
Moderator: Andrew
Art Vandelay wrote:At the time of the reunion, Perry's vocals were still the signature of the band.
Art Vandelay wrote:At the time of the reunion, Perry's vocals were still the signature of the band. The music was tailored around his vocal styles and capabilities at that point, which I happen to like and appreciate. While many people wished that there were heavier rock tunes on the album, everyone involved was probably being protective of his voice and being realistic of what could be sung live if they went on tour. Probably the same reason why Strange Medicine doesn't have as many uptempo rock songs.
If you listen to some of the live bootlegs of the Medicine tour, he was pushing it a bit on the heavier Journey songs. You're in the moment when you are there live, but to listen to them afterwards they sounded a helluva lot different that what he did years past. Even the ROR tour had those moments. But when he performed the slower, melodic R&B laced songs on the tour, he was 100% on and in his element. And he owned it.
The TBF song choices were made for a reason and it was a smart decision, creatively.
Gideon wrote:Perry's vocal transformation over the years due to a likely combination of that brutal touring schedule and poor care is fascinating to track.
The single biggest difference is audibly between 1981 and 1983.
I love letting my friends listen to Infinity/Evolution/Departure/Escape and then to Frontiers/Street Talk/Raised on Radio/FTLOSM and they think it's a different singer.
But I'd argue the second most notable jump is between 1994's FTLOSM and 1996's TBF.
Perry was raspy but strong as hell on both the studio and live performances of FTLOSM. By comparison, he's raspier and much more withered in TBF. Still sounds great, of course, but he's clearly nowhere near the power or range he used to have.
Journey/Survivor wrote:Gideon wrote:Perry's vocal transformation over the years due to a likely combination of that brutal touring schedule and poor care is fascinating to track.
The single biggest difference is audibly between 1981 and 1983.
I love letting my friends listen to Infinity/Evolution/Departure/Escape and then to Frontiers/Street Talk/Raised on Radio/FTLOSM and they think it's a different singer.
But I'd argue the second most notable jump is between 1994's FTLOSM and 1996's TBF.
Perry was raspy but strong as hell on both the studio and live performances of FTLOSM. By comparison, he's raspier and much more withered in TBF. Still sounds great, of course, but he's clearly nowhere near the power or range he used to have.
Even though Perry didn't hit a lot of the high notes on Frontiers that we had been used to in the past, I still felt like he had a strong voice on the Frontiers album and tour, and could probably still hit the high notes really well.
As you mentioned, I've always been shocked at how much weaker Perry sounds on TBF as opposed to how he sounded on FTLOSM.
Art Vandelay wrote:
His solo tour was cut short because of a bout of bronchitis, right?
Art Vandelay wrote:His solo tour was cut short because of a bout of bronchitis, right? Maybe that did a number on him, vocally.
JourneyHard wrote:Why have 15 tracks on an album if most of it is going to be ballads? That doesn't make any sense. They should have cut it down to ten songs and then add two more rockers for twelve tracks.
Castles Burning is the worst Journey song. Why even include this on the album, but force people to get the Japanese version for the best song I Can See It In Your Eyes?
The problem with Trial By Fire is it seemed like Journey was trying to make an album the critics would love instead of an album that Journey fans would love. The whole album cries of desperation. Please love us, critics. Please love us.
That is no way to write music.
danielb wrote:The production sounds like a million bucks, the songs are really strong and Perry's delivery is full of melancholy and grace. Their most mature album but possibly also their best?
Andrew wrote:danielb wrote:The production sounds like a million bucks, the songs are really strong and Perry's delivery is full of melancholy and grace. Their most mature album but possibly also their best?
Absolutely one of their very best and one of my three favs. A perfect 11 track album
Aaron wrote:GD Mac, really? So how about Evolution?
Andrew wrote:Aaron wrote:GD Mac, really? So how about Evolution?
Meh.
Aaron wrote:Now you're killing me boss. I'm going to have to call Evolution or Departure as their best. Escape will get an honorable mention. You can't beat Roy Thomas Baker's pegging inputs and layered vocals.Andrew wrote:Aaron wrote:GD Mac, really? So how about Evolution?
Meh.
jestor92 wrote:I wonder that because Arrival was a lot of the same and they seemed to open up the rockers a bit in each following release.
Aaron wrote:Now you're killing me boss. I'm going to have to call Evolution or Departure as their best. Escape will get an honorable mention. You can't beat Roy Thomas Baker's pegging inputs and layered vocals.Andrew wrote:Aaron wrote:GD Mac, really? So how about Evolution?
Meh.
Andrew wrote:LOL. I know. All good records but I prefer SP when he came down a notch or two rather than those notes my dogs enjoy.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests