Frustrating

[larryfromnextdoor]

WOW again!

I was invited to do a feature...and I did a feature that the band, management and the absolute vast majority loved!

Self glorification??!!!

Drew~

Don't waste any more time on these people. They're not worth the effort of a response.

amen donna,, now, get them leather britches on...

[donnaplease]

amen donna,, now, get them leather britches on...

Go ahead and hold your breath on that one, Lar!!!! I dare ya!!

BTW, I'm not sure I've ever heard 'leather' and 'britches' in the same sentence before...

[FinnFreak]

I find it incredibly frustrating and highly annoying to see this forum still being mentioned on other sites as an "unmoderrated" forum.

Er, excuse me, who the *%$# and I then?

This forum has always been moderrated and will always be moderrated - by me - who is online each and EVERY day and who is easily contactable via PM or whatever other method and who takes action when necessary, but ONLY when absolutely necessary.

You lot are all adults, all capable of being held accountable for your own actions and it bothers me that some feel the need to complain about other forums while posting on one that better suits their own individual needs.

I don't see anything here that has gotten out of hand or that has needed a heavy hand to control in several weeks - not since the announcement at least.

In fact, I would go as far to say that this HERE is the more fan friendly, open to opinion forum.

Am I wrong?

phöh - this place is GREAT..!


John -

[Red13JoePa]

Again while the interviews were brief, I found them rather intriguing with the (barely) veiled potshots @ Augeri from neal and deen.
I couldn't believe they treaded that close to outright ripping SA.
On a side note I see that Deen has since backpedaled while Neal just kept being neal and let his words remain.

But again that was an adjunct of the feature itself. to me I most enjoyed the journalistic account of the minutes of the trip and the 2 show reviews.
For the article, the diary and the 2 reviews I thought it was maybe the best piece the site's ever done.

[ohsherrie]

You're right Joe, there was a lot to the article and interviews besides the references to Augeri, but those comments are the only ones that some people paid any attention to. That's what they're trying to crucify Andrew over. They apparently think he wasn't objective because he didn't edit out the things they didn't want to hear. If the guys hadn't been so honest about they're feelings and experiences, or if Andrew had edited out what they said that put Augeri in a negative light, they probably wouldn't even mind the typos or that Dean proofed it.

[Lula]

You're right Joe, there was a lot to the article and interviews besides the references to Augeri, but those comments are the only ones that some people paid any attention to. That's what they're trying to crucify Andrew over. They apparently think he wasn't objective because he didn't edit out the things they didn't want to hear. If the guys hadn't been so honest about they're feelings and experiences, or if Andrew had edited out what they said that put Augeri in a negative light, they probably wouldn't even mind the typos or that Dean proofed it.

Good point!