Moderator: Andrew
sadie65 wrote:Just reading what was posted here...didn't come across as a smear to me. Nothing like being overly defensive. Oy.
Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:Just reading what was posted here...didn't come across as a smear to me. Nothing like being overly defensive. Oy.
You obviously are clueless to what goes on here. These republican doorknobs take swipes at Clinton, because that is the Standard Operating Procedure with them. They have not only manged to fuck up this country, but they have managed to fuck up the entire world as well. There is a reason NO ONE likes us. I can take shots at them, because their record is present and in sight. I don't take cheapies on them, and i certainly don't bash a president of past, like they do with Clinton./
Face it, they are out of ammo, out of luck, and soon out of fucking office.
sadie65 wrote:
Listen Deano...I am certainly not clueless as to what goes on here. I merely said I didn't think the post as written was an attempt to smear anyone.
The fact that you hold the opinions you hold doesn't change that statement. And before you label me as one of "them" I'd suggest you recognize I was ONLY speaking about the post in and of itself. Certainly there have been some really crappy posts in the name of politics.
But I think in this case only...it didn't come across as a smear.
Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:
Listen Deano...I am certainly not clueless as to what goes on here. I merely said I didn't think the post as written was an attempt to smear anyone.
The fact that you hold the opinions you hold doesn't change that statement. And before you label me as one of "them" I'd suggest you recognize I was ONLY speaking about the post in and of itself. Certainly there have been some really crappy posts in the name of politics.
But I think in this case only...it didn't come across as a smear.
Oh I hear you loud and clear Liz. The article as written was ok, but the poster posted it to get my blood boiling. The article is accurate, but that fuckhole won't cite a source, and to be completely honest with you, on two accounts, 1) I am not taking anymore republican smear attempts whether you Styxies think it is intentional or not; I will shoot first then listen... and 2) who the Hell wouldn't nod off at a MLK rally?
sadie65 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:
Listen Deano...I am certainly not clueless as to what goes on here. I merely said I didn't think the post as written was an attempt to smear anyone.
The fact that you hold the opinions you hold doesn't change that statement. And before you label me as one of "them" I'd suggest you recognize I was ONLY speaking about the post in and of itself. Certainly there have been some really crappy posts in the name of politics.
But I think in this case only...it didn't come across as a smear.
Oh I hear you loud and clear Liz. The article as written was ok, but the poster posted it to get my blood boiling. The article is accurate, but that fuckhole won't cite a source, and to be completely honest with you, on two accounts, 1) I am not taking anymore republican smear attempts whether you Styxies think it is intentional or not; I will shoot first then listen... and 2) who the Hell wouldn't nod off at a MLK rally?
And when would this approach be any different than any other time for you? Your blood boils only if you let it. Personally I'm of the opinion that if I think someone is posting something simply to piss me off I would find it humorous.
No one I know would fall asleep under normal circumstances. He's human. Something we're all guilty of being. Nothing for you to get yourself so worked up about. You and I both know there are many things people do that they never atone for. Now don't we?
But by all means...if it gets your rocks off to go ballistic over this...feel free. Not like anything I say will change that.
Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:
Listen Deano...I am certainly not clueless as to what goes on here. I merely said I didn't think the post as written was an attempt to smear anyone.
The fact that you hold the opinions you hold doesn't change that statement. And before you label me as one of "them" I'd suggest you recognize I was ONLY speaking about the post in and of itself. Certainly there have been some really crappy posts in the name of politics.
But I think in this case only...it didn't come across as a smear.
Oh I hear you loud and clear Liz. The article as written was ok, but the poster posted it to get my blood boiling. The article is accurate, but that fuckhole won't cite a source, and to be completely honest with you, on two accounts, 1) I am not taking anymore republican smear attempts whether you Styxies think it is intentional or not; I will shoot first then listen... and 2) who the Hell wouldn't nod off at a MLK rally?
And when would this approach be any different than any other time for you? Your blood boils only if you let it. Personally I'm of the opinion that if I think someone is posting something simply to piss me off I would find it humorous.
No one I know would fall asleep under normal circumstances. He's human. Something we're all guilty of being. Nothing for you to get yourself so worked up about. You and I both know there are many things people do that they never atone for. Now don't we?
But by all means...if it gets your rocks off to go ballistic over this...feel free. Not like anything I say will change that.
Liz, fighting you will only leave me in a poor prospective place, so I defer.
However, you should look up the word "passion."
sadie65 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:
Listen Deano...I am certainly not clueless as to what goes on here. I merely said I didn't think the post as written was an attempt to smear anyone.
The fact that you hold the opinions you hold doesn't change that statement. And before you label me as one of "them" I'd suggest you recognize I was ONLY speaking about the post in and of itself. Certainly there have been some really crappy posts in the name of politics.
But I think in this case only...it didn't come across as a smear.
Oh I hear you loud and clear Liz. The article as written was ok, but the poster posted it to get my blood boiling. The article is accurate, but that fuckhole won't cite a source, and to be completely honest with you, on two accounts, 1) I am not taking anymore republican smear attempts whether you Styxies think it is intentional or not; I will shoot first then listen... and 2) who the Hell wouldn't nod off at a MLK rally?
And when would this approach be any different than any other time for you? Your blood boils only if you let it. Personally I'm of the opinion that if I think someone is posting something simply to piss me off I would find it humorous.
No one I know would fall asleep under normal circumstances. He's human. Something we're all guilty of being. Nothing for you to get yourself so worked up about. You and I both know there are many things people do that they never atone for. Now don't we?
But by all means...if it gets your rocks off to go ballistic over this...feel free. Not like anything I say will change that.
Liz, fighting you will only leave me in a poor prospective place, so I defer.
However, you should look up the word "passion."
I know quite well the meaning of the word. I also think it's a catchall with you...something you hide behind to justify some of your comments.
A poor prospective place eh? Too bad. Though I think that has more to do with you than me.
Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:
Listen Deano...I am certainly not clueless as to what goes on here. I merely said I didn't think the post as written was an attempt to smear anyone.
The fact that you hold the opinions you hold doesn't change that statement. And before you label me as one of "them" I'd suggest you recognize I was ONLY speaking about the post in and of itself. Certainly there have been some really crappy posts in the name of politics.
But I think in this case only...it didn't come across as a smear.
Oh I hear you loud and clear Liz. The article as written was ok, but the poster posted it to get my blood boiling. The article is accurate, but that fuckhole won't cite a source, and to be completely honest with you, on two accounts, 1) I am not taking anymore republican smear attempts whether you Styxies think it is intentional or not; I will shoot first then listen... and 2) who the Hell wouldn't nod off at a MLK rally?
And when would this approach be any different than any other time for you? Your blood boils only if you let it. Personally I'm of the opinion that if I think someone is posting something simply to piss me off I would find it humorous.
No one I know would fall asleep under normal circumstances. He's human. Something we're all guilty of being. Nothing for you to get yourself so worked up about. You and I both know there are many things people do that they never atone for. Now don't we?
But by all means...if it gets your rocks off to go ballistic over this...feel free. Not like anything I say will change that.
Liz, fighting you will only leave me in a poor prospective place, so I defer.
However, you should look up the word "passion."
I know quite well the meaning of the word. I also think it's a catchall with you...something you hide behind to justify some of your comments.
A poor prospective place eh? Too bad. Though I think that has more to do with you than me.
What the Hell is wrong with you? I hide behind passion to justify my stances? Oh please expound on this. See, it seems to me you have been watching me in action for the last 2 or 3 years because to know what you know about me, without having any contact with since December 2005, strikes me as odd.
sadie65 wrote:
Nothing is wrong with me. Nothing odd about it. You and I both know that you tend to go off half cocked more often than not. You claim it's passion. I said it was something you hide behind because it makes it easier for you to justify some of your posts. You can and often are a very entertaining person. I've no doubt you believe what you say when you say it. But we also know that there are things you've said that you've had to retract or change...simply because that "passion" of yours got in the way.
Suffice it to say that you won't see things in the same light as I do. I'm cool with that. I assure you I know the meaning of the word passion.
Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:
Nothing is wrong with me. Nothing odd about it. You and I both know that you tend to go off half cocked more often than not. You claim it's passion. I said it was something you hide behind because it makes it easier for you to justify some of your posts. You can and often are a very entertaining person. I've no doubt you believe what you say when you say it. But we also know that there are things you've said that you've had to retract or change...simply because that "passion" of yours got in the way.
Suffice it to say that you won't see things in the same light as I do. I'm cool with that. I assure you I know the meaning of the word passion.
Goddammit Liz, I don't go off "half cocked" but I would rather call it a pissed off rage.
Now, I am trying to find kind words to end this bullshit interaction.
sadie65 wrote:
Oh that's right...you certainly wouldn't go off half cocked...not you with Jimbo and the twins.
Not bullshit. Just interaction between people who know better.
Rockindeano wrote:sadie65 wrote:
Oh that's right...you certainly wouldn't go off half cocked...not you with Jimbo and the twins.
Not bullshit. Just interaction between people who know better.
Are you on coke tonight? What has my cock n balls have to do with anything?
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
squirt1 wrote:Deano- ?? What is your opinion of the venerable Ted Kennedy and I forget the other noted Dem of jumping in on Bill as a determent to Hillary's presidential race? It seems the dem concensus is that he is hurting her chances with his small rages.
lights1961 wrote:just got me funny... thats all...
BILL HAS A 'DREAM'
EX PREZ NODS OFF DURING MLK AWARD PRESENTATION
Post Staff Report
Bill repeatedly lies about Obama and gets away with it. Lets be honest with ourselves- we all know he is a liar. Why does he get a free pass to lie repeatedly and never gets called to task? Lets call a spade a spade...
posted by MattClick here to commentBill Clinton Has a 'Dream'Former president Clinton nodded off during the MLK awards presentation.
January 21, 2008 -- Bill Clinton showed yesterday why he made it into the book "The Art of Napping."
During an appearance at the Convent Avenue Baptist Church in Harlem, the former president was caught nodding off.
Clinton was there during a service to honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., while his wife was nearby at Abyssinian Baptist Church, where she was endorsed by its minister, Rev. Calvin Butts.
Clinton has had napping episodes before. Among others, he nodded off at a Mets game and at Ronald Reagan's funeral.
When he was president, he told Dan Rather, "If I can take a nap, even 15 or 20 minutes in the middle of the day, it is really invigorating to me. On the days when I'm a little short of sleep, I try to work it out so that I can sneak off and just lie down for 15 minutes, a half an hour, and it really makes all the difference in the world."
Shadowsong wrote:Better caught in a dream
RedWingFan wrote:Don't know if you have seen this but here's a classic clip of Rush nailing that phony Clinton. So many people bought his, "I feel your pain", "I was virtually obsessed with Bin Laden" garbage. Yeah right. Complete fraud. Kudo's for signing welfare reform after vetoing it twice though.![]()
Enjoy!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdEhmVBH ... re=related
Rockindeano wrote:You are an asshole lights1961.
Care to say who wrote this? Doesn't matter. You filthy right wing scumbags have NO record to run on, so hey, guess what, smear Clinton.
FYI, Bill Clinton suffers from severe sleep disorder.
Asshole.
Cite your sleazy source.
Rockindeano wrote:I DID overreact, however, there is no doubt you fuckers plant this shit to stir me up, and I will always defend this guy. I am a proud Clinton Democrat, something you fuckers will never say about Bush- either of those two assholes.
I am sorry for calling you an asshole. That was wrong.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests