Moderator: Andrew
Rockin'Deano wrote:I RESPECT the Hell out of Perrys achievements....please don't skew my factual respect and my character assassination on him.
There is no denying he was a major prick, and if Jeff likes him as a person, well, fine. Jeff is Jeff, and I am RnD, what's the point?
TVL wrote:Yes, I agree this argument is moot. I don't think SP ever did thing's out of spite, control, or for money. I think he did thing's for the love of his craft and wanting to be the best he could be for the band. The band did not seem to care about quality, they just wanted to plow through and tour without giving SP the time he needed. The band seemed to only be thinking about money, IMO. SP is a perfectionist and doesn't want to put out a bad product. I hope he will finally understand that he has gotten older and his sound is not the same....doesn't have to be the same...he could still sound damn good. I hope he doe's something again, but I appreciate what he has already given us. I like the fact that JSS respect's Perry, also. I can move forward with JSS now.... He has a good voice in his own right and has alot of energy and a great sense of humor. I going to try to catch another show, I know it will a good time. Maybe they will record some new stuff along the way on this tour.
TVL wrote:Yes, I agree this argument is moot. I don't think SP ever did thing's out of spite, control, or for money. I think he did thing's for the love of his craft and wanting to be the best he could be for the band. The band did not seem to care about quality, they just wanted to plow through and tour without giving SP the time he needed. The band seemed to only be thinking about money, IMO.
Rockin'Deano wrote:steveforever wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:"Only he knows."Give me a fucking break. I am here to expose that fucker. You all want me to go after perry like I did with Tapegate? Didn't think so.
I'd like to see it myself, this would be a bigger fight than any that went on during tapegate. Give em hell.
Deano's right about the long time Perryheads from this board, they only supported him because they think Journey has no right to carry on without Perry. They've always wanted to see the Augeri era fail, no way they've have ever backed Deano on anything else and any support they've shown for JSS/Journey is false as they think and hope it will fail as well.
Listen my brotha...don't want to fight with you, but how do you know this? they've told you this? I love Steve Perry, did not adore or admire Augeri, but liked his stuff, and I think JSS is cool-where lies the problem? I don't see any of these people on here right now that you are referring to....
Like I said, they are here, go read about them.
The ranking of top Perry Bitches:
1) HOTS- The absolute skankiest bitch here. Nothing good to say EVER about Neal and the Band. A complete waste of web space.
2) Perryfaithful- Always talks a good game, but never has anything to bring to the table. Always stirring up shit for the sake of stirring up shit.
3) PROPERRY- She is too stupid to warrant a no. 1 or 2 ranking. Just a bling cheerleader who will love Perry no matter how much of an asshole he is.
4) Sherrie- She is ok, not a bad person at all, but is blinded too.
Go search these names and read the wars we have had. I would welcome a new round of fighting in a heartbeat, because I know I can't lose.
Classic Rock wrote:TVL wrote:Yes, I agree this argument is moot. I don't think SP ever did thing's out of spite, control, or for money. I think he did thing's for the love of his craft and wanting to be the best he could be for the band. The band did not seem to care about quality, they just wanted to plow through and tour without giving SP the time he needed. The band seemed to only be thinking about money, IMO.
They gave Steve Perry two years, how much more time did you think he deserved? Money is factor in everything I can agree to that but Neal and the rest of the guys wanted to tour for the love of their craft. They are musicians they love what they do and guys that rock as hard as Neal want to do as much as they can.
PROPERRY wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:steveforever wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:"Only he knows."Give me a fucking break. I am here to expose that fucker. You all want me to go after perry like I did with Tapegate? Didn't think so.
I'd like to see it myself, this would be a bigger fight than any that went on during tapegate. Give em hell.
Deano's right about the long time Perryheads from this board, they only supported him because they think Journey has no right to carry on without Perry. They've always wanted to see the Augeri era fail, no way they've have ever backed Deano on anything else and any support they've shown for JSS/Journey is false as they think and hope it will fail as well.
Listen my brotha...don't want to fight with you, but how do you know this? they've told you this? I love Steve Perry, did not adore or admire Augeri, but liked his stuff, and I think JSS is cool-where lies the problem? I don't see any of these people on here right now that you are referring to....
Like I said, they are here, go read about them.
The ranking of top Perry Bitches:
1) HOTS- The absolute skankiest bitch here. Nothing good to say EVER about Neal and the Band. A complete waste of web space.
2) Perryfaithful- Always talks a good game, but never has anything to bring to the table. Always stirring up shit for the sake of stirring up shit.
3) PROPERRY- She is too stupid to warrant a no. 1 or 2 ranking. Just a bling cheerleader who will love Perry no matter how much of an asshole he is.
4) Sherrie- She is ok, not a bad person at all, but is blinded too.
Go search these names and read the wars we have had. I would welcome a new round of fighting in a heartbeat, because I know I can't lose.
What's the matter Deano, are you getting BORED AGAIN????? Not enough excitement going on for you here??? And gee Deano, what about those PMS you sent me here apologizing over & over to me for the way you spoke to me here on this board, and NOW ONCE AGAIN, you do another 180 degree turn, that is certianly NOT SUPRISING to me, and shouldn't be to anyone else either.
It is my right to like whatever I like, and that will ALWAYS be Steve Perry, so if you have a problem with that , too bad!!!
Lori
Rock Fn wrote:One of the things that really hurt, is that Sony gave the guys a 4 million dollar advance on the album and tour. Then nothing happened. Talk about major screw job.
Matthew wrote:Rock Fn wrote:One of the things that really hurt, is that Sony gave the guys a 4 million dollar advance on the album and tour. Then nothing happened. Talk about major screw job.
Well, Sony got their revenge when they failed to promote "Arrival". Even though they would have been wasting their money if they had....
Matthew wrote:Classic Rock wrote:TVL wrote:Yes, I agree this argument is moot. I don't think SP ever did thing's out of spite, control, or for money. I think he did thing's for the love of his craft and wanting to be the best he could be for the band. The band did not seem to care about quality, they just wanted to plow through and tour without giving SP the time he needed. The band seemed to only be thinking about money, IMO.
They gave Steve Perry two years, how much more time did you think he deserved? Money is factor in everything I can agree to that but Neal and the rest of the guys wanted to tour for the love of their craft. They are musicians they love what they do and guys that rock as hard as Neal want to do as much as they can.
Yes - they are musicians and they love to tour. But was touring under the Journey name the ONLY option? Was urge to play the same 12 Journey songs night after night that compelling? It wasn't like Schon and Cain were being forced in retirement, was it?
Rockin'Deano wrote:Matthew wrote:Rock Fn wrote:One of the things that really hurt, is that Sony gave the guys a 4 million dollar advance on the album and tour. Then nothing happened. Talk about major screw job.
Well, Sony got their revenge when they failed to promote "Arrival". Even though they would have been wasting their money if they had....
How would that be a waste of money? Arrival, while not one of my favourites, is hardly embarrassing. Had Sony pushed Arrival, Journey would have life. So in essence, what you are saying is, Perry gave Sony the bird, and Sony turned around and gave Journey the bird-minus Steve Perry, who had abandoned ship. Got it, thanks.
Rockin'Deano wrote:PROPERRY wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:steveforever wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:"Only he knows."Give me a fucking break. I am here to expose that fucker. You all want me to go after perry like I did with Tapegate? Didn't think so.
I'd like to see it myself, this would be a bigger fight than any that went on during tapegate. Give em hell.
Deano's right about the long time Perryheads from this board, they only supported him because they think Journey has no right to carry on without Perry. They've always wanted to see the Augeri era fail, no way they've have ever backed Deano on anything else and any support they've shown for JSS/Journey is false as they think and hope it will fail as well.
Listen my brotha...don't want to fight with you, but how do you know this? they've told you this? I love Steve Perry, did not adore or admire Augeri, but liked his stuff, and I think JSS is cool-where lies the problem? I don't see any of these people on here right now that you are referring to....
Like I said, they are here, go read about them.
The ranking of top Perry Bitches:
1) HOTS- The absolute skankiest bitch here. Nothing good to say EVER about Neal and the Band. A complete waste of web space.
2) Perryfaithful- Always talks a good game, but never has anything to bring to the table. Always stirring up shit for the sake of stirring up shit.
3) PROPERRY- She is too stupid to warrant a no. 1 or 2 ranking. Just a bling cheerleader who will love Perry no matter how much of an asshole he is.
4) Sherrie- She is ok, not a bad person at all, but is blinded too.
Go search these names and read the wars we have had. I would welcome a new round of fighting in a heartbeat, because I know I can't lose.
What's the matter Deano, are you getting BORED AGAIN????? Not enough excitement going on for you here??? And gee Deano, what about those PMS you sent me here apologizing over & over to me for the way you spoke to me here on this board, and NOW ONCE AGAIN, you do another 180 degree turn, that is certianly NOT SUPRISING to me, and shouldn't be to anyone else either.
It is my right to like whatever I like, and that will ALWAYS be Steve Perry, so if you have a problem with that , too bad!!!
Lori
You smelly bitch. Don't you ever lie to people on here about me. I NEVER sent you jack shit. I hate you.
Yeah, I am the guy who changes 180 degrees, when in fact I am not afraid to admit that I have changed my mind on things and people when I was wrong the first time. You go praise the Lord Steve perry. Hope those reissues get you nice and wet.
Classic Rock wrote:I'm not saying it was their only touring option, but if Neal wants to tour under the name Journey he should be able to because I believe it his band and always was.
It is a shame that Neal himself didn’t believe that in 1986 or if he did he failed to act on it.
They gave him 2 years and I think it more than enough time.
And if it was my material yes I would want to play them as much as possible for as long as possible. I guess you have to be a musician to understand that.
Matthew wrote:
No. I'm saying that it's possible that - despite TBF selling one million copies - Sony didn't meet the targets they'd budgeted for re: the Journey reunion.
So when the next Journey album came along there might well have been a decision to cut their losses. Especially given that Perry was no longer in the band.
I don't think "Arrival" is embarrassing either. But equally I can quite understand why the Sony people might have lacked faith in Augeri's ability to connect with a mass audience. If I worked for Sony, I'd also be concerned that the album was a '80's pastiche'...that it was a backward-looking album..that it didn't respresent an exciting new phase for the band.
PROPERRY wrote:
Be careful what you say Deano, your own words could come back to bite you hard!
Lori
Rockin'Deano wrote:Matthew wrote:TVL wrote: I don't think anything was premeditated or that SP set out to "get" his bandmate's.
It's also worth remembering that Steve Perry was the driving force behind the decision to hire Irving Azoff, the manager who had recently masterminded the successful comeback of The Eagles.
This suggests to me that Perry was deadly serious about making the reunion work at the outset.
You are joking right? Perry wanted Herbie out, because herbie didn't take any shit. Perry wanted to run things, so he brought Azoff onboard. Big deal, Azoff emgineered the Eagles comeback. Hell, with all the original members, I could engineer that comeback! And as far as your comment about Perry bringing in Azoff to take the band to the top again, why not keep the manager that got you to the top in the first place? As far as Journey is concerned, Herbie is a lot more accomplished that Azoff.
Matthew wrote:I don't think "Arrival" is embarrassing either. But equally I can quite understand why the Sony people might have lacked faith in Augeri's ability to connect with a mass audience. If I worked for Sony, I'd also be concerned that the album was a '80's pastiche'...that it was a backward-looking album..that it didn't respresent an exciting new phase for the band.
NoMoreTails wrote:Sony got the album their guy Kalodner pushed for, the guys have made statements to that affect. Sony/JDK and Kevin Shirley laid the boundaries for what they thought Journey should be, Sony got the album they wanted and still sabotaged its success.
The Sony fucks Journey to get even with Perry fucking them idea is ludicrous, how the hell would that hurt Perry, it only helped his agenda to have people think he is Journey.
Here's a conspiracy for you: keep Journey on your label, dictate their direction making sure its ballad heavy, leak the album before its release whether on purpose or not (a Sony rep in Europe was supposedly responsible), plan to release a version with one of the best cuts designated for the Japanese release only, delay the US release for nearly a year to make sure everyone who is interested already has it, don't promote it after its release, release Essential Journey before Arrival has even been noticed, then have JDK court Perry and make comments about not being interested in working with this version of Journey any longer until he too is finally let go by Sony.
Oh, not to forget the failure to promote Remember Me in '98, and its less than prominent placement in the movie, Journey should have smelled a rat from the beginning.
Rockin'Deano wrote:Perry wanted HH out, because they were both hard headed; however, Perry couldn't manage a fuckin Burger King..I am sure his hip would hurt too much to make a batch of fries.
Azoff, in his defense, had a shit singer for 6 of the 8 years. In the first two years, they were on TV and if anyone saw Augeri on TV, you now know why there was never another appearance.
Rockin'Deano wrote:Perry wanted HH out, because they were both hard headed; however, Perry couldn't manage a fuckin Burger King..
Matthew wrote:Classic Rock wrote:I'm not saying it was their only touring option, but if Neal wants to tour under the name Journey he should be able to because I believe it his band and always was.
I'm not disputing that Schon has the right to use the Journey name. Unfortunately, the Journey name has suffered hugely because he took control of the band in 1998.
Matthew wrote:Classic Rock wrote:It is a shame that Neal himself didn’t believe that in 1986 or if he did he failed to act on it.
He knew that "Street Talk" had just been a massive success and was happy to follow Perry's lead because it had always proven to be lucrative in the past.
Plus...have you seen the ROR documentary? There's a segment where Schon is demonstrating what the new music technology could do and he was genuinely excited about it. So I wouldn't say the approach on ROR went against Schon's instincts at that time.
Matthew wrote:Classic Rock wrote:They gave him 2 years and I think it more than enough time.
Well, the decision to act reasonably quickly didn't pay off, did it? Unless you are contented with the collapse of their recording career...concerts on cruise ships and support slots for tired hair metal bands.
Matthew wrote:Classic Rock wrote:And if it was my material yes I would want to play them as much as possible for as long as possible. I guess you have to be a musician to understand that.
Plenty of musicians want to keep challenging and stretching themselves. There's no doubt that Schon and Cain lost that desire for a while. I really hope they get it back.
Rockin'Deano wrote:Actually, I don't think TBF did sell 1 million, although they are certified as such. They shipped 1 million. I am one of the few on here who like that record.
Actually, if I were a Sony exec, besides getting tons of young fine ass, I would listen to Arrival and I would have heard Higher Place, Signs of Life and 1 or 2 others, and said, "Hmm, this isn't half bad."
Seriously, I think Arrival is syrupy and too layered and polished, but definitely good enough to sponsor and make money on.
NoMoreTails wrote:Here's a conspiracy for you: keep Journey on your label, dictate their direction making sure its ballad heavy, leak the album before its release whether on purpose or not (a Sony rep in Europe was supposedly responsible), plan to release a version with one of the best cuts designated for the Japanese release only, delay the US release for nearly a year to make sure everyone who is interested already has it, don't promote it after its release, release Essential Journey before Arrival has even been noticed, then have JDK court Perry and make comments about not being interested in working with this version of Journey any longer until he too is finally let go by Sony.
Oh, not to forget the failure to promote Remember Me in '98, and its less than prominent placement in the movie, Journey should have smelled a rat from the beginning.
Matthew wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Sony got the album their guy Kalodner pushed for, the guys have made statements to that affect. Sony/JDK and Kevin Shirley laid the boundaries for what they thought Journey should be, Sony got the album they wanted and still sabotaged its success.
Why did Sony "sabotage" its success, NMT?
Classic Rock wrote:I will agree the name has suffered because of tapegate but again we are, for the most part, the only people that know about that.
I think the name started suffering when Perry refused to tour. He left them with no choice but to continue on.
Do you think they should have ended Journey back in 1998?
If so then why are you so excited to see them next year?
If Steve Perry was recording with Journey again do think they would have a single on the radio?They might but it is hard to say because 2006 is a lot different that 1996.
Def Leppard is the best thing that is happened to them in awhile
they are making waves now with JSS at the helm.
Sur - a record exec would think it isn't half-bad - but were they genuinely excited by it? Or totally convinced and motivated by the new singer? It seems that they weren't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests