Cat Peterik Guitars

by **Idiosyncrasy** » Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:37 pm

Hi,

I spotted this the other day! Thought people might be interested (apologies if someone has already mentioned it!)

http://www.catpeterikartguitars.com/home.html

- Danny.

by **Joe Vana** » Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:34 am

Idiosyncrasy wrote:Hi,

I spotted this the other day! Thought people might be interested (apologies if someone has already mentioned it!)

http://www.catpeterikartguitars.com/home.html

- Danny.

Oh My...he did the guitar behind the head thing in a promo....

JV

by **Red13JoePa** » Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:29 am

Why does that either bug or amuse you so much, Joe Vana?

by **Andrew** » Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:22 am

Red13JoePa wrote:Why does that either bug or amuse you so much, Joe Vana?

Yeah, I think that was cool...

by **MarcelJordan** » Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:26 pm

Seeing Jim there enjoying himself rockin' with his guitar, I think if Survivor were allowed to release records in the past with both JP and FS on the guitars, they would have been a Supergroup and had a longevity.

by **Ehwmatt** » Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:32 pm

Neat looking guitars. But, I don't think I'd buy one unless I had more money than god. The way I understand it, they are existing instruments painted... not fully custom instruments. Now, find a collaborator to create some fully custom axes AND paint them this way.. and you got a big-time winner! Cool video though.

by **Joe Vana** » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:18 am

Andrew wrote:
Red13JoePa wrote:Why does that either bug or amuse you so much, Joe Vana?

Yeah, I think that was cool...

Because I think its cheesy...IMHO....and I still have a right to that don't I? Obviously others like it.....

JV

by **jrnyman28** » Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:28 am

Ehwmatt wrote:Neat looking guitars. But, I don't think I'd buy one unless I had more money than god. The way I understand it, they are existing instruments painted... not fully custom instruments. Now, find a collaborator to create some fully custom axes AND paint them this way.. and you got a big-time winner! Cool video though.

There is a link to a "fully custom" page.,,I didn't follow it so I am not sure what it has to offer though.

by **Ehwmatt** » Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:29 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Neat looking guitars. But, I don't think I'd buy one unless I had more money than god. The way I understand it, they are existing instruments painted... not fully custom instruments. Now, find a collaborator to create some fully custom axes AND paint them this way.. and you got a big-time winner! Cool video though.

There is a link to a "fully custom" page.,,I didn't follow it so I am not sure what it has to offer though.

\

I could be wrong, but from what I can tell, all that means is you can design a custom paint job and select the guitar you want them to paint instead of choosing from say, the pre-selected Eye of the Tiger themed Telecaster that they offer... it's still not a custom, hand-made guitar made to your order... only the aesthetics are. That's how I'm understanding it at least...

by **Tito** » Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:15 am

I'm not technical enough to tell if the guitars sound good or cultured enough to know if the guitars look good. But, why would you get Jim Peterik to endorse your guitars. I'm not knocking him personally or anything, but the guy isn't really thought of as a guitarist. He's thought of as a songwriter first and probably a keyboard player a distant second. Even the few people/fans who know he plays guitar, I'm sure don't think of him as one of the greats. So, to me it's a waste of an endorsement deal/advertising dollars. Jim Peterik endorsement will not move one guitar. They should've got a name guitar player if they wanted to have an impact endorsement. Get a Frankie Sullivan instead (if he's available). Even a Joel Hoekstra or Mike Aquino would've had more umph.

by **jrnyman28** » Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:23 am

Tito wrote:I'm not technical enough to tell if the guitars sound good or cultured enough to know if the guitars look good. But, why would you get Jim Peterik to endorse your guitars. I'm not knocking him personally or anything, but the guy isn't really thought of as a guitarist. He's thought of as a songwriter first and probably a keyboard player a distant second. Even the few people/fans who know he plays guitar, I'm sure don't think of him as one of the greats. So, to me it's a waste of an endorsement deal/advertising dollars. Jim Peterik endorsement will not move one guitar. They should've got a name guitar player if they wanted to have an impact endorsement. Get a Frankie Sullivan instead (if he's available). Even a Joel Hoekstra or Mike Aquino would've had more umph.

I don't think he is "endorsing" them, I think he is invested in them. I think this is part his company.

by **Tito** » Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:25 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
Tito wrote:I'm not technical enough to tell if the guitars sound good or cultured enough to know if the guitars look good. But, why would you get Jim Peterik to endorse your guitars. I'm not knocking him personally or anything, but the guy isn't really thought of as a guitarist. He's thought of as a songwriter first and probably a keyboard player a distant second. Even the few people/fans who know he plays guitar, I'm sure don't think of him as one of the greats. So, to me it's a waste of an endorsement deal/advertising dollars. Jim Peterik endorsement will not move one guitar. They should've got a name guitar player if they wanted to have an impact endorsement. Get a Frankie Sullivan instead (if he's available). Even a Joel Hoekstra or Mike Aquino would've had more umph.

I don't think he is "endorsing" them, I think he is invested in them. I think this is part his company.

If that's the case - oh.

MR

Cat Peterik Guitars

Cat Peterik Guitars

Re: Cat Peterik Guitars

Who is online