Page 1 of 669

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:57 am
by stevew2
Keep Tito banned from this thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:59 am
by Michigan Girl
The only complaint I have, thus far, is the amount of money
spent on the inauguration events considering the state of our
economy....funds should've been cut, somewhere!!! :( :wink:

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Inaugura ... 946&page=1

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 am
by stevew2
Michigan Girl wrote:The only complaint I have, thus far, is the amount of money
spent on the inauguration events considering the state of our
economy....funds should've been cut, somewhere!!! :( :wink:

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Inaugura ... 946&page=1
That happens with every president, it is retarded though

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:09 am
by Tomulator
Uhh...hstily ordering Guantanamo Bay closed BEFORE you figure out what to do with the prisoners was unwise, IMO.

:shock:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:13 am
by stevew2
Tomulator wrote:Uhh...hstily ordering Guantanamo Bay closed BEFORE you figure out what to do with the prisoners was unwise, IMO.

:shock:
i think he is going to give them a shovel and make the prisoners build roads and bridges,thats what i would do

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:15 am
by conversationpc
Tomulator wrote:Uhh...hstily ordering Guantanamo Bay closed BEFORE you figure out what to do with the prisoners was unwise, IMO.

:shock:


Considering how often he'd talked about it even before the election, you think he would've already had a plan for this. It doesn't sound like it was thought through very well.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:24 am
by finalfight
Tomulator wrote:Uhh...hstily ordering Guantanamo Bay closed BEFORE you figure out what to do with the prisoners was unwise, IMO.

:shock:


He's already figured that out...

Middle of ocean

Splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:42 am
by bluejeangirl76
finalfight wrote:
Tomulator wrote:Uhh...hstily ordering Guantanamo Bay closed BEFORE you figure out what to do with the prisoners was unwise, IMO.

:shock:


He's already figured that out...

Middle of ocean

Splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash, splash


LMAO! Yeah there ya go.

But yeah, right off the bat, this Gitmo thing isn't striking me as a particularly good idea.
Its gonna be an interesting four years.

I am, however, looking forward to watching Sideshow Joe. Man that guy is gonna be fun. I'm betting on some Cheney-shooting-his-friend-in-the-face style extra-curricular hijinks. :twisted:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:07 am
by conversationpc
Fact Finder wrote:Image


What's the purpose of posting a pic of this gossip rag?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:55 am
by bluejeangirl76
Image


:lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:01 am
by Onestepper
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Image


:lol: :lol:


This made me laugh. Hard.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:15 am
by Luvsaugeri
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Image


:lol: :lol:


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:37 am
by LLL
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Image


:lol: :lol:


BJG - when I first saw this post I didn't see the website logo in the bottom corner clearly because of the angle of my lcd screen. It looked like it said "punchkitten.com" instead of "punditkitchen.com". I was LMAO thinking they really had a site for the kitten puncher thing! :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:44 am
by Rhiannon
Image

:P

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:44 am
by finalfight
LLL wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Image


:lol: :lol:


BJG - when I first saw this post I didn't see the website logo in the bottom corner clearly because of the angle of my lcd screen. It looked like it said "punchkitten.com" instead of "punditkitchen.com". I was LMAO thinking they really had a site for the kitten puncher thing! :lol: :lol:


I tawt I saw that too! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:59 am
by Lula
conversationpc wrote:
Tomulator wrote:Uhh...hstily ordering Guantanamo Bay closed BEFORE you figure out what to do with the prisoners was unwise, IMO.

:shock:


Considering how often he'd talked about it even before the election, you think he would've already had a plan for this. It doesn't sound like it was thought through very well.


my understanding is the detainees will be put into the u.s. system of justice and leave behind the seemingly illegal practices of the past several (bush) years.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:22 am
by Andrew
Fact Finder wrote:Image


The height of journalistic integrity and excellence....look at those insightful articles. Can some one post me a copy of this magazine from the USA. It looks like essential bathroom reading.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:23 am
by conversationpc
Lula wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Tomulator wrote:Uhh...hstily ordering Guantanamo Bay closed BEFORE you figure out what to do with the prisoners was unwise, IMO.

:shock:


Considering how often he'd talked about it even before the election, you think he would've already had a plan for this. It doesn't sound like it was thought through very well.


my understanding is the detainees will be put into the u.s. system of justice and leave behind the seemingly illegal practices of the past several (bush) years.


How is that possible since they are not subject to nor are they entitled to the rights inherent in our system of justice?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:36 am
by Lula
i don't know dave. i'm just going off of the few tidbits i heard on the radio. i suppose there is a year to figure it out though. i like the idea of closing the 'camp' and hope it does happen.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:38 am
by finalfight
Andrew wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Image


The height of journalistic integrity and excellence....look at those insightful articles. Can some one post me a copy of this magazine from the USA. It looks like essential bathroom reading.


Might make an interesting April Fools diversion to redecorate the front page of MR with similarly ludicrous articles! You could start with one about Perry actually releasing new material! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:55 am
by Rick
finalfight wrote:
Andrew wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Image


The height of journalistic integrity and excellence....look at those insightful articles. Can some one post me a copy of this magazine from the USA. It looks like essential bathroom reading.


Might make an interesting April Fools diversion to redecorate the front page of MR with similarly ludicrous articles! You could start with one about Perry actually releasing new material! :lol:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:00 am
by S2M
finalfight wrote:
Andrew wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Image


The height of journalistic integrity and excellence....look at those insightful articles. Can some one post me a copy of this magazine from the USA. It looks like essential bathroom reading.


Might make an interesting April Fools diversion to redecorate the front page of MR with similarly ludicrous articles! You could start with one about Perry actually releasing new material! :lol:



Yeah, you can start it off by reporting that an anonymous source(sister's cousin's third grade teacher's proctologist) claims SMFP is releasing something by November...... :shock:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:02 am
by TRAGChick
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Image


:lol: :lol:


LMAO!!!

Perhaps THIS should be my new Wallpaper!! :lol: :lol: :twisted:

Yeahright.....my Husband, the Republican, would freakin' DIVORCE me.... :o

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:03 am
by bluejeangirl76
StocktontoMalone wrote:
finalfight wrote:Might make an interesting April Fools diversion to redecorate the front page of MR with similarly ludicrous articles! You could start with one about Perry actually releasing new material! :lol:



Yeah, you can start it off by reporting that an anonymous source(sister's cousin's third grade teacher's proctologist) claims SMFP is releasing something by November...... :shock:


Yeah. That proctologist really had to dig to get the info out of Perry, too.
So it must be true.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:07 am
by AlteredDNA
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:
finalfight wrote:Might make an interesting April Fools diversion to redecorate the front page of MR with similarly ludicrous articles! You could start with one about Perry actually releasing new material! :lol:



Yeah, you can start it off by reporting that an anonymous source(sister's cousin's third grade teacher's proctologist) claims SMFP is releasing something by November...... :shock:


Yeah. That proctologist really had to dig to get the info out of Perry, too.
So it must be true.


So would that be considered a nugget of truth? ;)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:10 am
by bluejeangirl76
AlteredDNA wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:
finalfight wrote:Might make an interesting April Fools diversion to redecorate the front page of MR with similarly ludicrous articles! You could start with one about Perry actually releasing new material! :lol:



Yeah, you can start it off by reporting that an anonymous source(sister's cousin's third grade teacher's proctologist) claims SMFP is releasing something by November...... :shock:


Yeah. That proctologist really had to dig to get the info out of Perry, too.
So it must be true.


So would that be considered a nugget of truth? ;)


Or it could just be unbelievable shit. I guess we'll see. :o

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:33 am
by finalfight
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
AlteredDNA wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:
finalfight wrote:Might make an interesting April Fools diversion to redecorate the front page of MR with similarly ludicrous articles! You could start with one about Perry actually releasing new material! :lol:



Yeah, you can start it off by reporting that an anonymous source(sister's cousin's third grade teacher's proctologist) claims SMFP is releasing something by November...... :shock:


Yeah. That proctologist really had to dig to get the info out of Perry, too.
So it must be true.


So would that be considered a nugget of truth? ;)


Or it could just be unbelievable shit. I guess we'll see. :o


:lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:37 am
by conversationpc
Lula wrote:i don't know dave. i'm just going off of the few tidbits i heard on the radio. i suppose there is a year to figure it out though. i like the idea of closing the 'camp' and hope it does happen.


From what I've heard thus far, it's just a window dressing move. They'll probably either ship them to a prison in another country where they'll be treated worse than they are at Gitmo or they'll just shift them to another U.S. prison on foreign soil. I can't imagine Obama being dumb enough to put them in an actual U.S. prison.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:50 pm
by conversationpc
Fact Finder wrote:Here's a good one for you followers of O. Just yesterday he signed an exectuvive order banning lobbyist from working in his Administration, in fact, that was one of his campaign pledges. But today he broke his own promise. I see some of the libs on the MSNBC board are not happy with this...


I heard about this earlier this morning...He signs the freakin' order and not more than a day later and he's already making exceptions. :roll:

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:24 am
by Lula
complete bs! i'm sure there are others that can do the same job that don't have the lobbyist title attached. i also don't like tim geithner for the treasury. he made a mistake... okay and tell me why we should trust him to run the country's finances? again, i'm sure there are others that can do the job.