conversationpc wrote:
Of course they were trying to discredit them. Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame is/were anti-Bush liberals who lied about his supposed trip to Africa and the "evidence" or lack thereof that was uncovered because of it.
So, OK, let me see if I've got this straight. It was OK for Bush to lie about his reasons for going to Iraq and wrong for anyone to challenge that? Then it was right for the administration to retaliate in an underhanded way and lie about that too?
Regardless of how you or those you know are doing financially, the country as a whole is doing better economically than we were six years ago. The same sources that were used to justify a good economy during Clinton's administration are showing a strong economy now. That's not Republican spin manipulating the numbers. It can't be denied. You know, I wasn't doing so hot financially during the Clinton administration, either. I got laid off from jobs two or three times and my income was cut basically in half for awhile. I couldn't afford to pay all my bills. I could very easily have gotten angry and blamed it all on Clinton and his administration like you're doing with Bush. I took responsibility for my own life and, by the grace of God, managed to pull myself up by the bootstraps and quit being a complaining weasel and make a go of it. It still isn't easy and there are struggles but any financial troubles I ever find myself in from here on out will be by my own doing, not Bush's or any other politician.
But I just don't agree that the economy of the country overall is better off. I think certain segments of the population are better off. I think a lot more of the people would be better off with Democratic economic policies. Certainly all of those millions of people making minimum wage in all those small business jobs we keep hearing about with no medical benefits would be.