Journeymusic.com Makeover

by **DrFU** » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:20 am

In the Eclipse style and colors.

Looks better; still doesn't do much.

by **PianoMan1986** » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:33 am

DrFU wrote:In the Eclipse style and colors.

Looks better; still doesn't do much.

I agree. Wish they would do more video commentary for the fans, even just a couple minutes.

by **KenTheDude** » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:50 am

Well if they'd open up an actual message board over there, this place would become obsolete. ..............................................................................................................................BBWWWWHHHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.................I just couldn't say that with a straight face. :lol:

by **Argus** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:10 am

DrFU wrote:In the Eclipse style and colors.

Looks better; still doesn't do much.

Much better on the eyes! OMG Deen looks like Peter Wolf :shock:

At least I can finally read the text :wink:

Band Blogs are gone I think.

by **Don** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:24 am

Besides changing the colors (a remnant from the Lori Carpenter days) it's still the same engine running everything.

by **Argus** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:31 am

Don wrote:Besides changing the colors (a remnant from the Lori Carpenter days) it's still the same engine running everything.

True, that is the MO of the design company Azoff uses :wink:

by **slucero** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:37 am

...some photoshop work on those bio photos.. hide them wrinkles... and that light is awful....

by **DrFU** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:10 am

Argus wrote:
DrFU wrote:In the Eclipse style and colors.

Looks better; still doesn't do much.

Much better on the eyes! OMG Deen looks like Peter Wolf At least I can finally read the text Band Blogs are gone I think.

Wish they'd order up a big ol' plate of crow and put you and Mark back in charge ... but I guess that ship has sailed ... sigh

by **RocknRoll** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:21 am

DrFU wrote:
Argus wrote:
DrFU wrote:In the Eclipse style and colors.

Looks better; still doesn't do much.

Much better on the eyes! OMG Deen looks like Peter Wolf At least I can finally read the text Band Blogs are gone I think.

Wish they'd order up a big ol' plate of crow and put you and Mark back in charge ... but I guess that ship has sailed ... sigh

^^^^

by **The_Noble_Cause** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:27 am

Embarrasingly primitive. Why doesn't this band have a first-class website?

Website · by **steveo777** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:48 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Embarrasingly primitive. Why doesn't this band have a first-class website?

Because they haven't found anyone but doofs that don't know wtf they are doing would be my guess.

by **slucero** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:10 am

steveo777 wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Embarrasingly primitive. Why doesn't this band have a first-class website?

Because they haven't found anyone but doofs that don't know wtf they are doing would be my guess.

Neal is still auditioning girlfriends...

by **swataz** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:30 am

slucero wrote:...some photoshop work on those bio photos.. hide them wrinkles... and that light is awful....

They are too effing bright. Not to mention they look like an amateur took them.

by **Don** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:11 pm

I don't know what's worse; the sample audio clips from Amazon or the band's bio pics?

Talk about Deen Of The freakin' Dead.

by **Andrew** » Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:42 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Embarrasingly primitive. Why doesn't this band have a first-class website?

At least it's better than Van Halen's!!

by **The_Noble_Cause** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:41 am

slucero wrote:Neal is still auditioning girlfriends...

LOL. The last one, Lori, seemed like a positive influence on Neal - got him to clean up and interact with his fans, even if she was ghostwriting the comments.

by **Michigan Girl** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:09 am

Don wrote:I don't know what's worse; the sample audio clips from Amazon or the band's bio pics?

Talk about Deen Of The freakin' Dead.

He looks like the love child of Tommy Lee and Ron Wood ...very rock and roll!!

by **Ehwmatt** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:18 am

Man Deen looked cool as shit on the 2001 Vegas DVD. Now he just looks like a homo

by **Don** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:53 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Don wrote:I don't know what's worse; the sample audio clips from Amazon or the band's bio pics?

Talk about Deen Of The freakin' Dead.

He looks like the love child of Tommy Lee and Ron Wood ...very rock and roll!!

10 seconds in photobucket is all it took to give a little natural color to this. Do they actually think these washed out pictures look cool?

by **brywool** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:09 am

the site is way better than it used to be (not the last version but the older ones in black and gold).
The video things would be cool though.

But yeah, Peter Wolf. No kidding.

by **Saint John** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:21 am

Christ ... the pictures make the band members look like they need methadone really bad.

by **Don** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:27 am

Saint John wrote:Christ ... the pictures make the band members look like they need methadone really bad.

I honestly think this in intentional, to make the band look "harder", as opposed to the slick pop/rock persona they have developed over the years.
Castranova's photo is the worse. God, he looks ready for rehab.

There is no warmth in these pictures, which may be what the photographer was aiming for, but at the expense of making some of members look totally artificial, I don't like it.
Arnel looks more like a CGI character than a real human being, something out of a cut scene from a Japanese video game.

by **brywool** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:43 am

everybody wants the hard look these days. If you look soft, you look whimpy.
Seen Night Ranger's latest? YIKES.

by **Don** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:54 am

brywool wrote:everybody wants the hard look these days. If you look soft, you look whimpy.
Seen Night Ranger's latest? YIKES.

If you have no problems about releasing a song like After All These Years, you shouldn't have any qualms about looking wimpy. Night Ranger's promotional budget can't be more than a quarter of what Journey has available to them so that comparison won't wash.

Letting your girl friend handle your web design to save money, it's obvious Perry ain't the only Jew in the band. :lol:

by **Saint John** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:55 am

I think they should just use real concert photos. They're all good looking dudes, so I see no reason to use these terribly altered images.

Website · by **steveo777** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:57 am

Don wrote:
brywool wrote:everybody wants the hard look these days. If you look soft, you look whimpy.
Seen Night Ranger's latest? YIKES.

If you have no problems about releasing a song like After All These Years, you shouldn't have any qualms about looking wimpy. Night Ranger's promotional budget can't be more than a quarter of what Journey has available to them so that comparison won't wash.

Letting your girl friend handle your web design to save money, it's obvious Perry ain't the only Jew in the band.

Oh, haven't you heard? Perry isn't in the band anymore.

by **Don** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:59 am

Saint John wrote:I think they should just use real concert photos. They're all good looking dudes, so I see no reason to use these terribly altered images.

I agree. Even natural pics at home or in the studio would be okay. These guys aren't looking to score with 16 year olds (anymore), no need for a Malibu Barbie makeover.

by **S2M** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:59 am

steveo777 wrote:
Don wrote:
brywool wrote:everybody wants the hard look these days. If you look soft, you look whimpy.
Seen Night Ranger's latest? YIKES.

If you have no problems about releasing a song like After All These Years, you shouldn't have any qualms about looking wimpy. Night Ranger's promotional budget can't be more than a quarter of what Journey has available to them so that comparison won't wash.

Letting your girl friend handle your web design to save money, it's obvious Perry ain't the only Jew in the band.

Oh, haven't you heard? Perry isn't in the band anymore.

No....but he's the only one laughing to the bank, while 3/5s are bastardizing the Journey brand.... :lol:

by **RocknRoll** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:59 am

Don wrote:
brywool wrote:everybody wants the hard look these days. If you look soft, you look whimpy.
Seen Night Ranger's latest? YIKES.

If you have no problems about releasing a song like After All These Years, you shouldn't have any qualms about looking wimpy. Night Ranger's promotional budget can't be more than a quarter of what Journey has available to them so that comparison won't wash.

Letting your girl friend handle your web design to save money, it's obvious Perry ain't the only Jew in the band.

You sure it was to save money??

by **brywool** » Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:59 am

Don wrote:
brywool wrote:everybody wants the hard look these days. If you look soft, you look whimpy.
Seen Night Ranger's latest? YIKES.

If you have no problems about releasing a song like After All These Years, you shouldn't have any qualms about looking wimpy. Night Ranger's promotional budget can't be more than a quarter of what Journey has available to them so that comparison won't wash.

Letting your girl friend handle your web design to save money, it's obvious Perry ain't the only Jew in the band.

But the girlfriend did a great job of rebuilding it. Prior to that, it was subpar.

MR

Journeymusic.com Makeover

Journeymusic.com Makeover

Re: Journeymusic.com Makeover

Re: Journeymusic.com Makeover

Re: Journeymusic.com Makeover

Re: Journeymusic.com Makeover

Who is online