Monker wrote:Gays, lesbians, transgeners, etc, their lifestyle does not affect yours....but you act all threatened and make stuff up to project that threat upon other people.
Again, for the third time, where is all of this "acting out" that prompted this bill/law? It didn't happen. Perverts like you are letting your perverted minds invent situations that never happened and nobody is complaining about.
Now you are saying they are "acting out" when a person says they identify more with the sex other then the one they are physically born with. Again, that's not YOUR PROBLEM. Your perverted imagination is making it YOUR PROBLEM. How a person believes they are sexually oriented has absolutely no affect on you.
I'm not discussing people who are attracted to persons of the same sex. That's not trying to be something that is physically or genetically impossible. I'm talking about people who want to be a gender they are not. It's a disorder. Instead of helping that person with finding ways to accept what gender they actually are, some encourage them to act as a gender they are not. You can make many choices in life but gender you can not. You are either born male or female. You can remove or add all the body parts you want but that does not change one's DNA. Actually, when this is done the body itself fights off such alterations. Progressives want to rely on science and logic. This whole "gender identification" bullshit flies in the face of all of that. It's not just laymen people that think encouraging persons to act out being a gender they are not is unhealthy. There are people in the medical profession that do as well. In fact, one of the surgeons that pioneered gender reassignment surgery stopped doing them and instead focused on treating people to accept the gender they are. This was because he found that in a large amount of cases it did not help the patient the way it was intended to. In a lot of his cases, he found it made their situation worse, some to the point of committing suicide. Those suicides were not as a result of not being accepted by society either. You want to say this doesn't affect anyone but the person that is making this "gender identification" choice. When an authority wants to set a standard such as what is discussed here, it does involve the public and not just the persons in question. If it didn't there wouldn't be an attempt to enact laws that are either for or against rights for transgendered people when it comes to PUBLIC restroom access.
If you want to use the approach of how people "identify" themselves, then it seems pedophiles deserve acceptance as well. After all, they "identify" as being attracted to children. If the persons involved are accepting of said relationships who has the right to stand in their way? It's between them and doesn't involve others.