yulog wrote:I didn't take offense to anything (i'm not the one telling others to shove it, this sounds more like your the one who is offended, whereas my comment was a devils advocate approach),I meerly pointed out that what you do at your site is no different than what was done here , whether its picking one person or grouping a bunch of individuals its still the same thing.
I didn't take your generalizations as pointing the finger at me,i havent done anything wrong to the annex, why would i take it that way. Don't let your anger get the best of you, my comment was as much tongue and cheek as yours.
You seem quite sensitive about the annex, i'm not sensitive about it so i dont see how you would think i would take offense to anything you said. I thought intelligent debate was encouraged here(not that telling people to shove it really belongs here) but i find that for the most part you offer intelligent debate...a little angry at times but intelligent nonetheless.
Oh whatever....change the tampon, toxic shock is setting in dude....Im not sensitive (or overly) about shit ....that's the greatest misconception peolple seem to have about me. I don't give a fuck about much of anything that goes on here. If I actually had a fucking vested emotional interest in online relationships, I wouldn't sleep at night. Sadly there are people here and at other sites that could benefit from my attitude.
So try (as hard as it may be for you) to not read into what I'm saying....you can try to drum up some silly theory that somethings not right with me and the annex, but all it is is a silly theory and stupid one at that (because you're way off). I made a passing comment at how some of them might be slightly disappointed with my renewed interest in journey. You took that as an opportunity to take a swipe at someone there and make more out of it than anyone (including myself implied). Andrew clarified in this very thread that my statement was within bounds, while yours wasnt.