Moderator: Andrew
squirt1 wrote:IMO- they were all out of line and acting juvinile. The fans have suffered all these years . Classic Journey is Journey. Anything else has never sold well.
squirt1 wrote:You know RIP you may be right, but SS and Ross came back for TBF and Perry apoligized. ROR went well anyway . SS left TBF when SP wouldn't tour with TBF. Musicians get a little crazy after year especially if they do not have to work.
Rip Rokken wrote:Maybe someone has pointed this out already, but Neal seems to miss the point of what Perry said in his interview about "not cracking the stone". Assuming both sides are relaying the story accurately, Perry only asked them not to tour as JOURNEY, but to go out and do and play whatever they wanted under a different name. Neal actually first acknowledges that Perry said that, but then says he did exactly that by playing Journey songs with other musicians, which is the opposite of what Perry said.
Sorry -- this has just been bugging me, because I thought Neal had a very valid point at first until I re-read what both said.
PERRY:
So at the end of that conversation, I said “Look, you go call whatever you wanna do with whomever you’ve checked out something else. Call it the J-Boys. Call it anything. But don’t call it Journey, y’know? Because I am gonna get this done, eventually.” ... But in January, Jon told me on the phone, “I just wanna know.” And I said, “Don’t call it Journey. Because if you do, you will fracture the stone. And I don’t think I’ll be able to come back to it if you break it. If you crack it—it’s got so much integrity. We’ve worked so hard. Can’t you just, y’know—not do that?
SCHON:
If you watch the [Behind the Music] documentary on VH1—it’s pretty much one-sided, with Perry, the way they edited that thing, but there was a couple funny things that went down in that interview. He’s saying, y'know, “If these guys wanna go on, I think they should just start something new and not use the Journey name.” Don’t crack the stone is what he kept on saying. Don’t crack the stone. Don’t go out and play these songs with someone else and crack the stone. Well, he did the same thing, way before we did! He went out on a solo tour, a solo Steve Perry tour, where none of us were invited. Actually Jonathan Cain tried to go down and go in and see him in San Francisco and they wouldn’t let him in the building! And he was playin’, I think, nine Journey songs and three of his original songs.
LaDoDa wrote:Don Dokken is one ugly fucker.
Please tone that down.
Since 78 wrote:Ok I think I see what you're saying. Steve is right because, while he did go out on his own and play Journey music he didn't do it with the Journey name. It sounds like he might possibly have come back if Neal hadn't gone on with the Journey name. And Neal doesn't get that or chooses to ignore the meaning.
Rip Rokken wrote:Since 78 wrote:Ok I think I see what you're saying. Steve is right because, while he did go out on his own and play Journey music he didn't do it with the Journey name. It sounds like he might possibly have come back if Neal hadn't gone on with the Journey name. And Neal doesn't get that or chooses to ignore the meaning.
Exactly.... Perry said go on and play the songs, but don't call it Journey. Neal acknowledges that he said don't call it Journey, but then tries to tie it back into playing the songs, which is the opposite of what Perry said.
All this of course is with the assumption that both are relaying their stories accurately.
Rip Rokken wrote:Maybe someone has pointed this out already, but Neal seems to miss the point of what Perry said in his interview about "not cracking the stone". Assuming both sides are relaying the story accurately, Perry only asked them not to tour as JOURNEY, but to go out and do and play whatever they wanted under a different name. Neal actually first acknowledges that Perry said that, but then says he did exactly that by playing Journey songs with other musicians, which is the opposite of what Perry said.
Sorry -- this has just been bugging me, because I thought Neal had a very valid point at first until I re-read what both said.
PERRY:
So at the end of that conversation, I said “Look, you go call whatever you wanna do with whomever you’ve checked out something else. Call it the J-Boys. Call it anything. But don’t call it Journey, y’know? Because I am gonna get this done, eventually.” ... But in January, Jon told me on the phone, “I just wanna know.” And I said, “Don’t call it Journey. Because if you do, you will fracture the stone. And I don’t think I’ll be able to come back to it if you break it. If you crack it—it’s got so much integrity. We’ve worked so hard. Can’t you just, y’know—not do that?
SCHON:
If you watch the [Behind the Music] documentary on VH1—it’s pretty much one-sided, with Perry, the way they edited that thing, but there was a couple funny things that went down in that interview. He’s saying, y'know, “If these guys wanna go on, I think they should just start something new and not use the Journey name.” Don’t crack the stone is what he kept on saying. Don’t crack the stone. Don’t go out and play these songs with someone else and crack the stone. Well, he did the same thing, way before we did! He went out on a solo tour, a solo Steve Perry tour, where none of us were invited. Actually Jonathan Cain tried to go down and go in and see him in San Francisco and they wouldn’t let him in the building! And he was playin’, I think, nine Journey songs and three of his original songs.
Gunbot wrote:I think what Neal is talking about is that Steve was out there performing while Journey was still together as a whole. They had finished their biggest and most successful tour ever and Steve was out there doing the Journey redux version. A lot of people talk about how all the touring hurt Perry's voice but he didn't help himself by going out and performing after a world wide tour 6 months earlier. I saw him in Philly for the Frontiers show and I was surprised how different he sounded from when I had seen him on the Escape tour.
Michigan Girl wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:Since 78 wrote:Ok I think I see what you're saying. Steve is right because, while he did go out on his own and play Journey music he didn't do it with the Journey name. It sounds like he might possibly have come back if Neal hadn't gone on with the Journey name. And Neal doesn't get that or chooses to ignore the meaning.
Exactly.... Perry said go on and play the songs, but don't call it Journey. Neal acknowledges that he said don't call it Journey, but then tries to tie it back into playing the songs, which is the opposite of what Perry said.
All this of course is with the assumption that both are relaying their stories accurately.
Are we fueling the fire???![]()
wednesday's child wrote:Tuneage therefore isn't the problem, and yes... Neal is intentionally misdirecting us to tuneage as the issue
Rip Rokken wrote:Actually, that's exactly how it came off to me when I read it. Wanted to see what others thought, though, in case was looking at it wrong.
wednesday's child wrote:Yeah, I know.
I'm sorry if I misused your point to springboard some pent-up angst.
Just too much of it, bottled up, have I.
-wech
wednesday's child wrote:Argh!!
Rip Rokken wrote:wednesday's child wrote:Yeah, I know.
I'm sorry if I misused your point to springboard some pent-up angst.
Just too much of it, bottled up, have I.
-wech
Hmmmmmm..... bottled up angst, have you? No apologies need you make!
Gunbot wrote:You beat me to it dude. Did you take that picture in your basement while doing Jedi training?
Rip Rokken wrote:squirt1 wrote:IMO- they were all out of line and acting juvinile. The fans have suffered all these years . Classic Journey is Journey. Anything else has never sold well.
To me, "cracking the stone" was canning Ross and Smith for ROR....
Rip Rokken wrote:Gunbot wrote:You beat me to it dude. Did you take that picture in your basement while doing Jedi training?
Yes, and actually, I was blindfolded at the time -- I used the Force! Turned out pretty good, eh?
annie89509 wrote:yeah, like Stevew says, move on.Everything is water under the bridge now, anyway.
Rip Rokken wrote:annie89509 wrote:yeah, like Stevew says, move on.Everything is water under the bridge now, anyway.
That works for me... besides, I have a new controversy I'm hot on the heels of. I just listened to the new disc today from end-to-end, when something strange struck me -- I came to the realization that the entire thing had been lipped! What do you think?
stevew2 wrote:I like a rare moment when someone agrees with me, Ill take that moment, and will sleep on it, thanks goodnight,annie89509 wrote:yeah, like Stevew says, move on.Everything is water under the bridge now, anyway.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests