Moderator: Andrew
Wayne wrote:I think Dokken could have dominated 80's rock more than Motley Crue, Bob Jovi & Ratt ever could have because they had more originality in their music than the other three legendary 80's rock bands combined despite the lack of an image which would have set them apart but I think Dokken could have been the next Aerosmith or Van Halen of the 80's with Don Dokken's great vocals & George Lynch's guitar virtuosity but the MTV generation was clueless at the time wanting second rate Aerosmith/Kiss/Van Halen clones like Motley Crue to be their rock heroes.
Lebronfan wrote:For me its substance over style and that's why Dokken is better then the others. True, Dokken didn't use fireworks, flying monkeys or dick tricks on stage but its the music that matters.
Wayne wrote:I think Dokken could have dominated 80's rock more than Motley Crue, Bob Jovi & Ratt ever could have because they had more originality in their music than the other three legendary 80's rock bands combined despite the lack of an image which would have set them apart but I think Dokken could have been the next Aerosmith or Van Halen of the 80's with Don Dokken's great vocals & George Lynch's guitar virtuosity but the MTV generation was clueless at the time wanting second rate Aerosmith/Kiss/Van Halen clones like Motley Crue to be their rock heroes.
exsgt33 wrote:Dokken was a good band, but I always found them to be a little on the boring side live. Don Dokken is an average frontman at best. George Lynch was always the main attraction.
Dokken's overall package was not complete. Bands like Bon Jovi, Poison, and Motley Crue had the entire package (songs, personality, and great live acts.)
Lebronfan wrote:For me its substance over style and that's why Dokken is better then the others. True, Dokken didn't use fireworks, flying monkeys or dick tricks on stage but its the music that matters.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests