Obviously, you did not read any of those fact checking articles.
The $145 million.  
As said in PolitiFact: 
while we concluded that nine people related the company did at some point donate to the Clinton Foundation, we found that the bulk of the $145 million came from Giustra. Guistra said he sold all of his stakes in Uranium One in the fall of 2007, "at least 18 months before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state" and three years before the Russian deal. 
As written by Snopes:
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state. 
Of the remaining individuals connected with Uranium One who donated to the Clinton Foundation, only one was found to have contributed during the same time frame that the deal was taking place, according to The New York Times — Ian Telfer, the company’s chairman
the Clintons did not personally give the Russians Uranium. They got with the DOJ, CIA, Obama White House, FBI
WRONG.  As stated in the Snopes article, 
The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve 
Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. 
By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself “never intervened” in committee matters.Again, you are spreading LIES.
and made damn sure the Russians got 20% of OUR Uranium. Sold it to a country that at any given time, has 1200 or more nuclear weapons aimed at us.But to Monker, that's just fine. A good thing and no big deal. Do you think Monker figured out that CNN has been lying for the past year? I don't.
First of all, I did not say it was "just fine" or "a good thing".  it's not my place to judge.  But, as for the rest of your rant...implying the sale was a potential security risk...from Snopes:
(an excerpt from a statement from the NRC...not the committee Hillary was on, but another entity that had to approve of the sale)
NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.
(IE:  The US still controled the mines until they are SHUT DOWN...and Russia could not export the uranium outside of the US.  Therefore, Russia did not "control" anything)
From Politifact:
Russia’s purchase of the company "had as much of an impact on national security as it would have if they set the money on fire," said Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute and former director at the New America Foundation, in an interview with PolitiFact last year. "That’s probably why (CFIUS and the NRC) approved it."
(There was NO risk to national security.  How could there be when  the uranium could not leave the US anyway?)
NONE of what you have said is evidence that Clinton did anything wrong.  It's just more BS, and LIES....and the facts PROVE they are lies.