Deano's Avatar is back

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby styxman » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:23 am

Shadowsong wrote:
styxman wrote:

Hey Shadow, I like my human condition, knowing my luck if I flew free with the birds - Ted Nugent....bang, I'd be dead :lol:


Well, I guess Ted has never been a bird
Perhaps in his next life he will come back as a bird
& will experience being the target of his own sport.

To kill for survival & sustenance is one thing
but to kill for the thrill is a total disregard for the precious gift of life.

Sure we all have killed
A spider
A fly

A mosquito
a roach
as I have

Last three I will still kill
but I do try to trap & release any lost spiders of flies that find there way in my home
except lately the flies have been getting the swat

As for flies I ask them to leave
Some go to the window wanting to be let out
some don;t
then it;s war
as they bother the bird
I don;t know if they bite or just annoy
but he cries out when one is near him
So heck I feel bad for them but
mess with my bird and your dead...

:lol:

So
What's next with the Adventure's of D'Avatar?


Don't get me going on Ted Nugent :evil:

Avatar, well if I'm feelin' up to it, He'll collect someone in Sheffield and head off to Tasmania :shock: Hey perhaps the flies just want to see Budgie's cheerios trick :lol:
styxman
 

Postby Citygirl » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:26 am

Tasmania? I thought it was a European tour?

I'm enjoying the story though Styxman. You horror bumping off SA like that! :lol:

Was I one of the wee traffic cones that tried to set him free of Avatar and Perry?
Citygirl
8 Track
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Postby styxman » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:33 am

Les wrote:Tasmania? I thought it was a European tour?

I'm enjoying the story though Styxman. You horror bumping off SA like that! :lol:

Was I one of the wee traffic cones that tried to set him free of Avatar and Perry?


Reading some of your posts over the past few weeks, I nearly put you under the truck :shock:
styxman
 

Postby Citygirl » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:36 am

styxman wrote:Reading some of your posts over the past few weeks, I nearly put you under the truck :shock:


Lovely... shows what a nice person you are. :lol:
Citygirl
8 Track
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Postby styxman » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:38 am

Les wrote:
styxman wrote:Reading some of your posts over the past few weeks, I nearly put you under the truck :shock:


Lovely... shows what a nice person you are. :lol:


Ain't I just :wink:
styxman
 

Postby Citygirl » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:40 am

I'm sure you'll bump me off in the story at some point. Why don't you send me after Avatar and Perry and then they can dispose of me? Throw me in Loch Lomond maybe... or throw me in the Atlantic or something like that? Maybe even put me in the lorry to Siberia in SA's place... up to you.

Would make for some good entertainment.
Citygirl
8 Track
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Postby Shadowsong » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:49 am

styxman wrote: ?
Don't get me going on Ted Nugent :evil:

Avatar, well if I'm feelin' up to it, He'll collect someone in Sheffield and head off to Tasmania :shock: Hey perhaps the flies just want to see Budgie's cheerios trick :lol:


Haha
The flies are just after his lucky charms...
there magically delicious

Well, I don;t want him getting sick
fllies carry disease

So
What's next with the Adventure's of D'AvatarLots more to discover
I'll pm you
:lol:
User avatar
Shadowsong
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:42 am
Location: ~Looking through the Eyes of Forever~

Postby styxman » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:04 am

Les wrote:I'm sure you'll bump me off in the story at some point. Why don't you send me after Avatar and Perry and then they can dispose of me? Throw me in Loch Lomond maybe... or throw me in the Atlantic or something like that? Maybe even put me in the lorry to Siberia in SA's place... up to you.

Would make for some good entertainment.


What's this thing you have about Loch Lomond, doesn't happen to be that nudist colony on the small island there :lol: As for the Lorry, there is no Lorry anymore, no cargo :evil:
I'll keep an eye on you over the next few weeks.....as I might just drop you in Bagdad :wink:
styxman
 

Postby Wheels Of Fyre » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:07 am

Lula wrote:"Considering that my 5 year-old son can't do many things that any other 5 year-old child can do isn't fortunate in any capacity.

What an ignorant and insensitive thing you just said." Fyre

That is what I responded to. From that statement, well it seems that your focus is on limitations rather than nurturing. I never claimed a child with special needs is fortunate, but rather pointed out my displeasure with those that consider a child with special needs to be misfortunate/unfortunate. From reading Dave's responses to you just goes to show this is pointless. Dave pretty much makes sense ;).


So it's OK to label others as "retarded" but you find displeasure in my taking check in reality when it comes to what is and isn't fortunate? I find that rather screwy.

I have dreams but there's a difference between being in a dream world and reality. The reality is that my son is unfortunate to be in his condition. It has and will potentially forever limit him from being independent in ways that "normal" people take for granted. Do I focus on limitations? Absolutely. How in the real world will he ever be able to overcome them if not? Do I focus on his abilities? Absolutely. How in the real world will he ever be able to use them to gain independence and overcome his limitations if not? I have nothing but hope for him and I spend every moment I can providing him with the strength, courage, and discipline he'll need to exist in the real world.

As for Dave - I have no idea what he's talking about and have asked him to explain. My guess is that he's glossed over my posts without actually comprehending them otherwise he wouldn't have drawn the conclusion regarding hypocrisy. It's disturbing that you take his off-the-wall remark as a condemnation of me without even completely understanding, too!
http://fyrewyngz.proboards88.com/

The Garden of Eden can't be found on a map. It's not a geographical location. It's right where you are - if you're in the spirit.
Wheels Of Fyre
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:16 am
Location: Ohio

Postby styxman » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:10 am

FYRE wrote:
Lula wrote:"Considering that my 5 year-old son can't do many things that any other 5 year-old child can do isn't fortunate in any capacity.

What an ignorant and insensitive thing you just said." Fyre

That is what I responded to. From that statement, well it seems that your focus is on limitations rather than nurturing. I never claimed a child with special needs is fortunate, but rather pointed out my displeasure with those that consider a child with special needs to be misfortunate/unfortunate. From reading Dave's responses to you just goes to show this is pointless. Dave pretty much makes sense ;).


So it's OK to label others as "retarded" but you find displeasure in my taking check in reality when it comes to what is and isn't fortunate? I find that rather screwy.

I have dreams but there's a difference between being in a dream world and reality. The reality is that my son is unfortunate to be in his condition. It has and will potentially forever limit him from being independent in ways that "normal" people take for granted. Do I focus on limitations? Absolutely. How in the real world will he ever be able to overcome them if not? Do I focus on his abilities? Absolutely. How in the real world will he ever be able to use them to gain independence and overcome his limitations if not? I have nothing but hope for him and I spend every moment I can providing him with the strength, courage, and discipline he'll need to exist in the real world.

As for Dave - I have no idea what he's talking about and have asked him to explain. My guess is that he's glossed over my posts without actually comprehending them otherwise he wouldn't have drawn the conclusion regarding hypocrisy. It's disturbing that you take his off-the-wall remark as a condemnation of me without even completely understanding, too!


Fyre, that's 24 hours now!....where the fuck is the duck story :?
styxman
 

Postby SusieP » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:17 am

So has Avatar checked in?
I gave him my mobile phone number in case of emergency but I've not heard from him.

There were lights and explosions over the Sheffield skies last night, but nothing was on the local evening news, so I assume he's ok.
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby Matthew » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:24 am

FYRE wrote:
Lula wrote:"Considering that my 5 year-old son can't do many things that any other 5 year-old child can do isn't fortunate in any capacity.

What an ignorant and insensitive thing you just said." Fyre

That is what I responded to. From that statement, well it seems that your focus is on limitations rather than nurturing. I never claimed a child with special needs is fortunate, but rather pointed out my displeasure with those that consider a child with special needs to be misfortunate/unfortunate. From reading Dave's responses to you just goes to show this is pointless. Dave pretty much makes sense ;).



As for Dave - I have no idea what he's talking about and have asked him to explain. My guess is that he's glossed over my posts without actually comprehending them otherwise he wouldn't have drawn the conclusion regarding hypocrisy.


:roll:

Give it up Fyre....the hypocrisy debate was interesting yesterday...but I'd rather read about the budgies today.
User avatar
Matthew
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4979
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:47 am
Location: London

Postby styxman » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:27 am

SusieP wrote:So has Avatar checked in?
I gave him my mobile phone number in case of emergency but I've not heard from him.

There were lights and explosions over the Sheffield skies last night, but nothing was on the local evening news, so I assume he's ok.


We know why he's got your Mobile number, don't we :wink: Say nothin'
He's not there yet, I've taken to Donald rubber duck tonight so I've other plans :lol:
styxman
 

Postby styxman » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:28 am

Matthew wrote:
FYRE wrote:
Lula wrote:"Considering that my 5 year-old son can't do many things that any other 5 year-old child can do isn't fortunate in any capacity.

What an ignorant and insensitive thing you just said." Fyre

That is what I responded to. From that statement, well it seems that your focus is on limitations rather than nurturing. I never claimed a child with special needs is fortunate, but rather pointed out my displeasure with those that consider a child with special needs to be misfortunate/unfortunate. From reading Dave's responses to you just goes to show this is pointless. Dave pretty much makes sense ;).



As for Dave - I have no idea what he's talking about and have asked him to explain. My guess is that he's glossed over my posts without actually comprehending them otherwise he wouldn't have drawn the conclusion regarding hypocrisy.


:roll:

Give it up Fyre....the hypocrisy debate was interesting yesterday...but I'd rather read about the budgies today.


Hey Matthew, Shadow hates the word Budgie, you'll get a four paragraph we love the world post now :lol:
styxman
 

Postby Shadowsong » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:32 am

styxman wrote:
Matthew wrote:[
:roll:

Give it up Fyre....the hypocrisy debate was interesting yesterday...but I'd rather read about the budgies today.


Hey Matthew, Shadow hates the word Budgie, you'll get a four paragraph we love the world post now :lol:


I don;t hate the word budgie
It;s a fine word for a particular sort of bird
:lol:
Just don;t like to see it misapplied

Oooh does that sound familar... :roll:
User avatar
Shadowsong
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:42 am
Location: ~Looking through the Eyes of Forever~

Postby SusieP » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:35 am

styxman wrote:
SusieP wrote:So has Avatar checked in?
I gave him my mobile phone number in case of emergency but I've not heard from him.

There were lights and explosions over the Sheffield skies last night, but nothing was on the local evening news, so I assume he's ok.


We know why he's got your Mobile number, don't we :wink: Say nothin'
He's not there yet, I've taken to Donald rubber duck tonight so I've other plans :lol:



My mobile phone number was for SP to send me SMS messages whenever he wants, but Avatar wanted it too. You know how FORCEFUL he is when he wants something.
I didnt see the harm in letting him have it. Its not as if I'll ever see him a gain is it. :lol:

By the way -there was a news bulletin on tonight about there being a shortage of vibrating rubber ducks due to a sudden high demand today. :lol:
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby Matthew » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:36 am

styxman wrote:
Matthew wrote:
FYRE wrote:
Lula wrote:"Considering that my 5 year-old son can't do many things that any other 5 year-old child can do isn't fortunate in any capacity.

What an ignorant and insensitive thing you just said." Fyre

That is what I responded to. From that statement, well it seems that your focus is on limitations rather than nurturing. I never claimed a child with special needs is fortunate, but rather pointed out my displeasure with those that consider a child with special needs to be misfortunate/unfortunate. From reading Dave's responses to you just goes to show this is pointless. Dave pretty much makes sense ;).



As for Dave - I have no idea what he's talking about and have asked him to explain. My guess is that he's glossed over my posts without actually comprehending them otherwise he wouldn't have drawn the conclusion regarding hypocrisy.


:roll:

Give it up Fyre....the hypocrisy debate was interesting yesterday...but I'd rather read about the budgies today.


Hey Matthew, Shadow hates the word Budgie, you'll get a four paragraph we love the world post now :lol:


Sorry...I did of course mean Cock a tiel . :)
User avatar
Matthew
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4979
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:47 am
Location: London

Postby SusieP » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:45 am

[quote="Matthew
Sorry...I did of course mean Cock a tiel . :)[/quote]

Is that like "Coq au Vin" only with a different sauce? :? :lol: :lol:
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby Shadowsong » Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:47 am

Matthew wrote:
Sorry...I did of course mean Cock a tiel . :)


Oppps
:oops:
maybe we should move this to the porn thread

Bud G String
Cock a Tiel....thats spelt phonetically for the bird challenged

8)

Heard D'Avatar has got something cooking in his sweaty palms
I;m sure we haven't heard the last of him...
User avatar
Shadowsong
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:42 am
Location: ~Looking through the Eyes of Forever~

Postby Citygirl » Fri Sep 01, 2006 6:21 am

styxman wrote:What's this thing you have about Loch Lomond, doesn't happen to be that nudist colony on the small island there :lol: As for the Lorry, there is no Lorry anymore, no cargo :evil:
I'll keep an eye on you over the next few weeks.....as I might just drop you in Bagdad :wink:


Okay the Firth Of Forth then if that makes you happy. No lorry? Okay.

And please don't drop me in Bagdad. If you're gonna drop me anywhere make it somewhere interesting. I promise to be good and not stick up for SA anymore. :lol:
Citygirl
8 Track
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Previous

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests