President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby S2M » Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:32 pm

Melissa wrote:
donnaplease wrote:
Melissa wrote:Oh and add to that, here at work yesterday one of the area's Medicaid reps came in to tell us the changes they are making to supposedly "crack down" on Medicaid abuse (yeah right, I'll believe it when I see it :roll: ) since this year alone there has been an 80% increase in people signing up for Medicaid here. Of which she said, as I've always seen for the last 16 years, a GOOD amount of whom do not TRULY NEED it. They just "need" their brand new cars, iphones, and designer purses more, and the government "owes" them Medicaid because of that. :roll:


Mel, this is something that really gets me. Liberals call conservative selfish, only caring about themselves, the "rich" not wanting to help the poor, etc. Speaking solely for myself, I would do almost anything I could to help those truly in need, but they aren't really the ones benefitting by the government because there are so many people abusing the system. It's the same with the unemployment benefits - I know there are people who are really trying to get back to work - but there are also those that are gonna suck every last dime outta the system before they have to find a job.

I'm not surprised by the Medicaid rep's comment, and I'm sure you're not either. It makes me sick. :evil:


Nope I wasn't surprised at all, none of us were, and that's sad!


Can it, PUBBIE!!!! :lol:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Melissa » Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:36 pm

S2M wrote:Can it, PUBBIE!!!! :lol:


Shut up, LIBBIE :twisted:
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby RedWingFan » Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:51 pm

Melissa wrote:
S2M wrote:Can it, PUBBIE!!!! :lol:


Shut up, LIBBIE :twisted:

It's Libtard. Get it right!!! :D
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby Melissa » Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:16 am

RedWingFan wrote:
Melissa wrote:
S2M wrote:Can it, PUBBIE!!!! :lol:


Shut up, LIBBIE :twisted:

It's Libtard. Get it right!!! :D


Oh! Sorry! :lol:
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:43 am

RedWingFan wrote:By the way remember how the "sensationalist" media used to always count up the total casualties on the air? What happened to that? :roll:


Easy. The wars became old news. Casualties no longer made headlines even while Bush finished his final year(s). If the media is so rabidily liberal, they are doing a pretty piss poor job of propping up their chosen boy.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16111
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Monker » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:39 am

Again, this is a farce. Compare the market where it was on the first day of the Obama administration to where it is today. It is UP a huge percentage. There may be small dips for some stupid words that somebody says or something stupid that somebody does - but those type of things do NOT affect the long term. Anybody who makes the claim you just did below is doing nothing but partaking in partisan politics.

....and those five or six people you are talking about missed out on making a LOT of money. Idiots.

Fact Finder wrote:I love it... the guys with the money are firing back for a change...I told you guys before the Obama election that the big boys with money were taking their money and going home..ie..cashing in..hence the market going down....no confidence in what THE Won was bringing to the table..
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Monker » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:44 pm

Fact Finder wrote:
Monker wrote:Again, this is a farce. Compare the market where it was on the first day of the Obama administration to where it is today. It is UP a huge percentage. There may be small dips for some stupid words that somebody says or something stupid that somebody does - but those type of things do NOT affect the long term. Anybody who makes the claim you just did below is doing nothing but partaking in partisan politics.

....and those five or six people you are talking about missed out on making a LOT of money. Idiots.

Fact Finder wrote:I love it... the guys with the money are firing back for a change...I told you guys before the Obama election that the big boys with money were taking their money and going home..ie..cashing in..hence the market going down....no confidence in what THE Won was bringing to the table..



No! It's not up huge. Huge might be back to 12700 or where some people began, just to level the playing field. How many invested in the run up to 14,000 and are still at 11,000?


Are you kidding me? It was NOT at 12700 when Obama took office. Are you so stupid that you think the market crashed under Obama and not W? YOUR stated theory above is that people with money would "take their money and go home" because Obama was elected. You were, and are, WRONG. The people with money, and brains, don't give a shit who is in office. They care if the 'real' people are consuming and buying, and that business is actually doing business and making money. THAT IS HAPPENING much more now then when dumb-ass W left office. Get over it - that is a fact. All the rest of this is trivial bullshit that Republicans are politicizing for their own purposes. The bottom line is : the recession is over - and has been over for a VERY long time. Obama hasn't done much to help the economy....but it is cycling back up on its own...despite how much you and the rest of conservatives/Republicans don't want it to.

If you invested aggressively while the market was over heated in the Bush years, then you are stupid. If you did not invest aggressively after the crash, then you are stupid. People like you who think you should buy high and sell low just cuz of who is in the white house are completely ignorant of the real world.

And, when Obama took office, the dow was around 8000. Saying a %30 move from 8000 to 11000 is NOT HUGE is completely ignorant. Yeah, I'm sure your < %1 interest in your savings account did so much better. You may as well have had it in your mattress...and maybe you do since a Democrat was elected. Idiot.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby donnaplease » Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:28 am

I'm curious what you guys think about the GroundZeroMosque financier who has defaulted on some of his recent loans, calling it 'smart business' not to pay his creditors. Don't remember his exact comments, but it reminded me of the movie "Goodfellas" when Ray Liotta's character explained how the mob did their business - in one door and out the next but never paying creditors for goods received.

Any thoughts?
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby Rick » Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:42 am

Fact Finder wrote:Monker, I hate to break it to you, but the market going from 14,000 to 8,000 means that there was a whole lot of selling going on out there. Some buying has returned depending upon the news of the day, and a lot of buying has been at targeted stocks not the broader range.

On September 11th 2008 some $500 Billion was withdrawn from the money markets in a few hours period causing the FED to close the window. Now, don't tell me that some big boys were not taking their gains and cashing in, they absoutley did and I know of a couple. Then when the Gov made bank deposits guaranteed up to $250,000 instead of the previous $100,000 guarantee a lot of folks took the cap gains tax hit at the KNOWN Bush rate and a ton of 5 year $200,000 CDs were bought and laddered. Now, I firmly believe that most of this happend because of Joe the Plumber getting The Won to admit..."We just want to spread the wealth around a little." Laugh if you want, I don't care. Money that was in "PLAY" suddenly wasn't. In fact, some got locked up in 3/4/5 year CDs and can't be put into play right yet.

Business are said to be sitting on some 3 Trillion dollars in cash right now and not using it hire or expand because they don't know what the tax future holds. That is certainly big boy money my friend.

Now, word is coming out that Obama has caved and done a tax deal with the Pubbies this afternoon, at first glance it seems like that good shellacking he got on Nov 2nd has left it's mark. We'll see. :wink:


Everyone's been wondering what happened to Madsplash. :lol:
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Saint John » Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:44 am

The DOW was at 8,000 when Obama took office, FF.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Monker » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:21 am

Saint John wrote:The DOW was at 8,000 when Obama took office, FF.


Yeah, and all of those people who cashed in cuz Obama was elected caused the market to go up %30. What a partisan idiot.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Rick » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:45 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Monker, I hate to break it to you, but the market going from 14,000 to 8,000 means that there was a whole lot of selling going on out there. Some buying has returned depending upon the news of the day, and a lot of buying has been at targeted stocks not the broader range.

On September 11th 2008 some $500 Billion was withdrawn from the money markets in a few hours period causing the FED to close the window. Now, don't tell me that some big boys were not taking their gains and cashing in, they absoutley did and I know of a couple. Then when the Gov made bank deposits guaranteed up to $250,000 instead of the previous $100,000 guarantee a lot of folks took the cap gains tax hit at the KNOWN Bush rate and a ton of 5 year $200,000 CDs were bought and laddered. Now, I firmly believe that most of this happend because of Joe the Plumber getting The Won to admit..."We just want to spread the wealth around a little." Laugh if you want, I don't care. Money that was in "PLAY" suddenly wasn't. In fact, some got locked up in 3/4/5 year CDs and can't be put into play right yet.

Business are said to be sitting on some 3 Trillion dollars in cash right now and not using it hire or expand because they don't know what the tax future holds. That is certainly big boy money my friend.

Now, word is coming out that Obama has caved and done a tax deal with the Pubbies this afternoon, at first glance it seems like that good shellacking he got on Nov 2nd has left it's mark. We'll see. :wink:


Everyone's been wondering what happened to Madsplash. :lol:



Not sure what that means but..oh well

2:10 seconds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_atOvrT ... re=related

or listen to it all for some insight. :wink:


He (Madsplash) posted on here for a while that SP was coming out with a new album, and his response to everyone's disbelief was "We'll see". It became his mantra.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Monker » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:50 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Monker wrote:
Saint John wrote:The DOW was at 8,000 when Obama took office, FF.


Yeah, and all of those people who cashed in cuz Obama was elected caused the market to go up %30. What a partisan idiot.


The market will not be "UP" until the DOW hits 14,094. Until then we're just coming back, recovering, having a recession, blah blah blah. Call me then.


Idiot.

Dow when W was elected : 10,794.

On 11-20-2008, Dow was at 7,552.29, still under Bush.

When Obama was elected, down was just below 8000.

Dois is at 11,359.16 today.

The market peaked and CRASHED under W.
The market his is's lowest low under W,.
The market started to rise AFTER the election and BEFORE Obama was elected.
The market has continued to improve the ENTIRE time Obama has been in office.

This belief of a sell-off because of Obama being elected is a FARCE a LIE. It didn't happen. The FACT is the exact opposite is what has happened.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby donnaplease » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:08 pm

No comments on BO's press conference from yesterday??? :?

OK, I'll start. I think he did very well. He told us that he was putting country before politics, and I appreciate that. I know it was hard for him to stand up so strongly against the dems/libs, but he basically told them that as president, he has to be able to compromise in order to get things done. No more of this "ram it through" crap. Hopefully it is a sign of good things to come for our country.
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:47 am

donnaplease wrote:OK, I'll start. I think he did very well. He told us that he was putting country before politics, and I appreciate that.


Continuing Bush tax cuts that are not offset with any spending cuts is PURE politics, and will likely hurt the country's financial standing worse than any new entitlement. You can't talk about the deficit while simultaneously starving the treasury. Obama and the GOP are frauds.

donnaplease wrote:No more of this "ram it through" crap.


The very tax cuts Obama has now caved on, were initially "rammed through" via reconcilliation in 2000. Where was the outrage? Nothing in this administraion has been rammed through. The opposition party refuses to go along with Obama on even their own ideas.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16111
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Memorex » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:27 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
donnaplease wrote:OK, I'll start. I think he did very well. He told us that he was putting country before politics, and I appreciate that.


Continuing Bush tax cuts that are not offset with any spending cuts is PURE politics, and will likely hurt the country's financial standing worse than any new entitlement. You can't talk about the deficit while simultaneously starving the treasury. Obama and the GOP are frauds.

donnaplease wrote:No more of this "ram it through" crap.


The very tax cuts Obama has now caved on, were initially "rammed through" via reconcilliation in 2000. Where was the outrage? Nothing in this administraion has been rammed through. The opposition party refuses to go along with Obama on even their own ideas.


It's funny how one side sees the other as obstructionists when they stand firm, but the see their guy as principled when he stands firm. Is the party of no just more principled? Is the ramming through of something just being principled? did the republicans hold unemployment benefits hostage for an extension of tax rates, or did Obama hold the tax rates hostage for better unemployment benefits? Funny, huh?
User avatar
Memorex
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3571
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:40 am

Memorex wrote:It's funny how one side sees the other as obstructionists when they stand firm, but the see their guy as principled when he stands firm. Is the party of no just more principled? Is the ramming through of something just being principled? did the republicans hold unemployment benefits hostage for an extension of tax rates, or did Obama hold the tax rates hostage for better unemployment benefits? Funny, huh?


This president has stood firm on nothing.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16111
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby donnaplease » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:40 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
donnaplease wrote:OK, I'll start. I think he did very well. He told us that he was putting country before politics, and I appreciate that.


Continuing Bush tax cuts that are not offset with any spending cuts is PURE politics, and will likely hurt the country's financial standing worse than any new entitlement. You can't talk about the deficit while simultaneously starving the treasury. Obama and the GOP are frauds.

donnaplease wrote:No more of this "ram it through" crap.


The very tax cuts Obama has now caved on, were initially "rammed through" via reconcilliation in 2000. Where was the outrage? Nothing in this administraion has been rammed through. The opposition party refuses to go along with Obama on even their own ideas.


The fact that BO backed off his political stance to get the job done - with concessions from both sides is what I'm referring to. It may have been PURE politics, but he looked at the needs of the American people. If he had to cave on the taxes to get the unemployment benefits, then it's a win (or loss, depending on how you look at it) for both sides. But I understand what you're saying. Kinda burning the candle at both ends.

I can't speak to what happened in 2000 - didn't follow things back then. How can you say they refused to go along with BO - extending the tax cuts was their idea. :? Maybe I missed something. TNC, are you angry with BO for the way he talked to/about his democratic party cronies? I can understand where dems/libs would be livid.
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:47 am

donnaplease wrote:The fact that BO backed off his political stance to get the job done - with concessions from both sides is what I'm referring to. It may have been PURE politics, but he looked at the needs of the American people.

Tax cuts are not needed right now. People need jobs.

donnaplease wrote:How can you say they refused to go along with BO - extending the tax cuts was their idea. :?

The GOP actually holds power once again. So they are forced to play ball. Before the midterms, it was all opposition, all the time.

donnaplease wrote:TNC, are you angry with BO for the way he talked to/about his democratic party cronies? I can understand where dems/libs would be livid.


No, because anyone who has been paying attention knows that O is barely a liberal.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16111
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:20 am

Nice facts, FF. On nearly every issue, Obama has governed to the right of Republicans like Nixon and Ike. Where's the raging pinko liberalism? Passing Mitt Romney's healthcare plan? Expanding military intervention abroad? His most recent tax compromise only compounds this fact. Dude doesn't even have the balls to tax the rich at modest Clinton levels.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16111
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:25 am

donnaplease wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
donnaplease wrote:OK, I'll start. I think he did very well. He told us that he was putting country before politics, and I appreciate that.


Continuing Bush tax cuts that are not offset with any spending cuts is PURE politics, and will likely hurt the country's financial standing worse than any new entitlement. You can't talk about the deficit while simultaneously starving the treasury. Obama and the GOP are frauds.

donnaplease wrote:No more of this "ram it through" crap.


The very tax cuts Obama has now caved on, were initially "rammed through" via reconcilliation in 2000. Where was the outrage? Nothing in this administraion has been rammed through. The opposition party refuses to go along with Obama on even their own ideas.


The fact that BO backed off his political stance to get the job done - with concessions from both sides is what I'm referring to. It may have been PURE politics, but he looked at the needs of the American people. If he had to cave on the taxes to get the unemployment benefits, then it's a win (or loss, depending on how you look at it) for both sides. But I understand what you're saying. Kinda burning the candle at both ends.

I can't speak to what happened in 2000 - didn't follow things back then. How can you say they refused to go along with BO - extending the tax cuts was their idea. :? Maybe I missed something. TNC, are you angry with BO for the way he talked to/about his democratic party cronies? I can understand where dems/libs would be livid.


TNC is correct here. Obama IS a fraud, right there with the GOP. Obama basically traded Bush tax cuts for more unemployment...a lose lose situation. If Obama stands firm, and says no to continued tax cuts for the wealthiest in the nation, then people out of work(largely the fault of the past president's economic policy), lose their homes, cars and go hungry. So he makes the deal.. the Bush tax cuts are continued(stupidly I might add), and unemployment benefits continue. So how much are these Bush tax cuts going to cost the economy? I forget, 700 Billion? is that right? Whatever....at least the unemployment benefits given out will be used and given back to the economy. For every dollar issued for benefits, 1.60 comes back into the economy....versus every dollar of taxation "cut" for the rich, produces ZERO payback to the economy. The rich don't create jobs. That has been tried and failed miserably under Reagan. When will the republicans ever learn? it doesn't matter anyway, at least not to me. I have become apathetic to the whole thing now. Obama is no better than a republican. He has caved, to what was and is important...and now he is nothing but a lame duck president....something the republicans here will all stand up and cheer about. Our country sucks.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:28 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Nice facts, FF. On nearly every issue, Obama has governed to the right of Republicans like Nixon and Ike. Where's the raging pinko liberalism? Passing Mitt Romney's healthcare plan? Expanding military intervention abroad? His most recent tax compromise only compounds this fact. Dude doesn't even have the balls to tax the rich at modest Clinton levels.


Obama has NO balls. The republicans ought to thank their lucky stars He won and not Hillary. Things would be a lot different now.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Saint John » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:29 am

High marginal tax rates discourage work effort, saving, and investment, and promote tax avoidance and tax evasion. A reduction in high marginal tax rates would boost long term economic growth, and reduce the attractiveness of tax shelters and other forms of tax avoidance. The economic benefits of ERTA were summarized by President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers in 1994: "It is undeniable that the sharp reduction in taxes in the early 1980s was a strong impetus to economic growth."
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:26 am

Rockindeano wrote: . For every dollar issued for benefits, 1.60 comes back into the economy....versus every dollar of taxation "cut" for the rich, produces ZERO payback to the economy. .


Good grief, a few days ago the dollar sixty theory was mentioned by a democratic talking head and every Tom Dick and Harry is now repeating it ad nauseuam without even thinking about it or asking for evidence of this . There isn't any dollar sixy brought back into the economy, I dont care if you saw it on "Meet the Press"

If the government issues a dollar of benefits, that dollar needs to be administered by a bueracracy , that dollar spending needs to be financed (and with the govt being an easy customer for fiance they have less impetus/need for them to provide finance to private customers). Then you have the fact that whilst many benefit recipients are needy and honorable , there is finite percentage that are not, use the benefit as an excuse not to work. That missing paycheck, lack of production is something that does not get taxed, is money that is not spent in the economy. Add all that up, that buck sixty is gone. No buck sixty- you certainly can't prove that.

What is more provable is the fact that if you have a person who runs a small business, employs a few people and classifies him self with the IRS as an S-Corp and his business is worth more than 250,000 - that business is going to get caned by a potental tax increase amd will make people unemployed
Matt
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze

Postby Saint John » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:36 am

For decade after decade the working people have taken care of the lazy. I think anyone getting an unemployment check, and especially welfare, should have to report and do some sort of work. Clean up garbage in cities and on the sides of the road, shovel snow, remove graffiti and similar sorts of jobs. This country should be fucking spotless. No one should get money for free. :evil: I have never collected any sort of unemployment or welfare in my life and I (hopefully) never will. I would work at McDonalds first. Hell, within 2 or 3 years (or less) I'm quite sure I'd be in some sort of management. :) Fantastic corporation.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby S2M » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:39 am

Saint John wrote:For decade after decade the working people have taken care of the lazy. I think anyone getting an unemployment check, and especially welfare, should have to report and do some sort of work. Clean up garbage in cities and on the sides of the road, shovel snow, remove graffiti and similar sorts of jobs. This country should be fucking spotless. No one should get money for free. :evil: I have never collected any sort of unemployment or welfare in my life and I (hopefully) never will. I would work at McDonalds first. Hell, within 2 or 3 years (or less) I'm quite sure I'd be in some sort of management. :) Fantastic corporation.


Would that be President of the Chicago Chapter of the SP's Voice is not Toast fanclub? :lol:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:22 am

Saint John wrote:High marginal tax rates discourage work effort, saving, and investment, and promote tax avoidance and tax evasion. A reduction in high marginal tax rates would boost long term economic growth, and reduce the attractiveness of tax shelters and other forms of tax avoidance. The economic benefits of ERTA were summarized by President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers in 1994: "It is undeniable that the sharp reduction in taxes in the early 1980s was a strong impetus to economic growth."


Marginal tax rates are already at historic lows. During the post-WW2 period, when marginal tax rates were their highest, the economy boomed.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16111
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:23 am

Saint John wrote:For decade after decade the working people have taken care of the lazy. I think anyone getting an unemployment check, and especially welfare, should have to report and do some sort of work. Clean up garbage in cities and on the sides of the road, shovel snow, remove graffiti and similar sorts of jobs. This country should be fucking spotless. No one should get money for free. :evil: I have never collected any sort of unemployment or welfare in my life and I (hopefully) never will. I would work at McDonalds first. Hell, within 2 or 3 years (or less) I'm quite sure I'd be in some sort of management. :) Fantastic corporation.


Alot of assuming going on in this post. I thought Clinton made sure recipients have to work to recieve welfare bennies.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16111
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby fredinator » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:22 pm

TNC, any opinion (lol) on Donald Trump running for president?
fredinator
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:30 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:29 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Saint John wrote:For decade after decade the working people have taken care of the lazy. I think anyone getting an unemployment check, and especially welfare, should have to report and do some sort of work. Clean up garbage in cities and on the sides of the road, shovel snow, remove graffiti and similar sorts of jobs. This country should be fucking spotless. No one should get money for free. :evil: I have never collected any sort of unemployment or welfare in my life and I (hopefully) never will. I would work at McDonalds first. Hell, within 2 or 3 years (or less) I'm quite sure I'd be in some sort of management. :) Fantastic corporation.


Alot of assuming going on in this post. I thought Clinton made sure recipients have to work to recieve welfare bennies.


It's a good idea really. I believe President Clinton referred to it as Americorps. Welfare recipients should push a broom or pick up trash. This nation should look like Disneyland, spotless.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron