Moderator: Andrew
yogi wrote:Someone posted this assembly line and Andrew locked it so as to not have a problem as to where some of the posts were heading. I would like to comment on the reason that I think bands like Journey continue to tour.
My opinion is that money is NOT the main reason. To me someone like Neal Schon is the EXACT same as a famous world class athlete. Plain and simple it is DAMN hard to quit doing something you love to do. The money comes second, maybe third, maybe fourth, or maybe it doesnt even enter into the equation.
Why is it soooo hard for so many boxers and other professional athletes to give it up?? Oscar De La Hoya just faught and won the other night. Does he need the money?? NO, he needs the high that can only stem from being front and center standing in front of thousands of fans that love you can bring. Does Bret Farve need the money??? Does Frank Thomas???,did Gordie Howe????? Think of all of the athletes that hang around after their prime. Most of them and their families for the next five generations have been set financially for years.
The one thing that I think is even harder for musicians is that their skills may actually get better when they age. Athletes skills decline, and many truly dont know when to quit. They just know that they will miss the friendships, the locker room & the adoring fans.
So my answer to this EXCELLENT question is that Neal and the band feel they still have the skills to get back to the TOP of their profession. And even if they dont get back to the top, on most night they love what they are doing. In front of thousands of fans nightly they are getting a high that no amount of money or no drug can deliver.
Finally, they are smart enough to realize this wont last forever. None of us are getting any younger. When the fat lady sings that one last time there will be no turning back.
yogi wrote:And if you honestly think that you can give something up that is a passion and that you are still great at you are also nuts.
When athletes reach the end of the line MANY would do it for free if it meant they would get to hear the cheers a little while longer.
At least most athletes do subconsciously know their skills are diminishing. With musicians their skills may improve with age. To me it would be very tough to quit something that I truly love when I know I am on top of my game.
yogi wrote:Neal wouldnt get to hear the cheers and would not play in front of thousands nightly if he only played instrumental. Part of what I am saying is that they need the high of the hero worship that is thrown at them when they play peoples favorite songs.
How do you give that up?? I dont think the money enters into it that much.
It is more the power of the worship they receive and the chance that they possibly could rise to the top again.
yogi wrote: So my answer to this EXCELLENT question is that Neal and the band feel they still have the skills to get back to the TOP of their profession.
And even if they dont get back to the top, on most night they love what they are doing. In front of thousands of fans nightly they are getting a high that no amount of money or no drug can deliver.
Finally, they are smart enough to realize this wont last forever. None of us are getting any younger. When the fat lady sings that one last time there will be no turning back.
Free wrote:1. There at the very least two members who need to tour to earn a living.
2. If you think money is not the main reason you are nuts.
3. Herbie said in his interview that they are still touring because they need the money. So maybe they all need the money.
Money is the main factor here.
Why so many people try to explain way the money factor is beyond rational thought.
Free wrote:Do they need money? It seems obvious Ross, Steve and Deen do.
jrnyman28 wrote:Free wrote:Do they need money? It seems obvious Ross, Steve and Deen do.
I Am with Monker here. Where do you get this from. Last I read, Steve was looking forward to taking some time of to spend with his family. And time specifically with his son before his son goes off to college. Sounds like Steve is comfortable financially.
Free wrote:I get this information from using logic and from Herbie's last interview.
Free wrote:Sure Steve Augeri can take time off and spend with his family for a few months. I think there's no doubt he makes enough money touring to do this.
However, I highly doubt that he makes enough money touring each summer to not have to work any more. Remember he has no royalites coming in unless you count the two unpoplular bands he was with.
Free wrote:It would seem likely that Deen is in the same situation.
Free wrote:On beyond the music, Ross said that he lost his property that had been in his family for years. Herbie said that was because of his former drug habit. So that means that he lost the money he made during the hey day.
Free wrote:I don't think that Journey makes as much money touring as it would seem. They have to pay so many people to make a tour happen. What's left after payroll, touring expenses and management fees is what they get. I'm doubting it's as much as we all think it is.
Red13JoePa wrote:If Augeri and Castronovo, the likely lowest-paid members of the band are making less than 10k per show, I'd be very surprised. They're doing alright....well enough to buy and sell me.
NealIsGod wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:If Augeri and Castronovo, the likely lowest-paid members of the band are making less than 10k per show, I'd be very surprised. They're doing alright....well enough to buy and sell me.
Yeah, they are getting paid well to play music and have fun. I am sure being away from home is tough, but it's part of the job.
jrNY wrote:I can't help but think that somewhere deep down Neal, Jon and Ross take pleasure in the fact that they still can perform live while Perry cannot. Neal is younger than Perry and is still doing what Perry "loved to do".
I know alot of you believe that Perry is just enjoying his life but I feel that he would be performing today if he could. I wish I were wrong, but I can't help but think he knows that his days of performing live are behind him.
Red13JoePa wrote:jrNY wrote:I can't help but think that somewhere deep down Neal, Jon and Ross take pleasure in the fact that they still can perform live while Perry cannot. Neal is younger than Perry and is still doing what Perry "loved to do".
I know alot of you believe that Perry is just enjoying his life but I feel that he would be performing today if he could. I wish I were wrong, but I can't help but think he knows that his days of performing live are behind him.
Maybe...probably even. Doesn't mean he shouldn't try to put out a third studio album like the first 2.
NealIsGod wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:jrNY wrote:I can't help but think that somewhere deep down Neal, Jon and Ross take pleasure in the fact that they still can perform live while Perry cannot. Neal is younger than Perry and is still doing what Perry "loved to do".
I know alot of you believe that Perry is just enjoying his life but I feel that he would be performing today if he could. I wish I were wrong, but I can't help but think he knows that his days of performing live are behind him.
Maybe...probably even. Doesn't mean he shouldn't try to put out a third studio album like the first 2.
Two words: William Hung.
tragchk wrote:**Referee whistle**
PERSONAL FOUL!!![]()
How the HELL can you put Steve & William in the same sentence??
NealIsGod wrote:tragchk wrote:**Referee whistle**
PERSONAL FOUL!!![]()
How the HELL can you put Steve & William in the same sentence??
![]()
I didn't, but you did!
I am just saying that if Hung can record and sell a shitload of CDs, then Perry should have nothing to worry about!
Monker wrote:Free wrote:1. There at the very least two members who need to tour to earn a living.
and, where exactly are you getting this from? Interviews that are five to ten years old and guesswork?2. If you think money is not the main reason you are nuts.
What I think is nuts is assuming you know things when you really don't.3. Herbie said in his interview that they are still touring because they need the money. So maybe they all need the money.
Which interview? Castles Burning, the latest, or something else. CB is OLD, and I don't remember reading it in the latest.Money is the main factor here.
I don't think you can prove that.Why so many people try to explain way the money factor is beyond rational thought.
It's beyond rational thought to take something said five years ago and apply it to today. It's like saying Ross declared bankrupcy in 1991 so he must still need money.
Until you have definite proof of ANY of the member's finances, then all you are doing is guessing.
jrnyman28 wrote:Free wrote:Do they need money? It seems obvious Ross, Steve and Deen do.
I Am with Monker here. Where do you get this from. Last I read, Steve was looking forward to taking some time of to spend with his family. And time specifically with his son before his son goes off to college. Sounds like Steve is comfortable financially.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests