FyreWyngz wrote:I haven't placed blame however you and others - particularly Deano - have taken 100% credit.
As someone who keenly understands what went down, I would never have done that.
Many, many, variables were involved.
I was the first guy on this forum to recklessly open my yammer about lipsynching.
That much is true.
It is also true that Deano was the impetus that allows for Jeff to be there today.
That's not my dogmatic thoughts or Deano's, that actually comes straight from the mouth of a band member.
it doesn't detract from the fact that Saddam was a THREAT to OUR PRESIDENT and country.
A doctrine of preemptive war pivots on the magnitude of the threat a nation poses.
As a leaked classified British Intelligence memo (prior to the war) aptly stated,
"Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran." and
"Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." Add it up and spin it however you like. The bottom line is that a TYRANT has been dealt with and the world is a better place.
I'm not the one spinning like some epileptic Chanukah dreidel.
The National Intelligence Estimate clearly stated that this Iraq folly has caused
more terrorism, not less.
Why are you even entering the fray when you're not equipped with the most basic of facts?
Or, do you take after Dubya, and simply go on gut-instinct alone?
The contrast in your concerns is entirely puzzling. This was the point of my response which you've evaded.
Because its sooo nonsensical I don't want to stoop to dignifying it.
Plus, I want to save you from further embarassment by calling attention to it.
According to your harebrained logic, because Saddam was a bad man, I am prohibited from being irked about anything in my life (including my favorite band)?
It's one of the internet's cheapest, laziest arguments, second only to playing "the race card" or "the bad grammar/spelling card".
It can just as easily be turned around and used on you:
People are starving all over the world right this very instant, FYRE.
Why are you more aggressive in trading quips with me, instead of staving world poverty?
Moreover, somewhere in your city, a person is probably getting carjacked.
Why are your hackles in an uproar over me, instead of the soaring crime rates in your suburban community?
You've shown more concern and outrage about someone lip synching than you have about a LUNATIC TYRANT who's committed some REAL sins.
How can you gauge how politically active I am in my day-to-day life from this forum.
I come here to discuss the band, Journey, not to influence policy.
Your argument is shit. Stop yanking my crank.