Question

[knox]

I know, NOT ANOTHER POST ON THIS!!!!

But, I want to keep this one on track with this one topic.

The quetion is:

**** What do you think of the FAITHFULLY song on Deano's blog?****

To me, there are only a few conclusions that can be drawn:

1. Dean fabricated the whole recording.

2. There really was a taped vocal, it messed up, and Steve had to start singing with his real, and pretty bad, voice. To help cover it, he had the audience sing a lot of the song.

3. Steve's mic cut out, and when it came back on he was so shaken and nervous at the mishap that his voice suffered from nerves.

4. You don't notice any change in vocal quality at all, and it was just a mic mishap.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I happen to believe option 2. If one can not hear the vocal quality degrade seriously after the vocal sound cut out then my ear for music is MUCH better than I give myself credit for.

Please, no snide comments. Just post your opinions. If you don't want to, don't litter this thread with trash. It isn't hard, just tell what you think of THIS RECORDING ONLY.

[perryfaithful]

I know, NOT ANOTHER POST ON THIS!!!!

But, I want to keep this one on track with this one topic.

The quetion is:

**** What do you think of the FAITHFULLY song on Deano's blog?****

To me, there are only a few conclusions that can be drawn:

1. Dean fabricated the whole recording.

2. There really was a taped vocal, it messed up, and Steve had to start singing with his real, and pretty bad, voice. To help cover it, he had the audience sing a lot of the song.

3. Steve's mic cut out, and when it came back on he was so shaken and nervous at the mishap that his voice suffered from nerves.

4. You don't notice any change in vocal quality at all, and it was just a mic mishap.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I happen to believe option 2. If one can not hear the vocal quality degrade seriously after the vocal sound cut out then my ear for music is MUCH better than I give myself credit for.

Please, no snide comments. Just post your opinions. If you don't want to, don't litter this thread with trash. It isn't hard, just tell what you think of THIS RECORDING ONLY.

that was my thought also Knox. Frankly this was the tape that really brought the issue home for me!

[Marabelle]

i can't listen to another tape.

i just would like to know if the fans are getting their money's worth

and who is telling the truth.

someone from the band needs to fess up and set the record straight for all.

i think it has gone on long enough.

[swepett]

1. Dean fabricated the whole recording.

I have that full show and it is downloaded from Dime, a site with very high standards for the authenticity of the recordings. If this was fixed in any way, the recording would have been banned. In addition, the guy who recorded it claims that SA "slipped on stage-simple as that -no conspiracy..nothing...and that I saw with my own eyes"

I would never dream of teling this guy or girl that they are wrong, after all they were there and I wasn't, but if he simply slipped, I don't think it would have been so abruptly cut off. And yes, I can hear some differences in his voice after that. And, the other 2005 recording I have listened to, SA hasn't let the audience sing that song as much as he did here. Of course, that proves nothing and I haven't heard all shows SA has done but I have listened to quite a few the last couple of days and there's rarely a case of SA being quiet and leaving the singing this much to the crowd in this song.

2. There really was a taped vocal, it messed up, and Steve had to start singing with his real, and pretty bad, voice. To help cover it, he had the audience sing a lot of the song.

This is my guess too.