verslibre wrote:
That's your own shortcoming. Yours. What did I say of "things that should not be"? Do you see the word things? Is it singular, or is it plural?
Where the fucking hell would you ever get the notion that I find it acceptable that 12 years should be the age of consent? Or that I would be alright with an authority figure being for something like that?
All you did, as predicted, was deflect. And it still doesn't change what is going on in Kentucker. There are those of your ilk there, and in other places, who think it is perfectly alright to be in your 50s and 60s and bang chicks under 14.
Andrew titled this section aptly.
I deflected nothing. I said both situations are equally disturbing. You were pointing out what one state legislature is doing. I was pointing out that there is a member of the highest court in the land that doesn't have a problem putting a child in the same or similar situation. Your "those of your ilk" comment just shows your political bias. You completely ignore that same situation is currently legal in all 50 states. Last I checked not all 50 states are controlled by the same party.