verslibre wrote:steveo777 wrote:Wrong! It's justified to neutralize the threat when risk of death to people is at stake, not a movie. You know he would have fired on the cops, as well, and they have a right to defend themselves. I don't know why you're getting wrapped around the axle on this. It's just common sense and would stand up in any court of law as a justified killing. Which brings me to the question, who's side are you on anyway? Seems the so called liberals of today want to defend the bad guy, rather than place blame squarely where it belongs.While that might not be you, many are like that, including the public defender who was showing sympathy to the perp, saying he's a broken child. No, the guy is an evil nut case.
No, that's not what I meant. Sorry I have to explain it to you, but not everyone is Cordell Walker. And I'm not "defending the bad guy." That's just you blathering away off your leash. You sound like an old man getting worked up and spraying Sanka out your nose...for nothing.
I don't drink Sanka...



