President Barack Obama - My what big ears you have!

Off Topic Babble. The really important stuff...

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Fact Finder » Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:47 am

hoagiepete wrote:Why hasn't the media (and the rest of the libs) been crucifying Obama on the price of gas like they did GW?



That's simple, he's their guy. :wink:

The media in this country sucks donkey balls.
Image
User avatar
Fact Finder
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:19 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby Fact Finder » Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:58 am

Marking the similarities between President Barack Obama's time in office and former president Jimmy Carter's is nothing new. But as of Monday, Obama has hit one more Carter benchmark - both saw gas prices double in their first term of office. [See Where Gas Prices are Spiking the Most]

In fact, while just barely, Obama has seen an even higher gas price increase than Carter dealt with under his administration.

Under the Carter administration, gas prices increased by 103.77 percent. Gas prices since Obama took office have risen by 103.79 percent. No other presidents in recent years have struggled as much with soaring oil prices. Under the Reagan administration, gas prices actually dropped 66 percent. When Bill Clinton was president, gas prices grew by roughly 30 percent, and under both Bush presidencies, gas prices rose by 20 percent.
Image
User avatar
Fact Finder
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:19 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:42 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Marking the similarities between President Barack Obama's time in office and former president Jimmy Carter's is nothing new. But as of Monday, Obama has hit one more Carter benchmark - both saw gas prices double in their first term of office. [See Where Gas Prices are Spiking the Most]

In fact, while just barely, Obama has seen an even higher gas price increase than Carter dealt with under his administration.

Under the Carter administration, gas prices increased by 103.77 percent. Gas prices since Obama took office have risen by 103.79 percent. No other presidents in recent years have struggled as much with soaring oil prices. Under the Reagan administration, gas prices actually dropped 66 percent. When Bill Clinton was president, gas prices grew by roughly 30 percent, and under both Bush presidencies, gas prices rose by 20 percent.



You will see the strategic reserve released around August 1st (or before) which will knock gas prices down very nicely for the election and Obama will run on a platform of "hes fighting big oil and gas prices Stay they course". Watch out for the second term though- when gas prices hit the eight dollars a gallon that he said it ought to be at.
Matt
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1958
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze

Postby Monker » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:28 am

Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
Marking the similarities between President Barack Obama's time in office and former president Jimmy Carter's is nothing new. But as of Monday, Obama has hit one more Carter benchmark - both saw gas prices double in their first term of office. [See Where Gas Prices are Spiking the Most]

In fact, while just barely, Obama has seen an even higher gas price increase than Carter dealt with under his administration.

Under the Carter administration, gas prices increased by 103.77 percent. Gas prices since Obama took office have risen by 103.79 percent. No other presidents in recent years have struggled as much with soaring oil prices. Under the Reagan administration, gas prices actually dropped 66 percent. When Bill Clinton was president, gas prices grew by roughly 30 percent, and under both Bush presidencies, gas prices rose by 20 percent.



You will see the strategic reserve released around August 1st (or before) which will knock gas prices down very nicely for the election and Obama will run on a platform of "hes fighting big oil and gas prices Stay they course". Watch out for the second term though- when gas prices hit the eight dollars a gallon that he said it ought to be at.


Incredible that people actually believe this stuff.

None of the above will happen.

The exact same type of fiction was written about W...and there was more of a demand to release the reserves.
User avatar
Monker
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Postby Monker » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:34 am

Fact Finder wrote:
hoagiepete wrote:Why hasn't the media (and the rest of the libs) been crucifying Obama on the price of gas like they did GW?



That's simple, he's their guy. :wink:

The media in this country sucks donkey balls.


Oh, please, W went to war in Iraq for senseless 'reasons' and rising gas prices was one result. He deserved the critique. The fact is that supporters of the war were bragging how gas price would go DOWN as Iraq became friendly to the US. Funny how we expect democracy in the Muslim world to elect US friendly politicians...and how some try to rewrite history to blame others.
User avatar
Monker
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Postby Memorex » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:02 am

Monker wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
hoagiepete wrote:Why hasn't the media (and the rest of the libs) been crucifying Obama on the price of gas like they did GW?



That's simple, he's their guy. :wink:

The media in this country sucks donkey balls.


Oh, please, W went to war in Iraq for senseless 'reasons' and rising gas prices was one result. He deserved the critique. The fact is that supporters of the war were bragging how gas price would go DOWN as Iraq became friendly to the US. Funny how we expect democracy in the Muslim world to elect US friendly politicians...and how some try to rewrite history to blame others.


I'm not a fan of the war, but this stupid BS about it being about oil is about as lame as it gets. There was ZERO issue with oil in the first place. It's not like Iraq wasn't selling their lame little portion to us - there was no threat of us not getting oil. And there have been no transactions to point that anything changed as a result of any of those wars. Just a really, really uninformed talking point.

We went to war to beat the crap out of someone to calm the country down after we got a black eye. I'd be more inclined to believe our warheads were aging and they needed replacing, so we had to drop them somewhere.
User avatar
Memorex
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Memorex » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:06 am

There is a very long list of things Obama is doing and no responsible for that Bush did or started. There is a startling silence on this stuff.

People were angry at Bush because they thought he stole the election. He became an evil person to many. As I have said before, you can make a long list of things people hated Bush over and most are still going on today. It's just the reality of a presidency. Everyone thinks their guy is going to go their way and they forget half the country disagrees.

If Romney wins, the deficit will rise, next summer will see high gas prices, Afghanistan will still be a losing proposition, health care will still cost too much, there will still be a big ol tax fight, and we will still be on alert from many bad people trying to kill us. And half the country will defend him for the same things they crucified Obama over and the other half will be angry again. Welcome to the USA.
User avatar
Memorex
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Monker » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:43 am

Memorex wrote:
Oh, please, W went to war in Iraq for senseless 'reasons' and rising gas prices was one result. He deserved the critique. The fact is that supporters of the war were bragging how gas price would go DOWN as Iraq became friendly to the US. Funny how we expect democracy in the Muslim world to elect US friendly politicians...and how some try to rewrite history to blame others.

I'm not a fan of the war, but this stupid BS about it being about oil is about as lame as it gets. There was ZERO issue with oil in the first place. It's not like Iraq wasn't selling their lame little portion to us - there was no threat of us not getting oil. And there have been no transactions to point that anything changed as a result of any of those wars. Just a really, really uninformed talking point.
[/quote[

Reread what I said. I did not say anything about going to Iraq for oil or Iraq not selling their oil. I said rising gas prices was one result of the war...and it was. I specifically remember the debate about releasing the reserves...which is ridiculous because they exist for a MILITARY emergency...not a political/economic tool. Anyway, if you go look back at that time, gas prices DID rise...the very fact that we went to war in Iraq did that...the specifics are debatable.

We went to war to beat the crap out of someone to calm the country down after we got a black eye.


Correct...and then we turned our back on the proper decision in Afghanistan and started making up excuses to go into Iraq.

I'd be more inclined to believe our warheads were aging and they needed replacing, so we had to drop them somewhere.


It was all wishful thinking. If Sadam had more WMD, he would have used more against Iran. Saying we were his target was propaganda. He was not loved by Muslims...he tortured, gassed, killed Muslims in his own country...and went to war with them in Iran. Saddam was a secular leader and hated by Muslims. Giving WMD to a terrorist would be like Hitler giving an atomic bomb to Jews hoping they would use it against the US...especially since neither Hitler nor Saddam had such weapons.
User avatar
Monker
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Postby Memorex » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:46 am

In any case, I'm glad the dude's gone and I think we should remove anyone that cannot play nice. I'm tired of seeing their mugs on the news. Takes away time for fun.
User avatar
Memorex
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Fact Finder » Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:12 am

U.S. Tax Code now 4 times as long as Shakespeare's complete works...
Image
User avatar
Fact Finder
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:19 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby Fact Finder » Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:04 am

While the SS Agents are boffing Columbian Prostitutes, our illustrious Secretary of State represents the USA in a more proper way.... :roll:


Image

Image
Image
User avatar
Fact Finder
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:19 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:15 am

Fact Finder wrote:While the SS Agents are boffing Columbian Prostitutes, our illustrious Secretary of State represents the USA in a more proper way.... :roll:


Image

Image


hey lets not criticize drinking beer. Hell, lets not criticized getting laid either ,even if those3 Secret serice guys had to pay 47 dollars for it!
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1958
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze

Postby Memorex » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:46 am

I have no issue with Hilary having a great time wherever she is. You can't have all your public life years be business. As for the secret service issue, it's a simple case of fire them and move on. That some are married - they are going to catch enough crap as punishment. If the investigation shows that their actions in any way put the president or his staff at risk, then they need to be charged. The worst part of the story, I think, is the heavy drinking. I don't make very good decisions when I drink, but I don't have to secure a location for the President.

In any case, you have to wonder if the culture in the secret service is like this and we are only hearing about it now. As for the marines involved, I always assumed marines partied hard, as they should (except when on duty).

I did find it funny that the White House said they don't like to comment on ongoing investigations. Looking at all that this administration has weighed in on for the last three years - a lot of it petty - I found that remark laughable.
User avatar
Memorex
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Memorex » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:47 pm

I kinda figured this is how we would now "not" torture people.

http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/04/yonas-fikre-american-proxy-detention-tortured-uae

Number 637 on the list of things ok for one administration and not the other.
User avatar
Memorex
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby hoagiepete » Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:15 am

Memorex wrote:I have no issue with Hilary having a great time wherever she is. You can't have all your public life years be business. As for the secret service issue, it's a simple case of fire them and move on. That some are married - they are going to catch enough crap as punishment. If the investigation shows that their actions in any way put the president or his staff at risk, then they need to be charged. The worst part of the story, I think, is the heavy drinking. I don't make very good decisions when I drink, but I don't have to secure a location for the President.

In any case, you have to wonder if the culture in the secret service is like this and we are only hearing about it now. As for the marines involved, I always assumed marines partied hard, as they should (except when on duty).

I did find it funny that the White House said they don't like to comment on ongoing investigations. Looking at all that this administration has weighed in on for the last three years - a lot of it petty - I found that remark laughable.


+1 Trivial shit. This is what hoses any argument. Kind of like the R's going after Clinton for having his cigar sucked on.

Great point on the comments on ongoing investigations. Obama doesn't know when to keep his mouth shut and sure looks unpresidential when he doesn't. Kind of like his continued campaign style of speaking...since he's been president.
hoagiepete
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:16 am

Postby conversationpc » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:02 am

Memorex wrote:If the investigation shows that their actions in any way put the president or his staff at risk, then they need to be charged. The worst part of the story, I think, is the heavy drinking. I don't make very good decisions when I drink, but I don't have to secure a location for the President.


If they were involved in soliciting prostitutes, it's DEFINITELY a security issue. That puts them at all kinds of risk of at the very least being bribed, if not compromised in some other way that could actually put the President in physical jeopardy.
My blog = Dave's Dominion

Image
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17682
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby slucero » Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:16 pm

conversationpc wrote:
Memorex wrote:If the investigation shows that their actions in any way put the president or his staff at risk, then they need to be charged. The worst part of the story, I think, is the heavy drinking. I don't make very good decisions when I drink, but I don't have to secure a location for the President.


If they were involved in soliciting prostitutes, it's DEFINITELY a security issue. That puts them at all kinds of risk of at the very least being bribed, if not compromised in some other way that could actually put the President in physical jeopardy.



more proof that the US is at a moral crossroads....
"Government's role is to protect liberty, not to pursue unobtainable safety"
User avatar
slucero
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4099
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby donnaplease » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:23 pm

Obama eats dogs. Heheheheeeeee!
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby Fact Finder » Fri Apr 20, 2012 6:14 am

donnaplease wrote:Obama eats dogs. Heheheheeeeee!



I heard him a Moochelle are having Bo over for dinner. :lol:


on another LMAO moment...


General Motors reached another Obama milestone when they announced late on a Friday afternoon that they were suspending production of the Obama-inspired Chevy Volt for five weeks due to lack of demand.

Presumably the Volt was an attempt by GM to help Obama with his pledge to put 1 million electric cars on the road in return for the tens of billions of dollars in forgivable “loans” that the company got from the Obama administration from the TARP bailout.

The hybrid gas-electric vehicle gets 25 miles on a full, overnight charge and costs around $40,000. To date, GM has sold around 10,000 vehicles. To put it in perspective, the Chevy Corvette has a sticker price of $49,600.

If the Volt’s not in the federal witness protection program, it ought to be. Feburary and March sales were zero.


:lol: Silly libs.
Image
User avatar
Fact Finder
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:19 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:11 am

Fact Finder wrote:
donnaplease wrote:Obama eats dogs. Heheheheeeeee!



I heard him a Moochelle are having Bo over for dinner. :lol:

Image
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7412
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby Rick » Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:04 am

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Image
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16654
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Fact Finder » Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:50 am

Image
Image
User avatar
Fact Finder
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:19 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby conversationpc » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:30 am

Fact Finder wrote:If the Volt’s not in the federal witness protection program, it ought to be. Feburary and March sales were zero.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion

Image
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17682
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Monker » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:38 pm

conversationpc wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:If the Volt’s not in the federal witness protection program, it ought to be. Feburary and March sales were zero.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


There will eventually come a point where gasoline vehicles cost more to produce and operate then electric. When that time comes, Chevy, Ford, and Chrysler had better being doing what Tesla is doing or Tesla will be the only American car in production.

Tesla does it right.

http://www.teslamotors.com/
User avatar
Monker
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Postby Rick » Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:53 am

Monker wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:If the Volt’s not in the federal witness protection program, it ought to be. Feburary and March sales were zero.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


There will eventually come a point where gasoline vehicles cost more to produce and operate then electric. When that time comes, Chevy, Ford, and Chrysler had better being doing what Tesla is doing or Tesla will be the only American car in production.

Tesla does it right.

http://www.teslamotors.com/


Hey, that band make some nice looking cars. ;) :lol:
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16654
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby conversationpc » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:24 am

Rick wrote:
Monker wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:If the Volt’s not in the federal witness protection program, it ought to be. Feburary and March sales were zero.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


There will eventually come a point where gasoline vehicles cost more to produce and operate then electric. When that time comes, Chevy, Ford, and Chrysler had better being doing what Tesla is doing or Tesla will be the only American car in production.

Tesla does it right.

http://www.teslamotors.com/


Hey, that band make some nice looking cars. ;) :lol:


That's EXACTLY what I was thinking. Scary. :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion

Image
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17682
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Fact Finder » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:01 am

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/04/25/ ... to-summit/

Milwaukee Red Cross Told To Prep For Chicago Evacuation During NATO Summit

April 25, 2012 9:45 PM

CHICAGO (CBS) – Is there a secret plan to evacuate some residents of Chicago in the event of major trouble during the NATO summit next month? CBS 2 has uncovered some evidence that there is. It comes from the Milwaukee area branch of the American Red Cross.

CBS 2 News has obtained a copy of a Red Cross e-mail sent to volunteers in the Milwaukee area.

It said the NATO summit “may create unrest or another national security incident. The American Red Cross in southeastern Wisconsin has been asked to place a number of shelters on standby in the event of evacuation of Chicago.”

According to a chapter spokesperson, the evacuation plan is not theirs alone.

“Our direction has come from the City of Chicago and the Secret Service,” she said.

Officials at Chicago’s Office of Emergency Management and Communication said the directive did not come from them.

The U.S. Secret Service did not return calls for comment.

Some downtown residents told CBS 2’s Mike Parker that the news has them on edge.

Brad Klein said it is “very unnerving. I feel a little bit unsafe, just a bit more than a little bit. It doesn’t make me feel like I want to be in the city during the NATO conference.”

An executive with the Service Employees International Union, who trains members in preparation for the summit, thinks such a plan might be “over the top.”

SEIU Local 1 training director Tom Dobry said, “This could be a lot like Y2K – a lot of hype and buildup. People will say, ‘that was it?’ Not a big deal.”





What the hell is this about? It's gonna take alot more than a few shelters to evacuate Chicago, and what if the people don't want to go to Milwaukee? Huh?
Image
User avatar
Fact Finder
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:19 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby Memorex » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:11 am

Anytime these things come up, it's best to stay away. They are real nuts out there. The idea of limits doesn't seem to exist anymore.
User avatar
Memorex
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Memorex » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:41 am

So - Obama on Jimmy Fallon Slow Jammin the News. I thought it was funny, but it bothers me as well. I just can't imagine any other president doing this during difficult times.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAFQIciWsF4&feature=g-logo

Now, I am not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing. Part of me says let's laugh at ourselves, and part of me thinks he is so incredibly out of touch it's insulting. I think it's the combination of things. The 17 vacations, all the golf and basketball, all the huge White House parties, the expense of all of this. And outside of a few campaign style tours, I can't really think of much he has done since last September.

I can't really recall Clinton's vacations, but I know many were tucked away at private locations (maybe for private reasons), sort of off the radar. Bush had many of his vacations at his ranch and at Camp David. Obama is so out there and it's all so expensive. It's strange because he will be wealthy for the rest of his life and there will be plenty of time for all that. I say get all our men home, get everyone back to work, then go enjoy yourself. Anyway....
User avatar
Memorex
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby donnaplease » Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:56 am

What do y'all think of this?

Image
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

PreviousNext

Return to Save Me From The Cocaine Cowboys

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No Surprize and 1 guest