Moderator: Andrew
StocktontoMalone wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:Where are the Lions....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Are YOU serious????
![]()
StocktontoMalone wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:Where are the Lions....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Are YOU serious????
![]()
Rockindeano wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:Where are the Lions....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Are YOU serious????
![]()
Getting prepped and fired up for the Draft.
StocktontoMalone wrote:I was just thinkiing. Sometimes i do that. I believe the current NFL playoff system is unfair. I also believe the NBA system is fair. Therefore, I think the NFL should adopt the NBA's system.
The current NFL system allows for a division winner, regardless of record, to qualify for the playoffs - where a team with a better record would be a wildcard, or not even make the playoffs if that team doewn't win their division.
For instance:
Let's say the NFC looks like this:
East:
Giants 11-3
Dallas 11-3(really 9-5, but for purposes of this post, 11-3 works better)
Philly 8-5-1
Washington 7-7
North
Minnesota 9-5
Green Bay 8-6
Chicago 5-9
Detroit 0-14
South
Carolina 11-3
Tampa Bay 10-4(again, really 9-5, but for purposes, I changed it)
Atlanta 9-5
New Orleans 7-7
West
Arizona 8-6
San Francisco 5-9
Seattle 3-11
St. Louis 2-12
In the current system, the 4 divisional winners would be in(let's just assume the season ended today) Giants, Carolina, Arizona, and Minnesota. The TWo wild card winners would be Dallas and Tampa. And Atlanta would get fucked with a record of 9-5, because Arizona, with a record of 8-6, is a divisional winner.
This stuff happens all the time....
The current basketball system basically ranks the 8 teams in each conference(East, and West) and ranks them 1 through 8, and then when the playoffs start: 1 plays 8, 2 plays 7, 3 plays 6, and 5 plays 4....to ME this is the ONLY fair way.
Transfering that system to the NFC, it would look like this, more or less(because I'm NOT going through all the tie-breakers)
1) Giants
2) Carolina
3) Dallas
4) Tampa Bay
5) Minnesota
6) Atlanta
7) Arizona
8 Green Bay
Ok, all you football fanatics, what is your take?
JRNYFan wrote:Rockindeano wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:Where are the Lions....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Are YOU serious????
![]()
Getting prepped and fired up for the Draft.
If you're going to suck you might as well suck at the very bottom so you can get the top pick.
YoungJRNY wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:I was just thinkiing. Sometimes i do that. I believe the current NFL playoff system is unfair. I also believe the NBA system is fair. Therefore, I think the NFL should adopt the NBA's system.
The current NFL system allows for a division winner, regardless of record, to qualify for the playoffs - where a team with a better record would be a wildcard, or not even make the playoffs if that team doewn't win their division.
For instance:
Let's say the NFC looks like this:
East:
Giants 11-3
Dallas 11-3(really 9-5, but for purposes of this post, 11-3 works better)
Philly 8-5-1
Washington 7-7
North
Minnesota 9-5
Green Bay 8-6
Chicago 5-9
Detroit 0-14
South
Carolina 11-3
Tampa Bay 10-4(again, really 9-5, but for purposes, I changed it)
Atlanta 9-5
New Orleans 7-7
West
Arizona 8-6
San Francisco 5-9
Seattle 3-11
St. Louis 2-12
In the current system, the 4 divisional winners would be in(let's just assume the season ended today) Giants, Carolina, Arizona, and Minnesota. The TWo wild card winners would be Dallas and Tampa. And Atlanta would get fucked with a record of 9-5, because Arizona, with a record of 8-6, is a divisional winner.
This stuff happens all the time....
The current basketball system basically ranks the 8 teams in each conference(East, and West) and ranks them 1 through 8, and then when the playoffs start: 1 plays 8, 2 plays 7, 3 plays 6, and 5 plays 4....to ME this is the ONLY fair way.
Transfering that system to the NFC, it would look like this, more or less(because I'm NOT going through all the tie-breakers)
1) Giants
2) Carolina
3) Dallas
4) Tampa Bay
5) Minnesota
6) Atlanta
7) Arizona
8 Green Bay
Ok, all you football fanatics, what is your take?
The NFL is fine the way it is. It is simply a successful system, and the way it is set up, the NFL locks down on it's teams if they want to bid on a playoff birth, plain and simple.
First and foremost, is the division. You play only a 16 game schedule, but yet, play everyone in your division twice, so outside of the division, nothing else really matters unless you have a weak division record. The NBA plays a 5,000 game schedule, and it's easier for teams to get in via Wins and losses, which is the way it should be since the amount of games played.
That's why the NFL works and is the best sport of professionalism. If you don't win your division, then you better find another way to get in.. even with help.. or else. On some cases it comes down to two teams a year within a division then it can get fun with all of the tiebreakers mixed in and teams start watching the scoreboard to see how the thing will play out. The NFL is just more interesting and fun, while the NBA just plays a horrid amount of games and at the end just calculate the wins and losses, then plug in. The NFL is more of a strategy war, and if teams get screwed because of record, so be it, it's YOUR division that counts then everything else follows. It is a do or die league, no matter your record.
mikemarrs wrote:very good chance the lions draft a QB and they could go with tim tebow or matt stafford.
YoungJRNY wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:I was just thinkiing. Sometimes i do that. I believe the current NFL playoff system is unfair. I also believe the NBA system is fair. Therefore, I think the NFL should adopt the NBA's system.
The current NFL system allows for a division winner, regardless of record, to qualify for the playoffs - where a team with a better record would be a wildcard, or not even make the playoffs if that team doewn't win their division.
For instance:
Let's say the NFC looks like this:
East:
Giants 11-3
Dallas 11-3(really 9-5, but for purposes of this post, 11-3 works better)
Philly 8-5-1
Washington 7-7
North
Minnesota 9-5
Green Bay 8-6
Chicago 5-9
Detroit 0-14
South
Carolina 11-3
Tampa Bay 10-4(again, really 9-5, but for purposes, I changed it)
Atlanta 9-5
New Orleans 7-7
West
Arizona 8-6
San Francisco 5-9
Seattle 3-11
St. Louis 2-12
In the current system, the 4 divisional winners would be in(let's just assume the season ended today) Giants, Carolina, Arizona, and Minnesota. The TWo wild card winners would be Dallas and Tampa. And Atlanta would get fucked with a record of 9-5, because Arizona, with a record of 8-6, is a divisional winner.
This stuff happens all the time....
The current basketball system basically ranks the 8 teams in each conference(East, and West) and ranks them 1 through 8, and then when the playoffs start: 1 plays 8, 2 plays 7, 3 plays 6, and 5 plays 4....to ME this is the ONLY fair way.
Transfering that system to the NFC, it would look like this, more or less(because I'm NOT going through all the tie-breakers)
1) Giants
2) Carolina
3) Dallas
4) Tampa Bay
5) Minnesota
6) Atlanta
7) Arizona
8 Green Bay
Ok, all you football fanatics, what is your take?
The NFL is fine the way it is. It is simply a successful system, and the way it is set up, the NFL locks down on it's teams if they want to bid on a playoff birth, plain and simple.
First and foremost, is the division. You play only a 16 game schedule, but yet, play everyone in your division twice, so outside of the division, nothing else really matters unless you have a weak division record. The NBA plays a 5,000 game schedule, and it's easier for teams to get in via Wins and losses, which is the way it should be since the amount of games played.
That's why the NFL works and is the best sport of professionalism. If you don't win your division, then you better find another way to get in.. even with help.. or else. On some cases it comes down to two teams a year within a division then it can get fun with all of the tiebreakers mixed in and teams start watching the scoreboard to see how the thing will play out. The NFL is just more interesting and fun, while the NBA just plays a horrid amount of games and at the end just calculate the wins and losses, then plug in. The NFL is more of a strategy war, and if teams get screwed because of record, so be it, it's YOUR division that counts then everything else follows. It is a do or die league, no matter your record.
lights1961 wrote:Could Tebow save DETROIT as a city and a team, or would Bradord do it better...
JRNYFan wrote:I think the amount of teams getting in is just fine, but I agree with you that non-division winners should be given a higher seed over division winners with a smaller winning percentage.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests