SueinFlorida wrote:Trial by Fire by a mile. I really like Revelation but I love Trial by Tire.
DITTO, Sue...
Moderator: Andrew
youkeepmewaiting wrote:Trial By Fire, not taking anything away from Revelation, but TBF is a masterpiece
conversationpc wrote:Liquid_Drummer wrote:People dont realize how much of a patch work TBF is vocally. IF you use a program like Adobe Audition and separate the center channel from the stereo image you can hear Perry without any effects and hardly any backing music.. It is there that you can hear the edits... Tons of them.... He did not sing for very long on any of the tracks without stopping. Maybe he always "comped" the vocals like that... Hearing him without effects and backing music shows that the damage is there for sure.
That's exactly what I've heard several times now.Yes, he still sounded awesome because the tonality of his voice rasp or not...
Agreed.
Moose wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:TBF, though having some outstanding parts, is the worst of the cannonical Journey albums, as I will refer to Infinity through Revelation.
You can't possibly be serious.
separate_wayz wrote:Me personally, I like "Designer Vagina Craze" ..... That album is AWESOME!!!! Best work they've ever done .....
mikemarrs wrote:Trial By Fire or Revelation
which is better in your opinion?
Enigma869 wrote:JeremyP wrote:Makes you wonder why people got all up Augeri's ass for doing it.
You're comparing apples to watermelons, dude! Regardless of what studio "tricks" or enhancements, Perry may have used in the recording of TBF, he wasn't on a stage, lipping to tapes, and presenting it as a live show to the audience! It's simply NOT the same!
John from Boston
Gunbot wrote:Enigma869 wrote:JeremyP wrote:Makes you wonder why people got all up Augeri's ass for doing it.
You're comparing apples to watermelons, dude! Regardless of what studio "tricks" or enhancements, Perry may have used in the recording of TBF, he wasn't on a stage, lipping to tapes, and presenting it as a live show to the audience! It's simply NOT the same!
John from Boston
Who knows? If Perry had actually toured for that album, Tapegate might have come 10 years earlier. Then again maybe that's why he didn't want to tour ( that and the hip thing, of course).
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:Gunbot wrote:Enigma869 wrote:JeremyP wrote:Makes you wonder why people got all up Augeri's ass for doing it.
You're comparing apples to watermelons, dude! Regardless of what studio "tricks" or enhancements, Perry may have used in the recording of TBF, he wasn't on a stage, lipping to tapes, and presenting it as a live show to the audience! It's simply NOT the same!
John from Boston
Who knows? If Perry had actually toured for that album, Tapegate might have come 10 years earlier. Then again maybe that's why he didn't want to tour ( that and the hip thing, of course).
Perry would not have lipped for 2 reasons i think - one because he knew his entire reputation was based on his vocal ability and secondly (and the reason why some do not like him) is simply because he always held the aces and was never told what to do in the way that SA & JSS were, and probably Arnel will be
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
I think it was a big deal mainly cos rock bands are supposed to be all about the real deal when live and its the pop shit like - spice girls etc that lip to their album tracks.
Then again - i would be gutted to discover that Whitney or Celine lipped cos i have seen both in concert and thought they were incredible.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests