The History of Pop Music in 4 Chords: All goes back to DSB!

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

The History of Pop Music in 4 Chords: All goes back to DSB!

Postby Art Vandelay » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:57 am

It all goes back to Don't Stop Believin' :wink:

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=20647
"Serenity now...insanity later."
Art Vandelay
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:26 pm

Re: The History of Pop Music in 4 Chords: All goes back to D

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:30 am

Art Vandelay wrote:It all goes back to Don't Stop Believin' :wink:

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=20647


DSB is officially the 8th Wonder of the World. 8)
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Re: The History of Pop Music in 4 Chords: All goes back to D

Postby G.I.Jim » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:33 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Art Vandelay wrote:It all goes back to Don't Stop Believin' :wink:

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=20647


DSB is officially the 8th Wonder of the World. 8)


BJG...just noticed your signature. Do you like pickles? :wink: :lol:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby 4everkop » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:35 am

I am absolutely sick and tired of that chord progression, that is all you hear now a days G D Em C, D A Bm G, C G Am F. Nothing new. Or if your lucky in minor it is Em C G D
4everkop
45 RPM
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:46 am

Postby Art Vandelay » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:41 am

4everkop wrote:I am absolutely sick and tired of that chord progression, that is all you hear now a days G D Em C, D A Bm G, C G Am F. Nothing new. Or if your lucky in minor it is Em C G D


EXACTLY!!!!! :roll: :shock: :wink:
"Serenity now...insanity later."
Art Vandelay
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:26 pm

Postby Art Vandelay » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:42 am

Art Vandelay wrote:
4everkop wrote:I am absolutely sick and tired of that chord progression, that is all you hear now a days G D Em C, D A Bm G, C G Am F. Nothing new. Or if your lucky in minor it is Em C G D


EXACTLY!!!!! :roll: :shock: :wink:


Sorry, couldn't resist, as I know jack squat about chord progression.
"Serenity now...insanity later."
Art Vandelay
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:26 pm

Postby G.I.Jim » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:48 am

Art Vandelay wrote:
Art Vandelay wrote:
4everkop wrote:I am absolutely sick and tired of that chord progression, that is all you hear now a days G D Em C, D A Bm G, C G Am F. Nothing new. Or if your lucky in minor it is Em C G D


EXACTLY!!!!! :roll: :shock: :wink:


Sorry, couldn't resist, as I know jack squat about chord progression.


:lol: :lol: :lol: You beat me to it. I was going to say "Say it in english damnit!!!" :lol:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby 4everkop » Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:35 am

well its pretty much music theory, if you play guitar or piano, umm it is the progression of I V VI IV. A lot of songs are this chord progression. If you listen to faithfully it is pretty much the same progression as DSB but in a different key, same as with or without you by U2. Not saying that these are bad songs it's just that now adays music is so universal it is so hard to come up with something that hasn't been heard before, since nothing is new under the sun.
4everkop
45 RPM
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:46 am

Postby Ehwmatt » Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:42 am

4everkop wrote:well its pretty much music theory, if you play guitar or piano, umm it is the progression of I V VI IV. A lot of songs are this chord progression. If you listen to faithfully it is pretty much the same progression as DSB but in a different key, same as with or without you by U2. Not saying that these are bad songs it's just that now adays music is so universal it is so hard to come up with something that hasn't been heard before, since nothing is new under the sun.


I share your frustration a bit, but at the end of the day, if the song sounds good I'm not going to worry if I've heard an Emaj-C#min-Asus2-Bsus2 progression a thousand times previous. That's pop music. It's supposed to sound good. Plus, there are so many elements you can look for past a chord progression that really make a song - an incredible guitar solo, some neat chord inversions ala Todd Rundgren, walls of harmonies ala most melodic rock bands/Brian Wilson+Beach Boys, creative production etc etc. I listen to prog when I want to satiate my musical curiosity/desire for diversity.

In the end, there's a reason these types of progressions are used all the time: It's pleasing to the ear and is conducive to catchy melodies.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Rick » Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:58 am

Ehwmatt wrote:
4everkop wrote:well its pretty much music theory, if you play guitar or piano, umm it is the progression of I V VI IV. A lot of songs are this chord progression. If you listen to faithfully it is pretty much the same progression as DSB but in a different key, same as with or without you by U2. Not saying that these are bad songs it's just that now adays music is so universal it is so hard to come up with something that hasn't been heard before, since nothing is new under the sun.


I share your frustration a bit, but at the end of the day, if the song sounds good I'm not going to worry if I've heard an Emaj-C#min-Asus2-Bsus2 progression a thousand times previous. That's pop music. It's supposed to sound good. Plus, there are so many elements you can look for past a chord progression that really make a song - an incredible guitar solo, some neat chord inversions ala Todd Rundgren, walls of harmonies ala most melodic rock bands/Brian Wilson+Beach Boys, creative production etc etc. I listen to prog when I want to satiate my musical curiosity/desire for diversity.

In the end, there's a reason these types of progressions are used all the time: It's pleasing to the ear and is conducive to catchy melodies.


Yep, and as that video demonstrates, DSB could have been many different songs just by changing the lyrics.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Saint John » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:12 pm

Rick wrote:Yep, and as that video demonstrates, DSB could have been many different songs just by changing the lyrics.
Except all other songs don't have Neal's incredible guitar work, Perry's voice and Smitty's unorthodox playing on that one. Sorry, Ross. :lol: :twisted: :P
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby MarcelJordan » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:44 pm

Saint John wrote:
Rick wrote:Yep, and as that video demonstrates, DSB could have been many different songs just by changing the lyrics.
Except all other songs don't have Neal's incredible guitar work, Perry's voice and Smitty's unorthodox playing on that one. Sorry, Ross. :lol: :twisted: :P


Word! 8)
2011 New Album by Survivor - RE-ENTRY!
MarcelJordan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1383
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:01 pm

Postby FishinMagician » Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:58 pm

Ehwmatt wrote:
4everkop wrote:well its pretty much music theory, if you play guitar or piano, umm it is the progression of I V VI IV. A lot of songs are this chord progression. If you listen to faithfully it is pretty much the same progression as DSB but in a different key, same as with or without you by U2. Not saying that these are bad songs it's just that now adays music is so universal it is so hard to come up with something that hasn't been heard before, since nothing is new under the sun.


I share your frustration a bit, but at the end of the day, if the song sounds good I'm not going to worry if I've heard an Emaj-C#min-Asus2-Bsus2 progression a thousand times previous. That's pop music. It's supposed to sound good. Plus, there are so many elements you can look for past a chord progression that really make a song - an incredible guitar solo, some neat chord inversions ala Todd Rundgren, walls of harmonies ala most melodic rock bands/Brian Wilson+Beach Boys, creative production etc etc. I listen to prog when I want to satiate my musical curiosity/desire for diversity.

In the end, there's a reason these types of progressions are used all the time: It's pleasing to the ear and is conducive to catchy melodies.

well put. i dont understand the people that have the "its not complex therefore it is bad" train of thought :roll:
Image
User avatar
FishinMagician
8 Track
 
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Florida

Postby larryfromnextdoor » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:47 pm

im not much on theory.. BUT aint there only 7 notes in the scale, 12 if you count the octave? im just surprised how much has been done with that ..

if it works do it over and over...
larryfromnextdoor
MP3
 
Posts: 10331
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:40 am

Postby Ehwmatt » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:51 pm

FishinMagician wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
4everkop wrote:well its pretty much music theory, if you play guitar or piano, umm it is the progression of I V VI IV. A lot of songs are this chord progression. If you listen to faithfully it is pretty much the same progression as DSB but in a different key, same as with or without you by U2. Not saying that these are bad songs it's just that now adays music is so universal it is so hard to come up with something that hasn't been heard before, since nothing is new under the sun.


I share your frustration a bit, but at the end of the day, if the song sounds good I'm not going to worry if I've heard an Emaj-C#min-Asus2-Bsus2 progression a thousand times previous. That's pop music. It's supposed to sound good. Plus, there are so many elements you can look for past a chord progression that really make a song - an incredible guitar solo, some neat chord inversions ala Todd Rundgren, walls of harmonies ala most melodic rock bands/Brian Wilson+Beach Boys, creative production etc etc. I listen to prog when I want to satiate my musical curiosity/desire for diversity.

In the end, there's a reason these types of progressions are used all the time: It's pleasing to the ear and is conducive to catchy melodies.

well put. i dont understand the people that have the "its not complex therefore it is bad" train of thought :roll:


Thanks :lol:

I don't think 4ever is necessarily asking for super complex stuff, I think it's more along the lines of "I'm most likely going to hear E-C#-A-B or G-Cadd9-Em7-Dsus4" in this next song, something along those lines. I understand the complaint. It's just kinda hard to avoid it if you listen to pop/melodic music.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby FishinMagician » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:44 pm

Ehwmatt wrote:
FishinMagician wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
4everkop wrote:well its pretty much music theory, if you play guitar or piano, umm it is the progression of I V VI IV. A lot of songs are this chord progression. If you listen to faithfully it is pretty much the same progression as DSB but in a different key, same as with or without you by U2. Not saying that these are bad songs it's just that now adays music is so universal it is so hard to come up with something that hasn't been heard before, since nothing is new under the sun.


I share your frustration a bit, but at the end of the day, if the song sounds good I'm not going to worry if I've heard an Emaj-C#min-Asus2-Bsus2 progression a thousand times previous. That's pop music. It's supposed to sound good. Plus, there are so many elements you can look for past a chord progression that really make a song - an incredible guitar solo, some neat chord inversions ala Todd Rundgren, walls of harmonies ala most melodic rock bands/Brian Wilson+Beach Boys, creative production etc etc. I listen to prog when I want to satiate my musical curiosity/desire for diversity.

In the end, there's a reason these types of progressions are used all the time: It's pleasing to the ear and is conducive to catchy melodies.

well put. i dont understand the people that have the "its not complex therefore it is bad" train of thought :roll:


Thanks :lol:

I don't think 4ever is necessarily asking for super complex stuff, I think it's more along the lines of "I'm most likely going to hear E-C#-A-B or G-Cadd9-Em7-Dsus4" in this next song, something along those lines. I understand the complaint. It's just kinda hard to avoid it if you listen to pop/melodic music.


Oh I wasnt implying that 4ever thought that, I was just making that general statement that I have heard so many times lol.
Image
User avatar
FishinMagician
8 Track
 
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Florida

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:01 pm

I may be a ProgRocker but I have a distaste for stuff that is complex for the sake of being complex.

I wouldn't say I have an ear for "complex" compositions... I think "interesting" may be a better word for it. If something good is done with a "common" chord set, so be it, I'll like it. If something good is done with a "weird" chord set, so be it, I'll like it.
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio


Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests