Tito wrote:Why did the 2012 Presidental thread get locked?
Probably because you started it just to be a pain in the ass!
John from Boston
Moderator: Andrew
strangegrey wrote:Skylorde wrote:Two business people whom I highly respect told me the *very* same thing. I quote:
"We may end up paying slightly more on our bottom line but make no mistake about it; we'll adjust the prices of consumables and adjust the workforce accordingly to offset the bulk of the increase that is being levied on us."
"Sticking it to the rich" is nothing more than telling people (who really don't understand economics) what they want to hear.
Tell me if I'm wrong Frank.
You're not.
The democrats took/stole/borrowed (whatever you want to call it) the concept of fiscal responsibility from the republicans....and they've been claiming it as their own, the very day a fiscal democrat in the name of Bill Clinton became president. What has happened, is they've claimed ownership of a republican ideal and attracted a great deal of socially liberal conservatives to their side of the aisle. Pure genius if you ask me...
The end result is that the democrat electorate wants fiscally responsible leadership. However, that doesn't jive with the far-left's entitlement/hand-out agenda. So they walk a fine line. It's a line that Obama is going to have to walk very carefully during his presidency. ESPECIALLY since people are rebelling against a fiscally liberal republican president, who has spent with reckless abandon and piled up debt faster than a million high school girls with daddy's credit cards.
One of the many problems with the party formerly known as the republican party, is that they have adopted the old school democrat philosophy (which is to spend with reckless abandon) thinking that the people will love them for the shower of free entitlements they get.
The problem is, is that you can justify entitlement programs for the ultra poor...maybe, if you roll that way. Some of us dont...that's not the problem.
The problem is, You *can't* walk into a room and justify entitlement programs for the middle and upper class. That's what the republicans have been doing for years...and that has forced this massive revolt against them....despite the fact that the majority of the country is center-right.
hoagiepete wrote:You had me in agreement until your last paragraph. Entitlement programs for middle and upper class??? What entitlements are there for them? Please be specific.
strangegrey wrote:hoagiepete wrote:You had me in agreement until your last paragraph. Entitlement programs for middle and upper class??? What entitlements are there for them? Please be specific.
Oh, that's the easiest....I'll give the biggest example in modern history.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
Ehwmatt wrote:strangegrey wrote:hoagiepete wrote:You had me in agreement until your last paragraph. Entitlement programs for middle and upper class??? What entitlements are there for them? Please be specific.
Oh, that's the easiest....I'll give the biggest example in modern history.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
I don't agree with the bail out, but comparing the bailout package to simply handing out $1000 checks to people who don't pay income taxes is asinine. Not to mention said bail out certainly doesn't help anyone in my family or friends, though most of us are all solidly middle-upper class. Apples and oranges
strangegrey wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:strangegrey wrote:hoagiepete wrote:You had me in agreement until your last paragraph. Entitlement programs for middle and upper class??? What entitlements are there for them? Please be specific.
Oh, that's the easiest....I'll give the biggest example in modern history.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
I don't agree with the bail out, but comparing the bailout package to simply handing out $1000 checks to people who don't pay income taxes is asinine. Not to mention said bail out certainly doesn't help anyone in my family or friends, though most of us are all solidly middle-upper class. Apples and oranges
Absolutely not apples and oranges. The concept behind welfare and the bailout is identical. Establish a floor so that failure can be overlooked and forgiven.
While I agree that banks and the financial industry requires a certain amount of help...due to the fact that a regular corporation can file for bankruptcy and survive...a financial institution cant. Once consumer confidence is wrecked, theres no chance for a financial business to survive.
However, you need to read the bailout to understand what I'm driving at. There are aspects of this bailout that creates a legal precedent of government help in failure in ways never done before.
Rhiannon wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:If they do that in 2012, I'm done with the Republicans. So dumb.
Surely they wouldn't be that insane as to put Palin up against a dem incumbent. ...If so, maybe the mayans were right.![]()
Ehwmatt wrote:I've read it, I don't agree with it, but there is a far greater danger in just handing money out to individual citizens for free. Nothing's gonna change my mind about that.
Rhiannon wrote:Surely they wouldn't be that insane as to put Palin up against a dem incumbent.
Enigma869 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Surely they wouldn't be that insane as to put Palin up against a dem incumbent.
This woman can't figure out whether or not Africa is a country or a continent,
John from Boston
Enigma869 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Surely they wouldn't be that insane as to put Palin up against a dem incumbent.
In my opinion, Palin won't ever run for POTUS. This woman can't figure out whether or not Africa is a country or a continent, and we're going to elect her president? Then again, the morons of Alaska elected her and just re-elected Stevens who was convicted of a felony. No wonder people around the world think Americans are dopes!
Rhiannon wrote:Palin is a perfect fit for town mayor, reading "Where the Wild Things Are" to five year olds at the library once per month. She'd be great at organizing a county-wide bake sale to raise funds for little Billy who had a 4-wheeler accident. A true politician has to be a hardened, sharp, venomous creature in order to protect themselves and their job. Don't take this the wrong way, but she's too "cute" to lead a nation. She might be strong, who am I to judge, and I'd say she probably is a great woman. But president? She wouldn't last a day. Case in point comparison... Hillary could do it. Hillary is also a cold bitch who will chew you up. Palin would be the one with the band-aid for your "boo-boo".
Rhiannon wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Surely they wouldn't be that insane as to put Palin up against a dem incumbent.
In my opinion, Palin won't ever run for POTUS. This woman can't figure out whether or not Africa is a country or a continent, and we're going to elect her president? Then again, the morons of Alaska elected her and just re-elected Stevens who was convicted of a felony. No wonder people around the world think Americans are dopes!
Palin is a perfect fit for town mayor, reading "Where the Wild Things Are" to five year olds at the library once per month. She'd be great at organizing a county-wide bake sale to raise funds for little Billy who had a 4-wheeler accident. A true politician has to be a hardened, sharp, venomous creature in order to protect themselves and their job. Don't take this the wrong way, but she's too "cute" to lead a nation. She might be strong, who am I to judge, and I'd say she probably is a great woman. But president? She wouldn't last a day. Case in point comparison... Hillary could do it. Hillary is also a cold bitch who will chew you up. Palin would be the one with the band-aid for your "boo-boo".
Michigan Girl wrote:I will have to disagree with the bolded, Very Much, so I guess I might be taking it the wrong way.
As far as strength, she looked as though she had been crying during McCain's speech, not a good sign!!
Suzanne wrote:First let me start by saying I'm supportive of Obama BUT- someone asked me this question and I had no answer. If Obama has a Caucasian mother and an African-American father, why did he choose to be referred to as black? Example: Mariah Carey has a "white" parent and a "black" parent but I've never heard her call herself only "black". Mind you- I don't care of what desent (did I spell that right?) Obama is from- I'm mixed with a lot of different things if you go back far enough, I only pondered on the question I was asked. Thanks all...
Suzanne wrote:First let me start by saying I'm supportive of Obama BUT- someone asked me this question and I had no answer. If Obama has a Caucasian mother and an African-American father, why did he choose to be referred to as black? Example: Mariah Carey has a "white" parent and a "black" parent but I've never heard her call herself only "black". Mind you- I don't care of what desent (did I spell that right?) Obama is from- I'm mixed with a lot of different things if you go back far enough, I only pondered on the question I was asked. Thanks all...
strangegrey wrote:However, Palin had a few old-school republican things going for her, from the perspective of the disillusioned republican base....and those few things.....in todays atmosphere....were enough to make people forget all about the fact that she's an idiot....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests