Loneman1 wrote:According to Neal, it looks like Perry kinda held Jon and himself up at artistic gunpoint back in '87 in the middle of the Hawaii shows to sign the Elmo partnership otherwise he wouldn't go out on stage. This was done like 10 minutes before showtime on the 3rd gig. I've never heard THAT story before.......if thats the case, thats some pure unadulterated primadonna BS right there!
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=653 ... 6886119989
Neal needs to shut the fuck up and let his lawyers do their job. He signed the deal, Get over it and give Perry his due. While he is at it, he should admit he sucks as a businessman and doesn't really know what he's doing. He probably signed the settlement for his last lawsuit thinking he could do whatever he wanted to with merchandise trademarks. At least, that is how it seems to me.
A quote from Neal's original lawsuit from 2020. How can Nightmare enter into an agreement with Elmo Partners in 1986, AND Steve Perry force Neal to sign it in 1987? It seems to me that Neal doesn't even know when this happened, or is making shit up.
Smith and Valory are wrong that Nightmare Productions controls the Journey name. Cain and Schon, through an entity named Elmo Partners, hold all rights to the Journey name (the “Journey Mark”), including Trademark Registration Nos. 3168509 and 3189220. Specifically, pursuant to a Trademark License Agreement dated January 15, 1985, Nightmare Productions provided an exclusive, irrevocable license of the Journey Mark to Elmo Partners. Cain and Schon control the Journey Mark. Cain and Schon are expressly and solely authonzed to perform together under the Journey name.Also, the quote that Perry was citing was agreed to in 1997...when he left Journey...as we all know, Perry did NOT tour with Journey so HOW did Perry force Neal to sign this in
1997?
Cain, Schon and Perry are the three partners of Elmo Partners. In 1997, Cain,Schon and Perry entered into a General Partnership Agreement of Elmo Partners. Section 3.1 of the agreement provides that all decisions concerning the Journey Mark “shall require the prior written, unanimous consent of all PartnersAgain, the above are all quotes from Neal's original lawsuit from 2020.
https://mms.businesswire.com/media/2020 ... download=1Finally, the ROR tour started in the SUMMER of 1986, months after Nightmare signed the deal with Elmo Partners (which they would have to do to use the Journey name on the tour). In January of 1987, the ROR tour was almost OVER. Yes, there are Hawaii dates...with a LOT of seats sold, but Neal needs to explain how they were using the Journey name without it being licensed to them by Nightmare. What he is saying makes no sense at all...and he needs to explain why he RESIGNED in 1997.
Neal has only Neal to blame for this situation - nobody else...and his lawyers had better be doing a better job of shifting the blame then he does on social media.