Moderator: Andrew
Memorex wrote:The dates of Steve Perry coming back to the fold differ a little from folklore. Strange Medicine was released mid-1994. The legend was that he fell ill toward the end of the tour, Journey was looking to move on, he then decided to come back in order to remain in Journey. Or some version of those things.
The document is a little confusing on the timeline. It states that in Jan and Feb of 1994, moves were made to reform Journey as a band. It does not specifically say that it included Steve Perry, but was more about canceling the 1985 license. But by December 1994, it clearly did include him, or at least he agreed to Journey being reformed in some form. The Strange Medicine tour did not end until March of 1995.
The claim alleges, I think, $50 million in estimated tour revenue for 2020, which Ross feels he is 1/5 entitled to. But as we all know, actual 2020 tour revenue will be zero.
FamilyMan wrote:To me the most unsettling bit of news is this squabble about Arnel's movie deal. That sounds like it got nasty. And good for Arnel for playing hard ball.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:To me the most unsettling bit of news is this squabble about Arnel's movie deal. That sounds like it got nasty. And good for Arnel for playing hard ball.
If it wasn't for Neal, Arnel would be nothing. If the movie deal was the leverage Schon/Cain had to prevent the Ross/Smitty coup, then Arnel should have had Neal's back.
TageRyche wrote:I'm so sick of all this. I just wish they'd all go away and stop dipping the legacy of the band in a cesspool of scum and villainy.
At this point, I'm just saying "Fuck You" to all parties.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:To me the most unsettling bit of news is this squabble about Arnel's movie deal. That sounds like it got nasty. And good for Arnel for playing hard ball.
If it wasn't for Neal, Arnel would be nothing. If the movie deal was the leverage Schon/Cain had to prevent the Ross/Smitty coup, then Arnel should have had Neal's back.
Monker wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:To me the most unsettling bit of news is this squabble about Arnel's movie deal. That sounds like it got nasty. And good for Arnel for playing hard ball.
If it wasn't for Neal, Arnel would be nothing. If the movie deal was the leverage Schon/Cain had to prevent the Ross/Smitty coup, then Arnel should have had Neal's back.
Why are you so defensive of Neal? He's acting like a spoiled baby.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:To me the most unsettling bit of news is this squabble about Arnel's movie deal. That sounds like it got nasty. And good for Arnel for playing hard ball.
If it wasn't for Neal, Arnel would be nothing. If the movie deal was the leverage Schon/Cain had to prevent the Ross/Smitty coup, then Arnel should have had Neal's back.
FamilyMan wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:To me the most unsettling bit of news is this squabble about Arnel's movie deal. That sounds like it got nasty. And good for Arnel for playing hard ball.
If it wasn't for Neal, Arnel would be nothing. If the movie deal was the leverage Schon/Cain had to prevent the Ross/Smitty coup, then Arnel should have had Neal's back.
By that wisdom, you could just as easily say that Journey post-Perry owed themselves to Steve Augeri (whom I know you admire).
But the moment his voice failed him, he was out.
In this band, it’s every man for himself. They need Arnel. And he was simply reminding them.
Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:The dates of Steve Perry coming back to the fold differ a little from folklore. Strange Medicine was released mid-1994. The legend was that he fell ill toward the end of the tour, Journey was looking to move on, he then decided to come back in order to remain in Journey. Or some version of those things.
My God, I've been arguing for DECADES that this was not true. I have said there was a meeting in 1994 that determined the lineup of Journey, and not too long after Perry canceled his tour dates. This confirms that I was right. It happened MUCH earlier than was believed.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Why the eff would anyone give Schon shit about “Journey The Time”. That’s atrocious
Monker wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Why the eff would anyone give Schon shit about “Journey The Time”. That’s atrocious
No "one" did. One of the points of what Ross is saying that NIGHTMARE felt "Journey Through Time" was an encroachment on the Journey name. It wasn't a person, or a couple people, conspiring against Neal. It was a corporation protecting its asset. Also, it isn't like that is all Neal did - create the band and tour. He was essentially acting like it was a replacement for Journey/
So, IMO, Nightmare was acting in their best interests to try to stop it.
Memorex wrote:Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:The dates of Steve Perry coming back to the fold differ a little from folklore. Strange Medicine was released mid-1994. The legend was that he fell ill toward the end of the tour, Journey was looking to move on, he then decided to come back in order to remain in Journey. Or some version of those things.
My God, I've been arguing for DECADES that this was not true. I have said there was a meeting in 1994 that determined the lineup of Journey, and not too long after Perry canceled his tour dates. This confirms that I was right. It happened MUCH earlier than was believed.
I just don't know really. Going back and reading it, it could be that all the moves made in 1994 were about Herbie revoking the license, thereby putting it back solely in the hands of Nightmare so that Steve Perry could no longer control it via Elmo Partners and only have his say as a member of Nightmare. Especially when the language of the initial action in Feb is pretty negative towards Perry (which I didn't see till just a moment ago).
And that could include the actions in December as well. The complaint does say that it was unanimous in December that Journey would reform, which is why I assumed Perry had already agreed to be a member.
Funny how common this stuff probably is and we just don't hear much from other bands. I guess if you are around for 47 years and all the main members are still living and have a hand in it, and it's still making massive amounts of money, there are bound to be issues. I bet LRB wish their fights could have been over this kind of money. In 2020!
Eric wrote:The founder of the band wants to be more creative with the set lists: Eff off
So the founder of the band reunites with another original member and plays more creative setlists: No, you can’t.
I mean - no wonder he’s throwing tantrums and going nuts. My God. Seems as though a bunch of band members who have come and gone want to squeeze revenue out of a short and non-variable greatest hits set and if the founder of the band wants Journey to be Journey - continually evolve as they historically have - well we’ll stop it.
FamilyMan wrote:By that wisdom, you could just as easily say that Journey post-Perry owed themselves to Steve Augeri (whom I know you admire).
But the moment his voice failed him, he was out.
In this band, it’s every man for himself. They need Arnel. And he was simply reminding them.
Monker wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Why the eff would anyone give Schon shit about “Journey The Time”. That’s atrocious
No "one" did. One of the points of what Ross is saying that NIGHTMARE felt "Journey Through Time" was an encroachment on the Journey name. It wasn't a person, or a couple people, conspiring against Neal. It was a corporation protecting its asset. Also, it isn't like that is all Neal did - create the band and tour. He was essentially acting like it was a replacement for Journey/
So, IMO, Nightmare was acting in their best interests to try to stop it.
Arkansas wrote:
Yeah, I wonder why AP was so adamant about doing the movie deal. Why was this so important?
And, btw, I wonder what the movie deal really is. ???
later~
annie89509 wrote::shock: wow ... seriously no joke! How the heck can the band come back from this !?! According to the legal briefs filed on behalf of RV, Neal and/or Jon overstepped their authorities in proclaiming that Ross and Smitty are terminated from the band. So, what's going to happen now? They stay together, go back on the road (if and whenever), pretending like they're still "brothers". That's crazy!
Monker wrote:Why are you so defensive of Neal? He's acting like a spoiled baby.
Monker wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:To me the most unsettling bit of news is this squabble about Arnel's movie deal. That sounds like it got nasty. And good for Arnel for playing hard ball.
If it wasn't for Neal, Arnel would be nothing. If the movie deal was the leverage Schon/Cain had to prevent the Ross/Smitty coup, then Arnel should have had Neal's back.
Why are you so defensive of Neal? He's acting like a spoiled baby.
perryfan61 wrote:I was wondering the same thing? TNC always takes Neal's side, but the guy is far from innocent in all this.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:Why are you so defensive of Neal? He's acting like a spoiled baby.
I'm defensive of the band Journey. Jonathan and Neal are the only two constants in that band that have contributed creatively in any real way. Maybe you should go create a forum to discuss your passion for the greedy and lazy shareholders of Nightmare Inc. It would be one thing for Ross and Smitty to block JTT If the actual Journey was doing something creative with them involved. Instead, their actions are to defend the status quo, maintain creative atrophy, and to undermine the leader of the band. There was no other choice but to fire them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests