Moderator: Andrew
Saint John wrote:Journey made its bed by packaging up with 2 other nostalgic acts and marketing it as a GH tour. So, in short, that's the type of audience they drew ... fans that wanted to hear songs they grew up listening to. If there's one lesson learned here, it should be that they should have listened to me and went on tour with the Scorpions and Europe!!! The fans that that tour would have drawn would have far more open to new music. But my guess is that they followed the $$$ and went with the acts that they thought would put more asses in seats. There's nothing wrong with that, but don't act surprised that your GH only crowd rejected new material because I told you it was going to happen.
Saint John wrote:Journey made its bed by packaging up with 2 other nostalgic acts and marketing it as a GH tour. So, in short, that's the type of audience they drew ... fans that wanted to hear songs they grew up listening to. If there's one lesson learned here, it should be that they should have listened to me and went on tour with the Scorpions and Europe!!! The fans that that tour would have drawn would have far more open to new music. But my guess is that they followed the $$$ and went with the acts that they thought would put more asses in seats. There's nothing wrong with that, but don't act surprised that your GH only crowd rejected new material because I told you it was going to happen.
Yoda wrote:Hey Bry...you should check out Europe's new stuff, really good, heavy and no more eyeliner LOL!![]()
Why couldn't Journey throw in, as substitute of a few tour dates, an evening with Journey where they feature mainly music from the new album? I realize they would give up some profit, as it would only cater to the hardcore group of fans, but that would be one way of getting the music out to the audience in a live setting.
Don wrote:Yoda wrote:Hey Bry...you should check out Europe's new stuff, really good, heavy and no more eyeliner LOL!![]()
Why couldn't Journey throw in, as substitute of a few tour dates, an evening with Journey where they feature mainly music from the new album? I realize they would give up some profit, as it would only cater to the hardcore group of fans, but that would be one way of getting the music out to the audience in a live setting.
When you can drop a quarter of a million dollars on a married woman who's not your wife, why even worry about ticket sales at one or two "Album Showcase" gigs, right?
brywool wrote:Don wrote:Yoda wrote:Hey Bry...you should check out Europe's new stuff, really good, heavy and no more eyeliner LOL!![]()
Why couldn't Journey throw in, as substitute of a few tour dates, an evening with Journey where they feature mainly music from the new album? I realize they would give up some profit, as it would only cater to the hardcore group of fans, but that would be one way of getting the music out to the audience in a live setting.
When you can drop a quarter of a million dollars on a married woman who's not your wife, why even worry about ticket sales at one or two "Album Showcase" gigs, right?
What Neal does with his personal life is none of my business... as weird as it seems to me.
Yoda wrote:I suppose what it comes down to is that management feels their maximum profit from these classic bands come in the form of greatest hits only, and that new music isn't something that is going to be widely accepted by the larger majority who listen mainly to top 40. You would think in the age of satellite radio where there's a station for just about any musical taste, that these record companies and band managers would change that line of thinking.
brywool wrote:Yoda wrote:I suppose what it comes down to is that management feels their maximum profit from these classic bands come in the form of greatest hits only, and that new music isn't something that is going to be widely accepted by the larger majority who listen mainly to top 40. You would think in the age of satellite radio where there's a station for just about any musical taste, that these record companies and band managers would change that line of thinking.
I think a lot of this is because of radios fractured formatting. They're too freakin' segmented and there's no audience for older bands unless it's older music. Pretty silly and it seems that at some point, unless new tunes are added, those formats will go away because everybody's heard it all.
brywool wrote:With the album showcase deal, it still requires people to KNOW the album to get interested.
They need to get the songs into retail outlets like Herbie did early on. They need to get them in movies.
They need to get them at their own shows.
I absolutely do not understand why Classic Rock stations don't play new music by those bands. Yeah, it's classic rock which implies old tunes... but is it written in stone that that is how it has to be. Play NEW music and old by classic rock bands.
Yoda wrote:brywool wrote:Yoda wrote:I suppose what it comes down to is that management feels their maximum profit from these classic bands come in the form of greatest hits only, and that new music isn't something that is going to be widely accepted by the larger majority who listen mainly to top 40. You would think in the age of satellite radio where there's a station for just about any musical taste, that these record companies and band managers would change that line of thinking.
I think a lot of this is because of radios fractured formatting. They're too freakin' segmented and there's no audience for older bands unless it's older music. Pretty silly and it seems that at some point, unless new tunes are added, those formats will go away because everybody's heard it all.
I keep holding out hope that everybody will get so tired of what is considered "in style" that they'll want to make a huge music change - much like what happened in the 90's with grunge and alternative music. Except, maybe some sort of full circle thing where everybody comes back to AOR style music. I know it will never happen, but man am I so BORED with what's popular nowadays. I recognize a few good artists, but it's like trying to find a needle in a hay stack.
Deb wrote:brywool wrote:With the album showcase deal, it still requires people to KNOW the album to get interested.
They need to get the songs into retail outlets like Herbie did early on. They need to get them in movies.
They need to get them at their own shows.
I absolutely do not understand why Classic Rock stations don't play new music by those bands. Yeah, it's classic rock which implies old tunes... but is it written in stone that that is how it has to be. Play NEW music and old by classic rock bands.
Explain how the crowd at this years Download Festival was singing along to the new Mr Big album songs then? That fact was mentioned in at least a couple reviews and by DrFu who was there. If anything, their new album is probably harder to come by then Journey's new album (Walmart). Their new stuff isn't getting radio play either. Maybe it's cuz they are playing between 4 to 6 new songs at every show, so the songs are getting out there (youtube?). Or peeps just like the new stuff and have bought/downloaded/stole the tunes and actually know the lyrics.
brywool wrote:Yoda wrote:I suppose what it comes down to is that management feels their maximum profit from these classic bands come in the form of greatest hits only, and that new music isn't something that is going to be widely accepted by the larger majority who listen mainly to top 40. You would think in the age of satellite radio where there's a station for just about any musical taste, that these record companies and band managers would change that line of thinking.
I think a lot of this is because of radios fractured formatting. They're too freakin' segmented and there's no audience for older bands unless it's older music. Pretty silly and it seems that at some point, unless new tunes are added, those formats will go away because everybody's heard it all.
Don wrote:Yoda wrote:brywool wrote:Yoda wrote:I suppose what it comes down to is that management feels their maximum profit from these classic bands come in the form of greatest hits only, and that new music isn't something that is going to be widely accepted by the larger majority who listen mainly to top 40. You would think in the age of satellite radio where there's a station for just about any musical taste, that these record companies and band managers would change that line of thinking.
I think a lot of this is because of radios fractured formatting. They're too freakin' segmented and there's no audience for older bands unless it's older music. Pretty silly and it seems that at some point, unless new tunes are added, those formats will go away because everybody's heard it all.
I keep holding out hope that everybody will get so tired of what is considered "in style" that they'll want to make a huge music change - much like what happened in the 90's with grunge and alternative music. Except, maybe some sort of full circle thing where everybody comes back to AOR style music. I know it will never happen, but man am I so BORED with what's popular nowadays. I recognize a few good artists, but it's like trying to find a needle in a hay stack.
This already happened for melodic rock as far as touring goes. The last five years were huge for a lot of the 80s hair bands and what not. I see grunge bands starting to have their second renaissance now.
Don wrote:brywool wrote:Yoda wrote:I suppose what it comes down to is that management feels their maximum profit from these classic bands come in the form of greatest hits only, and that new music isn't something that is going to be widely accepted by the larger majority who listen mainly to top 40. You would think in the age of satellite radio where there's a station for just about any musical taste, that these record companies and band managers would change that line of thinking.
I think a lot of this is because of radios fractured formatting. They're too freakin' segmented and there's no audience for older bands unless it's older music. Pretty silly and it seems that at some point, unless new tunes are added, those formats will go away because everybody's heard it all.
Actually, it is written in stone pretty much because of the catalogs and how the royalty payments are structured for these older acts. First things first, the record company has to send the released singles for new music to the stations. The management for Journey, REO, Foreigner seem to only send the material to A/C stations instead of the current adult pop/rock stations for whatever reasons.
Classic rock stations aren't modeled for paying a bunch of different artists royalty payments outside of the legacy catalogs, that's what the other stations that play current music are for. The DJs can't just play what they want. Someone needs to get payed every time a song gets spun. Classic rock stations don't have the budget for all that.
brywool wrote:By the way I LOVED hearing LA DO DA the other night.
Deb wrote:brywool wrote:With the album showcase deal, it still requires people to KNOW the album to get interested.
They need to get the songs into retail outlets like Herbie did early on. They need to get them in movies.
They need to get them at their own shows.
I absolutely do not understand why Classic Rock stations don't play new music by those bands. Yeah, it's classic rock which implies old tunes... but is it written in stone that that is how it has to be. Play NEW music and old by classic rock bands.
Explain how the crowd at this years Download Festival was singing along to the new Mr Big album songs then? That fact was mentioned in at least a couple reviews and by DrFu who was there. If anything, their new album is probably harder to come by then Journey's new album (Walmart). Their new stuff isn't getting radio play either. Maybe it's cuz they are playing between 4 to 6 new songs at every show, so the songs are getting out there (youtube?). Or peeps just like the new stuff and have bought/downloaded/stole the tunes and actually know the lyrics.
brywool wrote:Deb wrote:brywool wrote:With the album showcase deal, it still requires people to KNOW the album to get interested.
They need to get the songs into retail outlets like Herbie did early on. They need to get them in movies.
They need to get them at their own shows.
I absolutely do not understand why Classic Rock stations don't play new music by those bands. Yeah, it's classic rock which implies old tunes... but is it written in stone that that is how it has to be. Play NEW music and old by classic rock bands.
Explain how the crowd at this years Download Festival was singing along to the new Mr Big album songs then? That fact was mentioned in at least a couple reviews and by DrFu who was there. If anything, their new album is probably harder to come by then Journey's new album (Walmart). Their new stuff isn't getting radio play either. Maybe it's cuz they are playing between 4 to 6 new songs at every show, so the songs are getting out there (youtube?). Or peeps just like the new stuff and have bought/downloaded/stole the tunes and actually know the lyrics.
Outside of America, music fans are more open to new stuff. The bands are encouraged outside of the US to play new stuff. Here, as Jon said in the latest interview, crowds want to hear what they know, or they leave. That's the difference.
Deb wrote:brywool wrote:
Outside of America, music fans are more open to new stuff. The bands are encouraged outside of the US to play new stuff. Here, as Jon said in the latest interview, crowds want to hear what they know, or they leave. That's the difference.
You've got a point there. Sad, but true.
brywool wrote:
Outside of America, music fans are more open to new stuff.
brywool wrote:Deb wrote:brywool wrote:
Outside of America, music fans are more open to new stuff. The bands are encouraged outside of the US to play new stuff. Here, as Jon said in the latest interview, crowds want to hear what they know, or they leave. That's the difference.
You've got a point there. Sad, but true.
Yeah, it's super sucky. That means we're forever going to shows hearing stuff we've heard forever.
ooh, cosmic!
As far as Journey is concerned, I think they should've at least thrown in stuff from Revelation. That album did pretty well for them and I was surprised when they didn't play anything from it during this tour. How does a band move forward if they don't acknowledge the present? I don't think it's a slam on the band so much as the American attention span...
wait, what was I saying? Oooh! Lookit the kitty!
Saint John wrote:brywool wrote:
Outside of America, music fans are more open to new stuff.
This isn't totally true. North Americans are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to new music. The hits are the songs we grew up listening to, partying to, went to proms to, etc. We have a really emotional connection to these songs. In places where they weren't really ever popular on the radio (overseas), the listener is able to listen to the entire album and decide what they do and do not like. They're not guided by memories of radio play, but, rather, the album as a whole.
And that's the difference. Here people demand to hear songs that "take them back" to a different time, and that's an emotional bond that's really hard to break. The foreigners don't have that emotional bond, and are, by virtue of the lack of that bond, able to interchange concert songs without throwing a tantrum. So I don't think it's an "openness," so much as it is a bond ... or lack of that bond. Does that make sense?![]()
![]()
Deb wrote:Saint John wrote:brywool wrote:
Outside of America, music fans are more open to new stuff.
This isn't totally true. North Americans are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to new music. The hits are the songs we grew up listening to, partying to, went to proms to, etc. We have a really emotional connection to these songs. In places where they weren't really ever popular on the radio (overseas), the listener is able to listen to the entire album and decide what they do and do not like. They're not guided by memories of radio play, but, rather, the album as a whole.
And that's the difference. Here people demand to hear songs that "take them back" to a different time, and that's an emotional bond that's really hard to break. The foreigners don't have that emotional bond, and are, by virtue of the lack of that bond, able to interchange concert songs without throwing a tantrum. So I don't think it's an "openness," so much as it is a bond ... or lack of that bond. Does that make sense?![]()
![]()
Huh?People all over the world have emotional connection to popular songs not just the US. Heck, take Journey or especially Mr Big for example...in Japan....those bands' hits charted there and elsewhere just as well as they did in the US.....in some cases even more so. MB's TBWY went #1 in 15 countries, that's a lot of radios and alot emotional connections in alot of countries.
I think Bry is right on the money, the rest of the world is more open to listening to new stuff. North Americans just don't have the attention span and glom onto that one song and don't listen to the rest of the album.
Don wrote:A lot of American bands have become famous overseas purely for being ... American. When Bon Jovi was hot in Japan in the early 80s before they blew up in the states, it was more to do with them representing a fashion, a style that just oozed Americana in a country whose youth were trying to experience individualism for the first time. A lot of these melodic acts that are popular in Europe right now are getting a second chance because while they were busy being relevant in the states back in the 80s, the Euros were into other themes at the time, romantic punk, electronica and other genres of music. It's not that the music is better now, it's just in fashion at the moment. Eclipse stayed on most charts for one week only in Europe. It wasn't about the music being great but more so because the album had Journey's iconic 80s name on the cover. Notice how none of the singles charted? It's like Metallica in Russia; the band isn't playing to more than 300k at one gig because of the albums being appreciated more, its more to do with the band representing the west, something the Russians are just now getting to grips with. For many countries, their 80s moments are now, where as here in the states, it's the nostalgia of that era that we feel attachment to.
Eric wrote:Let me also add that nobody knows La Do Da either, so if you're gonna play something rare might as well be new.
Seems to me Management and the Band weren't communicating well enough to let the AIP potential slip through the cracks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests