a reporter has compiled a list of more than 500 physical, verbal or threatened attacks by leftists against conservatives.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/unden ... 2018-10-31

[Monker]

Undeniable Hate: Reporter Lists 573 Attacks by Leftists Against Conservatives Since 2016

While the liberal media continues to claim the threat of political violence in the country comes mainly from the right, a reporter has compiled a list of more than 500 physical, verbal or threatened attacks by leftists against conservatives.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/unden ... 2018-10-31

"Trump’s Hollywood Walk of Fame star destroyed"

Really? You all are going to take a count and then include bullshit like this and whine about being yelled at at restaurants and elevators? The Republican party is a bunch of whiny little bitches.

The stupid "angry mob" being out to get conservatives backfired with crazy RWNJ's mailing pipe bombs. Period. Move on to something else already.

[verslibre]

"15,000" troops, huh? I don't think we have that many soldiers in Af-freakin'-ghanistan.

Your daily reminder that:

The caravan has *already* shrunk by 50%.

Experts expect it to be 10% of original size by the time it reaches the US

It is over 1,000 miles away

It is *refugees* mostly women and children.

Seeking asylum is LEGAL.

Krump is a racist ass.

https://twitter.com/Mikel_Jollett/status/1057762746727428096

P.S. They're not arriving in tanks.

[Monker]

For what it’s worth... I do not understand how living in a country with its democracy established over 200 years ago, and now, for the first time in history, suddenly we have one of our former presidents set up a group called "Organizing for Action" (OFA).

Because there is a movement to destroy what was established two hundred years ago. This wasn't something that suddenly happened. It's been a careful plan, executed over decades so as to conceal it's goal from public. Which is a globalist government. The globalists don't want countries to have their own sovereignty. Hence the push for open boarders and pushing the narrative that uncontrolled immigration is not a bad thing. For decades, they have been successful in their plan. So much so they no longer have to hide their actions from the public. We all need to remember that a Republic was established two hundred years ago, not a democracy. When the founding fathers set up citizen's rights and freedoms in the Constitution they knew these rights and freedoms could leave it open for attack. Hence the reason for the second amendment.

Oh, please, your head is so full of conspiracy crap that nothing you say seems to be based on reality.

The problem here is not about 'globalism'. It is about isolationism and how people like you want to build 30ft walls, end long standing alliances that has kept most of Europe war free since ww2, remove the US from leading the world in various ways because it involves working with other nations. You hate the UN. You invent all kinds of shit to justify your belief that the US should isolate itself and hide behind its walls. It's STUPID.

You can't get away from the fact that we live in a world that is connected in a multitude of ways. Economically, socially, political, culturally, environmentally. Belief in these facts does not mean a person is against the United States and its history. Belief in these facts does not mean a belief that this country can not control its own destiny.

Honestly, you believe in isolationism. That belief would would make the US into a third world country, not relating to other nations in a meaningful and significant way. Your belief in isolationism means the US should no longer be a leader in the world. Your belief in isolationism is a belief that our model should not be based on the belief that the US should be a shining example of Democracy and the will of the people, which all people of the world should look to as an example. Instead, your belief in isolationism means we should hide in the shadows while other countries surpass us with their ability to lead by example while we are left on the sidelines. Your belief in isolating the US from the rest of the world sucks.

[Boomchild]

Really? You all are going to take a count and then include bullshit like this and whine about being yelled at at restaurants and elevators? The Republican party is a bunch of whiny little bitches.

The stupid "angry mob" being out to get conservatives backfired with crazy RWNJ's mailing pipe bombs. Period. Move on to something else already.

Give me a break, if someone was to deface Obama's presidential portrait or something erected in his honor people would also be crying fowl. There is a time and place to express your opposition, which isn't disturbing legislators as they go about their private daily lives. Again I will point out that long before the bomb mailing incident you had a person not happy with Republicans attempt to assassinate them on a baseball field. In which one was struck by a bullet but lucky wasn't fatal.

[Boomchild]

Oh, please, your head is so full of conspiracy crap that nothing you say seems to be based on reality.

The problem here is not about 'globalism'. It is about isolationism and how people like you want to build 30ft walls, end long standing alliances that has kept most of Europe war free since ww2, remove the US from leading the world in various ways because it involves working with other nations. You hate the UN. You invent all kinds of shit to justify your belief that the US should isolate itself and hide behind its walls. It's STUPID.

You can't get away from the fact that we live in a world that is connected in a multitude of ways. Economically, socially, political, culturally, environmentally. Belief in these facts does not mean a person is against the United States and its history. Belief in these facts does not mean a belief that this country can not control its own destiny.

Honestly, you believe in isolationism. That belief would would make the US into a third world country, not relating to other nations in a meaningful and significant way. Your belief in isolationism means the US should no longer be a leader in the world. Your belief in isolationism is a belief that our model should not be based on the belief that the US should be a shining example of Democracy and the will of the people, which all people of the world should look to as an example. Instead, your belief in isolationism means we should hide in the shadows while other countries surpass us with their ability to lead by example while we are left on the sidelines. Your belief in isolating the US from the rest of the world sucks.

Wrong. I believe that as a sovereign nation, we have a right to secure our borders by any means necessary. That as a sovereign nation we have a right to control immigration to this country. I believe that we should not allow any outside organization to dictate what our laws or positions should be. I believe that our country has enough of it's own problems that we should be focused on solving them before any issues outside of our country. I believe we have a right to withdraw from or sign onto trade deals with other countries or nations.

[Boomchild]

CNN President Jeff Zucker made an embarrassing admission during an interview with Vanity Fair published Thursday, saying that his network depends on covering President Donald Drumpf in order to maintain the attention of its audience. When Zucker broached the question of why CNN spends such an inordinate time covering the president versus other subjects, Zucker said that he is practically dependent on him in order to keep their ratings. “We’ve seen that, anytime you break away from the Drumpf story and cover other events in this era, the audience goes away. So we know that, right now, Donald Drumpf dominates,” Zucker said.

There also was the undercover video by Project Veritas in which a CNN producer explained that in a company meeting CNN's CEO praised them for their coverage of the hurricane but ordered them to get back to focusing all their efforts on T r u m p.

[Boomchild]

And now some video of these peaceful migrants looking to ask for asylum in the U.S..

https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson. ... 1171/?t=26

[Monker]

Really? You all are going to take a count and then include bullshit like this and whine about being yelled at at restaurants and elevators? The Republican party is a bunch of whiny little bitches.

The stupid "angry mob" being out to get conservatives backfired with crazy RWNJ's mailing pipe bombs. Period. Move on to something else already.

Give me a break, if someone was to deface Obama's presidential portrait or something erected in his honor people would also be crying fowl.

Yes, they would be crying. I've been saying for decades that Democrats are pussies. Now, Republicans, Trump Republicans specifically are whiny little bitches. You have lowered yourself to their level.

Wah, wah, wah...his star was attacked viciously....so lets add that to a list and compare it to pipe bombs. Wah, wah, wah :,(

There is a time and place to express your opposition, which isn't disturbing legislators as they go about their private daily lives.

Wah, wah, wah...Democrats were disturbed by Tea Party'ers while they went about their daily lives. Wah, wah, wah, Republicans are disturbed while they went about their daily lives. Perhaps the whiny bitches should quit their jobs of serving the public if they can't handle the public's response.

"You guys are a bunch of cry babies.

Again I will point out that long before the bomb mailing incident you had a person not happy with Republicans attempt to assassinate them on a baseball field. In which one was struck by a bullet but lucky wasn't fatal.

Yeah, repeating the Republican talking point in order to avoid the reality that you people were the ones who hours prior to the first pipe bomb were talking about the angry mob of Democrats. You were wrong again. (In referring to sex with Trump, "I was the first one to receive a package. The only difference is, mine went off." Stormy Dainiels - even she is less of a whiny bitch then you guys.

Maybe you should stop listening to the President and repeating his crap. Even FF got caught up in the President's lies, and repeated the lie that we are the only country on Earth that allows birthright citizenship. Every time Trump opens his mouth it is a lie. Even YOU got caught up in it with his lie about releasing the FISA info.

[Boomchild]

Yeah, repeating the Republican talking point in order to avoid the reality that you people were the ones who hours prior to the first pipe bomb were talking about the angry mob of Democrats. You were wrong again. (In referring to sex with Drumpf, "I was the first one to receive a package. The only difference is, mine went off." Stormy Dainiels - even she is less of a whiny bitch then you guys.

Maybe you should stop listening to the President and repeating his crap. Even FF got caught up in the President's lies, and repeated the lie that we are the only country on Earth that allows birthright citizenship. Every time Drumpf opens his mouth it is a lie. Even YOU got caught up in it with his lie about releasing the FISA info.

Wrong again, my position has been that you will find radicals in ANY political group. You will find people in ANY political group that will doing things that don't represent the group as whole. You harp on the latest event while completely ignoring that just like there was this one person in one group, there was another from another group that attempted to assassinate Republican senators.

As far getting caught up in things, what was your "Hillery had permission to use a private server" about? That was you getting caught up in a lie. When called on it, you couldn't even produce where you got it from. Or how about you repeating the lie that "All 17 agencies concur that Russia hacked the DNC servers"? Get off your soap box.

[Boomchild]

“Pro-Life Democrat” Joe Manchin Caught Posing for Picture With Planned Parenthood Abortion Activists

West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin insists he’s a pro-life Democrat. But when is a pro-life Democrat not really a pro-life Democrat? When it’s Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia — who was caught posing for a picture with a group of Planned Parenthood abortion activists.

Mountaineer Journal has obtained a photo of Sen. Joe Manchin, posing with a group of Planned Parenthood activists.

The photo was taken on July 10, 2015, when Planned Parenthood’s West Virginia field organizer and pro-choice students from West Virginia University delivered approximately 680 petitions to Sen. Manchin’s office.

https://www.lifenews.com/2018/11/01/pro ... VTeNIeBBv0

[Monker]

Yeah, repeating the Republican talking point in order to avoid the reality that you people were the ones who hours prior to the first pipe bomb were talking about the angry mob of Democrats. You were wrong again. (In referring to sex with Drumpf, "I was the first one to receive a package. The only difference is, mine went off." Stormy Dainiels - even she is less of a whiny bitch then you guys.

Maybe you should stop listening to the President and repeating his crap. Even FF got caught up in the President's lies, and repeated the lie that we are the only country on Earth that allows birthright citizenship. Every time Drumpf opens his mouth it is a lie. Even YOU got caught up in it with his lie about releasing the FISA info.

Wrong again, my position has been that you will find radicals in ANY political group. You will find people in ANY political group that will doing things that don't represent the group as whole.

Which are are completely silent until it is RWNJ's mailing bombs and pulling triggers. You are completely silent when it is the alt-right voices on this forum were making ridiculous statements about Civil War and violent liberal "mobs". You only critique one side. So, you are either a coward, or just another person from the alt-right who doesn't like being called out.

You harp on the latest event while completely ignoring that just like there was this one person in one group, there was another from another group that attempted to assassinate Republican senators.

As I said, in the context of the mail bombs, it proved the hypocritical bullshit of the alt-right and Trump. And, you are only using this as a way to avoid reality.

As far getting caught up in things, what was your "Hillery had permission to use a private server" about? That was you getting caught up in a lie. When called on it, you couldn't even produce where you got it from. Or how about you repeating the lie that "All 17 agencies concur that Russia hacked the DNC servers"? Get off your soap box.

If that is all you got in response to this, then I feel pretty confident standing on your imaginary soap box....because you know what is coming out of Trump's mouth is complete bullshit and you have no argument to support it...even though his lies are repeated constantly on this forum.

[Boomchild]

Which are are completely silent until it is RWNJ's mailing bombs and pulling triggers. You are completely silent when it is the alt-right voices on this forum were making ridiculous statements about Civil War and violent liberal "mobs". You only critique one side. So, you are either a coward, or just another person from the alt-right who doesn't like being called out.

Wrong again, I have commented that it seems that civil war could be possible due to the increasing polarization an unrest that is occurring in this country. Furthermore, I am not obligated to respond or counter everything discussed here.

As I said, in the context of the mail bombs, it proved the hypocritical bullshit of the alt-right and Drumpf. And, you are only using this as a way to avoid reality.

Where were you when the assassination attempt on the Republican senators occurred? I didn't see you on here condemning that action. Find a post where I made the claim that violence does not come from those on the right.

If that is all you got in response to this, then I feel pretty confident standing on your imaginary soap box....because you know what is coming out of Drumpf's mouth is complete bullshit and you have no argument to support it...even though his lies are repeated constantly on this forum.

What I and others have is evidence of you posting a lie. A lie that YOU couldn't provide evidence of where you got it from. You didn't and still don't have any argument to support the claim you made. The source of the lie mostly likely is yourself. You should be the last person criticizing others on the subject.

[Monker]

Which are are completely silent until it is RWNJ's mailing bombs and pulling triggers. You are completely silent when it is the alt-right voices on this forum were making ridiculous statements about Civil War and violent liberal "mobs". You only critique one side. So, you are either a coward, or just another person from the alt-right who doesn't like being called out.

Wrong again, I have commented that it seems that civil war could be possible due to the increasing polarization an unrest that is occurring in this country. Furthermore, I am not obligated to respond or counter everything discussed here.

No, you're not "obligated". But, your hypocrisy is plain as day as I pointed out. Don't pretend to be a "voice of reason" when only one side speaks up.

As I said, in the context of the mail bombs, it proved the hypocritical bullshit of the alt-right and Drumpf. And, you are only using this as a way to avoid reality.

Where were you when the assassination attempt on the Republican senators occurred? I didn't see you on here condemning that action.

You are taking things out of their context and missing my point....even though I have repeated it several times.

When the shooting you mention occurred, liberal Democrats in this forum were not arguing that a Civil War was going to happen and RWNJ's would fire the first shot. You did not have a Democrat President going on about an imaginary conservative "mob". If they were I would say the same thing about that stupidity.

Republicans went on for years about Hillary's comment about a "vast right wing conspiracy". What the fuck do you think Trump is going on about and you guys are falling right in line with his constant lies and exaggerations. It is just as ridiculous and pathetic. But, I'm telling this to someone who seems to believe every political conspiracy theory so you may not even see the reality of the comparison.

What I and others have is evidence of you posting a lie.

Oh, please. What you have is an exaggerated story from 18months ago. I really don't care about that much at all.

What I am talking about is a President who lies on a daily basis and a forum of his zombies who pick up on it and repeat it, or make up shit to go alone with it, or pass along other people's made up bullshit.

[Boomchild]

No, you're not "obligated". But, your hypocrisy is plain as day as I pointed out. Don't pretend to be a "voice of reason" when only one side speaks up.

It is you that is applying this "voice of reason" to my posts. That was never my intention. My intent was simply to point out that you find radical individuals in every political party. That is all.

You are taking things out of their context and missing my point....even though I have repeated it several times.

No, I asked you a question, which you are now avoiding. Pretty sad that there has to be a certain type of conversation happening for you to denounce such an act of violence.

Oh, please. What you have is an exaggerated story from 18months ago. I really don't care about that much at all.

Exaggerated? I think not. Did you or did you not make the statement "Hillary had permission to use the private server"? When it became abundantly clear that this was untrue, could you or could you not provide the source of where you got it from? So here you are commenting on things where a source can be presented but when you did it you couldn't produce the source. That's because the source was you and no one else. The time frame of when your lie occurred doesn't matter. It happened. So like I said before you are the last person to be criticizing others.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Bannon vs Frum debate. This should be good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... oq5ZrAc7pk

[The_Noble_Cause]

For all the talk about RWNJs committing violence, anyone following the story about James Polite? Formerly profiled in the NYTimes as a homeless youth turned Democratic staffer, he was just arrested for anti-semtic vandalism - including setting fires at a Yeshiva. Craziness happens on both sides.

[slucero]

2nd Kavanaugh Accuser Admits She Lied; Referred For Criminal Prosecution; Kamala's Office Involved....

The woman, Judy Munro-Leighton, took credit for contacting the office of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as "Jane Doe" from Oceanside, California. Jane Doe claimed - without naming a time or place - that Kavanaugh and a friend raped her "several times each" in the backseat of a car. Harris referred the letter to the committee for investigation.

"They forced me to go into the backseat and took 2 turns raping me several times each. They dropped me off 3 two blocks from my home," wrote Munro-Leighton, claiming that the pair told her "No one will believe if you tell. Be a good girl."

Kavanaugh was questioned on September 26 about the allegation, to which he unequivocally stated: "[T]he whole thing is ridiculous. Nothing ever -- anything like that, nothing... [T]he whole thing is just a crock, farce, wrong, didn't happen, not anything close."

The next week, Munro-Leighton sent an email to the Judiciary committee claiming to be Jane Doe from Oceanside, California - reiterating her claims of a "vicious assault" which she said she knew "will get no media attention."

Upon investigation, the Judiciary Committee investigators found that Munro-Leighton was a left wing activist who is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh, who lives in Kentucky. When Committee investigators contacted her, she backpedaled on her claim of being the original Jane Doe - and said she emailed the committee "as a way to grab attention."

"I am not Jane Doe . . . but I did read Jane Doe’s letter. I read the transcript of the call to your Committee. . . . I saw it online. It was news.” claimed Munro-Leighton.

Dems keep giving people reasons to not vote for them....

[verslibre]

[Boomchild]

Hey look, it's Michael Moore holding that "body slam the press" sign. He must have been in the closet all the time!

[verslibre]

Hey look, it's Michael Moore holding that "body slam the press" sign. He must have been in the closet all the time!

Get with it, dude. When have you ever seen Moore without his cap?