Saint John wrote:While Perry certainly had diminished range during ROR I would guess that his inability to tour any longer was almost certainly a combination of physical and psychological issues.
That clearly, is your own interpretation of Perry's statements regarding it. While you may or may not be correct, let's try to get away from you stating something as fact by using phrases such as "almost certainly" in your delivery. The *most* I have heard Perry discuss regarding this, (which is no more or less than anyone else here, save for Lora....is Steve saying that he was "toast". That can be interpretted in a TON of different ways....whether "toast" is physical issues, psychological issues, both issues or none of the above....is something left to the imagination and interpretation of the listener.
I encourage people to come to their own opinions regarding this, instead of listing to your statements presented as fact, when you're as much in the dark as anyone. Perhaps, someday, Lora can give us a little more than what's already out there....but until then, no one knows for certain regarding Perry's reasons for leaving Journey in the 80s and 90s...not me, not you, not Arnel, etc,etc
Tomulator wrote:Jana wrote:TOMULATOR:
"AP just CONFIRMED a fact that most of us already knew...SP had physical issues that prevented him from continuing with Journey during ROR.

"
Steve Perry said why he cut short the ROR (Though they finished most of the tour). He said he was toast and he was grieving over his mother's death. Steve Perry said why he didn't tour for Trial by Fire. He needed a hip replacement. So the tour didn't happen. No big secret.

Now, why he hasn't chosen to record in the last 12 years is the question.
Yes but...my point is that AP said Perry "bailed" (meaning left on his OWN accord) because he "got sick". Now, that implies that it was the ROR tour (recall, SP initiated the ending of that tour saying he was "toast"). My point is that AP is implying that SP was sick and THAT prompted him to "bail". This was way prior to the hip thingy...
Hmmm....

Arnel is hardly an authoritative source for this. When Steve Perry left in 97 and in 87, Arnel had zero contact with Journey, Journey's management or anyone in the US music industry.
What Arnel may or may not say and/or imply regarding these events is heresay...and his heresay is either fueled by what Fucka, Fro others within the band *told* him to say OR his own
assumption into the matter.
Nothing more, nothing less.
To try to draw out the real reasons behind Perry's depature in the 80s and the 90s, from something Arnel has said (or was encouraged to say) is at the very least, silly, and the very most, dangerously idiotic.