lordreo wrote:Guys? Am I the only one on here that doesn't have Eclipse yet?
Damned I whish I lived in America (or that at least we had Walmart here)
You're all driving me nuts^^
No, gotta wait till payday!

Moderator: Andrew
lordreo wrote:Guys? Am I the only one on here that doesn't have Eclipse yet?
Damned I whish I lived in America (or that at least we had Walmart here)
You're all driving me nuts^^
Andrew wrote:steveo777 wrote:BTW, how much of a degradation of quality is a 320kbs mp3 compared to listening to the actual disc?
Still a little. It's as good as you'll get for a MP3/compression from WAV. Full CD I think I saw at around 390....something like that.
Andrew wrote:steveo777 wrote:Don wrote:I'm sorry and I know a lot of people will disagree when they hear the complete version but Tantra is just too much Pomp and Circumstance when all I want to do is rock. When the next track starts, it's actually a relief.
I like Tantra, but it requires a certain mood. It seems Disney-esque, or something like that....or meatloafish in places.
It's off the wall brilliant. Some will get it...some won't.
Pretty sad that if people have an opinion that you dont agree with , you call it rubbish or an attempt to bait. Get over yourself, seriously.
However, Arnel just dont deliver and if he does they held him back.
What used to make this place different from Journey Forum & Backtalk was always the fact that you could point out the flaws in a song or album. Seems like nowdays you have get on board with Journey 100% or one's opinion doesnt count. You want people to follow you and your review blindly the exact same way you're following Neal&Co, blindly .
I called your 100% review, 2 months ago , surprise surprise .
When the vocals arent 100% , the album isnt a true 100%.
Once again , nothing against Arnel and his voice. He is trying his best, but a) his voice doesnt fit half the songs and b) they have made sure Neal's guitars owerpowers his voice.
Behshad wrote:Andrew wrote:steveo777 wrote:BTW, how much of a degradation of quality is a 320kbs mp3 compared to listening to the actual disc?
Still a little. It's as good as you'll get for a MP3/compression from WAV. Full CD I think I saw at around 390....something like that.
Wrong!
To calculate the bitrate of audio CD you have to multiply the sampling rate by the resolution by the number of channels:
44.1 kHz X 16 bit X 2 chan. = 1411 kbps
Andrew wrote:BEHSHADPretty sad that if people have an opinion that you dont agree with , you call it rubbish or an attempt to bait. Get over yourself, seriously.
Dude, you crack me up. You are one of the most combative people on this board and love nothing more than something to stir the shit up about. This is just the latest. But you are taking it far more seriously than I am.However, Arnel just dont deliver and if he does they held him back.
I disagree.What used to make this place different from Journey Forum & Backtalk was always the fact that you could point out the flaws in a song or album. Seems like nowdays you have get on board with Journey 100% or one's opinion doesnt count. You want people to follow you and your review blindly the exact same way you're following Neal&Co, blindly .
Yeah, the old 'I'm following blindly fanboy comment. Bwahahahaha. C'mon dude, you are more creative than that!
And if you think this place is anything like Backtalk was, you'd be deleted already!
I called your 100% review, 2 months ago , surprise surprise .
Wow...genius stuff old mate! What are next week's Lotto numbers and where is Osama hiding....oh wait....ok, where is Perry hiding?
When the vocals arent 100% , the album isnt a true 100%.
I think the vocals are 100%. Amazing stuff.Once again , nothing against Arnel and his voice. He is trying his best, but a) his voice doesnt fit half the songs and b) they have made sure Neal's guitars owerpowers his voice.
I'm sure your analytical powers will find you well sought after once I'm gone.
Cheerio!
Andrew wrote:Behshad wrote:Andrew wrote:steveo777 wrote:BTW, how much of a degradation of quality is a 320kbs mp3 compared to listening to the actual disc?
Still a little. It's as good as you'll get for a MP3/compression from WAV. Full CD I think I saw at around 390....something like that.
Wrong!
To calculate the bitrate of audio CD you have to multiply the sampling rate by the resolution by the number of channels:
44.1 kHz X 16 bit X 2 chan. = 1411 kbps
If uncompressed. Compressed MP3 has a max bitrate higher than 320.
Non-standard bit rates up to 640 kbit/s can be achieved with the LAME encoder and the freeformat option, although few MP3 players can play those files. According to the ISO standard, decoders are only required to be able to decode streams up to 320 kbit/s.
Melissa wrote:Given it one listen so far and pretty much agree with Behshad's opinions about it too. Great guitar album, but a bit too heavy for the current voice it seems to me.
Andrew wrote:Melissa wrote:Given it one listen so far and pretty much agree with Behshad's opinions about it too. Great guitar album, but a bit too heavy for the current voice it seems to me.
A hint of descent against the album - before Behshad reports you to me for erradication - I will step in and say thank you for adding your voice to the MANY opinions here that are welcomed and encouraged.
Behshad wrote:Andrew Pretty sad that if people have an opinion that you dont agree with , you call it rubbish or an attempt to bait. Get over yourself, seriously.
Eric wrote:Behshad wrote:Andrew Pretty sad that if people have an opinion that you dont agree with , you call it rubbish or an attempt to bait. Get over yourself, seriously.
I like how you can rip Andrew's review but when he responds to your ripping he's the bad guy.
Andrew wrote:Melissa wrote:Given it one listen so far and pretty much agree with Behshad's opinions about it too. Great guitar album, but a bit too heavy for the current voice it seems to me.
A hint of descent against the album - before Behshad reports you to me for erradication - I will step in and say thank you for adding your voice to the MANY opinions here that are welcomed and encouraged.
Melissa wrote:Andrew wrote:Melissa wrote:Given it one listen so far and pretty much agree with Behshad's opinions about it too. Great guitar album, but a bit too heavy for the current voice it seems to me.
A hint of descent against the album - before Behshad reports you to me for erradication - I will step in and say thank you for adding your voice to the MANY opinions here that are welcomed and encouraged.
LOL, you make that sound like it's on purpose, and it's not. I like the album. I don't love it, but I like it. I think Arnel is a great singer. I just also happen to think some of the heaviness of the album and his voice just don't quite go together. That's not a big deal. People can like the album and not have to love it the same way the Journey nutsack swingers around here do.
Andrew wrote:Just for the record - my opinion is now on very public record. If anyone agrees - awesome.
Anyone doesn't - not my worry and I respect just about any opinion out there...as long as it makes sense.
The only issue I have is when I read silly comments such as Arnels vocal performance. You may not feel it was right style/volume/zing....whatever. But no one can question the performance on this album. It is an amazing feat.
Behshad - most of the time I'm ribbing you, but a few of your comments seem bewildering and have me wondering if you have a way to short memory about the long history of this board and the ways it has impacted on my relationship with this band.
I'll give Arnel your best when I interview him next week.
Andrew wrote:Melissa wrote:Andrew wrote:Melissa wrote:Given it one listen so far and pretty much agree with Behshad's opinions about it too. Great guitar album, but a bit too heavy for the current voice it seems to me.
A hint of descent against the album - before Behshad reports you to me for erradication - I will step in and say thank you for adding your voice to the MANY opinions here that are welcomed and encouraged.
LOL, you make that sound like it's on purpose, and it's not. I like the album. I don't love it, but I like it. I think Arnel is a great singer. I just also happen to think some of the heaviness of the album and his voice just don't quite go together. That's not a big deal. People can like the album and not have to love it the same way the Journey nutsack swingers around here do.
Absolutely! I was just teasing
Behshad wrote:Andrew wrote:Just for the record - my opinion is now on very public record. If anyone agrees - awesome.
Anyone doesn't - not my worry and I respect just about any opinion out there...as long as it makes sense.
The only issue I have is when I read silly comments such as Arnels vocal performance. You may not feel it was right style/volume/zing....whatever. But no one can question the performance on this album. It is an amazing feat.
Behshad - most of the time I'm ribbing you, but a few of your comments seem bewildering and have me wondering if you have a way to short memory about the long history of this board and the ways it has impacted on my relationship with this band.
I'll give Arnel your best when I interview him next week.
And I can see how youre trying to smoothen things up , maybe for another L.A trip in the future![]()
Andrew wrote:I'll give Arnel your best when I interview him next week.
Andrew wrote:Behshad wrote:Andrew wrote:Just for the record - my opinion is now on very public record. If anyone agrees - awesome.
Anyone doesn't - not my worry and I respect just about any opinion out there...as long as it makes sense.
The only issue I have is when I read silly comments such as Arnels vocal performance. You may not feel it was right style/volume/zing....whatever. But no one can question the performance on this album. It is an amazing feat.
Behshad - most of the time I'm ribbing you, but a few of your comments seem bewildering and have me wondering if you have a way to short memory about the long history of this board and the ways it has impacted on my relationship with this band.
I'll give Arnel your best when I interview him next week.
And I can see how youre trying to smoothen things up , maybe for another L.A trip in the future![]()
Shit stirrer! I'd love a holiday. Where we going?
Melissa wrote:Given it one listen so far and pretty much agree with Behshad's opinions about it too. Great guitar album, but a bit too heavy for the current voice it seems to me. And definitely not standard formula Journey that the radio hit fans are used to. And while that's a good thing to the minority of us here, I don't think it will be live. Those standard formula fans (which are the majority) will sit for the new stuff and not "get it". But, I like that they broke from that norm on this album. Blows Revelation away.
On 2 other album notes, loving Mirrorball and Rockaholic so far too.
koberry wrote:Melissa wrote:Given it one listen so far and pretty much agree with Behshad's opinions about it too. Great guitar album, but a bit too heavy for the current voice it seems to me. And definitely not standard formula Journey that the radio hit fans are used to. And while that's a good thing to the minority of us here, I don't think it will be live. Those standard formula fans (which are the majority) will sit for the new stuff and not "get it". But, I like that they broke from that norm on this album. Blows Revelation away.
On 2 other album notes, loving Mirrorball and Rockaholic so far too.
I'm not getting the comment of Arnel's voice not being up to the heaviness of the tracks. I shouldn't do this, I know I shouldn't, somebody stop me.... but take a listen to Perry on I'm Cryin', Lay it Down, Back Talk and Message of Love. Now, don't get me wrong, I love Steve Perry. But I remember a quote from Neal when Frontiers came out talking about how great Perry sounded. He'd mentioned something about his previously sounding like a seal. He truely meant it as a compliment on how much more he liked Perry's voice since it had dropped. But I think it said quite a bit about Perry's ability to handle the harder stuff.
So accusations of Arnel's voice being too thin just don't ring true for me. I think he kills it on this release.
Let the unhinged lashing and wild gesticulations begin.
Saint John wrote:Well, I'm glad to see that everyone has the fucking album ... but me!!!![]()
![]()
Ehwmatt, did you get the actual CD or just a downloaded version?
PS If you got the actual CD before me, fuck you.![]()
Andrew wrote:
Indeed. Can't even be bothered typing a response. Too busy writing my official review...
steveo777 wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:Deano, don't bail! It's just getting fun again!
He just wants Fact Finder to have to start another thread. Dean, come on, dude. You can't
let people on the internet punch your card like this.
Saint John wrote:Don wrote:Hey, I'm digging this record for the most part but to the people that said ROR was Perry's album, Eclipse can be painted with the same brush concerning one member dominating a release because Neal has his stamp all over this puppy.
Not really a fair comparison, Don. Firing members, changing the 1 word album theme, liquidating assets and being a completely out of control, 80 proof asshole is a bit different from demanding a harder direction with an emphasis on guitar, rather than the usual keyboard driven albums.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests