Moderator: Andrew
Newsmax? Why not Breitbart, Cherry Bomb? Both are so far from credible, it's laughable.K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Summed up well, I thought. Now my little lapdog can follow me and post something.
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Rand-Pa ... id/769177/
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:UncleKG wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote: Trump has extended his hand to liberals several times asking to work together, only to have it slapped away.
Oh, you mean the exact same thing Republicans have done for the past eight years?
Name one Republican Bill Obama signed.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:UncleKG wrote:Donald (D)rump, Almost-Leader of the Free World, Still Sweats the Small Stuff
"It is in (D)rump’s nature to be deeply concerned with optics and perception—the crowds, how the media sees him, the celebrities, a designer’s assessment of him—but less so with the minutia of actually running a country. And there is little incentive, at least so far, for this to change. Sweating the small stuff, after all, is not only true to who he is, but it also arguably won him the election. (D)rump’s base ate up his thin-skinned criticism of the media and his endless rumination on his own celebrity. They, too, cared more about his “Make America Great Again” proclamations without worrying about the specifics."
Vanity Fair? Snowflake.
verslibre wrote:Stop embarrassing yourself. The way you guys are talking, Trump is the Second Coming. EVERY Prez has been spoofed on SNL. NOT every Prez got his panties wadded over it. If Trump sleeps soundly at night having made fun of a disabled guy, then he'd better gird his loins, because the hair memes are loaded and the bay doors are opening.
UncleKG wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote:
Name one Republican Bill Obama signed.
And how many filibusters did Republicans mount, or judges at all levels they basically refused to consider?
UncleKG wrote:Lewis is boycotting because he doesn't (apparently) feel Drump is the "legitimate" president. Other Dems are boycotting in solidarity because of how Drump went after a Civil Rights icon for a perceived slight. Criticizing (or boycotting the inauguration) due to Drump's behavior is about Drump himself and not the office.
Personally, I think they should all attend.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:I do hope being President Trump is going to keep more occupied with work undoing Obama's mess. But then again, Trump does not act like a panty waste like Bush did. That said, at least Bush was man enough to take it and not hide behind a extremely bias, lying "Media" like Obama did, or blame everybody for his failures but himself. Truthfully, Main Stream Media is nothing more then a politically driven propaganda machine. But Uncle KGB would know about that. Maybe she, I mean he,.......well anyway, will post something from Good Housekeeping, or a real unbias source like Rolling Stone.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:UncleKG wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote: Trump has extended his hand to liberals several times asking to work together, only to have it slapped away.
Oh, you mean the exact same thing Republicans have done for the past eight years?
Name one Republican Bill Obama signed.
Boomchild wrote:UncleKG wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote:
Name one Republican Bill Obama signed.
And how many filibusters did Republicans mount, or judges at all levels they basically refused to consider?
This response is pure deflection. Do yourself a favor and answer K.C.'s question.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:These are not the numbers that were debunked by Snopes.
http://www.inquisitr.com/3748311/donald ... ic-nation/
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Boomchild wrote:verslibre wrote:Stop embarrassing yourself. The way you guys are talking, Trump is the Second Coming. EVERY Prez has been spoofed on SNL. NOT every Prez got his panties wadded over it. If Trump sleeps soundly at night having made fun of a disabled guy, then he'd better gird his loins, because the hair memes are loaded and the bay doors are opening.
Really, "the disabled guy" thing again. There have been plenty examples of Trump using the very same hand motions or mannerisms when talking about other things. That issue aside he does need to selectively pick his battles and not feel the need to respond to the small fry. Meaning things that will have little to no impact on what he has or is going to do.
I do hope being President Trump is going to keep more occupied with work undoing Obama's mess. But then again, Trump does not act like a panty waste like Bush did. That said, at least Bush was man enough to take it and not hide behind a extremely bias, lying "Media" like Obama did, or blame everybody for his failures but himself. Truthfully, Main Stream Media is nothing more then a politically driven propaganda machine. But Uncle KGB would know about that. Maybe she, I mean he,.......well anyway, will post something from Good Housekeeping, or a real unbias source like Rolling Stone.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:KGB is 6 years old, right? Such a child.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:""It's so easy..." - Axl Rose
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-con ... /1150/text Sponsored by a Republican.
So you can do your own research, here's a complete list.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-roo ... egislation"
I'm sure there is something in their about a planter for a Robert Byrd Library. You posted 134 laws of crap. In four years 134 laws.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:President Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009. In the first quarter of 2009, GDP declined at an annual rate of -5.4 percent...blah, blah, blah
UncleKG wrote:A perfect illustration of George Carlin's quote - "Think of how stupid the average person is and realize half of them are stupider than that."
Another illustration is the multiple examples I've seen of people who don't know Obamacare and the ACA are the same thing.
UncleKG wrote:Place your bets! Will Drump acknowledge this and if so, will he claim credit for it?
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/19/b-2-bombers-strike-isis-in-libya.html
Boomchild wrote:In those cases he has directly held talks with some of them and others seem to be reacting to what Trump has said he is going to do as POTUS.
Boomchild wrote:verslibre wrote:Stop embarrassing yourself. The way you guys are talking, Trump is the Second Coming. EVERY Prez has been spoofed on SNL. NOT every Prez got his panties wadded over it. If Trump sleeps soundly at night having made fun of a disabled guy, then he'd better gird his loins, because the hair memes are loaded and the bay doors are opening.
Really, "the disabled guy" thing again. There have been plenty examples of Trump using the very same hand motions or mannerisms when talking about other things. That issue aside he does need to selectively pick his battles and not feel the need to respond to the small fry. Meaning things that will have little to no impact on what he has or is going to do.
"Now the poor guy, you gotta see this guy," he continued, before launching into an apparent impression of Mr Kovaleski, waving his arms around with his hands at an odd angle.
"Uhh I don't know what I said. Uhh I don't remember. He's going like 'I don't remember. Maybe that's what I said.'"
Mr Kovaleski has arthrogryposis, a condition that affects the movement of joints and is noticeable in his right arm and hand.
Here, below, is a video of Trump speaking about Kovaleski on Nov. 24. Note that Trump first says the article was “written by a nice reporter.” (Kovaleski is indeed nice.) Then he goes on to mock him, jerking his arms in front of his body: “Now, the poor guy, you ought to see this guy, ‘Ah, I don’t know what I said, I don’t remember, I don’t remember, maybe that’s what I said.’”
Trump’s explanation in Colorado is simply not credible. First of all, we already confirmed that Kovaleski did not grovel or say he made a mistake. Moreover, Trump actually appears to paraphrase Kovaleski’s brief statement about not remembering that thousands of people celebrated. Trump now suggests he was just imitating a grovel, but that’s not what he was actually doing.
Instead, Trump is clearly imitating Kovaleski’s disability — the reporter has arthrogryposis, which visibly limits the functioning of his joints. Trump claims he did not know Kovaleski, but the reporter closely covered Trump’s troubled business dealings while he was a reporter for the N.Y. Daily News between 1987 and 1993.
verslibre wrote:Don't even try to write that shit off.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote: A once in a life time event, and they can't go.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Boomchild, did you see where the Girl Scouts of America has refused to let the girls be in tomorrows parade ? A once in a life time event, and they can't go.
UncleKG wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote: A once in a life time event, and they can't go.
The average life span for a female in the U.S. is around 79 years, so it's actually more like a 20 (times, approx.) in a life time event.
Boomchild wrote:
If your 79 and still a Girl Scout, maybe should give up trying to complete those merit patches.
Boomchild wrote:At this point it would be this way for any non progressive liberal in the oval office. Speaking of the Girl Scouts, I'm surprised that any liberal would be involved with such an organization. Based on "the values" liberals profess to have, one would think they would consider the Girl Scouts and the Boy Scouts organizations sexist. Claiming that they are not "gender inclusive".
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests