Neal Schon's private parts admitted as evidence:

[tater1977]

People News

Neal Schon's private parts admitted as evidence: $50 Million Law suit against Journey erected

By April MacIntyre Jul 9, 2012


According to an email sent to Monsters and Critics, Tareq’s attorney has successfully admitted into evidence a picture of Neal Schon’s penis and an audio recording where the Journey guitarist tells Tareq, “I am f**king your wife.”

The $50 million lawsuit against Schon and his publicist alleges Schon sent Tareq “an email of his large penis, said email being sent for no other purpose than to humiliate and injure the Plaintiff.”

Tareq, currently divorcing his wife Michaele Salahi, is alleging that Schon not only took away his wife, but destroyed their successful business partnership.

Now the $50 Million Law suit against Journey will move forward to Supreme Court

On the eve of the new Journey tour, Tareq Salahi's Chief Counsel, Charles Roberts announced that the fifty million dollar lawsuit against defendants DD Entertainment, Journey and founder Neal Schon will proceed to the Virginia Supreme Court.

Mr. Salahi went on record this morning to say,

“I am thankful that this case will have the opportunity to be reviewed by the Virginia Supreme Court. We look forward to the chance for our case to be heard by a jury of my peers from within the local community where I grew up and in which Michaele and I lived as husband and wife. It was outrageous that Journey knew that I would be extremely emotionally distraught when my wife and business partner became missing after Neal Schon lured her into his entertainment business. Today's decision to proceed to the Virginia Supreme Court is another step toward justice as a result of Neal Schon’s and Journey’s selfish and outrageous behavior and for their inexcusable acts which caused me extreme emotional distress.”

Chuck Roberts, Mr. Salahis Attorney, stated:

“We are going to see this case all the way through for Mr. Salahi. We were always prepared to go to the Virginia Supreme Court as we are confident that there is enough evidence of outrageous and lewd acts committed by the Defendants to permit this case to move forward. Journey's founder Neal Schon's behavior was inexcusable. The fact that Neal Schon allegedly chose, among other things, to send a picture of his penis to Mr. Salahi and then allegedly called my client to let him know he was "F**cking" Mr. Salahi's wife, is simply disgusting and proves his malicious intent to willfully inflict emotional pain and torment on my client. We are confident that the Court will rule that a jury should be presented with this evidence and allowed to decide for themselves if this type of abhorrent behavior is within the generally accepted standards of decency and morality in our community."

[SF-Dano]

From the front page here:

$50M LAWSUIT AGAINST JOURNEY & NEAL SCHON DISMISSED:Today, July 9, 2012 the Honorable Dennis Hupp, Circuit Court Judge for Warren County, Virginia, dismissed with prejudice, Tareq Salahi's $50 million dollar lawsuit against the rock band Journey and lead guitarist Neal Schon.
After having his initial complaint dismissed on April 13, 2012 for failure to state a claim, Mr. Salahi hired a new attorney and attempted to repackage his legally and factually deficient complaint. However, after a two hour hearing, Mr. Salahi's litigiousness found no further favor, and his Amended Complaint was, yet again, dismissed - this time with prejudice.
Spearheading the successful legal efforts of Mr. Schon and Journey were Bruce Blanchard, Esq. and Stephen Cobb Esq., shareholders in the litigation group at the Virginia law firm of Odin, Feldman, & Pittleman P.C.
Upon the dismissal of the Amended Complaint with prejudice, Mr. Blanchard remarked 'As we have said all along, this case did not have a basis in law or in fact and was not worthy of the Court's time.'

[steveo777]

I've said from the beginning that this case had no merit and would be tossed. Now it has come to pass. When it is thrown out with extreme prejudice I wonder if that prevents Tareq from filing anymore frivolous lawsuits?

Why doesn't this guy just go off himself and stop breathing our valuable air. What a POS!

[STORY_TELLER]

I've said from the beginning that this case had no merit and would be tossed. Now it has come to pass. When it is thrown out with extreme prejudice I wonder if that prevents Tareq from filing anymore frivolous lawsuits?

Why doesn't this guy just go off himself and stop breathing our valuable air. What a POS!

In the formal legal world a court case that is dismissed with prejudice means that it is dismissed permanently. A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can't be brought back to court.

[The Sushi Hunter]

Pictures sent of Schon's large penus injured and humiliated Tareq. LOL

That must be one large penus!

[steveo777]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/1 ... 24498.html

The couple's courtroom win comes at the same time as one of Neal's own professional wins -- the success of his latest single, "Resonate."

Success...where?

[Gideon]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

[portland]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

No, just the fact he is a total dickhead.

[Gideon]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

No, just the fact he is a total dickhead.

You all care about that entirely too much. As long as those calloused, wrinkly fingers can pluck guitar strings with the best of 'em, who cares?

Besides, it was a penis joke and you should have taken advantage of it.

[KenTheDude]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

If he's circumcised, it's circumstantial evidence.

[Gideon]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

If he's circumcised, it's circumstantial evidence.

Zing! There you go.

[The Sushi Hunter]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

If he's circumcised, it's circumstantial evidence.

And if he's not?

[DrFU]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

If he's circumcised, it's circumstantial evidence.

And if he's not?

Fore-nsic, of course ...

[Gideon]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

If he's circumcised, it's circumstantial evidence.

And if he's not?

Fore-nsic, of course ...

Nicely done.

[donnaplease]

http://www.nvdaily.com/news/2012/07/tar ... irms-1.php

It was front-page news in our local newspaper today. Of course, I work in Front Royal, the small town (relatively-speaking) where the trial occurred yesterday. I'm still waiting to run into Tareq at lunch one day. I'd love to have a sit-down conversation with him.

[steveo777]

http://www.nvdaily.com/news/2012/07/tareq-salahi-loses-lawsuit-against-rock-guitarist-entertainment-firms-1.php

It was front-page news in our local newspaper today. Of course, I work in Front Royal, the small town (relatively-speaking) where the trial occurred yesterday. I'm still waiting to run into Tareq at lunch one day. I'd love to have a sit-down conversation with him.

I think you'd get more of the truth out of Neal than that scumbag opportunist.

[AR]

How about a class action lawsuit by fans against the band for the Generations tour?

[The Sushi Hunter]

What a stupid lawsuit anyways.

[steveo777]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

No, just the fact he is a total dickhead.

Did you really ever believe that any of the shit this lawsuit was about was really true? Women run off with guys everyday. That does not mean Neal really sent a pic of his dick. I just don't believe he did that. I don't care what photo shopped images made onto the internet. So now that we have that out of the way, why again is Neal a total dickhead? Looking forward to hearing him play some guitar!

[artist4perry]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

No, just the fact he is a total dickhead.

Did you really ever believe that any of the shit this lawsuit was about was really true? Women run off with guys everyday. That does not mean Neal really sent a pic of his dick. I just don't believe he did that. I don't care what photo shopped images made onto the internet. So now that we have that out of the way, why again is Neal a total dickhead? Looking forward to hearing him play some guitar!

Someone scared my eyes for life sending me a copy of that so called photo....looked totally fake to me. I was grateful for the fig leaf they placed over said member...sorry poor pun! I wanted to puke....blech.

I am not condoning how Neal and his girlfriend handled themselves through the divorce, but I am glad the court saw sense. If it is true then Neal is more of a yogurt head than I thought, if false well, that guy is enough of a lying publicity hound that I can see him faking such a photo.

Go cry in your Wheaties Tarique or whoever his name is...move on. I could not stay with someone who would run off and shack up with someone else anyway....I have my pride. Man up.

[Red13JoePa]

Dismissed without predjudice , Rock On Neal.

[Don]

Dismissed without predjudice , Rock On Neal.

It's "with prejudice" meaning that the plaintiff is barred from bringing an action again on the same claim.

[Yoda]

Dismissed without predjudice , Rock On Neal.

It's "with prejudice" meaning that the plaintiff is barred from bringing an action again on the same claim.

Yep. The plaintiff will have to find another body part to sue Neal for!

[la michelona]

Would Schon's genitals be considered substantial evidence?

If he's circumcised, it's circumstantial evidence.

And if he's not?

Fore-nsic, of course ...

I'm happy to see some things haven't changed