Journey at Sioux Falls, SD

[RaisedOnRadio92]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

[Angiekay]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

That's the most ridiculous comment. I've seen bands play MORE in smaller venues then in big. It has nothing to do with WHERE they are playing unless they add more bands to the lineup or there are time restrictions of which there were neither in Sioux Falls. And BTW....Rockford has only about 5,000 more people than Sioux Falls.

[Since 78]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

That's the most ridiculous comment. I've seen bands play MORE in smaller venues then in big. It has nothing to do with WHERE they are playing unless they add more bands to the lineup or there are time restrictions of which there were neither in Sioux Falls. And BTW....Rockford has only about 5,000 more people than Sioux Falls.

Cool! Now I'm off the hook for most ridicules comment! You tell em AK!

The other one was funnier.

[RaisedOnRadio92]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

That's the most ridiculous comment. I've seen bands play MORE in smaller venues then in big. It has nothing to do with WHERE they are playing unless they add more bands to the lineup or there are time restrictions of which there were neither in Sioux Falls. And BTW....Rockford has only about 5,000 more people than Sioux Falls.

Go ahead, call it ridiculous. But check Journey's set lists for shows. The more high profile city, the more unique the set list.

P.S - Rockford Illinois may not be very big, but do you know where it's located? Chicago and Madison. 2 HUGE cities.

[Saint John]

[

P.S - Rockford Illinois may not be very big, but do you know where it's located? Chicago and Madison. 2 HUGE cities.

I think you meant Milwaukee.

[bluejeangirl76]

Cool! Now I'm off the hook for most ridicules comment!

Erm... no, you're not.

[Since 78]

Cool! Now I'm off the hook for most ridicules comment!

Erm... no, you're not.

Well, I knew what I meant!

[Don]

Nice. Looks like we got our own little South Dakota variation of the Hatfield-McCoy feud. brewing right here in this thread.

[Saint John]

Nice. Looks like we got our own little South Dakota variation of the Hatfield-McCoy feud. brewing right here in this thread.

Gee...how exciting.

[Don]

Where is stevew2 when we need him?

[fightingilliniJRNY]

[

P.S - Rockford Illinois may not be very big, but do you know where it's located? Chicago and Madison. 2 HUGE cities.

I think you meant Milwaukee.

Rockford is 75 miles from Madison. It's 95 from Milwaukee. Straight shot up I-39 from Rockford to Madison.

[fightingilliniJRNY]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

That's the most ridiculous comment. I've seen bands play MORE in smaller venues then in big. It has nothing to do with WHERE they are playing unless they add more bands to the lineup or there are time restrictions of which there were neither in Sioux Falls. And BTW....Rockford has only about 5,000 more people than Sioux Falls.

I sincerely hope that the band doesn't try harder at certain cities than others. That would be unacceptable in my mind. And I don't think that's the case with Journey. Plus, the set list doesn't vary that much from show to show on their tours. So it's not like Neal sits around when drawing up the setlist and says "Damn, we're in Sioux Falls tonight? Fuck it, we'll open with Open Arms and then play a 35-minute version of Lovin', Touchin', Squeezin'. That should be good enough for tonight."

[Don]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

That's the most ridiculous comment. I've seen bands play MORE in smaller venues then in big. It has nothing to do with WHERE they are playing unless they add more bands to the lineup or there are time restrictions of which there were neither in Sioux Falls. And BTW....Rockford has only about 5,000 more people than Sioux Falls.

I sincerely hope that the band doesn't try harder at certain cities than others. That would be unacceptable in my mind. And I don't think that's the case with Journey. Plus, the set list doesn't vary that much from show to show on their tours. So it's not like Neal sits around when drawing up the setlist and says "Damn, we're in Sioux Falls tonight? Fuck it, we'll open with Open Arms and then play a 35-minute version of Lovin', Touchin', Squeezin'. That should be good enough for tonight."

The setlist has been the same for the last few shows, yes? I would expect them to change it a little after they have that 6 day break in the middle of August, knock out a a few rehearsals and do some different material the rest of the tour.

[portland]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

That's the most ridiculous comment. I've seen bands play MORE in smaller venues then in big. It has nothing to do with WHERE they are playing unless they add more bands to the lineup or there are time restrictions of which there were neither in Sioux Falls. And BTW....Rockford has only about 5,000 more people than Sioux Falls.

I sincerely hope that the band doesn't try harder at certain cities than others. That would be unacceptable in my mind. And I don't think that's the case with Journey. Plus, the set list doesn't vary that much from show to show on their tours. So it's not like Neal sits around when drawing up the setlist and says "Damn, we're in Sioux Falls tonight? Fuck it, we'll open with Open Arms and then play a 35-minute version of Lovin', Touchin', Squeezin'. That should be good enough for tonight."

The setlist has been the same for the last few shows, yes? I would expect them to change it a little after they have that 6 day break in the middle of August, knock out a a few rehearsals and do some different material the rest of the tour.

Why mess with it...it's just perfect the way it is

[Angiekay]

This set list is pretty pathetic.. I presume it was most likely because it's in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and not a high-profile city. I'm going to go see them in Rockford Illinois in a few weeks, and that's close to Chicago and Madison, Wi. So I'm expecting them to try more for that show....

That's the most ridiculous comment. I've seen bands play MORE in smaller venues then in big. It has nothing to do with WHERE they are playing unless they add more bands to the lineup or there are time restrictions of which there were neither in Sioux Falls. And BTW....Rockford has only about 5,000 more people than Sioux Falls.

Go ahead, call it ridiculous. But check Journey's set lists for shows. The more high profile city, the more unique the set list.

P.S - Rockford Illinois may not be very big, but do you know where it's located? Chicago and Madison. 2 HUGE cities.

Uh, I just did! Big deal if it's BETWEEN two huge cities. Question is, why aren't they PLAYING those big cities. Bands don't change set lists just because of where they play. And if Journey is the only ones who feel the need to do that, it's no wonder I don't go see them anymore.