Boomchild wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Ask Merkel how well it's working out for her. Sweeden is about to throw them out. Stop lying.Sweden’s state-funded broadcaster has revealed that of 163,000 migrants who came to Sweden, less than 500 have found jobs.
Sweden saw a record 163,000 applications for asylum last year as a result of the migrant crisis and many Swedes were assured that the new arrivals would contribute to the economy; but new research from Sweden’s state-owned SVT reveals that fewer than 500 migrants have found work.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06 ... bs-sweden/Refugees: Welcome to Sweden, You'll Get a Job in a Decade
He could be one of the lucky ones as soon as he gets his residence permit, in a year or so. But if the past is anything to go by, about half of the refugees arriving today in the Nordic nation will still be unemployed by 2025.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... n-a-decadeMerkel's open-door policy hits German economy as 99% of migrants STILL don't have a job
THE German chancellor's controversial open-door migrant policy has been dealt another catastrophic blow after it emerged only 1 in every 10,000 migrants who arrived since last year has a job
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/710 ... oor-policyRefugees won’t plug German labor gap
Few refugees from Syria and other war zones have vocational training or a degree.
“Let’s not delude ourselves,” said Ludger Wößmann, director of Munich-based Ifo Center for the Economics of Education. “From everything we know so far, it seems that the majority of refugees would first need extensive training and even then it’s far from certain that it would work out.”
http://www.politico.eu/article/refugees ... kills-gap/
The argument Drump's ban makes is they shouldn't be let in because of terrorism, not job prospects. You're comparing countries of 8 million and 80 million to a country of 320 (approx.) million. Stands to reason there will be more job prospects here. Even if not, you're comparing countries with far more lenient policies on allowing them in than the vetting process the US has, which takes 18 months to two years and involves fewer numbers.