President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:43 am

conversationpc wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:And before I go to bed, lookie here....Do you believe in Miracles? Hold onto your socks people....Fox News, that fair and balanced news agency :roll: actually has a report out which is detrimental to the GOP.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01 ... ctivities/

I cannot believe my eyes.

PS- Fuck you Murdoch, OReilly, Hannity, Beck, Rove, Palin, and Hume.


I posted this article on Facebook yesterday. Not surprising at all.


Yeah, I know you did...that's where I got it from, your facwebook page. Good on you Dave for being honest. Kudos buddy.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:48 am

Saint John wrote:
Rockindeano wrote: the African American president!


He's actually "bi-racial." There is no such thing as "African American" in the way it's commonly, but mistakenly, used. They're black American, save for the few that have actually come here after their birth in lovely spots of Africa, like Libya, Algeria, Sudan, Rwanda and Somalia. If he were "African American" he wouldn't be able to be president. You're not a birther are you? :lol:


Why did I just know you would pop out of the corner with a two hand from the ass windmill jam on this sentence. Yeah I know he is bi racial, but you get my point...the real point is, and even you hard edged righties have to admit, and be a bit embarrassed too, about Boehners orange glow. Dude looks like he spent the night at Mr. Burns sleepover party at the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant. he looks ridiculous. I was watching the speech, and the person next to me said, "who is that guy, and why doues he look orange?" I said, "oh that is Speaker of the House, John Boehner. He isn't orange, just tan. he lives in Ohio. I imagine they get really good sun at this time of year." :roll: Dude, we in California, who DO get good sun this time of the year, aren't that fucking tan.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby conversationpc » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:14 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Rockindeano wrote: the African American president!


He's actually "bi-racial." There is no such thing as "African American" in the way it's commonly, but mistakenly, used. They're black American, save for the few that have actually come here after their birth in lovely spots of Africa, like Libya, Algeria, Sudan, Rwanda and Somalia. If he were "African American" he wouldn't be able to be president. You're not a birther are you? :lol:


Why did I just know you would pop out of the corner with a two hand from the ass windmill jam on this sentence. Yeah I know he is bi racial, but you get my point...the real point is, and even you hard edged righties have to admit, and be a bit embarrassed too, about Boehners orange glow. Dude looks like he spent the night at Mr. Burns sleepover party at the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant. he looks ridiculous. I was watching the speech, and the person next to me said, "who is that guy, and why doues he look orange?" I said, "oh that is Speaker of the House, John Boehner. He isn't orange, just tan. he lives in Ohio. I imagine they get really good sun at this time of year." :roll: Dude, we in California, who DO get good sun this time of the year, aren't that fucking tan.


I saw a clip from the speech and, though he did look a bit orange, he still didn't look as bad as this...

Image

...or this, for that matter...

Image

:lol: :lol: :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Behshad » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:16 am

Rockindeano wrote: I was watching the speech, and the person next to me (RobbieG) said, "who is that guy, and why doues he look orange?" I said, "oh that is Speaker of the House, John Boehner. He isn't orange, just tan. he lives in Ohio. I imagine they get really good sun at this time of year." :roll: Dude, we in California, who DO get good sun this time of the year, aren't that fucking tan.


:lol: :twisted:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Rhiannon » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:25 am

Biden had a mysterious twinkle in his eye last night, didn't he? It was like he'd just made a long putt in a Viagra commercial.
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby Saint John » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:28 am

Rhiannon wrote:Biden had a mysterious twinkle in his eye last night, didn't he? It was like he'd just made a long putt in a Viagra commercial.


Man, every time I see that dude I can't help but think of Alfred, the butler from the original Batman series. :lol:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby StevePerryHair » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:30 am

I don't think anyone is as bad as our last Governor Crist! He looks the same shade of orange all year around. And he lived in Tallahassee. It's not like he spent his weeks on the beach! What is it with politicians and tanning beds! :lol: You can see his skin damage! Gross!

Image
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby S2M » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:35 am

Was watching last night and couldn't help thinking of these Hollywood Award shows and how they're just ballwashing and vagina-washing opportunities for these attention seekers. Last night seemed like the same phenomenon. And the blatant division in rhetoric when only one party would stand up and clap, while the other remained seated....yeah, they'll be bi-partisanship in the future... :roll:

And then all these 'lawmakers' who basically are thowing themselves at Barack, looking for a him to sign that pamphet as if they were some native aboriginal tribe that thought Gilligan was their god. I half expected to hear someone call him, 'Little Buddy'
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Rhiannon » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:38 am

Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:Biden had a mysterious twinkle in his eye last night, didn't he? It was like he'd just made a long putt in a Viagra commercial.


Man, every time I see that dude I can't help but think of Alfred, the butler from the original Batman series. :lol:


Kim says he looks like Jeff Dunham's Walter puppet.

Image
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:02 am

Biden is definitley a blowhard and inserts his foot into his mouth all the time, but he would be a blast to party with and his wife Jill, err, Dr Jill is hot. I would love to go out and get Joe all hyped up on beers and then get him to do some Jaeger bombs, and then hopefully "Amtrak Joe" would pass out....and then I could rail(no pun intended), Jill to oblivion. That's my dream. You know, Martin Luther King had a dream...to end racial discrimination...but my dream is to rail the Vice President's wife. I'm a bit twisted, even Lynn said so back in Florida in 2006.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby slucero » Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:25 am

Rockindeano wrote:Am I the only one here who turned off the State of the Union? It was slow, went nowhere, talked too much about education, none about jobs(at least the first 35 minutes were w/o job talk), and what the fuck was Obama stammering around on? He didn't have any Congresional attention, Boehner looked ridiculous up there in his fake tan...seriously, he is 3 shades darker than the African American president! This is the first SOTU I turned off and I went and watched the Oilers game...the fucking Oilers game, people! Whomever is Obama's speech writer needs to find work elsewhere. The only enlightening moment I saw was when Obama was touting High Speed Rail and investment, and said trains will get you to where you are going to faster than air in many cases, and you will do so "without the pat down."

Boring speech IMHO.



The biggest irony of that speech was Obama imploring Congress to "work together".... while simultaneously moving himself politically to the center... which he has to do for 2012...

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:58 am

Rhiannon wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:Biden had a mysterious twinkle in his eye last night, didn't he? It was like he'd just made a long putt in a Viagra commercial.


Man, every time I see that dude I can't help but think of Alfred, the butler from the original Batman series. :lol:


Kim says he looks like Jeff Dunham's Walter puppet.

Image


:shock: :shock:

No way. I can't believe you just posted that.

Not 30 seconds ago I posted this exact thing on Facebook, not even having seen MR since yesterday.


Image
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby Melissa » Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:01 am

Didn't watch it but heard the "highlights" on the news this a.m. Interesting the mention of changes to the healthcare bill. The biggest IMO being that the govt needs to keep their nose OUT of the relationship between a doctor and patient.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby S2M » Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:07 am

Melissa wrote:Didn't watch it but heard the "highlights" on the news this a.m. Interesting the mention of changes to the healthcare bill. The biggest IMO being that the govt needs to keep their nose OUT of the relationship between a doctor and patient.


Hmmm....what if a terminal patient voices a desire to die. And the physician complies. Should the state/government still keep the nose out?
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Rhiannon » Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:17 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote::shock: :shock:

No way. I can't believe you just posted that.

Not 30 seconds ago I posted this exact thing on Facebook, not even having seen MR since yesterday.


A whole new worllllldd! :lol:
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby Melissa » Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:19 am

S2M wrote:
Melissa wrote:Didn't watch it but heard the "highlights" on the news this a.m. Interesting the mention of changes to the healthcare bill. The biggest IMO being that the govt needs to keep their nose OUT of the relationship between a doctor and patient.


Hmmm....what if a terminal patient voices a desire to die. And the physician complies. Should the state/government still keep the nose out?


What? :lol: Um, that happens all the time, a patient decides to refuse further treatment and let whatever may happen, happen. My mother did so when everything they tried no longer worked and she wanted to go home to die, and that's exactly what happened. We got her home, and she died in my father's arms. Not sure of your point, unless you're talking about someone wanting a doctor to kill them, and if so, well that's not what I meant, so don't be a dingus, lol.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby RossValoryRocks » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:05 pm

S2M wrote:
Melissa wrote:Didn't watch it but heard the "highlights" on the news this a.m. Interesting the mention of changes to the healthcare bill. The biggest IMO being that the govt needs to keep their nose OUT of the relationship between a doctor and patient.


Hmmm....what if a terminal patient voices a desire to die. And the physician complies. Should the state/government still keep the nose out?


Yes.

The Government has no right to make medical choices for people.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby conversationpc » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:12 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
S2M wrote:
Melissa wrote:Didn't watch it but heard the "highlights" on the news this a.m. Interesting the mention of changes to the healthcare bill. The biggest IMO being that the govt needs to keep their nose OUT of the relationship between a doctor and patient.


Hmmm....what if a terminal patient voices a desire to die. And the physician complies. Should the state/government still keep the nose out?


Yes.

The Government has no right to make medical choices for people.


Why is suicide illegal then? It's a medical choice isn't it?
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby RossValoryRocks » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:16 pm

conversationpc wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
S2M wrote:
Melissa wrote:Didn't watch it but heard the "highlights" on the news this a.m. Interesting the mention of changes to the healthcare bill. The biggest IMO being that the govt needs to keep their nose OUT of the relationship between a doctor and patient.


Hmmm....what if a terminal patient voices a desire to die. And the physician complies. Should the state/government still keep the nose out?


Yes.

The Government has no right to make medical choices for people.


Why is suicide illegal then? It's a medical choice isn't it?


Suicide is not illegal...ASSISTED suicide is...bit of a difference...and it shouldn't be...anyone who has watched a love one rotting away, in pain, with dementia or Alzhiemers, cancer or what have you knows that a person should be able to end their life under these circumstances with dignity and as free of pain as possible.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby artist4perry » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:25 pm

You want fun? Wait till you see what Obama has in store for your schools. We had a meeting today. More teaching to the test. But now we are just making the tests harder, and teachers jobs impossible. I wonder when teachers will just throw their hands up and go to a higher paying profession with fewer hoops to jump through. Oh and to add to the fun, we are doing something to the schools that have not been tried or tested yet. Your kids are the guinea pigs. I am all for school alignment, but not at the cost of learning. The tests hurt our kids. And they are getting frustrated with them and not caring a fig about passing them anymore. But it is coming to the point where if your kids don't pass them, they cannot get into a college. The ACT's are going to be a thing of the past, the proficiency tests are going to rule their world. Algebra is going to be introduced as early as the second grade. Parents, brush up on your math, your going to need it. :shock: :shock: :shock:

Still pissed off after a meeting at school today. Sorry for the venting. Back to your scheduled Political vent fest.

I just want to say, we need to be able to teach our kids the basics again, and not to a stupid standardized test. It started with Bush, and a concept that is fine in theory. But then Government stuck its big nose. ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby slucero » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:55 am

At a House Budget Committee hearing earlier today, Medicare's Chief Actuary Rick Foster provided a concise, damaging verdict on two key promises of the health care law's proponents.


McCLINTOCK: "True or false: The two principle promises that were made in support of Obamacare were one, that it would hold costs down. True or false?"

FOSTER: "I would say false, more so than true."

McCLINTOCK: "The other promise... was the promise that if you like your plan, you can keep it. True or false?"

FOSTER: "Not true in all cases."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC9rhGWJA2w

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby slucero » Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:10 am

"Meet the new boss same as the old boss"...

Dems and Reps are one in the same.....


Filibuster lives: Senate rejects changes in rules

WASHINGTON – The filibuster lives on. The Senate voted overwhelmingly late Thursday to reject efforts to change its rules to restrict the blockades that have sewn gridlock and discord in recent years on Capitol Hill.
Instead, senators settled on a more modest measure to prevent single lawmakers from anonymously holding up legislation and nominations, and the parties' Senate leaders announced a handshake deal to conduct business in a more efficient and civilized way.

The two leaders, Democrat Harry Reid of Nevada and Republican Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, also endorsed legislation, to be drawn up later, to break the logjam of confirmations of presidential appointments by reducing by as much as a third the number of appointees subject to Senate approval.

Senators were emphatic in their votes against limiting the filibuster, a treasured right of minorities trying to prevent majorities from running roughshod over them. Many Democrats, while now in the majority, envisioned a day, perhaps as early as after the 2012 election, when they would return to the minority.


Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:05 pm

artist4perry wrote:You want fun? Wait till you see what Obama has in store for your schools. We had a meeting today. More teaching to the test. But now we are just making the tests harder, and teachers jobs impossible. I wonder when teachers will just throw their hands up and go to a higher paying profession with fewer hoops to jump through. Oh and to add to the fun, we are doing something to the schools that have not been tried or tested yet. Your kids are the guinea pigs. I am all for school alignment, but not at the cost of learning. The tests hurt our kids. And they are getting frustrated with them and not caring a fig about passing them anymore. But it is coming to the point where if your kids don't pass them, they cannot get into a college. The ACT's are going to be a thing of the past, the proficiency tests are going to rule their world. Algebra is going to be introduced as early as the second grade. Parents, brush up on your math, your going to need it. :shock: :shock: :shock:

Still pissed off after a meeting at school today. Sorry for the venting. Back to your scheduled Political vent fest.

I just want to say, we need to be able to teach our kids the basics again, and not to a stupid standardized test. It started with Bush, and a concept that is fine in theory. But then Government stuck its big nose. ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:


I love you Ging, but your union is THE problem, same as Lula's. President Obama is SPOT on to increase teacher production/value. There are far too many who do NOTHING, and continue to reap a paycheck. Obama is absolutely correct, in that public schools need to improve. If you are a good teacher, you shouldn't have anything to worry about. Kudos to the President.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby conversationpc » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:19 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:Suicide is not illegal...ASSISTED suicide is...bit of a difference...and it shouldn't be


Actually, saying suicide is not illegal isn't exactly correct. As far as I know, you won't stand trial for it but the police will take you to a mental hospital to be evaluated against your will and, in some states anyway, you can be held for up to three days. So it's not exactly illegal, according to standard definitions.

...anyone who has watched a love one rotting away, in pain, with dementia or Alzhiemers, cancer or what have you knows that a person should be able to end their life under these circumstances with dignity and as free of pain as possible.


Stu, I have watched a loved one withering away with Alzheimer's and cancer but thanks for just assuming that someone else hasn't gone through that. Watching my Grandfather not know who I or anyone else was or that anyone else was even in the room,for that matter is probably the worse experience I've ever been through.

I can understand allowing someone to die who's being kept alive when they are suffering and would die anyway if it weren't for life-saving technology and I wouldn't deny anyone that right but it's a completely different matter, in my opinion, to allow someone to actually end their life prematurely. If you want to blow yourself away and end it yourself, then fine. It's another matter to ask someone to help you do it. That puts the other person in an ethical situation that they shouldn't have to be in.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby artist4perry » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:24 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
artist4perry wrote:You want fun? Wait till you see what Obama has in store for your schools. We had a meeting today. More teaching to the test. But now we are just making the tests harder, and teachers jobs impossible. I wonder when teachers will just throw their hands up and go to a higher paying profession with fewer hoops to jump through. Oh and to add to the fun, we are doing something to the schools that have not been tried or tested yet. Your kids are the guinea pigs. I am all for school alignment, but not at the cost of learning. The tests hurt our kids. And they are getting frustrated with them and not caring a fig about passing them anymore. But it is coming to the point where if your kids don't pass them, they cannot get into a college. The ACT's are going to be a thing of the past, the proficiency tests are going to rule their world. Algebra is going to be introduced as early as the second grade. Parents, brush up on your math, your going to need it. :shock: :shock: :shock:

Still pissed off after a meeting at school today. Sorry for the venting. Back to your scheduled Political vent fest.

I just want to say, we need to be able to teach our kids the basics again, and not to a stupid standardized test. It started with Bush, and a concept that is fine in theory. But then Government stuck its big nose. ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:


I love you Ging, but your union is THE problem, same as Lula's. President Obama is SPOT on to increase teacher production/value. There are far too many who do NOTHING, and continue to reap a paycheck. Obama is absolutely correct, in that public schools need to improve. If you are a good teacher, you shouldn't have anything to worry about. Kudos to the President.


No offense Deano, I loves you too..........but it is not just a problem of a few bad teachers. It is also a problem with student apathy.
Students are very lazy these days, and don't want to do any work at all, they are too into cell phones and social life. Not to mention we have so many that are just spoiled rotten at home and parents don't care what they do in school as long as they don't bug them.
Parents are growing more into single parent homes where the parents are too overworked and stressed to help students with work.

Many students go home to no food, or no decent home life. Hard to motivate a student who does not know where they will eat or sleep.

Students are raised to be rude, hateful, and disrespectful. These make teaching very difficult because they disrupt classroom learning. The teacher wastes so much time on disciplining the few that the larger student body does not get the full 45 minutes of instruction time.

Poor areas deal with kids that are on the welfare cycle. One student told me she did not need school, she will just grow up, have babies and get her check. This is a vicious cycle for many poor families.

Their own parents don't care if they do well in school. They were school dropouts so why would they expect more from their kids?

Schools across the nation are dealing with these problems. But the government does not take these things into consideration.

It must be all teachers must be stupid and don't want to help these kids. We rack our brains to help these kids.

They are so sick of the tests that they intentionally fail them.....they told us this.

Just wait, you have no idea what is in store. Teachers are going to quit outright, or like me will muddle through the social experiment for the sake of the love of teaching.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Rockindeano » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:31 pm

ALL valid points Mom, and I agree. There is obviously a combination of problems and there must be a combination of resolutions too.

I do think the President is on the right track in his quest to make better public education. I am a proponent of public education and also for bettering it....ironically I went to private school from K-6, until I then went to public school(family divorce, finances, etc.) Anyway, I vividly remember "learning" in 6th grade, what I had learned in 2nd. I knew all the books of the Bible meorized in 2nd grade...I knew all the states of the union and their capitols as well. private school is so much better, BUT not everyone can afford to go, so therefore that is why I am a proponent of improving public schooling. The only thing I didn't miss in private school was getting my poor ass swatted by a sadistic bitch teacher! That was legal back in my day here in California.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby artist4perry » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:13 pm

Rockindeano wrote:ALL valid points Mom, and I agree. There is obviously a combination of problems and there must be a combination of resolutions too.

I do think the President is on the right track in his quest to make better public education. I am a proponent of public education and also for bettering it....ironically I went to private school from K-6, until I then went to public school(family divorce, finances, etc.) Anyway, I vividly remember "learning" in 6th grade, what I had learned in 2nd. I knew all the books of the Bible meorized in 2nd grade...I knew all the states of the union and their capitols as well. private school is so much better, BUT not everyone can afford to go, so therefore that is why I am a proponent of improving public schooling. The only thing I didn't miss in private school was getting my poor ass swatted by a sadistic bitch teacher! That was legal back in my day here in California.


I also realize there are teachers that have no place teaching. I was beaten in the hand for being left handed by my 3rd grade teacher till my mom found out. :shock: My fourth grade teacher used to spank you if you did not understand the math problems. :shock: I have known teachers that hate kids and say as much every day. Get out of the profession. We don't need that kind of bad publicity. We have pedophiles who go into teaching to molest children. Teachers have been given a black eye by the minority of bad teachers. But we cannot solve the problems these kids have without fixing home problems and issues too.

Moms and dads out there need to care enough to help their kids to find education to be all important. When their folks don't give a fig about them.............(low turn outs on parent teacher conference nights), children going hungry, savagely beaten at home, children being homeless, mom or dad are drug abusers or dealers, mom or dad are child molesters, children are spoiled, children are little brats, children are hoods and gang bangers, children struggling to find time between jobs at night and school, children being lazy or apathetic, and our society putting more emphasis on Snookie from Jersey Shore than being a success in Education.............Do you guys see an issue here that a teacher can wave a magic wand and fix?

Other countries are kicking our butts in education.........why? Because their focus is education to get ahead. Our kids are not caring. Very few do anymore.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Angel » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:35 am

artist4perry wrote:No offense Deano, I loves you too..........but it is not just a problem of a few bad teachers. It is also a problem with student apathy.
Students are very lazy these days, and don't want to do any work at all, they are too into cell phones and social life. Not to mention we have so many that are just spoiled rotten at home and parents don't care what they do in school as long as they don't bug them.
Parents are growing more into single parent homes where the parents are too overworked and stressed to help students with work.

Many students go home to no food, or no decent home life. Hard to motivate a student who does not know where they will eat or sleep.

Students are raised to be rude, hateful, and disrespectful. These make teaching very difficult because they disrupt classroom learning. The teacher wastes so much time on disciplining the few that the larger student body does not get the full 45 minutes of instruction time.

Poor areas deal with kids that are on the welfare cycle. One student told me she did not need school, she will just grow up, have babies and get her check. This is a vicious cycle for many poor families.

Their own parents don't care if they do well in school. They were school dropouts so why would they expect more from their kids?

Schools across the nation are dealing with these problems. But the government does not take these things into consideration.

It must be all teachers must be stupid and don't want to help these kids. We rack our brains to help these kids.

They are so sick of the tests that they intentionally fail them.....they told us this.

Just wait, you have no idea what is in store. Teachers are going to quit outright, or like me will muddle through the social experiment for the sake of the love of teaching.


Ginger, honestly, if I overheard one of my children's teachers say what you just said, I'd request a new teacher. I know there are students with problems-and a lot of them, but it's not ALL students. I have one child that has graduated from high school, one in high school and two in elementary school. They come home every day to a warm, clean home, a kitchen full of food and two loving parents. I am very involved in their life, I have taught them the value of hard work and I can promise you that none of my children would ever even THINK of making a statement about having babies so the government would support them. My oldest is in college and the three younger children know that college is the expectation. So, if they had teachers that viewed all students as lazy, disrepectful, welfare cases-well, I'm not sure I would trust that that teacher had their best interest in mind.

(Heaven help me for what I'm about to say) I agree with Dean and Obama (cringe) there needs to be a way to make sure the good teachers are more valued and the bad teachers are weeded out.
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

Postby Behshad » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:08 am

artist4perry wrote:Other countries are kicking our butts in education.........why? Because their focus is education to get ahead. Our kids are not caring. Very few do anymore.


Image

So in other countries, the board of education doesnt get the teachers involved but rather invites the KIDS in and tells them : you need to care cause we need to get ahead ??? :roll:
Nice way to try to put the blame on parents and kids. :roll: If Parents are 100% involved and the kid is full of desire to learn, it dont mean shit
if the teacher isnt a good teacher. Now you have a GOOD teacher and even if half the class is "not caring" a good teacher can turn it around.
We do need better teachers to help the kids that arent caring. If it was easy anybody could do it , duh ;)
I hate to agree with Natalie(cringe) :wink: :lol: but if you were my kids teacher, Id switch to a different SCHOOL! 8)
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Angel » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:16 am

Behshad wrote:I hate to agree with Natalie(cringe) :wink: :lol: but if you were my kids teacher, Id switch to a different SCHOOL! 8)

It's OK, B, you didn't TOTALLY agree with me, I was just going to switch teachers, you're going to switch schools. :lol: :wink:
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests